Playing the Zone: Inside MovesFirst things first: My dad excelled at basketball. He played in high school and briefly in city college (he had to leave after one year to go to work after his father died) and, eventually, it kept him from combat in Korea. My dad never tires of telling that story. When he was drafted into the army and sent to Korea, the Commanding Officer of the base called him into his office. He had heard of my dad’s basketball skills and told him that he wouldn’t be fighting because they needed him on the Army basketball team in Asia. He spent his two years in the army playing basketball all over Asia and never once had to fire a gun in combat or feel the fear of being behind enemy lines. I assure you, this is something not lost on him. His brother, Joe, joined the Marines after Pearl Harbor and fought through the entire war, engaging in every important Pacific battle there was only to be shot and killed in what would have been his last battle before it was all over, Iwo Jima. My dad knew all too well how lucky he was. And my dad’s friends never tired of telling us stories about him either. One friend, a man who later taught history at my high school and who was on the team with my dad when they were in high school, told me that when the team was behind by a point going into the last few seconds the coach always had the same plan: ”Get the ball to Ferrara.” Later, when I asked my dad why he never pursued professional basketball, he told me it just wasn’t an option anyone thought about in 1953. He was good but not terribly tall (6’3″) and it probably wouldn’t have led to making more money than he did as an electrician at the ship yard anyway. But still, even today, when he proudly pulls out the pictures of his glory days, I can tell, he wishes it would’ve happened, somehow.
Sports movies – basketball, football or otherwise – don’t do a lot for me. Something about the templates available that just doesn’t work for me. The templates come in two basic sizes. Either an athlete or team is going for the big personal victory (Rocky, Breaking Away) or the sport is but a backdrop to view the damaged goods within (Raging Bull, North Dallas Forty). Scenario number two offers the most compelling stories and they are the sports movies I prefer, the ones where the sport is barely involved because it’s really about the characters and their lives. Biopics usually fall somewhere in between and offer deeper looks into the characters as well from Pride of the Yankees and Fear Strikes Out to Raging Bull and The Fighter. Basketball has only a handful of decent films and for most people, Hoosiers is the stand out (speaking here solely of narrative films, thus excluding for the purposes of this post the extraordinary Hoop Dreams). I like Hoosiers, certainly, but for me, the basketball film that hits home the most, the one that brings me closer to my feelings about my dad and his journey through life, is Inside Moves. Inside Moves is a movie I saw plenty of times back in the early eighties. It ran on cable a lot and whenever I flipped through the channels and came across it, I’d watch it. It was the first time I’d ever seen David Morse in a movie and I immediately liked him. It was the first time I had seen Diana Scarwid as well and she too seemed immediately likeable. John Savage, on the other hand, I was more than familiar with. I had already seen The Deer Hunter, Hair and The Onion Field by the time I saw Inside Moves and was once again impressed with how deep inside the character Savage went. To this day, I think it’s shameful that he didn’t get Oscar nominations for The Deer Hunter and Inside Moves. Watching it again recently, I was able to see the flaws I either didn’t see the first several times around or willfully ignored. Former husband and wife writing team Valerie Curtin and Barry Levinson do a good job of painting the broad strokes of the story with their adapted screenplay from Oscar winner Brian Helgeland’s novel but the details get a little sketchy. Or should I say, the details get underlined a bit too much. Let’s start at the beginning. Inside Moves is the story of Roary (John Savage), a man who attempts suicide by jumping off a ten story building and fails, which leaves him handicapped but mobile (in the film, all the disabled characters refer to themselves and each other as “cripples”). After a several-months-long stay at the hospital he finds himself on his own and hanging out at Max’s, a local low-rent bar inhabited by several other “cripples,” including a blind man (“Stinky” played by Bert Remson), a paralyzed man (“Blue Lewis” played by Bill Henderson) and a man with no hands (“Wings” played by Harold Russell, real life amputee from World War II and Oscar winner for The Best Years of Our Lives). And there’s the bartender, Jerry (David Morse), young and tall and talented, passionate about basketball but with a bum leg that he doesn’t have the money to fix (it’s never explained what is wrong with his leg but on the enjoyable DVD commentary between director Richard Donner and novelist Helgeland, it is said, half-jokingly by Helgeland, that it was a motorcycle accident). Roary and Jerry become good friends and Roary wants to help Jerry get that operation but Jerry has a reckless side of him that has to be dealt with first. He loves a girl, Ann, strung out on drugs and prostituting herself for cash, and consistently falls back into the same self-destructive loops whenever she’s around. When she’s finally gone and Jerry does get that operation via a loan from an unlikely source, he abandons his friends and focuses on his newly found semi-pro career in basketball. If Jerry isn’t hobbling himself with self-destructive relationships, he’s hobbling himself by abandoning the good ones. And that’s where the aforementioned underlining comes in. Near the climax, when Jerry finally shows his face again, he says all of that, literally (“I’m the only real cripple here” etc) even though it’s been beautifully expressed by the actors and plot up to that point. Jerry’s act of contrition makes Simon Oakland’s explanation at the end of Psycho look positively ambiguous. Fortunately, the temptation was resisted to insert a title card before Jerry’s scene that read, “And Now, Here’s What the Characters Symbolize,” although, implicitly, the title card is there anyway. But that underlining aside, this movie has a lot to recommend it, not the least of which is John Savage’s amazing central performance. As Roary, John Savage takes the character through a growth process both emotionally and physically that the audience can see in the character. After his failed suicide attempt, his body is left deformed and brutalized and Savage does an extraordinary job of, as Richard Donner notes in the commentary, “using his hands almost as a second character.” They wave around and make fists and seem to provide, again from Donner, a “balance for him, both physically and emotionally.” Also providing balance to the film is the terrific sense of friendship and comradery among Remson, Henderson and Russell, a kind of poor man’s Greek chorus, commenting on the action and gently nudging our protagonists in the right direction. But mainly, for me, it’s that sense of having a dream that seems impossible come true. Although the story of Jerry’s operation, recovery and swift ascendance through the semi-pros to the pros is unlikely, it feels right. When I watch it, I can’t help but think of my dad and what he could have done had he been given the chance. One last story: When we were kids, my brother and our friends played basketball a lot in our driveway. Our dad had, of course, installed a basketball pole, regulation height and size (this was before the days of going to Target and buying a handy, portable, water-ballasted pole that you could easily set up. Back then, you had to bore a hole, fill it with cement, erect the pole, attach the backboard, etc. You get the idea: It took dedication). Every now and then, when dad would walk by to the car, we’d ask him to take a shot, usually one we felt was impossible. Usually he’d decline, never wanting to draw attention to himself. But sometimes he’d oblige us. He’d grab a hold of the ball, dribble a couple of times (remember, no warm up, no regular playing) and put it up. I can’t remember a time when it didn’t go in. And more often than not, it was nothing but net. 14 Responses Playing the Zone: Inside Moves
Fred – It’s certainly possible my dad could have made it onto a pro team but in his situation he just needed to find work and fast. He got it at the Navy shipyard in Charleston and that was that. So often that’s how life goes. John Savage is an interesting actor. He never seemed to really catch fire and I don’t know why. He has so far not been nominated for any Oscar. Not for The Deer Hunter, not for The Onion Field and not for Inside Moves and I think a nomination for each one of those could have been easily justified and would have helped him go further as a lead. I’m not a huge sports fan, but there are at least three documentaries about them I could watch over and over: Reifenstahl’s Olympia, Ichikawa’s Tokyo Olympiad, and the aforementioned Hoop Dreams. Hoop Dreams is pretty straightforward, more about good storytelling than it is about remarkable photography or editing, but the other two make you admire the human body itself. Reifenstahl, of course, goes for a sort of Olympian power-of-the-Gods thing- she evokes classicism the whole time (particularly in the opening with the nudes) and one of her strategies seems to be painting the athletes as superhuman heroes- which is easy enough to attribute to a fascist aesthetic, but it’s a strategy Olympics coverage still uses. Plus, there’s the sweet, sweet sight of Jesse Owens winning a race right in Hitler’s face, and the film seems to recognize it as a delightful moment. Ichikawa is even better- he captures the sense of drive and focus the athletes attain and, doesn’t give a damn about who won and who lost, or about any kind of narrativisation. He’s fascinated by movement, utter focus, and how that translates to one’s body, and one of the key events for him is the marathon- it’s not about superhuman output, but grim determination. Tom, you definitely don’t need to be a sports fan to enjoy sports films, at least the best of them. The worst usually play off the sport itself and to fans of the sport but the best are really just insightful dramas or comedies or documentaries with sport as the background. And I’ve never seen Ichikawa’s Tokyo Olympiad but now I’d like to give it a look. “He never seemed to really catch fire and I don’t know why.” He was excellent, that’s for sure. The way he moves in the movie really shows how much a good actor can use his body in a performance. I swear, watching this movie, those swinging, swaying movements of his seem so natural I can’t believe there’s even any acting going on. To be fair to Pacino, his Scent of a Woman performance may have been all gestures and yelling, but a lot of his nominations were for restrained ones (like the Godfather) or nuanced ones, where he was performing in-character (like Dog Day Afternoon.) Plus, sometimes huge theatrical performances are just a whole lot of fun- I mean, look at any Tom Waits performance, ever. I think Pacino’s performance in The Godfather is one of the greatest of the seventies. It’s a thing of beauty. Inside Moves and The Onion Field were films I eagerly rewatched over and over on cable in the late 70s-early 80s…Great acting then,as now is usually whisked from the cinemas quickly and buried into the network chain,which probably works better for the viewer to discover later as they wake up from their nap on the sofa and are too tired to reach over to switch the channel. My favorite Basketball movie?…hmmmm.The Absent Minded Professor? The Onion Field was the first film I ever saw with James Woods and he scared the hell out of me. I saw it before Inside Moves or Deerhunter and Savage just blew me away. Good call on The Absent Minded Professor. Wouldn’t even come to mind for most people when thinking about basketball. Kind of like M.A.S.H. with football. Good choice. Woods is one of those actors where I’m never sure of why he’s not looked upon as one of the greats- I’ve literally never seen a bad performance from him, and there are any number of movies (like Videodrome) that would fall apart without an actor of his particular skills at the center. I wonder if it’s because he’s unremarkable looking. I don’t know, maybe. He definitely exudes presence on the screen which is usually what it takes to be a star. He was excellent in Once Upon a Time in America, showing he had the presence to hold the audiences attention through a four hour epic. my favorite scene in the movie is when Roary tells the 3 old guys of his attempted suicide and one of them-teary eyed-tells him he’s a schmuck ’cause everyone knows that you get the handcap then try to commit suicide. Chris, in that scene it’s great that the three old guys don’t give Roary the easy sympathy he’s looking for. They first look at him, bewildered, as if to say, “Suicide? How stupid.” Then, as you say, make a joke out of it which gets him laughing. It’s a great way to connect the characters and it’s one of the many well thought-out moments in the film. Leave a Reply |
Archives
Featured Sites
Popular terms
3-D
Action Films
Actors
Actors' Endorsements
animal stars
Animation
Anime
Anthology Films
Autobiography
Awards
B-movies
Best of the Year lists
Biography
Biopics
Blu-Ray
Books on Film
British Cinema
Canadian Cinema
Character Actors
Chicago Film History
Cinematography
Classic Films
College Life on Film
Comedy
Comic Book Movies
Czech Film
Dance on Film
Digital Cinema
Directors
Disaster Films
Documentary
Drama
DVD
Early Talkies
Editing
Educational Films
European Influence on American Cinema
Experimental
Exploitation
Fairy Tales on Film
Faith or Christian-based Films
Family Films
Film Composers
film festivals
Film History in Florida
Film Noir
Film Scholars
Film titles
Filmmaking Techniques
Food in Film
Foreign Film
French Film
Gangster films
Genre
Genre spoofs
Guest Programmers
HD & Blu-Ray
Holiday Movies
Hollywood lifestyles
Horror
Horror Movies
Icons
independent film
Italian Film
Japanese Film
Korean Film
Literary Adaptations
Martial Arts
Melodramas
Method Acting
Mexican Cinema
Moguls
Monster Movies
Movie Books
Movie Costumes
Movie locations
Movie lovers
Movie Reviewers
Movie settings
Movie Stars
Music in Film
Musicals
Outdoor Cinema
Paranoid Thrillers
Parenting on film
Polish film industry
political thrillers
Politics in Film
Pornography
Pre-Code
Producers
Race in American Film
Remakes
Road Movies
Romance
Romantic Comedies
Russian Film Industry
Satire
Scandals
Science Fiction
Screenwriters
Semi-documentaries
Serials
Short Films
Silent Film
silent films
Social Problem Film
Sports
Sports on Film
Stereotypes
Straight-to-DVD
Studio Politics
Suspense thriller
Swashbucklers
TCM Classic Film Festival
Television
The British in Hollywood
The Germans in Hollywood
The Hungarians in Hollywood
The Irish in Hollywood
The Russians in Hollywood
Theaters
Trains in movies
Underground Cinema
VOD
War film
Westerns
Women in the Film Industry
Women's Weepies |
Excellent review of a film that was a sleeper when it came out, and likely forgotten today. I used to also watch Inside Moves whenever it was on cable, especially to catch John Savage, an actor I always liked and felt wasn’t given enough good roles in films (he was criminally underused by Spike Lee in Do the Right Thing, his role reduced to a cameo). Savage would just climb into a role, inhabit it and make you forget you were watching an actor play a role.
Interesting story about your dad. It’s a shame he didn’t go for the pros, because he might have had a good shot. This was before the game became more vertical in the early 60s with Bill Russell and Wilt Chamberlain, so a 6’3″ player was tall by the standards of the day (whereas now, when he would be considered a small guard). By the way, we also had the regulation hoop in our yard, which my Dad had to cement into a foot deep hole (luckily he’s an architect and quite handy). Back then, it was either that or screwing into the roof over the garage.