Thoughts on Marilyn Monroe

Next year marks the 50th anniversary of Marilyn Monroe’s death, but the pop culture machine is already ramping up to review her life and recast her career. Recently, the famous white dress from The Seven Year Itch—a signifier of her star image as Hollywood’s premiere sex symbol—sold for $5.6 million. Next month, a retrospective of her films is playing at BAM, the performing arts center in New York City. Two narrative films featuring Monroe as a character are scheduled for release: My Week with Marilyn (2011), starring Michelle Williams as MM, focuses on the tumultuous production of The Prince and the Showgirl in which an unsympathetic Laurence Olivier attempted to direct a neurotic Monroe; Blonde (in development for 2012), with Naomi Watts as MM, is another adaptation of Joyce Carol Oates’s imaginary Monroe memoir.

While I welcome renewed attention to her film career, especially a reevaluation of her movies and her importance to film history, I am bracing myself for the inevitable onslaught of merchandising and exploitation. Earlier this year, the rights to her image were sold for $50 million to Jamie Salter of Authentic Brands Group, which partnered with the media company NECA to acquire the Marilyn Monroe estate. Salter envisioned producing new films starring the real MM through the magic of CGI. He babbled to the New York Post: “These celebrities don’t talk back. They don’t go out on the town late. They are ready to film every day.” (I am guessing that “these celebrities” refers to dead movie stars.) Salter continued, “We’re not really interested in the trinkets and trash. Don’t get me wrong, it’s a good business—calendars, posters, and shot glasses—but that’s not what we want to do with Marilyn Monroe.” Yikes.

MY BOOK ON MM

Before this landmark anniversary gets too close, and before the stores are swimming in Marilyn merchandizing, I thought I would offer some facts and observations on Marilyn Monroe’s life and career that I find intriguing and thought-provoking. The market is so flooded with MM bios, trivia books, and photo collections that the information can be overwhelming, contradictory, and more focused on the phenomenon than the person. But, a long time ago, I wrote a career biography of Monroe, which concentrated on her impact on the film industry and analyzed the significance of her film roles. In the process, I discovered much about her life and career that had often been recounted but rarely placed in context.

To prevent this post from becoming a small tome, I will divide my commentary into three parts to be posted over three weeks, covering her life, her movies, and the post-death phenomenon. Today, I will offer some facts and information on her life and career. Fans will likely know much of this information, but I hope to present it in a new light to provoke fresh thought on an established icon.

1. Born and raised in a company town. MM was born Norma Jeane Mortenson on June 1, 1926, in Los Angeles, and her life danced around the fringes of the film industry long before she courted a studio contract. Her mother, Gladys Baker, who named her third child after silent film star Norma Talmadge, worked as a film cutter at Consolidated Film Industries, a processing lab for the Hollywood studios, at the time of MM’s birth. Later, she worked briefly as a cutter for Columbia Pictures. During this time, Gladys rented part of her home to an English couple who worked in the industry. The wife was a registered extra, while the husband was a stand-in for George Arliss.

After 16-year-old Norma Jeane married James Dougherty, he went to work for Lockheed Aviation, alongside a young Robert Mitchum. A dozen years later, Mitchum costarred with MM in River of No Return. The following year, Dougherty joined the Merchant Marines, and his young wife went to work at the Radio Plane Company in Burbank, which was owned by actor Reginald Denny. Denny had parlayed his fascination with model aviation into an important wartime business by developing a prototype for a radio-controlled target drone to help train anti-aircraft gunners. The plant produced these drones for the army. In 1945, Denny gave permission for photographer David Conover to do a photo shoot inside the plant for Yank magazine. Conover spotted Norma Jeane Dougherty, and she readily agreed to model for his shoot. The photographer worked for the 1st Motion Picture Camera Unit, which operated through Hal Roach Studios. His commanding officer was actor-turned-serviceman Ronald Reagan, though whether he saw the photos of Monroe is unknown. The photos in Yank started MM’s journey toward a movie career.

YOUNG NORMA JEANE OF THE RADIO PLANE CO. POSES FOR YANK MAGAZINE.

MM’s life from the beginning touched the fringes of the film industry, painting L.A. as a company town, where millions grow up in the shadow of the business. Given this proximity, perhaps it seemed natural to MM to pursue and attain stardom; on the other hand, this “six degrees of separation” between Norma Jeane and the Hollywood industry also implies that stardom in L.A. can be as far away as it is close, as elusive as it is attainable.

2. Absent mother, absent father, absent siblings. Though MM lived in an orphanage for a time during her childhood, she was not an orphan. Gladys Baker was very much alive during MM’s childhood but incapable of caring for her. Mentally ill, she lived most of her life in institutions, while MM lived with friends of her mother’s, in foster homes (where she was sexually abused), or in an orphanage before marrying at age 16. MM’s father was either Edward Mortenson, Gladys’s second husband, or C. Stanley Gifford, a coworker at Consolidated Film Industries, depending on which biographer you believe. Mortenson died in a traffic accident in 1929, while Gifford wanted no part of Gladys or her child. MM had two half-siblings, a sister named Berniece and a brother named either Robert Kermit or Hermitt Jack (depending on the biographer). Gladys’s first husband, Jack (or, Jap) Baker, took the siblings to Kentucky in the 1920s. The boy died in childhood, and neither Berniece nor Norma Jeane knew they had a sister until after the latter married Dougherty. I interviewed Berniece Baker Miracle while writing my book on MM, and she was a bit defensive about Norma Jeane’s childhood experiences, remarking that she didn’t know what happened to her because she had been kept away from her mother and sister for so many years.

GLADYS BAKER AND HER DAUGHTER NORMA JEANE

So, despite having a father, mother, and siblings, MM grew up alone in foster homes and an orphanage. I can only imagine what that felt like. Throughout her life, MM suffered with issues involving trust, abandonment, identity, and self-worth, resulting in bad behavior on the set, including habitual tardiness. It doesn’t take a psychiatrist to figure out why.

3. Pin-up. Most know that MM modeled as a pin-up for men’s magazines such as Laff, Peek, See, Glamorous Models, Cheesecake, and U.S. Camera. These magazines, which had sprung up as a result of the popularity of the pin-up during WWII, featured women in bathing suits, negligees, towels, etc. While there was no overt nudity, these magazines came as close as possible, making them a direct ancestor to Playboy.

YOUNG NORMA JEANE: PIN-UP MODEL

While a star, MM was famous for her quivering red lips, blonde hair, and come-hither smile. Many studio makeup artists, hairstylists, and studio execs claimed to have invented Monroe’s signature—and, later, signifying—features. In her autobiography, Shelley Winters, who briefly roomed with MM, claimed to have influenced her roommate to adopt the light blonde hair and bright red lips. In my opinion, MM learned about hair and makeup during her tenure at the Blue Book Modeling Agency, where she took classes in modeling from the agency’s owner, Emmeline Snively. Snively taught her to lower her smile to emphasize her mouth and detract from her nose, resulting in a slight quiver to her lips. Long before MM met Winters, she showed a preference for bright red lips and developed her own formula for lipstick—three shades of red covered with a bit of Vaseline or wax.

SYLVIA BARNHART TURNED MM FROM BRUNETTE TO BLONDE.

Hairdresser Sylvia Barnhart of Frank & Joseph’s Beauty Salon turned MM’s hair from a kinky brown to blonde. When I interviewed Barnhart in the early 1990s, she disputed the claim that MM did not want to become a blonde or resisted changing her hair color. The hairdresser changed the young model’s hair gradually over a four or five-month period, and MM wanted the lighter color to accentuate her eyes. Barnhart served as Monroe’s hair stylist and colorist until about 1951.

4. An avid jogger and a college girl. MM began lifting weights when she was married to James Dougherty, who encouraged her to live a healthy life. While a young starlet, she worked out with barbells to strengthen her arms and torso, and she jogged most mornings. Early on, she worked to maintain a healthy body and a healthy mind. She opened charge accounts at various bookstores and took out library cards. She was something of an expert on actress Eleanora Duce, which a Life magazine reporter discovered when he questioned her about Duce’s photograph on her nightstand. While making the film Love Nest in 1951, she attended classes in literature and art appreciation in the adult extension program at UCLA. I like thinking of Monroe in this way, because it counters the studio’s attempts to paint her as a dumb blonde off screen, and it stands in contrast to her later image as an unhealthy, drug-addled victim of Hollywood.

MM EXERCISES WITH HER BARBELLS.

5. Acting student. Most know that during the mid-1950s MM became a student of the Method, which was taught in New York City’s famed Actors Studio by Lee and Paula Strasberg. However, Monroe was serious about acting as art form from the beginning, taking classes from several teachers long before the Strasbergs came into her life. While under contract to 20th Century Fox the first time, she took lessons at the Actors Lab, paying for her own lessons with modeling jobs. The Actors Lab, which was a West-Coast offshoot of the Group Theatre, was operated by Roman Bohnen, J. Edward Bromberg, and Morris Carnovsky. She studied with Carnovsky for almost two years. While briefly under contract to Columbia, she was assigned to take lessons from Natasha Lytess. In many MM biographies, Lytess is painted as a kind of obsessive interloper who was too controlling of Monroe, because the young starlet requested her teacher be on the set at all times. Not surprisingly, most directors dubbed Lytess a lunatic and deemed her presence as an intrusion. However, Lytess had been a member of an acting ensemble headed by legendary theatrical director Max Reinhardt, and her skills as a teacher should not be dismissed. Lytess worked with MM for seven years, at one point quitting her job at Columbia to work with her most famous pupil. In 1951, MM took an acting course with Michael Chekhov, a Russian character actor who had actually studied under Stanislavski. Apparently, Jack Palance suggested Chekhov to Monroe. Like MM, Palance feared he was being typecast as a heavy and had sought out Chekhov to improve his overall acting skills.

NATASHA LYTESS COACHES HER MOST FAMOUS PUPIL.

Seldom discussed is why Monroe took acting classes, even when she could ill afford them. The obvious answer was that she was serious about learning to act, but I  think it was also because she wanted to be taken seriously as an actress. During the lean years, when she was struggling to stay on contract and land a breakthrough role, Monroe traveled the party circuit, allowing herself to be at the beck and call of studio execs like Joseph Schenck, who graced his poker parties with young starlets. Though hoping to attract the attention of producers and directors, these starlets were auditioning to be mistresses as much as actresses. Perhaps MM wanted to make it understood that she was in it for a career, not a love nest in Beverly Hills. Later, she used publicity about her acting coaches and classes to try to counter being typecast as a dumb blonde on and off the screen.

6. The nude calendar vs. Apples, Knockers and Cokes. At her lowest point financially in 1949, MM posed nude for photographer Tom Kelley for a calendar. Two photos emerged from this shoot, “A New Wrinkle” and “Golden Dreams,” with the former chosen as the calendar shot. A few years later, the photos were reissued for more calendars and other merchandising, with “Golden Dreams” selected as the favored pose. One of my uncles owned a calendar with “Golden Dreams,” and he held onto it long after it was out of date.  I remember finding it hidden under another calendar in his room.

However, MM did not star in a stag film titled Apples, Knockers and Cokes during this time. This black-and-white short featured a stunning blonde opening a picnic basket containing apples and a Coca-Cola bottle. During the 1970s and 1980s, the film surfaced with a false rumor claiming the blonde was Marilyn Monroe.

WHEN A CRITIC COMPLAINED THAT STARLET MONROE WOULDN'T LOOK GOOD IN A POTATO SACK, FOX PUBLICISTS CAME UP WITH THIS PHOTO TO SEND TO NEWSPAPER AND FANZINES.

7. Darryl Zanuck vs. Marilyn Monroe. As much as I admire Zanuck as a producer, he never seemed to appreciate Marilyn Monroe. He did not pick up her option the first time she was under contract to 20th Century Fox. After she was placed under contract again in December 1950, her publicity photos were requested more than those of any other star, even established ones like Betty Grable. Instead of recognizing that she had the potential to be a major star, Zanuck suspected that someone who knew MM was tampering with the mail tabulations on her behalf. After he did realize her appeal with the public, he tossed her in any film that called for a gorgeous, buxom blonde, without a thought to grooming her for starring roles. After a stunning appearance at an exhibitors’ function in 1951, in which theater owners repeatedly asked which films the show-stopping blonde was starring in, Zanuck signed her to a seven-year contract.

However, she was immediately loaned to RKO, who wanted her for the drama Clash by Night in a supporting role as a working class girl who toils in a cannery. Despite MM’s good notices in Clash by Night, Zanuck continued to cast her as the dumb buxom blonde, most notably in Monkey Business with Cary Grant and Ginger Rogers. Finally, she was cast in the drama Niagara as a cheating wife and murderess, which made her a star. Still, Zanuck and MM continued to clash over her roles, with Zanuck insisting on exploiting her image as the sexy but naïve dumb blonde and MM determined to expand on that image.

MM WITH ZANUCK (LEFT) AND WALTER WINCHELL (LEFT)

8. Marilyn, Inc. The dispute with Zanuck and Fox resulted in MM walking out on her contract and heading for New York City. There, she dropped in on the Actors Studio with the intention of putting films such as There’s No Business Like Show Business behind her. Eventually, Zanuck and Fox capitulated to Monroe, their biggest box-office draw, and gave her what she wanted. She did not want more money; instead she wanted a measure of creative control, including director and cinematographer approval. She also wanted her contract to be non-exclusive, allowing her to make films for her own company, Marilyn Monroe Productions, Inc.

The film industry was undergoing a transition in the 1950s because of the Paramount Decree, in which the Supreme Court declared the major studios an oligopoly and forced them to sell their theaters. It was the beginning of the end for the old studios, who began to let go of their tight hold on their actors. Many stars opted out of their contracts and launched their own production companies, including Burt Lancaster, Kirk Douglas, and John Wayne, in order to appear in films of their choosing. Few female stars took this route—except for Marilyn Monroe. More than most male stars, she understood the value of creative control over her star image and career. And, more than the male stars of the period, MM took a beating in the press for her defection from Fox.

Next week, I will list the films of MM that are most interesting to her career.

25 Responses Thoughts on Marilyn Monroe
Posted By debbe : June 27, 2011 3:22 pm

g-d forgive me, but in one of those pictures I thought it was Britney Spears.

I didnt know alot about MM, and I agree with you, I would like to think of her as taking classes at UCLA as well. Cant wait for the next two blogs.

Posted By Kingrat : June 27, 2011 4:58 pm

Suzidoll, thanks so much for the post, and I’m looking forward to more. Love the photos of Norma Jeane, who has a sweet natural beauty.

In Kazan’s autobiography he portrays Marilyn as a sweet girl who was done over by Hollywood. However, at one point MM was sleeping with Kazan, one of the most famous directors at the time, and Arthur Miller, the most famous heterosexual playwright of the time, and asking Kazan if she should marry Joe DiMaggio, the most famous baseball player of the time. Coincidence? Or does this sound more like Eve from ALL ABOUT EVE? You can also see MM’s pathological lateness as a way of being in control. The take where she finally got the line right was the one they had to use, which gave her an edge over the other actors. On some level she must have understood this, so that she wasn’t perhaps the passive victim some accounts would have you believe.

Posted By AL : June 27, 2011 5:12 pm

Monroe had considerable cosmetic surgery over the years, but everything she had done was an improvement and was performed with expertise and was always very subtle. The first thing was a “chin job” (recommended by her modeling agency). While having her hair “processed” she had her hairline altered, requesting that they use Rita Hayworth as a model. (Miss Hayworth had had electrolosis on hers.) I’ve always said that Marilyn never looked better than she did when she passed away. She specified in her will exactly who was authorized to do her hair & makeup for her funeral. I don’t find that to be at all “gruesome”–I think it was admirable…We all miss her, but she left us with a wonderful legacy–some of her films are excellent and timeless and her performances were always spot-on…

Posted By AL : June 27, 2011 5:16 pm

4.6 MILLION dollars for the white dress? Who paid that? The Kennedy dress went for “only” a million…hmmm

Posted By AL : June 27, 2011 5:20 pm

A friend who knew her quite well at The Actor’s Studio quotes her as having said, about Montgomery Clift, “He’s the only person I know who’s more f***ed-up than I am.”

Posted By muriel schwenck : June 27, 2011 6:10 pm

I could never stand that trembly lip affectation of hers. She was *always* over marketed, so a new round of merchandising is just par for course.

Posted By michaelgsmith : June 27, 2011 6:57 pm

Great stuff. As someone who has to regularly remind students that Monroe was not a “dumb blonde” in real life, I especially appreciate your fourth point.

Posted By Kathryn : June 27, 2011 7:26 pm

I know it may not be very gauche of me to say this, but Marilyn Monroe was the gateway drug that led me to classic film when I was little and I appreciate her still….

That potato sack photo and side story are fantastic!

Posted By Lisa W. : June 27, 2011 7:44 pm

Fascinating! I love learning the facts vs. the oft-repeated mis-information! MM was a magnetic presence and an interesting woman— I can’t wait to read more! I find Al’s comment about plastic surgery interesting, as I would have thought the practice not so refined as to be subtle (thinking Phyllis Diller right now!) or more dangerous back then? I remember reading about Rita Hayworth’s hairline being altered, and at least from the photos Suzi posted here, I think you’re hard pressed to argue that MM’s changed as dramatically as her hair color sure did!

Posted By dukeroberts : June 27, 2011 10:50 pm

Thanks, Suzi. You included some bits about her that I did not know and some pictures I had never seen.

I must say that I find the thought of creating new movies “starring” Marilyn Monroe, or a “reasonable” CGI facsimile of her, rather offensive. While it was done, and rather neatly, with Laurence Olivier as the villain in Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow, I think it is awful and will hopefully not come to fruition or become a trend. There have been commercials with the likenesses of John Wayne, Gene Kelly and Donald O’Connor, but not whole movies starring their likenesses.

Posted By suzidoll : June 27, 2011 11:02 pm

Dukeroberts: I am with you on the use of CGI to “bring back” dead stars–so crass and disrespectful.

Posted By missrhea : June 27, 2011 11:40 pm

Nice article, Suzidoll. I’m not much of a MM fan but she and my dad shared the same birthday and, ironically, both died in 1962 – MM in August and my dad in October. (Andy Griffith also shares their birthday.)

Posted By chris : June 28, 2011 2:56 pm

To Mr. Salter and others like him: I refuse to see any new movies featuring dead stars(Monroe, John Wayne, etc.) CGI’d on the screen. Yes, they are icons of the screen. However, stealing their images is akin to putting them to work without their consent. Also, their time has passed and it’s time to new stars to emerge.

Posted By Vincent : July 2, 2011 9:20 am

No one would appreciate seeing more of Monroe, Lombard or Harlow (three classic Hollywood icons whose combined lifespan was less than a century) than me — but CGI images aren’t the real thing, and never can be. It’s impossible for one to guess how Marilyn or Carole or Jean would portray a character they had nothing to do with in real life; we can’t get into their minds.

I’m not the world’s most avid Monroe fan, but from more I read about her, and see more informal pix of her that belie the overblown Technicolor “sex symbol” aura, the more I come to respect and admire her. Part of me wishes she had been born 20 years earlier and worked in the Hollywood of the 1930s, when actresses were given roles that stressed their intelligence as much as their figures.

Posted By stefmagura : July 3, 2011 1:27 am

“And, more than the male stars of the period, MM took a beating in the press for her defection from Fox.”

I read that sentence three times when reading this article. For me, it helps sum up not only how she could be treated, but how women were treated as opposed to how males were treated back then. Women weren’t taken as seriously. I especially think this is true for Marilyn MMonroe considering her image.

Posted By Fantomex : July 4, 2011 3:00 am

Sorry,but I disagree-I would love to see some movies with Marilyn in CGI (in the style of Pixar or Dreamworks PDI) or in anime movies from Japanese studios. Maybe an adventure can be created that would show all of the classic Hollywood characters in a movie stopping somebody evil, or saving Hollywood, or used in a game-the sky’s the limit. Try and keep open minds, people.

Posted By Vincent : July 4, 2011 9:41 am

“I would love to see some movies with Marilyn in CGI (in the style of Pixar or Dreamworks PDI) or in anime movies from Japanese studios. Maybe an adventure can be created that would show all of the classic Hollywood characters in a movie stopping somebody evil, or saving Hollywood, or used in a game — the sky’s the limit.”
___________________

I can see where you’re coming from, but Monroe isn’t a “character,” but a flesh-and-blood person who’s no longer with us. Your idea sounds like a remake of “Monsters vs. Aliens,” with Marilyn as Ginormica.

Posted By Debbie A-H : July 4, 2011 3:09 pm

Love the info, Suzi. (I should read your Marilyn book!) Going on to read the next article right now!

Posted By Fantomex : July 5, 2011 2:07 am

I can see where you’re coming from, but Monroe isn’t a “character,” but a flesh-and-blood person who’s no longer with us. Your idea sounds like a remake of “Monsters vs. Aliens,” with Marilyn as Ginormica.

And why not? (Well, not really like that, but something that would use her likeness in some way.) I’ve already seen a made-up poster for a early-60′s premake of KIll Bill starring Monroe as The Bride with John Wayne as Bill and Dorothy Dandridge as Bernita Green that points out one way that somebody has used her likeness. Or the use could be just similar to what was done for Olivier in Sky Captain & The World Of Tomorrow.

Posted By DDB9000 : July 6, 2011 9:41 am

muriel schwenck said…

“I could never stand that trembly lip affectation of hers. She was *always* over marketed, so a new round of merchandising is just par for course.”

I agree totally with this, I have never found MM to be talented in any way whatsoever, never found her to be so overly attractive (but then I’ve always preferred black or brown hair), and I think the fact that it seems a large portion of society thinks the opposite of what I do is proof positive to me of her worthlessness, other than to a mewling band of whitebread sheep.

As for bringing her back in CGI form, why not? All she ever was was plain image and no substance. A lifeless stiff then, as is now.

Posted By dukeroberts : July 6, 2011 8:35 pm

So, DDB9000, what you’re basically saying is, you don’t like Marilyn Monroe. Did I get that right?

I prefer brunettes too, but Marilyn was just wow to me. Have you ever seen Niagara? You should give that one a try if you haven’t seen it before.

Posted By DDB9000 : July 7, 2011 8:23 am

dukeroberts…

Yes, I’ve seen ‘Niagara”, and while it’s an alright genre film, MM is clearly out of her league with her wooden ‘acting’ style. I’d much rather look at the falls themselves then her – and they do a better acting job too.

Posted By DDB9000 : July 7, 2011 8:28 am

addendum…

and doesn’t she sing also, and badly with that ‘little girl’ voice that put back the causes of women’s rights by at least a decade…

Posted By Jenni : July 7, 2011 6:09 pm

Hmmm. Marilyn Monroe. My daughter chose her as the subject of an english paper she had to write last year, she got an A on it, and I had fun skimming the biography my daughter chose for research purposes. Sorry, it wasn’t your book, Suzi!
My view of MM is skewed by my older relatives views of her, that she was a dumb blonde, with an awful singing voice. I have seen her in Niagara, and thought she did a good job in that role, same for Seven Year Itch. After reading my daughter’s paper on MM, I can honestly say that I feel sort of sorry for MM, due to the truly awful childhood she had, and agree that that has to be a large factor in her messed up adult life.

Posted By dukeroberts : July 7, 2011 7:01 pm

Set back women’s rights? I don’t think so. She helped advance the cause by taking charge of her own sexuality and using it to her advantage. Isn’t that partly what the Sexual Revolution was about? She was objectified, sure, but after she became a star she was objectified on her own terms.

Leave a Reply

MovieMorlocks.com is the official blog for TCM. No topic is too obscure or niche to be excluded from our film discussions. And we welcome your comments on our blogs and bloggers.
Archives
Popular terms
3-D  Action Films  Actors  Actors' Endorsements  animal stars  Animation  Anime  Anthology Films  Autobiography  Awards  B-movies  Best of the Year lists  Biography  Biopics  Blu-Ray  Books on Film  Boxing films  British Cinema  Canadian Cinema  Character Actors  Chicago Film History  Cinematography  Classic Films  College Life on Film  Comedy  Comic Book Movies  Czech Film  Dance on Film  Digital Cinema  Directors  Disaster Films  Documentary  Drama  DVD  Early Talkies  Editing  Educational Films  European Influence on American Cinema  Experimental  Exploitation  Fairy Tales on Film  Faith or Christian-based Films  Family Films  Film Composers  film festivals  Film History in Florida  Film Noir  Film Scholars  Film titles  Filmmaking Techniques  Food in Film  Foreign Film  French Film  Gangster films  Genre  Genre spoofs  Guest Programmers  HD & Blu-Ray  Holiday Movies  Hollywood lifestyles  Horror  Horror Movies  Icons  independent film  Italian Film  Japanese Film  Korean Film  Leadership  Literary Adaptations  Martial Arts  Melodramas  Method Acting  Mexican Cinema  Moguls  Monster Movies  Movie Books  Movie Costumes  Movie locations  Movie lovers  Movie Reviewers  Movie settings  Movie Stars  Music in Film  Musicals  New Releases  Outdoor Cinema  Paranoid Thrillers  Parenting on film  Polish film industry  political thrillers  Politics in Film  Pornography  Pre-Code  Producers  Race in American Film  Remakes  Road Movies  Romance  Romantic Comedies  Russian Film Industry  Satire  Scandals  Science Fiction  Screenwriters  Semi-documentaries  Serials  Short Films  Silent Film  silent films  Social Problem Film  Sports  Sports on Film  Stereotypes  Straight-to-DVD  Studio Politics  Suspense thriller  Swashbucklers  TCM Classic Film Festival  Television  The British in Hollywood  The Germans in Hollywood  The Hungarians in Hollywood  The Irish in Hollywood  The Russians in Hollywood  Theaters  Trains in movies  Underground Cinema  VOD  War film  Westerns  Women in the Film Industry  Women's Weepies