Exploring the past with Cinema Retro
Cinema Retro is published in the UK and bills itself as “The Essential Guide to Movies of the ’60s & ‘70s.” It often spotlights British films but the diversity of their coverage is admirable. As someone who’s rather obsessed with British cinema from the period, the magazine has become essential reading for me. I discovered Cinema Retro about 5 years ago and wrote a brief blurb at my Cinebeats blog expressing how much I enjoyed the publication. Soon afterward I heard from editor, Lee Pfeiffer who graciously thanked me and sent me a complimentary issue. Over the last few years I’ve stayed in touch with Lee and became acquainted with some of the magazine’s talented contributors such as Steve Saragossi, Tom Lisanti and Darren Allison. And I’ve been impressed with the friendly nature of the Cinema Retro staff and their unbridled enthusiasm for the movies they write about. They make no apologies for their admiration of Clint Eastwood westerns, James Bond films, star studded WWII adventures and curvy screen sirens. But they also devote themselves to carefully researched stories about the history of film production in and outside of the UK. Each issue features timely CD and book reviews and the writers tend to focus on three or four films with extensive research going into each piece. They often cover marginalized or neglected movies, which I appreciate like GIRL ON A MOTORCYCLE (1968), HENNESSY (1975), I’LL NEVER FORGET WHAT’S ‘ISNAME (1967) and CANDY (1968) with lengthy articles chock-full of glossy photos. The magazine interviews with cast and crew members usually provide me with information that I can’t find anywhere else and the writer’s devotion to each topic is apparent in every issue. When their enthusiasm for a particular film bubbles over as it recently did for the WWII action adventure comedy, KELLY’S HEROES (1970), Cinema Retro publishes a “Special Issue” that covers every aspect of the film’s production.
The latest issue of Cinema Retro (Vol. 7: Issue #21) features an in-depth look at A CLOCKWORK ORANGE (1970) from author Raymond Benson, which includes interviews with the film’s star, Malcolm McDowell and Stanley Kubrick’s producer & brother-in-law, Jan Harlan. McDowell is always engaging in his interviews and Harlan offers up some surprising insights and speculations on the possibility of unreleased Kubrick material finally seeing the light of day. John Exshaw provides the magazine with a lengthy look at another one of my favorite films, Ken Russell’s highly controversial THE DEVILS (1971), which begins from the perspective of British film censors and Stephanie Callas casts a distinctively female eye on Bernardo Bertolucci’s X-rated erotic classic LAST TANGO IN PARIS (1972). The issue also contains an fascinating roundtable style interview with directors Ken Russell, Mike Hodges and Michael Winner conducted by Matthew Fields during the “After the Wave” retrospective at the 2011 Edinburgh International Film Festival, which happens to be the best piece I’ve read on the event all year. The beautiful British actress Vera Day is also interviewed and discusses her work in films such as THE PRINCE AND THE SHOWGIRL (1957), QUATERMASS II: ENEMY FROM SPACE (1957), UP THE CREEK (1958) and THE HAUNTED STRANGLER (1958). Day seems to enjoy remembering her career highlights, which include being discovered by Hammer film director Val Guest and acting opposite the legendary horror icon Boris Karloff. Author Tom Lisanti offers up a comparative piece on two Jean Harlow biopics made in 1965 and the magazine continues to explore the history of British film production in Gareth Owen’s “Pinewood Past” column. There is a lot more to discover in the new issue of Cinema Retro but you’ll have to pick up a copy of the magazine for yourself if you want to read further. Besides the magazine, Cinema Retro recently published a book titled CINEMA SEX SIRENS by Dave Worrell and magazine editor Lee Pfeiffer. The book promises to provide readers with a “unique collection of photographs of female stars of the ’60s and ’70s” as well as “little-known insights into their lives and careers.” You can expect chapters like “The Russ Meyer Ladies” and “The Women of Blaxploitation” as well as individual profiles on a bevy of beautiful actresses from the period such as Brigitte Bardot, Raquel Welch, Sophia Loren, Ursula Andress, Mamie Van Doren, Jane Fonda, Ann-Margret, Claudia Cardinale, Anita Ekberg, Sylvia Kristel, Elke Sommer and Angie Dickinson. Dickinson fans take note! Tomorrow TCM will be showcasing Angie’s work in a select batch of films including one of my favorites, John Boorman’s POINT BLANK (1967). Cinema Retro is a fun read for fans of ’60s & ’70s era films and can currently be found in better bookstores. You can also purchase issues or subscribe to the magazine online if you visit www.cinemaretro.com 6 Responses Exploring the past with Cinema Retro
Not that I’m aware of, John. Producer Jan Harlan discusses footage that Kubrick cut from 2001 for example, which he obviously kept. If you’re a Kubrick fan I highly recommend picking up a copy of the magazine to learn more. As for Angie’s age, she didn’t start acting until she was in her early ’20s so she has to be older than 18 in that picture. Am still reading the KELLY’S HEROES issue-have not seen the latest one yet but will keep an eye out for it. The also did a great issue on the Leone “Man With No Name” trilogy sometime back-will have to see about subscribing to this. It would be incredible if the footage Kubrick cut from 2001 after the premiere would be made available. Of course, I would have to buy the Blu-Ray all over again….aaaagghhhh! Hey, can’t find any contact info on your site – which I’ve just been enjoying. Can you locate mine on http://www.subtitledonline.com and drop me a message please? The titles in this issue are all familiar from my childhood and remind me of the diversity of mainstream films of the past vs. now. I am nostalgic for an era that will never be surpassed, especially considering the way things are going today. Leave a Reply |
Archives
Featured Sites
Popular terms
3-D
Action Films
Actors
Actors' Endorsements
animal stars
Animation
Anime
Anthology Films
Autobiography
Awards
B-movies
Best of the Year lists
Biography
Biopics
Blu-Ray
Books on Film
British Cinema
Canadian Cinema
Character Actors
Chicago Film History
Cinematography
Classic Films
College Life on Film
Comedy
Comic Book Movies
Czech Film
Dance on Film
Digital Cinema
Directors
Disaster Films
Documentary
Drama
DVD
Early Talkies
Editing
Educational Films
European Influence on American Cinema
Experimental
Exploitation
Fairy Tales on Film
Faith or Christian-based Films
Family Films
Film Composers
film festivals
Film History in Florida
Film Noir
Film Scholars
Film titles
Filmmaking Techniques
Food in Film
Foreign Film
French Film
Gangster films
Genre
Genre spoofs
Guest Programmers
HD & Blu-Ray
Holiday Movies
Hollywood lifestyles
Horror
Horror Movies
Icons
independent film
Italian Film
Japanese Film
Korean Film
Literary Adaptations
Martial Arts
Melodramas
Method Acting
Mexican Cinema
Moguls
Monster Movies
Movie Books
Movie Costumes
Movie locations
Movie lovers
Movie Reviewers
Movie settings
Movie Stars
Music in Film
Musicals
Outdoor Cinema
Paranoid Thrillers
Parenting on film
Polish film industry
political thrillers
Politics in Film
Pornography
Pre-Code
Producers
Race in American Film
Remakes
Road Movies
Romance
Romantic Comedies
Russian Film Industry
Satire
Scandals
Science Fiction
Screenwriters
Semi-documentaries
Serials
Short Films
Silent Film
silent films
Social Problem Film
Sports
Sports on Film
Stereotypes
Straight-to-DVD
Studio Politics
Suspense thriller
Swashbucklers
TCM Classic Film Festival
Television
The British in Hollywood
The Germans in Hollywood
The Hungarians in Hollywood
The Irish in Hollywood
The Russians in Hollywood
Theaters
Trains in movies
Underground Cinema
VOD
War film
Westerns
Women in the Film Industry
Women's Weepies |
“..possibility of unreleased Kubrick material…” Wasn’t Kubrick notorious for destroying everything after he had his final negative cut? Unused footage, props, sets, the works? Where would this new material come from? Of course, I understand he didn’t have full control on his earlier work.
How old was Angie Dickenson when that photo was taken? 18, maybe?