jpg00017

George C. Scott unwittingly trained a dolphin to kill the President of the United States

Mike Nichols was a veteran comedy director of stage and screen, not to mention a comedy performer of no small renown.  He would go on to become of the few people to win an Emmy, Grammy, Oscar and a Tony (the fabled EGOT)—all but the Emmy being won for his comedy work.

Buck Henry was a prolific comedy writer whose career had taken him from the writing staff of The Steve Allen Show to co-creating Get Smart with Mel Brooks to updating Howard Hawks’ screwball classic Bringing Up Baby for a new generation under the title What’s Up Doc?  In the years to come he would become a recurring host of Saturday Night Live, a contributor to The Daily Show and a guest star on 30 Rock.

Together they had collaborated on The Graduate, and Catch 22.  They had a contractual obligation to producer Joseph E. Levine for a third film—and so in 1973 Mike Nichols and Buck Henry made a paranoid conspiracy thriller about a plot to use talking dolphins to assassinate the President.  This is a not a joke.

 jpg00018

Day of the Dolphin is NOT airing as part of tonight’s tribute to ’70s thrillers, but gee, why not?  It stars the great, gruff George C. Scott as a marine biologist who has spent many years and many fortunes studying how dolphins use language.  In part this has meant studying the dolphins’ own language of chirps and clicks.  But it has also meant teaching the dolphins to speak English themselves.

Somehow, these comedy veterans Nichols and Henry manage to depict this absolutely ludicrous idea completely straight—and it is quite a feat to show a dolphin talking to George C. Scott and not have it be an absurd joke.  (Or, for that matter, to include a scene in which the dolphin attempts to rape Trish Van Devere, Scott’s real-life wife playing Scott’s onscreen wife.  This scene too is played without any irony or mockery)

jpg00022

But wait, there’s more…

You see, although George C. Scott’s character has constructed his own private Sea World out of a combination of scientific curiosity and desire to drop out of the unpleasant mainstream world, his research is being funded by a Sinister Cabal of venture capitalists and National Security spooks gone rogue, who are bankrolling all this because they want to use the dolphins as unwitting assassins.

jpg00021

I was a little leery about giving that plot point away, even though we’re talking here about a 40 year old movie, because it’s a 40 year old obscure movie that I assume most of y’all reading this probably haven’t seen.  By my reckoning, any movie you haven’t seen is a new movie no matter how long ago it was made.  But, this can’t really count as a spoiler since it was on the poster.

images

Which means I can really dig into this plot point, because it is completely bonkers.  You have to give Nichols and Henry credit for having the courage of their convictions, because they commit to every nuttiness of the premise with complete sincerity.  Even George C., who could so easily have phoned this in, makes his character absolutely believable.  And the most impressive aspect of all is the performance by the dolphins—there are no mechanical dolphins here, no puppets, no men in dolphin costumes, no special effects.  Just actual, living dolphins acting in the same frame as Scott and the other cast members.  It’s stunning.

jpg00028

But it’s also what starts to unravel the already slender thread holding this together.

Because here’s the thing: Scott’s research has taken many years, and cost an outrageous amount of money.  The end result is a dolphin that can communicate easily with human beings.  Without realizing it, he’s gotten all the money to do this from a Sinister Cabal.  The Sinister Cabal has paid this money, and been this patient, because they need an intelligent trained dolphin to go plant a magnetic bomb on the President’s yacht.  But… that’s all they need.  An intelligent, trained dolphin.  Any old intelligent, trained dolphin will do just fine.  They don’t need the dolphin to be able to talk.

jpg00024

In fact, they consider the dolphins’ ability to speak to be a severe liability—it means their reluctant assassins can serve as witnesses against them (although even this bizarre movie stops short of trying to visualize a talking dolphin giving evidence in court).

So what we’re dealing with is a film about a conspiracy that decides to invest many years and millions of dollars into creating a weapon more powerful than they really need.  They could have just gone to, I dunno, Chicago’s Shedd Aquarium or somesuch and kidnapped some ordinary grade intelligent, trained dolphins and avoided the whole “this dolphin can talk” risk of exposure. (And while we’re on this topic, let’s also note that the bad guys haven’t really thought through the implications of using dolphins who a) can swim faster than any boat; b) have sensory apparatuses so sophisticated they can track boats through miles of open sea; c) have been armed with weapons; and d) know right from wrong.  Whether these dolphins can speak or not doesn’t even really enter into whether they might turn out to be the wrong choice of assassin).

jpg00025

Lest you think that the assassination scheme really depended on the superior intelligence of these specific dolphins, let me just remind you of what I said a few paragraphs above: this movie was made using real dolphins.  Their names were Buck and Ginger (and yes, Buck was named in honor of Buck Henry.  Ginger was named in honor of Ginger Rogers).  Every single thing the dolphin characters do in the film were done by real dolphins.  Except speak, of course—Buck Henry did the dolphin voice.

jpg00019

But it’s not like 70’s era paranoid conspiracy thrillers ever really traded much on plausibility.  In fact, I’m not able at the moment to call up a single 1970s paranoid conspiracy thriller whose conspiracy actually makes any sense in reality.

Then again, that was the whole point—in the 1970s, reality itself had stopped making any sense.  Somehow, people were now living in a world in which police officers opened fire on unarmed college students, political leaders who advocated nonviolent ways to encourage others to live in harmony were routinely shot dead in public, and the President himself conspired with ordinary criminals to commit petty larceny.

It wasn’t easy to make sense of these absurd tragedies. And the tumult of the early 1970s certainly seemed to be one in which American society was being torn into two parts—on one side you had the peace-lovers, the gentle, the ones who believed in a progressive future and wanted to work towards that goal.  On the other you had anyone in power, who had proven themselves willing to resort to any means, no matter how cruel or base, to protect and enhance that power.

Sure, that’s overly reductive and simplistic.  But the appeal of the conspiracy theory was that it took the messy chaos of life and imposed order.  The world was more complicated than that, but it made for an easy-to-understand story—and so naturally if you set out to tell a story inside such times, chances are your story would follow the same contours.

jpg00018

And in fact, as trippy as the Day of the Dolphin may be, it’s not as if you can draw a bright line between the insanity of its plot and the real world in which it was made.  F’r’instance, the reason Mike Nichols and Buck Henry made this atypical work after The Graduate and Catch 22 was that they needed to settle a contractual obligation to Joseph Levine before they moved on to other projects elsewhere—and Levine was stuck without a director for Day of the Dolphin after its original director Roman Polanski had to quit.  And why did Polanski drop out?  Because his wife pregnant wife Sharon Tate was brutally murdered by Charles Manson—part of the spiraling crisis of violence that seemed to be eating America alive at the time.

936full-the-day-of-the-dolphin-poster

12 Responses George C. Scott unwittingly trained a dolphin to kill the President of the United States
Posted By joes : January 25, 2014 9:02 am

I don’t know why folks keep saying this is an “obscure” movie (I’ve read this on other sites as well).

Big name actors. Major Director. Large studio picture. Two Oscar nominations. Pretty famous in it’s day. Came out on VHS and now, DVD.

What’s so obscure about it?

P.S. And, it’s a pretty good thriller as well

Posted By LD : January 25, 2014 1:28 pm

When this movie was released it may not have been top box office, but those who did see it seemed to think it warranted discussion. The “what if” scenario. It didn’t seem far fetched to people brought up on “Flipper”. You are so right when you wrote about dolphins being so intelligent they didn’t need to learn our language to accomplish their mission. For the past several years we have been trying to learn theirs.

Posted By Jenni : January 25, 2014 6:35 pm

Enjoyed this movie when it aired on TCM a couple years ago. Didn’t realize Henry & Nichols had a thing to do with it-I must’ve zoned out when the opening credits rolled. I vaguely remember ads for it on tv when it was released in theaters. One more thing, a nitpick, not all on the “left” in the political world of the 1970s were peaceful. The Weather Underground did kill people.

Posted By Richard Brandt : January 25, 2014 8:58 pm

It’s a punch line in an old Carol Burnett routine…”He’s down in Florida working with dolphins, for God’s sake.” But a pretty watchable movie. Nice job placing it in its context.

Posted By Doug : January 26, 2014 12:12 am

Here’s a bit more context-other 1970′s movies with preposterous
concepts played (mostly) straight:
Westworld 1973
The Boys From Brazil 1978
The Stepford Wives 1975
The Omen 1976

Just thinking-Mike Nichols was regarded as one of the premier filmmakers of the era, building on the foundation of Nichols/May. I can imagine studios demanding that other directors copy whatever Nichols was doing. His “Catch 22″ and “Day Of The Dolphin” may have opened the door for “Westworld” and “The Stepford Wives” which are also played straight but with tongue in cheek.
Did these ‘serious’ films pave the way for…”Airplane!”?

Posted By george : January 26, 2014 12:38 am

There have always been movies with preposterous concepts, up to the present day. (See: the TWILIGHT series, WORLD WAR Z, HUNGER GAMES, and any superhero movie.)Some work better than others. At least the silly-concept movies of the ’70s didn’t cost $200 million to produce and market.

I would guess that ROSEMARY’S BABY “opened the door” for THE STEPFORD WIVES and BOYS FROM BRAZIL, which were also written by Ira Levin.

Posted By george : January 26, 2014 12:57 am

I don’t mind a slight “tongue in cheek” feel to these movies. It’s a relief from today’s preposterous-concept movies, which we’re supposed to take with deadly seriousness.

For instance: the grim and humorless MAN OF STEEL, which is in the vein of Chris Nolan’s grim and humorless Batman movies.

Part of this is to appease the fanboy base, which wants its superheroics played straight and without a whiff of Adam West-style camp. But it can make for a cold viewing experience, unless you’re a hardcore superhero addict.

Posted By MattL : January 26, 2014 2:22 am

I’ve seen The Day of the Dolphin a few times. Always enjoyed it but one aspect you don’t mention is that the movie has a melancholic [almost depressing] tone to it. As if all those years training dolphins have been a waste because it led to such a terrible predicament. And because of this the thriller element is not central to the film as much as dealing with saving the poor dolphins! Part of the reason for the movie’s tone too is George Delerue’s lilting score.

Posted By Gayle : January 28, 2014 2:23 am

Sorry, this is NOT an obscure film. I well remember the TV ads at the time of its release. The other points previously made also indicate it.

Posted By robbushblog : January 30, 2014 9:21 pm

I almost watched this on Netflix a few times. I will correct my procrastination soon.

Posted By Gamera2000 : February 1, 2014 5:04 am

Saw this at the theater back in 1973 when I was 13. I was into anything that was science fiction so I had to see this.

I enjoyed it at the time, without ever thinking about the absurdities of the plot. I agree with the other commentator, it was a melancholy film, with a sense that human evil would destroy anything as wonderful as communicating with another species.

Interestingly, this was also based on a novel by Robert Merle, which is completely different than the movie.

Posted By swac44 : February 6, 2014 3:43 pm

I first knew Buck Henry as a guest on SNL, apparently they used to bring him on once per season late in the year so they could plan a show that would use up unused sketches that had fallen by the wayside. It was all new material, as far as the viewer was concerned, but because it was Buck they didn’t have to worry about tailoring the sketches to fit a major star host’s persona. In the pre-IMDb days, that’s about all I knew about him.

Eventually I figured out where his real talents lay, although I did more recently learn a fun bit of trivia about him: he used to belong to one of the camera clubs that would hire pin-up legend Bettie Page to pose for amateur cheesecake shots, and got to know her personally before she dropped out of public view. I believe he’s written about this experience elsewhere, although I couldn’t tell you where offhand.

Leave a Reply

Current ye@r *

MovieMorlocks.com is the official blog for TCM. No topic is too obscure or niche to be excluded from our film discussions. And we welcome your comments on our blogs and bloggers.
See more: facebook.com/tcmtv
See more: twitter.com/tcm
3-D  Action Films  Actors  Actors' Endorsements  Actresses  animal stars  Animation  Anime  Anthology Films  Art in Movies  Australian CInema  Autobiography  Avant-Garde  Aviation  Awards  B-movies  Beer in Film  Behind the Scenes  Best of the Year lists  Biography  Biopics  Blu-Ray  Books on Film  Boxing films  British Cinema  Canadian Cinema  Character Actors  Chicago Film History  Cinematography  Classic Films  College Life on Film  Comedy  Comic Book Movies  Crime  Czech Film  Dance on Film  Digital Cinema  Directors  Disaster Films  Documentary  Drama  DVD  Early Talkies  Editing  Educational Films  European Influence on American Cinema  Experimental  Exploitation  Fairy Tales on Film  Faith or Christian-based Films  Family Films  Film Composers  Film Criticism  film festivals  Film History in Florida  Film Noir  Film Scholars  Film titles  Filmmaking Techniques  Films of the 1960s  Films of the 1980s  Food in Film  Foreign Film  French Film  Gangster films  Genre  Genre spoofs  HD & Blu-Ray  Holiday Movies  Hollywood history  Hollywood lifestyles  Horror  Horror Movies  Icons  independent film  Italian Film  Japanese Film  Korean Film  Literary Adaptations  Martial Arts  Melodramas  Method Acting  Mexican Cinema  Moguls  Monster Movies  Movie Books  Movie Costumes  movie flops  Movie locations  Movie lovers  Movie Reviewers  Movie settings  Movie Stars  Movie titles  Movies about movies  Music in Film  Musicals  Outdoor Cinema  Paranoid Thrillers  Parenting on film  Pirate movies  Polish film industry  political thrillers  Politics in Film  Pornography  Pre-Code  Producers  Race in American Film  Remakes  Revenge  Road Movies  Romance  Romantic Comedies  Satire  Scandals  Science Fiction  Screenwriters  Semi-documentaries  Serials  Short Films  Silent Film  silent films  Social Problem Film  Sports  Sports on Film  Stereotypes  Straight-to-DVD  Studio Politics  Stunts and stuntmen  Suspense thriller  Swashbucklers  TCM Classic Film Festival  TCM Underground  Television  The British in Hollywood  The Germans in Hollywood  The Hungarians in Hollywood  The Irish in Hollywood  Theaters  Thriller  Trains in movies  Underground Cinema  VOD  War film  Westerns  Women in the Film Industry  Women's Weepies