Vincente on Vincent

Today, the films of Anthony Quinn are spotlighted as part of TCM’s Summer Under the Stars. Lust for Life, one of my favorite movies featuring the earthy, expressive actor, airs this evening. However, this biopic of artist Vincent Van Gogh is not really Quinn’s movie. Nor is it star Kirk Douglas’s film, despite his intense, show-stopping performance. Instead, Lust for Life belongs to director Vincente Minnelli, who not only identified strongly with Van Gogh’s tortured life but also translated the artist’s techniques, palette, and compositions into cinematic equivalents.  Minnelli was inspired and influenced by painters throughout his entire life career, from his days as a set dresser on Broadway to his years as one of MGM’s most talented directors. He filled notebooks with photos and illustrations of paintings, ornamentation, architectural details, and other imagery, which he used as references for set and costume design. He approached his work in Hollywood like an artist, and he strove to collapse the distance between fine and popular art. Alongside the 17-minute ballet at the end of An American in Paris, Lust for Life is his finest achievement in that regard.

WITH HIS HAIR AND BEARD DYED RED, KIRK DOUGLAS LOOKED SO MUCH LIKE VAN GOGH THAT A VISIT TO AN ART MUSEUM BECAME AWKWARD WHEN ALL THE OTHER VISITORS STARED AT HIM INSTEAD OF THE PAINTINGS.

The film was intended as an adaptation of Irving Stone’s 1934 novelization of Van Gogh’s life. MGM purchased the rights to the novel Lust for Life in 1946 with vague plans to turn it into a biopic starring Spencer Tracy. But, the studio didn’t seriously consider producing a film version until after John Huston’s dramatization of Toulouse-Lautrec, Moulin Rouge, became a critical and popular hit in 1952. By the time MGM and Minnelli were ready for the film, it was 1955, and the studio had only nine months till the rights to the book ran out. Stone was not inclined to renew the rights, which meant that Minnelli and producer John Houseman were under considerable pressure to complete the film quickly. No one involved in the production was particularly impressed with Stone’s work, though they continued to promote the project as an adaptation. Scriptwriter Norman Corwin deleted some of Stone’s contrived devices, including an imaginary woman who served as a muse and foil for Van Gogh. Instead, Corwin turned to the letters between the artist and his brother, Theo, to drive the narrative. Once on location in Europe, Minnelli found Corwin’s depiction of Van Gogh’s experiences in Arles to be flat, and he reworked them with the help of another writer.

QUINN CLAIMED THAT HE WAS VISITED BY THE GHOST OF GAUGUIN DURING SHOOTING. SUPPOSEDLY, GAUGUIN WAS ANNOYED BECAUSE THE ACTOR KEPT HOLDING THE BRUSH INCORRECTLY.

Minnelli interpreted Van Gogh’s life using two themes found in many of his films: (1) Van Gogh is portrayed as an outsider who is alienated from mainstream society by his creative impulses; (2) and, as an artist, Van Gogh is uncompromising in his commitment to his calling—to the exclusion of a happy family and the comforts of a normal life.  According to biographers, Minnelli related to the artist’s emotional isolationism and the way he sought to escape life’s disappointments through rigorous creative activity.  When he was involved with a film that he found worthy, he drove himself to the point of exhaustion to meet his creative vision. Ex-wife Judy Garland was one of the first to recognize Minnelli sublimated his internal struggles and neuroses through his work.

The narrative is divided into four phases: the early adult life of Van Gogh among the poor in the mining district of the Borinage; his recuperation from an illness in Holland; his brief stay in Paris where he met several Impressionist painters; and his years in the south of France, including his final days in a hospital in Auvers. Minnelli asked cinematographers Russell Harlan and Freddy Young (later David Lean’s go-to director of photography) to help him devise a separate color scheme for each phase. Three cinematographers worked on Lust for Life, including Joseph Ruttenberg who shot the wheat fields and landscapes around Arles. The first part of the film, which is set in the mining district of the Borinage, uses a dark color scheme of grays and browns. In the scenes in which Van Gogh is recuperating in the countryside of Holland, a cooler palette of greens and blues dominates. In Paris, when Van Gogh meets some of the Impressionist painters, reds and blues pop up in the production design. Yellows show up in the final section of the film after Van Gogh moves to the south of France. In his autobiography, I Remember It Well, Minnelli discusses the use of yellow in Van Gogh’s work.  Based on the way that the sun, lamps, and other light sources were depicted in the paintings, Minnelli believed that the sun represented turmoil and torment for the artist. The color schemes in the four sections loosely echo Van Gogh’s own palette during each phase of his painting.

‘CAFE TERRACE AT NIGHT’ WAS RECREATED IN ‘LUST FOR LIFE.” IT WAS ALSO THE INSPIRATION FOR A SET IN THE BALLET OF ‘AN AMERICAN IN PARIS.’

                   So instrumental were the color schemes to Minnelli that he informed MGM that he did not want to use Eastman Color film stock to shoot Lust for Life. Eastman Color had become the studio’s stock of choice during the 1950s, but Minnelli found that it did not adequately capture the subtleties of yellow.  He cajoled MGM into allowing him to shoot with Ansco film stock, which had virtually been abandoned by the industry by 1955. MGM purchased the last reserve of Ansco stock for Lust for Life, and they persuaded the company to open a special lab to process the film for the duration of production.

In addition to referencing Van Gogh’s palette, Minnelli reworked the artist’s compositions into specific scenes in the film. In the first section, Van Gogh watches a peasant family at dinner, and the blocking of the characters matches the composition of The Potato Eaters. Later, the artist throws open his window on his first day in Arles to reveal rows of fruit trees in an orchard—a view recognizable in his painting The White Orchard. A composition that is repeated throughout the film shows Douglas as Van Gogh in the foreground painting one of the artist’s recognizable subjects visible in the background.

MINNELLI RE-STAGED THE COMPOSITION OF ‘THE POTATO EATERS’ AS AN ORDINARY MOMENT FROM GAUGUIN’S LIFE THAT HE  TRANSFORMED INTO ART.

Minnelli wanted Van Gogh’s paintings, working methods, and style to permeate Lust for Life, so that the energy expended during scenes of the artist furiously painting were apparent in the art works themselves.  Van Gogh’s actual paintings are shown throughout the film, usually as inserts in scenes of the artist working. The paintings had been photographed while Minnelli and his cinematographers were still in Europe. They photographed the paintings onto 8 by 10-inch plates. The plates were sent back to the studio in Hollywood, where they were set up on a table in the camera department at MGM. Transparencies of the plates were made, and during shooting, these transparencies were lit from behind and then photographed onto Ansco film. This process showed the paintings to their best advantage, even revealing the brushstrokes.

VAN GOGH IN THE FOREGROUND WORKS OUT HIS INTERPRETATION OF THE LANDSCAPE IN THE BACKGROUND. MINNELLI WAS FORCED TO USE CINEMASCOPE BY MGM, BUT HE CLEARLY MASTERED THE WIDESCREEN COMPOSITIONS .

Shooting on location throughout France and Holland proved arduous, especially on a tight schedule. An exhausted Minnelli was sometimes contentious with Houseman and members of his crew. But, the director was at his happiest when in the throes of a film he believed had artistic merit. In his autobiography, he described his days of working on Lust for Life to be “the most thrilling and stimulating creative period of my life.”

Griffin, Mark. A Hundred or More Hidden Things: The Life and Films of Vincente Minnelli. Philadelphia: DaCapo Press, 2010.

Levy, Emanuel. Vincente Minnelli: Hollywood’s Dark Dreamer. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2009.

Minnelli, Vincente. I Remember It Well. New York: Doubleday & Co., Inc. 1974.

9 Responses Vincente on Vincent
Posted By Kingrat : August 20, 2012 3:55 pm

Susan, thank you for this outstanding post on LUST FOR LIFE. I shre your admiration for Minnelli’s work on this film. One small note: Minnelli didn’t actually direct the final ballet in AN AMERICAN IN PARIS; according to Leslie Caron, Gene Kelly did. Minnelli would have supervised the sets and costumes, however.

Posted By generasputinhole : August 20, 2012 5:14 pm

just saw this one for the first time recently, and as an artist, found the production’s evident passion for the subject thrilling. often these Movies about Painters can be very generalized stories in which the protagonist’s skill could be anything; music, dancing, writing, and the film would be basically the same, but hearing the characters discussing their art in a way that was accurate to how it might have actually been was wonderful. Additionally I found that the story’s probing into the artist’s internal conflicts and drives to be completely believable (if necessarily dramatized for the sake of entertainment). The insert paintings you described were also exciting to see, and must have been especially so at a time when most people’s only chance to see the art was in a microscopic, so-so print in a book of art or an encyclopedia article, etc.
naturally, the performances by Douglas, Quinn, et al, were riveting; and Minelli’s bringing to life of so many of Van Gogh’s works of art was excellent- This film was a genuine pleasure all around. thanks for sharing this BTS info, was quite informative!

Posted By Juana Maria : August 20, 2012 9:15 pm

Thank you thank you thank you for writing about this movie!!! It’s one of my all time favorites even if it does have a sad ending. Van Gough lives on in his works I think much the same way actors and directors live on because of their films. Thanks for this article!!!

Posted By Susan Doll : August 20, 2012 11:08 pm

Thank you all for your kind comments. I am glad to find others who are enthusiastic about this film, which certainly elevates the artistic biopic.

Posted By James : August 21, 2012 7:19 am

I was lucky enough to see Lust For Life last year at the BAM Cinemetek in Brooklyn (as part of a Minnelli retrospective), and the director’s use of color was stunning to see projected on the screen, particularly in the final scenes. I’ve never watched the movie on DVD or television, but I have to imagine it wouldn’t look nearly as beautiful as it did at BAM.

Posted By michaelgloversmith : August 21, 2012 10:23 am

Great point about Minnelli dissolving the line between popular and fine art. This is the reason why The Band Wagon is my favorite of his films: the pretentious Broadway director who wants to mount a musical version of Faust was clearly meant to be a self-parody.

Posted By Susan Doll : August 21, 2012 10:44 am

James: I envy your chance to the see the film on a big screen, and I will bet the paintings looks rich and alive. I totally agree with you that DVD/TV could not possibly match that experience, which is true more often than not.

Posted By Lisa W. : August 22, 2012 12:16 am

Oh, I love Lust for Life and was thinking as I was reading, how much I’d love to see it on a big screen! If James saw a print last year in Brooklyn, maybe there’s hope for getting one in Chicago? Now must learn more about Mr. Minelli since this film and An American in Paris are both so outstanding. Thanks for the excellent post!

Posted By Les : August 29, 2012 10:15 pm

I just watched Dr. Jekyll and Mr Hyde on TCM with Spencer Tracey. I do believe this was the greatest portrail of this story ever. Tracey was great as was the whole cast Ingrid Bergman, Lana Turner and all were all great. However I was surprised to see it was only giver three stars. This is a four star movie a masterpiece and derserving of high praise. To say it was just a good movie does a serious injustice to a great movie with great actors. I love TCM and will continue to watch great films on here :)

Leave a Reply

MovieMorlocks.com is the official blog for TCM. No topic is too obscure or niche to be excluded from our film discussions. And we welcome your comments on our blogs and bloggers.
Archives
Popular terms
3-D  Action Films  Actors  Actors' Endorsements  Actresses  animal stars  Animation  Anime  Anthology Films  Autobiography  Avant-Garde  Aviation  Awards  B-movies  Beer in Film  Behind the Scenes  Best of the Year lists  Biography  Biopics  Blu-Ray  Books on Film  Boxing films  British Cinema  Canadian Cinema  Character Actors  Chicago Film History  Cinematography  Classic Films  College Life on Film  Comedy  Comic Book Movies  Crime  Czech Film  Dance on Film  Digital Cinema  Directors  Disaster Films  Documentary  Drama  DVD  Early Talkies  Editing  Educational Films  European Influence on American Cinema  Experimental  Exploitation  Fairy Tales on Film  Faith or Christian-based Films  Family Films  Fan Edits  Film Composers  Film Criticism  film festivals  Film History in Florida  Film Noir  Film Scholars  Film titles  Filmmaking Techniques  Films of the 1980s  Food in Film  Foreign Film  French Film  Gangster films  Genre  Genre spoofs  Guest Programmers  HD & Blu-Ray  Holiday Movies  Hollywood history  Hollywood lifestyles  Horror  Horror Movies  Icons  independent film  Italian Film  Japanese Film  Korean Film  Leadership  Literary Adaptations  Martial Arts  Melodramas  Method Acting  Mexican Cinema  Moguls  Monster Movies  Movie Books  Movie Costumes  Movie locations  Movie lovers  Movie Magazines  Movie Reviewers  Movie settings  Movie Stars  Movies about movies  Music in Film  Musicals  New Releases  Outdoor Cinema  Paranoid Thrillers  Parenting on film  Pirate movies  Polish film industry  political thrillers  Politics in Film  Pornography  Pre-Code  Producers  Race in American Film  Remakes  Revenge  Road Movies  Romance  Romantic Comedies  Russian Film Industry  Satire  Scandals  Science Fiction  Screenwriters  Semi-documentaries  Serials  Short Films  Silent Film  silent films  Social Problem Film  Spaghetti Westerns  Sports  Sports on Film  Stereotypes  Straight-to-DVD  Studio Politics  Stunts and stuntmen  Suspense thriller  Swashbucklers  TCM Classic Film Festival  Tearjerkers  Television  The British in Hollywood  The Germans in Hollywood  The Hungarians in Hollywood  The Irish in Hollywood  The Russians in Hollywood  Theaters  Thriller  Trains in movies  Underground Cinema  VOD  War film  Westerns  Women in the Film Industry  Women's Weepies