Vincente on Vincent
![]() WITH HIS HAIR AND BEARD DYED RED, KIRK DOUGLAS LOOKED SO MUCH LIKE VAN GOGH THAT A VISIT TO AN ART MUSEUM BECAME AWKWARD WHEN ALL THE OTHER VISITORS STARED AT HIM INSTEAD OF THE PAINTINGS. The film was intended as an adaptation of Irving Stone’s 1934 novelization of Van Gogh’s life. MGM purchased the rights to the novel Lust for Life in 1946 with vague plans to turn it into a biopic starring Spencer Tracy. But, the studio didn’t seriously consider producing a film version until after John Huston’s dramatization of Toulouse-Lautrec, Moulin Rouge, became a critical and popular hit in 1952. By the time MGM and Minnelli were ready for the film, it was 1955, and the studio had only nine months till the rights to the book ran out. Stone was not inclined to renew the rights, which meant that Minnelli and producer John Houseman were under considerable pressure to complete the film quickly. No one involved in the production was particularly impressed with Stone’s work, though they continued to promote the project as an adaptation. Scriptwriter Norman Corwin deleted some of Stone’s contrived devices, including an imaginary woman who served as a muse and foil for Van Gogh. Instead, Corwin turned to the letters between the artist and his brother, Theo, to drive the narrative. Once on location in Europe, Minnelli found Corwin’s depiction of Van Gogh’s experiences in Arles to be flat, and he reworked them with the help of another writer. ![]() QUINN CLAIMED THAT HE WAS VISITED BY THE GHOST OF GAUGUIN DURING SHOOTING. SUPPOSEDLY, GAUGUIN WAS ANNOYED BECAUSE THE ACTOR KEPT HOLDING THE BRUSH INCORRECTLY. Minnelli interpreted Van Gogh’s life using two themes found in many of his films: (1) Van Gogh is portrayed as an outsider who is alienated from mainstream society by his creative impulses; (2) and, as an artist, Van Gogh is uncompromising in his commitment to his calling—to the exclusion of a happy family and the comforts of a normal life. According to biographers, Minnelli related to the artist’s emotional isolationism and the way he sought to escape life’s disappointments through rigorous creative activity. When he was involved with a film that he found worthy, he drove himself to the point of exhaustion to meet his creative vision. Ex-wife Judy Garland was one of the first to recognize Minnelli sublimated his internal struggles and neuroses through his work. The narrative is divided into four phases: the early adult life of Van Gogh among the poor in the mining district of the Borinage; his recuperation from an illness in Holland; his brief stay in Paris where he met several Impressionist painters; and his years in the south of France, including his final days in a hospital in Auvers. Minnelli asked cinematographers Russell Harlan and Freddy Young (later David Lean’s go-to director of photography) to help him devise a separate color scheme for each phase. Three cinematographers worked on Lust for Life, including Joseph Ruttenberg who shot the wheat fields and landscapes around Arles. The first part of the film, which is set in the mining district of the Borinage, uses a dark color scheme of grays and browns. In the scenes in which Van Gogh is recuperating in the countryside of Holland, a cooler palette of greens and blues dominates. In Paris, when Van Gogh meets some of the Impressionist painters, reds and blues pop up in the production design. Yellows show up in the final section of the film after Van Gogh moves to the south of France. In his autobiography, I Remember It Well, Minnelli discusses the use of yellow in Van Gogh’s work. Based on the way that the sun, lamps, and other light sources were depicted in the paintings, Minnelli believed that the sun represented turmoil and torment for the artist. The color schemes in the four sections loosely echo Van Gogh’s own palette during each phase of his painting. ![]() ‘CAFE TERRACE AT NIGHT’ WAS RECREATED IN ‘LUST FOR LIFE.” IT WAS ALSO THE INSPIRATION FOR A SET IN THE BALLET OF ‘AN AMERICAN IN PARIS.’
In addition to referencing Van Gogh’s palette, Minnelli reworked the artist’s compositions into specific scenes in the film. In the first section, Van Gogh watches a peasant family at dinner, and the blocking of the characters matches the composition of The Potato Eaters. Later, the artist throws open his window on his first day in Arles to reveal rows of fruit trees in an orchard—a view recognizable in his painting The White Orchard. A composition that is repeated throughout the film shows Douglas as Van Gogh in the foreground painting one of the artist’s recognizable subjects visible in the background. ![]() MINNELLI RE-STAGED THE COMPOSITION OF ‘THE POTATO EATERS’ AS AN ORDINARY MOMENT FROM GAUGUIN’S LIFE THAT HE TRANSFORMED INTO ART. Minnelli wanted Van Gogh’s paintings, working methods, and style to permeate Lust for Life, so that the energy expended during scenes of the artist furiously painting were apparent in the art works themselves. Van Gogh’s actual paintings are shown throughout the film, usually as inserts in scenes of the artist working. The paintings had been photographed while Minnelli and his cinematographers were still in Europe. They photographed the paintings onto 8 by 10-inch plates. The plates were sent back to the studio in Hollywood, where they were set up on a table in the camera department at MGM. Transparencies of the plates were made, and during shooting, these transparencies were lit from behind and then photographed onto Ansco film. This process showed the paintings to their best advantage, even revealing the brushstrokes. ![]() VAN GOGH IN THE FOREGROUND WORKS OUT HIS INTERPRETATION OF THE LANDSCAPE IN THE BACKGROUND. MINNELLI WAS FORCED TO USE CINEMASCOPE BY MGM, BUT HE CLEARLY MASTERED THE WIDESCREEN COMPOSITIONS . Shooting on location throughout France and Holland proved arduous, especially on a tight schedule. An exhausted Minnelli was sometimes contentious with Houseman and members of his crew. But, the director was at his happiest when in the throes of a film he believed had artistic merit. In his autobiography, he described his days of working on Lust for Life to be “the most thrilling and stimulating creative period of my life.” Griffin, Mark. A Hundred or More Hidden Things: The Life and Films of Vincente Minnelli. Philadelphia: DaCapo Press, 2010. Levy, Emanuel. Vincente Minnelli: Hollywood’s Dark Dreamer. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2009. Minnelli, Vincente. I Remember It Well. New York: Doubleday & Co., Inc. 1974. 9 Responses Vincente on Vincent
just saw this one for the first time recently, and as an artist, found the production’s evident passion for the subject thrilling. often these Movies about Painters can be very generalized stories in which the protagonist’s skill could be anything; music, dancing, writing, and the film would be basically the same, but hearing the characters discussing their art in a way that was accurate to how it might have actually been was wonderful. Additionally I found that the story’s probing into the artist’s internal conflicts and drives to be completely believable (if necessarily dramatized for the sake of entertainment). The insert paintings you described were also exciting to see, and must have been especially so at a time when most people’s only chance to see the art was in a microscopic, so-so print in a book of art or an encyclopedia article, etc. Thank you thank you thank you for writing about this movie!!! It’s one of my all time favorites even if it does have a sad ending. Van Gough lives on in his works I think much the same way actors and directors live on because of their films. Thanks for this article!!! Thank you all for your kind comments. I am glad to find others who are enthusiastic about this film, which certainly elevates the artistic biopic. I was lucky enough to see Lust For Life last year at the BAM Cinemetek in Brooklyn (as part of a Minnelli retrospective), and the director’s use of color was stunning to see projected on the screen, particularly in the final scenes. I’ve never watched the movie on DVD or television, but I have to imagine it wouldn’t look nearly as beautiful as it did at BAM. Great point about Minnelli dissolving the line between popular and fine art. This is the reason why The Band Wagon is my favorite of his films: the pretentious Broadway director who wants to mount a musical version of Faust was clearly meant to be a self-parody. James: I envy your chance to the see the film on a big screen, and I will bet the paintings looks rich and alive. I totally agree with you that DVD/TV could not possibly match that experience, which is true more often than not. Oh, I love Lust for Life and was thinking as I was reading, how much I’d love to see it on a big screen! If James saw a print last year in Brooklyn, maybe there’s hope for getting one in Chicago? Now must learn more about Mr. Minelli since this film and An American in Paris are both so outstanding. Thanks for the excellent post! I just watched Dr. Jekyll and Mr Hyde on TCM with Spencer Tracey. I do believe this was the greatest portrail of this story ever. Tracey was great as was the whole cast Ingrid Bergman, Lana Turner and all were all great. However I was surprised to see it was only giver three stars. This is a four star movie a masterpiece and derserving of high praise. To say it was just a good movie does a serious injustice to a great movie with great actors. I love TCM and will continue to watch great films on here :) Leave a Reply |
Archives
Featured Sites
Popular terms
3-D
Action Films
Actors
Actors' Endorsements
Actresses
animal stars
Animation
Anime
Anthology Films
Autobiography
Avant-Garde
Aviation
Awards
B-movies
Beer in Film
Behind the Scenes
Best of the Year lists
Biography
Biopics
Blu-Ray
Books on Film
Boxing films
British Cinema
Canadian Cinema
Character Actors
Chicago Film History
Cinematography
Classic Films
College Life on Film
Comedy
Comic Book Movies
Crime
Czech Film
Dance on Film
Digital Cinema
Directors
Disaster Films
Documentary
Drama
DVD
Early Talkies
Editing
Educational Films
European Influence on American Cinema
Experimental
Exploitation
Fairy Tales on Film
Faith or Christian-based Films
Family Films
Fan Edits
Film Composers
Film Criticism
film festivals
Film History in Florida
Film Noir
Film Scholars
Film titles
Filmmaking Techniques
Films of the 1980s
Food in Film
Foreign Film
French Film
Gangster films
Genre
Genre spoofs
Guest Programmers
HD & Blu-Ray
Holiday Movies
Hollywood history
Hollywood lifestyles
Horror
Horror Movies
Icons
independent film
Italian Film
Japanese Film
Korean Film
Leadership
Literary Adaptations
Martial Arts
Melodramas
Method Acting
Mexican Cinema
Moguls
Monster Movies
Movie Books
Movie Costumes
Movie locations
Movie lovers
Movie Magazines
Movie Reviewers
Movie settings
Movie Stars
Movies about movies
Music in Film
Musicals
New Releases
Outdoor Cinema
Paranoid Thrillers
Parenting on film
Pirate movies
Polish film industry
political thrillers
Politics in Film
Pornography
Pre-Code
Producers
Race in American Film
Remakes
Revenge
Road Movies
Romance
Romantic Comedies
Russian Film Industry
Satire
Scandals
Science Fiction
Screenwriters
Semi-documentaries
Serials
Short Films
Silent Film
silent films
Social Problem Film
Spaghetti Westerns
Sports
Sports on Film
Stereotypes
Straight-to-DVD
Studio Politics
Stunts and stuntmen
Suspense thriller
Swashbucklers
TCM Classic Film Festival
Tearjerkers
Television
The British in Hollywood
The Germans in Hollywood
The Hungarians in Hollywood
The Irish in Hollywood
The Russians in Hollywood
Theaters
Thriller
Trains in movies
Underground Cinema
VOD
War film
Westerns
Women in the Film Industry
Women's Weepies |
Susan, thank you for this outstanding post on LUST FOR LIFE. I shre your admiration for Minnelli’s work on this film. One small note: Minnelli didn’t actually direct the final ballet in AN AMERICAN IN PARIS; according to Leslie Caron, Gene Kelly did. Minnelli would have supervised the sets and costumes, however.