When the Bad Guys are the Good GuysLET ALL WHO VENTURE FORTH BE WARNED: SPOILERS ABOUND! Over Thanksgiving break, I watched Topkapi with my wife and father-in-law and enjoyed it immensely. Neither my wife nor I really remembered it very well from our childhood and I had watched bits and pieces of it here and there since without really taking it in fully. The movie is delightful in every way and Peter Ustinov alone is worth the time spent with this cosmopolitan group of jewel thieves. He won an Oscar for his highly amusing portrayal of the inept street hustler, Arthur Simon Simpson, and it was an honor richly deserved. The film was directed by Jules Dassin who, earlier, had directed the tension-filled noir thriller, Rififi, which also includes a heist at its center but is sinister, dark and heavy whereas Topkapi is as light as a feather. The plot of Topkapi revolves around Elizabeth Lipp (Melina Mercouri) and her desire to steal the dagger of the Sultan Mahmud I from the grounds of Topkapi Palace, now a heavily guarded, and alarmed, museum. She and the men she recruits (Maximilian Schell, Robert Morley and Peter Ustinov among them) must break in and successfully replace the dagger with a fake one to reap their rewards. And here comes the spoiler: They don’t. They fail. In fact, they go to prison and all I could think was, “But I wanted them to win! This sucks!” Only the movies can make me root for criminals. The surprising thing is just how often it happens. Silents Please: Hugo and The ArtistIn one of those serendipitous quirks of scheduling, two homages to the silent film era are opening at the same time. Martin Scorsese’s Hugo, a 3D extravaganza adapted from Brian Selznick’s gorgeously illustrated children’s book The Invention of Hugo Cabret, uses the life and work of Georges Melies as the central mystery for its eponymous hero to uncover. Conceived for 3D, it uses the contemporary (and derided) version of movie magic to look backward at a magician who was famed for his own glorious special effects fakery. Michel Hazanavicius’ The Artist is a labor of love that made to mimic a 1927 silent. It was shot without sound on Hollywood back lots, framed in the old 1.33:1 aspect ratio, and was converted to B&W in post-production. Where Hugo posits Melies’s art as contemporary as the Hollywood blockbuster he is a character inside, The Artist embalms the object of its adoration. Department Store Movies: A $ign of Our Times
I remember when shopping in the big department stores was festive and fun. Each year, I was able to tap into the Christmas Spirit in the big department stores, which were always decked out in colorful holiday decorations, as I took my time pondering over my gift purchases. Undoubtedly, I was seeing the experience through the haze of memories of Hollywood movies, which have mythologized the department store as an important American social institution. Somewhere along the way, holiday shopping ceased to be festive and fun, but I continue to expect that my shopping experiences will be like those in Miracle on 34th Street or A Christmas Story. The ugly stories of Black Friday mayhem and madness inspired me to poke around the history of department stores and their depiction in the movies, not only in Christmas films but in all genres. Toxic Love a la MilaneseMilan, Italy is world famous as a mecca for high fashion, design and the AC Milan football club but the statistics also reveal that it is one of Europe’s most polluted cities, if not the worst, due to smoke spewing factories and auto emissions. Against this gray, industrial backdrop, Luigi Comencini has set his rarely seen but moving 1974 drama, DELITTO D’AMORE (aka Crime of Love), which is now available on DVD from Raro Video, the boutique DVD label from Italy that recently opened a distribution branch in the U.S. READ MORE Muppet LoveI have something I need to say. It’s something I don’t say often enough, and for that I am sorry. You deserve to hear it. The words are few but powerful. I love you. I love you, Muppet Movie. Everyone must go! The uncut return of INTRUDER (1988)!
Politics, Protest & Progress in THE STRAWBERRY STATEMENTStuart Hagmann’s THE STRAWBERRY STATEMENT (1970) is often dismissed today as a dated relic of the early ‘70s. During its initial release it was singled out for being exploitive and failing to be a straightforward adaptation of the book it was based on. Many critics claimed that Stuart Hagmann’s direction was erratic and too creative for its own good, which supposedly diminished the film’s political message. When I recently set aside some time to watch THE STRAWBERRY STATEMENT I prepared myself for the worst. I expected to see a confusing, opportunistic, dated and laughable Hollywood film made to cash in on the political zeitgeist of the late ‘60s and early ‘70s. But I came away from the movie with an entirely different opinion and immediately understood why it had been nominated for a Palme d’Or at Cannes in 1970 and walked away with a Jury Prize. Not only is THE STRAWBERRY STATEMENT a much better film than I had anticipated but it’s particularly poignant considering the current political climate. Student protest, police brutality, free speech and social activism are still hot button issues today. Not a lot has changed in 40 years. We’re still fighting the same battles and wrestling with the same complex issues that have been plaguing the country for decades. Like other controversial films from the same period such as MEDIUM COOL (1969), ZABRISKI POINT (1970) and PUNISHMENT PARK (1971), THE STRAWBERRY STATEMENT asked some important questions that still haven’t been answered. Thanks for the History Lesson but I’m Just Here for the MovieI’ve spent a large portion of my life in love with history. From early on, I read about movies and history, usually in that order. My father had a complete encyclopedia set of American history as well as multiple books on various figures and events in world history. I read through as many of them as I could and found myself, early on, blending my two loves, of movies and history, together. What that meant a lot of the time was that I’d watch a movie based on an actual historical event and then anxiously read up on the event afterwards. I still prefer to do it that way. When a film is made about a significant event I already know a lot about, the film can suffer in my eyes because the history is too familiar with me. But when I see the film first, I can enjoy it for the drama inherent to the production and then read about the history. The interesting thing is, if the movie’s mediocre to bad, I get annoyed by any liberties taken with the history. When it’s good, I couldn’t care less. Going Back to the WellmanWilliam A. Wellman was an attractive guy who happened to make a lot of movies, one of those directors who led an entire life before entering the cinema (as salesman, hockey player, soldier). For Wellman and so many other early Hollywood craftsmen, directing was, as John Ford described it, just another “job of work”. Wellman was one industrious worker, credited with 83 shorts and features from 1920 – 1958. He excelled at compact stories of blue-collar types getting sore at each other (or what Manny Farber called “hard-visaged ball bearings standing around – for no damned reason and with no indication of how long or for what reason they have been standing.”), able to create a humming rhythm out of wisecracks and violence. The studios, however, tasked him with tackling much more, leading him to clumsily apply his blunt style to melodramas and comedies (his ’37 Star is Born is especially sluggish). His career is wildly uneven but well worth looking into, especially the period in the 30s where he was cranking out saucy and speedy pre-coders like Night Nurse and Other Men’s Women (both 1931). The Warner Archive has just released a third film from his stellar ’31: Safe in Hell (along with later Wellman efforts My Man and I (1952) and his final film Lafayette Escadrille (1958)). On Al Pacino, John Cazale, and Dog Day Afternoon
|
Archives
Christopher, Duke, Tom and Jenni - I ... - Greg Ferrara
Featured Sites
Popular terms
3-D
Action Films
Actors
Actors' Endorsements
animal stars
Animation
Anime
Anthology Films
Autobiography
Awards
Best of the Year lists
Biography
Biopics
Blu-Ray
Books on Film
British Cinema
Canadian Cinema
Character Actors
Chicago Film History
Cinematography
Classic Films
College Life on Film
Comedy
Comic Book Movies
Czech Film
Dance on Film
Digital Cinema
Directors
Disaster Films
Documentary
Drama
DVD
Early Talkies
Editing
Educational Films
European Influence on American Cinema
Experimental
Exploitation
Fairy Tales on Film
Faith or Christian-based Films
Family Films
Film Composers
film festivals
Film History in Florida
Film Noir
Film Scholars
Film titles
Filmmaking Techniques
Food in Film
Foreign Film
French Film
Gangster films
Genre
Genre spoofs
Guest Programmers
HD & Blu-Ray
Holiday Movies
Hollywood lifestyles
Horror
Horror Movies
Icons
independent film
Italian Film
Japanese Film
Korean Film
Literary Adaptations
Martial Arts
Melodramas
Method Acting
Mexican Cinema
Moguls
Monster Movies
Movie Books
Movie Costumes
Movie locations
Movie lovers
Movie Reviewers
Movie settings
Movie Stars
Music in Film
Musicals
Outdoor Cinema
Paranoid Thrillers
Parenting on film
Polish film industry
political thrillers
Politics in Film
Pornography
Pre-Code
Producers
Race in American Film
Remakes
Road Movies
Romance
Romantic Comedies
Russian Film Industry
Satire
Scandals
Science Fiction
Screenwriters
Semi-documentaries
Serials
Short Films
Silent Film
silent films
Social Problem Film
Sports
Sports on Film
Stereotypes
Straight-to-DVD
Studio Politics
Suspense thriller
Swashbucklers
TCM Classic Film Festival
Television
The British in Hollywood
The Germans in Hollywood
The Hungarians in Hollywood
The Irish in Hollywood
The Russians in Hollywood
Theaters
Trains in movies
Underground Cinema
VOD
War film
Westerns
Women in the Film Industry
Women's Weepies |