Art Meets Artifice in Shohei Imamura’s A MAN VANISHES (1967)
The fuzzy line that separates fiction from reality has become increasingly blurred in recent years. Reality television programs promise to provide viewers with an unscripted look at the life of individuals willing to bare all for our entertainment but there is very little reality found in reality television. Inquisitive cameras, altered environments and skillful editors make participants keenly aware of their involvement in an orchestrated production and truth eventually takes a backseat to drama as would-be stars and starlets compete for their moment in the spotlight. Cinema has also become progressively more self-aware. The current influx of mocumentaries, docudramas, 3D movies and “found footage” films attempt to obscure reality and mimic authenticity while filmmakers such as Werner Herzog, Errol Morris, Michael Haneke and Abbas Kiarostami seem to enjoy encouraging viewer participation in oblique ways. Their films frequently refuse to provide easy answers to the problematic truths they present and directly or indirectly ask audiences to question what they’re seeing on screen. They illustrate how reality is often subjective, transitory and pliable.
Shohei Imamura’s name might not be as recognizable as Werner Herzog, Errol Morris, Michael Haneke or even Abbas Kiarostami but it should be. This talented Japanese director helped pioneer the kind of ambiguous and self-reflective documentary filmmaking that’s widely popular today. Imamura began his career working as an assistant director to Yasujiro Ozu at Shochiku Studio although the older director had very little influence on Imamura’s own output. During the ‘60s Imamura started producing his own films with help from Japan’s Art Theatre Guild (ATG) and he became an important figure in the Japanese New Wave thanks to the critical success of films like PIGS AND BATTLESHIPS (1959), THE INSECT WOMAN (1963), THE PORNOGRAPHERS (1966) and A MAN VANISHES (1967). Imamura eventually abandoned narrative film altogether and concentrated on making documentaries throughout most of the ‘70s. His films were well received in Japan as well as Europe where he was awarded with two Palme d’Ors at the Cannes Film Festival for THE BALLAD OF NARAYAMA (1983) and THE EEL (1997) before he passed away in 2006 at age 79 but Americans have been slow to embrace his work. That’s gradually changing thanks to companies such as Criterion, which has released a handful of the director’s films on DVD. This week we can also thank Icarus Films for sponsoring the U.S. Theatrical Premiere of Shohei Imamura’s 1967 film, A MAN VANISHES (aka Ningen johatsu, or The Unexplained Disappearance of a Human Being). A MAN VANISHES was never released in the U.S. during it’s initial run but it will have its premiere in New York at the Anthology Film Archives on November 15th and in Los Angeles at Cinefamily on November 16th. The film plays through November 21st and will be shown as part of a weeklong retrospective of Shoehei Imamura’s work that also includes screenings of KARAYUKI-SAN, THE MAKING OF A PROSTITUTE (1975), THE PIRATES OF BUBUAN (1972), IN SEARCH OF THE UNRETURNED SOLDIERS IN THAILAND (1971) and OUTLAW-MASU RETURNS HOME (1973). Imamura’s films frequently focused on Japan’s working class and cast light on the country’s rigid class structure while illuminating the effects of war, political strife and social upheaval on individuals as well as families. Outcasts, drifters, prostitutes, criminals and killers populate his films but the director never pities these offbeat characters and seems to relish their imperfections. This might lead you to believe that Imamura’s films are heavy-handed but nothing could be further from the truth. He had a robust sense of humor and seemed to enjoy introducing an element of whimsy or surrealism into his work no matter how bleak the material was. And while he often dealt with very serious subjects his humanism was always on display. Like many Japanese filmmakers, writers and artists from his era, Imamura was also interested in understanding and deconstructing the idea of national identity in the wake of WW2 and the American occupation of his country. Many of the characters, ideas and themes that concerned Shoei Imamura came to fruition in A MAN VANISHES, which is one of the director’s most expansive and fascinating films. It was originally supposed to be a straightforward documentary about the thousands of people that mysteriously disappear in Japan every year. But over time Imamura decided to focus on one man, a youthful plastic salesman named Tadashi Oshima, who vanished without a trace during a business trip in 1965. Imamura limited the scope of his film after he realized that the details of Oshima’s disappearance were complex and deserved his complete attention. But reality and fiction began to collide after the director paid the missing man’s fiancée for her participation and hired an actor (Shigeru Tsuyuguchi) to portray an investigative reporter asking questions about Oshima’s disappearance. Oshima’s frustrated and lonely fiancée eventually develops feelings for the actor portraying the reporter causing the film to veer off in strange and unexpected directions. And as Oshima’s family, friends, coworkers and acquaintances begin to share their own stories about the missing man it becomes increasingly apparent that he presented a different face to everyone he knew. No clear image of Oshima ever takes shape and the reasons behind his disappearance dissolve into a puddle of apprehension, misunderstandings and skewered perspectives as unanswerable questions finally obscure any truths that might emerge. Part documentary and part fiction, A MAN VANISHES refuses to be easily categorized and aggressively defies viewer expectations at every twist and turn. Hidden cameras captured some of the ensuing drama but Imamura also used formal sets where he was able to control events and manipulate the action. While the film focuses on the mysterious disappearance of Oshima it also asks larger questions about personal identity and our impermanent nature while blurring the lines between art and artifice. A MAN VANISHES reminds us that all men ultimately vanish behind carefully constructed personalities that disintegrate after death or in this case, after the credits roll, leaving behind a mere shadow of the people they once were. If you can’t make it to the U.S. Premiere of A MAN VANISHES don’t despair. Icarus Films will be screening their Shoehei Imamura retrospective at other venues in the future. They’re also planning to release a collection of Imamura’s films in a DVD box set next month. You can find more information about this upcoming release at the Icarus Films’ website. 2 Responses Art Meets Artifice in Shohei Imamura’s A MAN VANISHES (1967)
Thanks, Susan! Hopefully you’ll get a chance to see the film soon. Imamura’s a fascinating filmmaker and it’s a shame that he’s not better known and more appreciated in the US. Leave a Reply |
Archives
Featured Sites
Popular terms
3-D
Action Films
Actors
Actors' Endorsements
Actresses
animal stars
Animation
Anime
Anthology Films
Autobiography
Avant-Garde
Aviation
Awards
B-movies
Beer in Film
Behind the Scenes
Best of the Year lists
Biography
Biopics
Blu-Ray
Books on Film
Boxing films
British Cinema
Canadian Cinema
Character Actors
Chicago Film History
Cinematography
Classic Films
College Life on Film
Comedy
Comic Book Movies
Crime
Czech Film
Dance on Film
Digital Cinema
Directors
Disaster Films
Documentary
Drama
DVD
Early Talkies
Editing
Educational Films
European Influence on American Cinema
Experimental
Exploitation
Fairy Tales on Film
Faith or Christian-based Films
Family Films
Fan Edits
Film Composers
Film Criticism
film festivals
Film History in Florida
Film Noir
Film Scholars
Film titles
Filmmaking Techniques
Films of the 1980s
Food in Film
Foreign Film
French Film
Gangster films
Genre
Genre spoofs
Guest Programmers
HD & Blu-Ray
Holiday Movies
Hollywood history
Hollywood lifestyles
Horror
Horror Movies
Icons
independent film
Italian Film
Japanese Film
Korean Film
Leadership
Literary Adaptations
Martial Arts
Melodramas
Method Acting
Mexican Cinema
Moguls
Monster Movies
Movie Books
Movie Costumes
Movie locations
Movie lovers
Movie Magazines
Movie Reviewers
Movie settings
Movie Stars
Movies about movies
Music in Film
Musicals
New Releases
Outdoor Cinema
Paranoid Thrillers
Parenting on film
Pirate movies
Polish film industry
political thrillers
Politics in Film
Pornography
Pre-Code
Producers
Race in American Film
Remakes
Revenge
Road Movies
Romance
Romantic Comedies
Russian Film Industry
Satire
Scandals
Science Fiction
Screenwriters
Semi-documentaries
Serials
Short Films
Silent Film
silent films
Social Problem Film
Spaghetti Westerns
Sports
Sports on Film
Stereotypes
Straight-to-DVD
Studio Politics
Stunts and stuntmen
Suspense thriller
Swashbucklers
TCM Classic Film Festival
Tearjerkers
Television
The British in Hollywood
The Germans in Hollywood
The Hungarians in Hollywood
The Irish in Hollywood
The Russians in Hollywood
Theaters
Thriller
Trains in movies
Underground Cinema
VOD
War film
Westerns
Women in the Film Industry
Women's Weepies |
Too bad this isn’t coming to my neck of the woods. I like films that blur the line between documentary and narrative, especially those who pioneered this theme in a sincere and interesting way. Some of today’s snarky, “fake you out” docs that people seem to find so clever today are not nearly as smart as a film like this.
Great post on a unique filmmaker.