Not Invited to the Oscar Ball: Overlooked Foreign Language Film ContendersHave you ever wondered how the Academy comes up with the five nominees for the Best Foreign Language Film each year? I am always a little puzzled by the selections and wonder why some of the most critically acclaimed contenders of the year didn’t make the grade. The category usually ends up looking like a case of random selection by a corporate committee, tempered with some bureaucratic public relations sensitivity toward a country’s political and international identity. Take, for example, the case of Bernardo Bertolucci’s THE CONFORMIST (1970), a film that didn’t get nominated for Best Foreign Language Film. Here was a film that was a major film festival award winner and ended up on many critics’ ten best list in 1970. In Pauline Kael’s review of the film, she wrote, “It’s a triumph of feeling and of style – lyrical, flowing, velvety style, so operatic that you come away with sequences in your head like arias.” And David Thomson called it, “a great film, very beautiful and deeply disturbing.” Yet it was not the only artistic triumph by a major filmmaker that got passed over in the Best Foreign Language Film category that year. Others left out in the cold with Bertolucci included Claude Chabrol (LE BOUCHER), Francois Truffaut (THE WILD CHILD), Satyajit Ray (DAYS AND NIGHTS IN THE FOREST), Costa-Gavras (THE CONFESSION), and Andrzej Wajda (LANDSCAPE AFTER BATTLE) to name just a few. What did end up in the 1970 Best Foreign Language Film category was First Love (Switzerland), Hoa-Binh (France), Paix sur Les Champs (Belgium), Tristana (Spain) and Investigation of a Citizen Above Suspicion (Italy). The latter film, directed by Elio Petri, won the Oscar. I am a huge fan of Petri’s stylish sci-fi sex comedy, The Tenth Victim (1965), his paranoid Mafia drama, We Still Kill the Old Way (1967) and the haunting, erotic paranormal thriller, A Quiet Place in the Country (1968), but I find Investigation of a Citizen heavy handed and overly didactic in its equation of fascism with law enforcement (as represented by a police chief). Luis Bunuel’s Tristana, on the other hand, was certainly deserving of a nomination but the other three titles are now practically forgotten and none of the contenders are currently available as a domestic DVD release. So much for longevity and taking their place as timeless screen classics. Oddly enough, THE CONFORMIST turned up at the 1971 Oscar race – not as a nominee for the Best Foreign Language Film (the winner that year was Vittorio DeSica’s The Garden of the Finzi Continis) – but as a nominee for Best Screenplay (Based on material from another medium). The competition included A Clockwork Orange, The Last Picture Show, The Garden of the Finzi Continis and The French Connection (the winner). My question is are Academy members bilingual? Otherwise, how can they assess whether a foreign language film is deserving of a Best Screenplay honor? Did they read the Italian screenplay of THE CONFORMIST or did they base their vote on the English subtitles for the film? It makes no sense to me and I have noticed that many international films, ignored in so many other Oscar categories, often end up running for writing awards, either as a screenplay based on material from another medium or a screenplay based on material not previously published or produced; among these are UMBERTO D. (1952), GENERAL DELLA ROVERE (1959), BALLAD OF A SOLDIER (1959), HIROSHIMA, MON AMOUR (1959), LAST YEAR AT MARIENBAD (1961) – this one alone is some kind of joke, right? – and LA GUERRE EST FINIE (1966). For those of you who share my confusion and amusement over the Best Foreign Language Film category, here is what I have learned about the Academy’s selection process. First, every country is allowed to nominate one entry to represent them. Then, the Academy members narrow the finalists down to five entries. All entries must reflect the same year of release in their own country. Here’s where it gets tricky. A movie like Investigation of a Citizen Above Suspicion can run in the Best Foreign Language Film category the same year it is released in internationally. Once the film officially opens in the U.S., however, it can be nominated again in other appropriate categories that year, which explains why Investigation of a Citizen Above Suspicion turned up in the Academy Award race for Best Writing (Story and Screenplay Based on Factual Material or Material Not Previously Published or Produced) the year AFTER it won the Best Foreign Language Film Oscar. This means that a film like Jean-Pierre Melville’s ARMY OF SHADOWS, which was released in 1969 but wasn’t released in the U.S. until 2006, could have been nominated for numerous Oscars in 2006. (It wasn’t though it did win the New York Film Critics Circle Award for Best Foreign Language Film as well as a special citation from the Los Angeles Film Critics Association). Another famous example is Jean Renoir’s BOUDU SAVED FROM DROWNING, originally released in 1932; it didn’t receive an official U.S. release until 1967 which meant it could have been nominated for Best Picture that year, running against Bonnie and Clyde, Doctor Dolittle, The Graduate, Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner and In the Heat of the Night (the winner). The Academy Awards Foreign Language Film category was first inaugurated in 1956. That year the nominees included The Captain of Kopenick (Germany), Gervaise (France), The Burmese Harp (Japan), Qivitoq (Denmark) and La Strada (Italy), which won the Oscar. It was a exceptionally strong first list of contenders, even if there wasn’t room to include Robert Bresson’s A Man Escaped, Grigoriy Chukhray’s The Forty-First and Satyajit Ray’s Aparajito. But before that, the category existed as a special honorary award which was bestowed upon only one international film each year, beginning in 1947 with Vittorio DeSica’s SHOESHINE (1946). Some of these single honorees have since fallen into obscurity (due to unavailability) or no longer enjoy the critical clout or recognition they once held such as MONSIEUR VINCENT (1947, France), THE WALLS OF MALAPAGA (1949) by French director Rene Clement and GATE OF HELL (1953); the latter film, shot in Eastmancolor, by Japanese director Teinosuke Kinugasa is in dire need of a major restoration (Criterion, please help!). Over the years the Academy has recognized numerous international films in the Foreign Language category which have gone on to become enduring cinema classics because of their timeless appeal and historical importance. And sometimes the Academy has honored a film not submitted by its own country for consideration in the Foreign Language category for other honors such as Federico Fellini’s LA DOLCE VITA (1960), which won an Oscar for Best Black and White Costume Design and garnered nominations for Best Black and White Art Direction, Best Writing (written directly for the screen) and Best Director. The Academy has even paid tribute to some of the greatest directors in the history of world cinema with honorary awards received late in their career such as Akira Kurosawa (awarded in 1990), Satyajit Ray (awarded in 1992), and Jean-Luc Godard (honored in 2010). At the same time, I am often stunned by how many great directors and films have been ignored or overlooked by this organization and how many of the international films nominated have passed into obscurity; many of the latter have often been films selected by their own country for reasons that had less to do with artistry than a decision that included political, cultural and social reasons. See if any of the following Best Foreign Language Film nominees ring a bell? Paw (1959, Denmark), Macario (1960, Mexico), Placido (1961, Spain), Dear John (1964, Sweden), The Red Lanterns (1965, Greece), Three (1965, Yugoslavia), Portrait of Chieko (1967, Japan), The Boys of Paul Street (1969, Hungary), The Policeman (1971, Israel), The Pedestrian (1973, Federal Republic of West Germany), The Truce (1974, Argentina)….the list goes on and on. No one expects the Academy to recognize any film as controversial and polarizing as Pier Paolo Pasolini’s spectacle of cruelty, SALO, OR THE 120 DAYS OF SODOM (1975), or Nagisa Oshima’s sexually explicit IN THE REALM OF THE SENSES (1976) or Gaspar Noe’s brutalizing IRREVERSIBLE (2002). But the members can occasionally surprise us, like they did for the 46th Academy Awards, by nominating LAST TANGO IN PARIS (1972) for Best Actor (Marlon Brando) and Best Director (Bernardo Bertolucci). And as recently as last year’s Oscar race, I was flabbergasted when DOGTOOTH (2009) turned up as the entry from Greece; directed by Giorgos Lanthimos, this bizarre, unclassifiable film about a family completely isolated from the outside world by the father/husband is the closest thing to an avant-garde film the Academy has ever recognized. But for all the small victories that have occurred along the way – Ingmar Bergman receiving Best Director nominations for Cries and Whispers (1972), Face to Face (1976) and Fanny and Alexander (1982) or Krzysztof Kieslowski’s THREE COLORS: RED (1994) scoring Academy Award nods for Best Cinematography, Best Writing and Best Director – the major omissions are hard to fathom. Some of the directors who have NEVER been recognized by the Academy with an honorary award for their work or for directing a specific film include Roberto Rossellini, Luis Bunuel (yes, he’s received two Oscar nominations for writing but not directing), Yasujiro Ozo, Robert Bresson, Henri-Georges Clouzot, Carl Theodor Dreyer, Ousmane Sembene, Rainer Werner Fassbinder, Andrey Tarkovskiy, Kenji Mizoguchi, Abbas Kiarostami, Werner Herzog, Jean-Pierre Melville, Claude Chabrol, Miklos Jancso, Aleksandr Sokurov, Pier Paolo Pasolini, Jacques Tati, Michael Haneke, Shohei Imamura, Luchino Visconti, Aki Kaurismaki and on and on. It still amuses me that Roberto Benigni got a Best Director nomination for LIFE IS BEAUTIFUL (1997), a self-conscious blend of slapstick, sentimentality and anti-Nazi fantasy that somehow captured the hearts and minds of the Academy voters; It also pulled in six other nominations including Best Picture, Best Actor (Benigni won for his performance), and Best Foreign Language Film (it won over Brazil’s Central Station and Iran’s Children of Heaven!)? I can’t imagine that the Benigni film will hold up over time or be a movie anyone would return to again and again. Nor can I imagine anyone returning to Lina Wertmuller’s SEVEN BEAUTIES (1975), another “concentration camp comedy,” that earned Oscar nominations for Best Actor (Giancarlo Giannini), Best Director, Best Writing and Best Foreign Language Film. Other frivolous, lightweight entries in this category include YESTERDAY, TODAY AND TOMORROW, a mildly entertaining trifle from Vittorio DeSica that can’t compare to his key films in the neorealism movement, yet won the Best Foreign Language Film Oscar for 1964 (my choice would have been WOMAN IN THE DUNES), Claude LeLoach’s A MAN AND A WOMAN (it beat out THE BATTLE OF ALGIERS for the 1966 award) and Gabriele Salvatores’ unmemorable eye-candy, MEDITERRANEO, which won over Yimou Zhang’s vastly superior RAISE THE RED LANTERN in 1991. Not to rub more salt in the wound but consider all of the films which are now considered important benchmarks in world cinema that NEVER got invited to the Oscar ball: The Seventh Seal (1957), The Cranes Are Flying (1957), Kanal (1957), Ashes and Diamonds (1958), The Music Room (1958), Fires on the Plain (1959), Nazarin (1959), Rocco and His Brothers (1960), Breathless (1960), L’Avventura (1960), Late Autumn (1960), Breathless (1960)…. ….Yojimbo (1961), Cleo from 5 to 9 (1961), Viridiana (1961), Ivan’s Childhood (1962), Jules and Jim (1962), Harakiri (1963), Contempt (1963), Gertrud (1964), Andrei Rublev (1966), Persona (1966), Belle du Jour (1967), Weekend (1967), Playtime (1967), Aguirre, Wrath of God (1972), Ali: Fear Eats the Soul (1974)…. it’s almost starting to look like the entire catalogue of the Criterion Collection, right? One could play this game forever mentioning such famous Oscar shutouts as Wings of Desire (1987) or Like Water for Chocolate (1992) but questions about the process will always linger over the ceremony like an albatross. There is one other thing that has always bugged me – how is it that Ireland and Canada occasional have entries accepted in the Best Foreign Language Film category but not Australia? Sure, Canada usually submits a French language entry but dialects and accents are often as indecipherable in an Australian film as they are in an Irish or Scottish film and I feel like the talented filmmakers Down Under are routinely ignored when it comes to Academy Award consideration. Look at all of the films and directors who were overlooked for Academy Award consideration during the glory days of the Australian New Wave: Walkabout (1971, Nicholas Roeg), Picnic at Hanging Rock (1975, Peter Weir), The Devil’s Playground (1976, Fred Schepisi), The Getting of Wisdom (1978, Bruce Beresford), Newsfront (1978, Phillip Noyce), The Chant of Jimmie Blacksmith (1978, Fred Schepisi), Gallipoli (1981, Peter Weir), and Max Max 2: The Road Warrior (1981, George Miller). At least My Brilliant Career (1979, Gillian Armstrong) received an Oscar nomination for Best Costume Design and Breaker Morant (1980, Bruce Beresford) managed to snag an Academy Award nom for Best Writing. At least New Zealand got some love one year when Jane Campion’s THE PIANO (1993) secured eight nominations, winning three of them. So who will win the Best Foreign Language Film prize at the 84th Academy Award ceremony? The contenders are Bullhead (Belgium), Footnote (Israel), In Darkness (Poland), Monsieur Lazhar (Canada), and A Separation (Iran). IN DARKNESS (yes, another film about Nazis and the Holocaust – what Academy Award festival is complete with at least one of those a year?) and A SEPARATION are familiar titles to me because they have been traveling the film festival circuit for the past year and have been slowly accumulating critical praise. My hunch, based on the word of mouth I’ve heard, is that A SEPARATION has the edge but you never know. The real question is which of these five films – if any – will stand the test of time or soon fade into obscurity like so many other contenders before them? And will we even get an opportunity to see them? Then again, were these selections more worthy than the entries that didn’t make it to the finish line this year like Le Havre (Finland, directed by Aki Kaurismaki), The Kid With the Bike (Belgium, directed by Jean-Pierre & Luc Dardenne) , The Turin Horse (Hungary, directed by Bela Tarr), Once Upon a Time in Anatolia (Turkey, directed by Nuri Bilge Ceylan), The Flowers of War (China, directed by Zhang Yimou), The Way Home (India, directed by Biju Kumar & Damodaran Biju Kumar) and many others. Only time will tell.
Below are links to the Academy’s rules for selecting candidates for Best Foreign Language Film and a link to ALL of the individual countries’ entries for the 84th Oscar competition. http://www.oscars.org/awards/academyawards/rules/rule14.html 12 Responses Not Invited to the Oscar Ball: Overlooked Foreign Language Film Contenders
No, Juana, it was not. The 1960 nominees were The Virgin Spring (the winner), Kapo, La Verite, Macario, and The Ninth Circle. Well certainly the Academy leaves out a lot of great films from the foreign language film category I do think their track record with this award is slightly better than the actual Best Picture award (although not necessarily recently). And speaking of which since this is the official TCM blog, I am always disappointed how few Best Foreign pictures winners and nominees, TCM airs every year during 31 Days of Oscars. I really think that should change and this would be a great time to introduce some of these movies to new viewers (especially some of the films that have fallen a bit into obscurity, if it’s possible to get airing rights to any of them). Honestly, while I admire your well thought essay, I can’t get too worked up over the injustice of those global directors who received no love from the Academy when the list of domestic directors also neglected would be just as long. One wonders why the Academy bothers to recognize the world cinema at all when they must know they can’t begin to do it properly. It smacks of a token effort. Kim, I agree that it would be great to see more Oscar nominated international films during 31 Days of Oscar but we are in the minority there. Most viewers prefer English language films and many complain when we show movies with subtitles. You should have seen some of the complaints when we featured Ingmar Bergman and Andrei Tarkovsky as directors of the month. CitizenKing, I’ve always felt that the whole idea of the Academy Awards and conducting film industry competitions is self-promotional and the very nature of it guarantees that some of the most deserving will be ignored due to internal politics, ignorance or bad taste. I rarely get worked up over the awards but wanted to point out how absurd it all is was by picking one category that always comes off, as you noted, as a “token effort.” The first peculiarity about this category is that each country selects its nominee. The second is that the Academy voters actually have to see each of the five nominated films at scheduled showings to have their votes counted. This is why some upsets occur. Interestingly, A SEPARATION did not make the audience last-day Best of Fest at the Palm Springs Film Festival last month. I enjoyed the films of Ingmar Bergman. I really liked hearing “The Seventh Seal” in Swedish! Though “Wild Strawberries” was as good in my opinion. I did like the actors. I thought Max Von Sydow was brillant!! I too know people who will not watch films with subtitles; my siblings and I do not make that mistake! My sisters and I are multilingual. We are very happy with foreign cinema. Gracias!!! Juana, so glad you don’t find subtitles an inconvenience. I love hearing the actors’ real voices and can usually tune into the film on a visual narrative level without any major obstacles. Morlock Jeff: I agree completely! I have looked for and found an Italian movie you mentioned, though I admit I found it prior to your nice article. It is “Investigation of a Citizen Above Suspicion”. I was eager to hear Gian Maria Volante’s real voice since he is dubbed in the Westerns I have seen him in. His real voice is quite deep and gravelly. I was quite distracted in trying to watch this movies because I kept thinking that’s “El Indio” or as “Ramon Rojo”. How about you? How do you feel about this movie and Gian Maria Volonte? Do you picture him as the villain in those Spaghetti Westerns? Gian Maria Volonte is one of the great Italian actors of his generation and his intensity and range reminds me of Rod Steiger. I particularly like him as El Indio in FOR A FEW DOLLARS MORE. He makes a great adversary for Clint Eastwood and is not your average one dimensional villain; he’s complicated, unpredictable, with a hair-trigger temper and a twisted sense of humor. His outrageousness is part of his charisma and appeal. Volonte is also memorable in Jean-Pierre Melville’s 1970 gangster thriller Le Cercle Rouge and countless other Italian films including Lulu the Tool, We Still Kill the Old Way and Christ Stopped at Eboli. Morlock Jeff: Volante is also the boyfriend that breaks up with Claudia Cardinale in “The Girl with a Suitcase”. Who would do that? Anyway,he is as much if not more so the adversary of Lee Van Cleef in FOR A FEW DOLLARS MORE. Especially because of what he did to the Colonel. I have read and maybe that is not what it is,but Volante’s character is supposedly a hashish addict or marijuana addict. I read that on the Net and particuliarly on AMC. PS. My OCD is killing me that I make silly typos. Sorry, I mean to write subtitles not “suntitles”. Unless for some reason the Sun needs titles underneath it. HA HA. Thanks for writing me back! Leave a Reply |
Archives
Featured Sites
Popular terms
3-D
Action Films
Actors
Actors' Endorsements
animal stars
Animation
Anime
Anthology Films
Autobiography
Awards
B-movies
Best of the Year lists
Biography
Biopics
Blu-Ray
Books on Film
Boxing films
British Cinema
Canadian Cinema
Character Actors
Chicago Film History
Cinematography
Classic Films
College Life on Film
Comedy
Comic Book Movies
Czech Film
Dance on Film
Digital Cinema
Directors
Disaster Films
Documentary
Drama
DVD
Early Talkies
Editing
Educational Films
European Influence on American Cinema
Experimental
Exploitation
Fairy Tales on Film
Faith or Christian-based Films
Family Films
Film Composers
film festivals
Film History in Florida
Film Noir
Film Scholars
Film titles
Filmmaking Techniques
Food in Film
Foreign Film
French Film
Gangster films
Genre
Genre spoofs
Guest Programmers
HD & Blu-Ray
Holiday Movies
Hollywood lifestyles
Horror
Horror Movies
Icons
independent film
Italian Film
Japanese Film
Korean Film
Leadership
Literary Adaptations
Martial Arts
Melodramas
Method Acting
Mexican Cinema
Moguls
Monster Movies
Movie Books
Movie Costumes
Movie locations
Movie lovers
Movie Reviewers
Movie settings
Movie Stars
Music in Film
Musicals
New Releases
Outdoor Cinema
Paranoid Thrillers
Parenting on film
Polish film industry
political thrillers
Politics in Film
Pornography
Pre-Code
Producers
Race in American Film
Remakes
Road Movies
Romance
Romantic Comedies
Russian Film Industry
Satire
Scandals
Science Fiction
Screenwriters
Semi-documentaries
Serials
Short Films
Silent Film
silent films
Social Problem Film
Sports
Sports on Film
Stereotypes
Straight-to-DVD
Studio Politics
Suspense thriller
Swashbucklers
TCM Classic Film Festival
Television
The British in Hollywood
The Germans in Hollywood
The Hungarians in Hollywood
The Irish in Hollywood
The Russians in Hollywood
Theaters
Trains in movies
Underground Cinema
VOD
War film
Westerns
Women in the Film Industry
Women's Weepies |
How about “Rocco & his Brothers”? Was it nominated or not? I would like to know. I love a lot of foreign films since I’m multi-lingual.