When Everything Comes Together: Roman Holiday

Turner Classic Movies and Fathom Events will be hosting a theatrical screening across the country this weekend of the classic from 1953, Roman Holiday, starring Audrey Hepburn and Gregory Peck (see more info here).  If you haven’t seen it, this would be the perfect opportunity to take it in, capping a holiday weekend with a big screen presentation of one of the best romantic comedies ever made.   That’s right, it’s a romantic comedy and it’s worth seeing.  There was a time when rom-coms were done well and this, in fact, was their heyday.  But Roman Holiday has more going for it than just that.  It also has the good luck of being a movie in which all the right pieces fell into place.


If you haven’t seen Roman Holiday, the story is simple, as any good romantic comedy is, because it’s the characters that make it work.  A young princess, Princess Ann (Audrey Hepburn), doesn’t want to go through with a royal tour of Rome and escapes from her royal handlers only to be helped by a reporter, Joe Bradley (Gregory Peck), who doesn’t even know she’s the princess he’s supposed to be interviewing at a press conference.  He figures it out, even though she gives him a phony name, and decides to take her around Rome, with her incognito, and secretly get an exclusive by having his photographer, Irving Radovich (Eddie Albert), record the whole thing without the princess knowing.  You may think you can figure out where it goes from there but, as far as these things go, it’s quite surprising (especially the shocking and disturbing scene where Joe loses his hand!) and perhaps the reason it has survived so many years as a durable classic is the very fact that it doesn’t simply fall into every cliche there is to be had, although many rom-com cliches followed from its expert lead.   And, of course, the main reason it still holds up so well is that cast.  That amazing cast.

We often hear of famous movie roles being offered to actors other than the ones we have come to know and love, and wonder what it would have been like.  The same happened for Roman Holiday and, in the case of both leads, the answer seems clear: it would have worked but not quite as well.

First, the role of the princess.  It was offered to both Elizabeth Taylor and Jean Simmons and I can say, without reservation, that both would have been more than effective in their portrayals, Simmons more so, but neither possessed that quality that made Audrey Hepburn so perfect for the role.  And I do mean perfect.  It may seem trite to claim someone was made for a role, but Hepburn, while successful in dozens of other portrayals in her career, was made to play a young, sweet, naive princess in her early twenties and, as the luck of the universe would have it, she was cast in exactly that role at exactly the time she was perfect for it.  Yes, she was a fine actress but with the role of the princess in Roman Holiday, more is required than acting.  Taylor and Simmons could have acted the role well.  Hepburn feels like the role.  She feels like the real thing.  It was just… just… something she had, something that can’t be measured or quantified.


As for the role of the reporter, it was offered to Cary Grant who turned it down.  I’ve read many times that he turned it down because he felt he was too old but I don’t think that’s the case.  Not only did he regularly act with actresses much younger than himself, including Audrey herself, years later, in Charade (though, of course, she was now eleven years older), but the role doesn’t require anything that would have stopped Cary from making the audience believe age didn’t matter.  It was also said he knew he wouldn’t be the focal point and maybe that has some truth in it but I think the real reason is that Grant simply knew how he came off and understood it wouldn’t work for the story.  Here’s what I mean.  The story of Roman Holiday works because the princess, who seems lovely and refined, is being shown the town by a distinctly down to earth American reporter.  It’s his “matter of fact,” salt of the earth quality that plays off of her refined sweetness so well.  Cary Grant would feel like a member of the same royal family that the princess comes from, not her American tour guide.  Gregory Peck, on the other hand, was as made for the role as Audrey was for hers.  All the qualities Peck possessed meshed perfectly with those of Hepburn’s.  It wasn’t just a perfect match of characters in the story but a perfect match of actors on the screen.

Finally, I’d be remiss if I didn’t mention Eddie Albert.  No one else could have played Irving and I didn’t even know that until I saw Eddie Albert play the part.  Had you told me he was perfect as a beat photographer in Rome, before I saw it, I’d have said you were crazy.  Afterwards? It’s a stroke of genius.

The movie is directed by the great William Wyler who, to no one’s surprise, guided Audrey to her first and only Oscar for her beautiful performance.  It’s a movie that holds up well today and, I daresay, will hold up well a hundred years from now.  Treat yourself to a holiday this weekend and see one of the best, most enduring, and most perfectly cast romantic comedies ever, Roman Holiday, presented by Turner Classic Movies and Fathom Events.

2 Responses When Everything Comes Together: Roman Holiday
Posted By swac44 : November 27, 2015 4:31 pm

Thanks to Roman Holiday, my girlfriend spent her whole time growing up wanting to ride a vintage Vespa scooter just like Hepburn’s princess and Peck’s reporter (I also happen to work for a newspaper), while I always wanted one due to my love of the Who’s album and film Quadrophenia, although I also had a fondness for this classic romantic comedy. Shortly after we started dating we both got matching Vespas, so clearly we were meant to be together, it was foretold in the movies!

Also, just got some insight last night into the story behind Roman Holiday thanks to seeing the new film Trumbo about blacklisted screenwriter Dalton Trumbo. Enjoyed the film, especially Bryan Cranston’s performance, although the broad comic tone occasionally felt at odds with the serious subject matter. Still worth seeing for a great cast, and the recreation of this dark time in Hollywood history.

Posted By gregferrara : November 28, 2015 4:50 pm

I find it interesting that Dalton Trumbo won not once but twice and both times under a pseudonym. I mean, what are the odds? With this one, though, he was fronted by Ian McLellan Hunter so when he, Dalton, won the Oscar for story and he, Ian, went up to accept, there wasn’t the same embarrassment that happened a few years later when Dalton’s pseudonym, Robert Rich, won for THE BRAVE ONE and there was no one to accept.

Anyway, I’d like to see the new movie but Cranston’s performance seems so utterly affected from the trailers that I don’t know if I’ll get through it.

Leave a Reply

Current ye@r *

MovieMorlocks.com is the official blog for TCM. No topic is too obscure or niche to be excluded from our film discussions. And we welcome your comments on our blogs and bloggers.
See more: facebook.com/tcmtv
See more: twitter.com/tcm
3-D  Academy Awards  Action Films  Actors  Actors' Endorsements  Actresses  animal stars  Animation  Anime  Anthology Films  Art Direction  Art in Movies  Asians in Hollywood  Australian CInema  Autobiography  Avant-Garde  Aviation  Awards  B-movies  Beer in Film  Behind the Scenes  Best of the Year lists  Biography  Biopics  Black Film  Blu-Ray  Books on Film  Boxing films  British Cinema  Canadian Cinema  Character Actors  Chicago Film History  Cinematography  Classic Films  College Life on Film  Comedy  Comic Book Movies  Crime  Czech Film  Dance on Film  Digital Cinema  Directors  Disaster Films  Documentary  Drama  DVD  Early Talkies  Editing  Educational Films  European Influence on American Cinema  Experimental  Exploitation  Fairy Tales on Film  Faith or Christian-based Films  Family Films  Film Composers  Film Criticism  Film Festival 2015  film festivals  Film History in Florida  Film Noir  Film Scholars  Film titles  Filmmaking Techniques  Films About Gambling  Films of the 1930s  Films of the 1960s  Films of the 1970s  Films of the 1980s  Food in Film  Foreign Film  French Film  Gangster films  Genre  Genre spoofs  HD & Blu-Ray  Holiday Movies  Hollywood history  Hollywood lifestyles  Horror  Horror Movies  Icons  independent film  Italian Film  Japanese Film  Korean Film  Literary Adaptations  Martial Arts  Melodramas  Memorabilia  Method Acting  Mexican Cinema  Moguls  Monster Movies  Movie Books  Movie Costumes  movie flops  Movie locations  Movie lovers  Movie Magazines  Movie Reviewers  Movie settings  Movie Stars  Movie titles  Movies about movies  Music in Film  Musicals  New Releases  Outdoor Cinema  Paranoid Thrillers  Parenting on film  Pirate movies  Polish film industry  political thrillers  Politics in Film  Pornography  Pre-Code  Producers  Race in American Film  Remakes  Revenge  Road Movies  Romance  Romantic Comedies  Russian Film Industry  Satire  Scandals  Science Fiction  Screenwriters  Semi-documentaries  Serials  Set design/production design  Short Films  Silent Film  silent films  Social Problem Film  Spaghetti Westerns  Sports  Sports on Film  Stereotypes  Straight-to-DVD  Studio Politics  Stunts and stuntmen  Suspense thriller  Swashbucklers  TCM Classic Film Festival  TCM Underground  Television  The British in Hollywood  The Germans in Hollywood  The Hungarians in Hollywood  The Irish in Hollywood  Theaters  Thriller  Trains in movies  U.S.S. Indianapolis  Underground Cinema  VOD  War film  Westerns  Women in the Film Industry  Women's Weepies