Shock Theater: “We Guarantee to Bury You Without Charge if You Die of Fright”
Nothing could be better than seeing films on a big screen with an appreciative audience, especially for the low price of $5.00, except for perhaps seeing them projected on celluloid. Each film will be projected from a 16mm print. The series opens with The House on Haunted Hill and Screaming Skull, followed by The Amazing Transparent Man and Beyond the Time Barrier on July 1. August brings two films from Roger Corman’s studio, Dementia 13 and The Terror, while September offers The Phantom Planet and Night of the Blood Beast. In October, Phillips will show two Italian horror flicks, Nightmare Castle and Caltiki the Undying Monster, while November brings Bloodlust and She-Demons. Finally, Shock Cinema celebrates the Christmas season with Lady Frankenstein and Frankenstein’s Daughter on December 2. Michael Phillips graciously agreed to be interviewed about Shock Theater, the joys of programming, and the movie-going scene in Chicago. Q: What is Shock Theater and what is the Cinema Dementia Collection? MP: Shock Theater from the Cinema Dementia Collection is a new monthly horror film series in Chicago. At 9pm on the first Friday of every month between June and December (and hopefully beyond), we’ll be showing a horror or sci-fi double feature at the Wicker Park Arts Center (the former St. Paul’s Lutheran Church in Wicker Park, 2215 W. North Ave.) on genuine 16mm film. Those films come from the Cinema Dementia Collection, which is the name local film collector Chip Hess gave to his extensive collection of B-movies. Q: What is your background in film, and how did you get into film programming? What are your past programming ventures? MP: I don’t have any scholarly background in film, although I once took a class called The Modern Horror Film, so maybe that qualifies me for this venture. I started out as a fan who lived in a small town with one video store. Once my friends and I had watched everything that was relatively new, we moved on to the black and white stuff. Eventually I realized I had seen a good chunk of the films nominated for the Best Picture Oscar, so I decided to see them all (I finished that task in 2009). Amidst the prestige films were the genre pictures that sometimes snagged a nomination, so I got into film noir, classic horror, screwball comedy, you name it. In 2004 a friend who ran the projectors at the then-LaSalle Bank Theater was leaving for grad school and asked if I wanted to take over. I projected there for the next six years, adding programming to my resume around 2006; by the end, I was the sole programmer. Bank of America, who took over LaSalle Bank, closed the Cinema in December 2010, but thankfully my former colleagues Julian Antos and Becca Hall have continued the tradition with their Northwest Chicago Film Society. In addition to that, I program the Chicago International Movies & Music Festival, and last year I started doing neighborhood screenings that turned into my new nonprofit screening series, South Side Projections. Q: Chicago offers several specialty or alternative venues that offer audiences a chance to see classic-era movies, such as the Silent Film Society of Chicago, the Northwest Chicago Film Society, and Facets’ Night School. What accounts for the popularity of seeing old films on the big screen? Or, why are these programs/venues able to survive? MP: Well, they’re not all able to survive, especially when their evil banker owners sell the buildings they’re housed in. [The Bank of America exhibited no interest in the cinema series that bore its name, though it was a 35-year community institution. The bank arrogantly closed the Cinema amidst local protests.] But yes, Chicago is a pretty great place to see classic films, and there are a lot of options. I feel like part of it is sort of circular: There are a lot of great places to see films, which creates an audience hungry for more of this stuff, which helps other, new ventures succeed. Facets’ Night School is a good example of that—you know that there are people who (1) love films, and (2) have demonstrated that they’ll go great distances to see them (like the far northwest side, or the south side with Doc Films, etc.). You look around and realize that nobody’s doing a certain thing—like presenting “schlocky” films in a setting that emphasizes there’s something of value in them, and you do a fun little presentation that helps people identify that value. Presto, you have an enthusiastic crowd willing to come out for those midnight screenings in the dead of winter in Chicago. It might seem crazy, but not if you look at the elements that went into the decision. This might just be me rationalizing the decision to do Shock Theater, but I feel like it has a good chance of succeeding. Q: The films for Shock Theater will be projected from 16mm films. What are the advantages of projected films? Where do you get your prints? MP: Film just looks better. Yeah, it might be scratched up or spliced, but even a beat-up 16mm film print is going to look better than most projected DVDs (and these prints are excellent!). You can argue about why that is, or say that it’s just a matter of preference—scratches and splices vs. washed-out picture and/or that weird blocky pixelation you get with DVD projection. But we film lovers know the difference. This is how they were meant to be seen! (You know, late at night, with a crowd of people, in a church basement.) That’s really the key, though: Even if you’re watching a projected DVD, the real draw is seeing movies with a crowd. Comedies are funnier, romances are weepier, and horror films are scarier when you’re experiencing them with a few dozen or a few hundred other people. That feeling of being part of something, of being in a big group of people sharing an experience: You can’t have that on your Netflix streaming (or, dear lord, your iPhone). The prints, as I mentioned above, come from Chip Hess’s Cinema Dementia Collection. Q: What is the significance of the name Shock Theater? MP: Shock Theater was initially Universal Studios’ packaging of their classic 1930s and 1940s horror films for television in the late 1950s. They’d encourage local TV stations to hire a host to present the films for late-night audiences. They were really popular, so Universal followed them with Son of Shock. It’s pretty much become a catch-all phrase for presenting low-budget films, usually on television, but here we’re using it for semi-theatrical presentation of horror and sci-fi B-movies from the 1950s and 1960s. Q: Each week, Shock Theater presents a double feature. Can you explain the pairings? MP: Each double feature has a theme. June is haunted houses, July is films directed by Poverty Row genius Edgar Ulmer, August is Roger Corman productions, September is terror in outer space, October is Italian horror films, November is “Castaway Dismay” (films about bad things happening to people stranded on islands), and December is the lovely ladies of Frankenstein. Q: Which films are you particularly excited about? MP: Can I tell you a secret? When I programmed this, I hadn’t seen any of the films. Not a single one. That’s the great thing about programming: You’re in charge, and you get to show films you want to see. And to be even more honest, I’m hardly “programming” this series, as Chip gave me a list of possible double features and I picked these seven from it. So I’m really excited about all of them, and the low-key environment hopefully will allow me to sit back and enjoy them. But if I had to single any out, I’d go with the Ulmer double feature in July, Francis Ford Coppola’s Dementia 13 in August, and the beautiful, uncut print of Lady Frankenstein in December—a film that most U.S. audiences saw in a severely cut theatrical print. Q: Besides the movies themselves, what else can audiences expect at Shock Theater? MP: We’re trying to make the presentation as lively as possible. For our haunted house double feature in June, we’re presenting The House on Haunted Hill in genuine Emergo, the gimmick that William Castle used when the film premiered in 1959. We’re also in negotiations with the actual Screaming Skull to make an appearance for the film of the same name. We’ll have hosts at some of the screenings: The June double feature will be presented by the folks at the Underground Multiplex, and August features local horror-film writer Joel Wicklund of the great website Shadows and Screams. We’ll also have door prizes provided by an anonymous friend of horror films, cheap concessions, and free burial services for anyone who dies of fright. One thing audiences should not expect—and I want to emphasize this—is a place to try out their Rifftrax routines. We’re not showing these films for people to offer lame running commentaries. We might have guest hosts, but we definitely don’t have any talking robots, even if a lot of these films were featured on Mystery Science Theater 3000. The point we’re trying to make is that if you try to watch the films on their own terms, you’ll be surprised at how good they can be. Sure, there’s going to be some moments of hilarity, but I hope audiences manage to come away with a new appreciation of the particular genius required to make good films on low budgets. Q: What is the most difficult part of programming a series like this, or any series? MP: Normally it’s finding prints of the movies you want to show, but Chip has taken care of that. It’s kind of a weird situation to have a plethora of things to choose from and have to narrow it down. When I was programming Bank of America Cinema, there was a more or less rigid set of boundaries, and when I booked films that transgressed those boundaries, the audience would get upset or not show up (or, in one case, try to storm the projection booth). I guess I have similar boundaries in my other ventures: CIMMfest has to be movies about music, and Shock Theater has to be scary stuff. The other difficulty, especially when you’re starting something new, is getting the word out. Q: Why do you do it; what do you get out of it? MP: I do it because I love movies and I love sharing my discoveries with others. I love knowing that I’ve made a big group of people happy because of the work I’m doing. I realize that I’m lucky as hell to be in a position to be doing this. If not for a particular chain of coincidences and a very supportive spouse, I’d probably be a full-time copyeditor for a dietetics journal instead of a filmmaker and film programmer. I still do the copyediting because film programming doesn’t pay unless you have that rare full-time job, but I’m thankful every day that I get to share my love of film with a bunch of people who start out as strangers but often end up as friends. 8 Responses Shock Theater: “We Guarantee to Bury You Without Charge if You Die of Fright”
…except that one, because it’s lost. I’ve seen the trailer, and I hope someday to see the seven or so minutes that are in a Portuguese archive. Mike is an important member of a wonderful and dedicate group of reel film enthusiasts here in Chicago without whom many of us would be much poorer. There is a growing need everywhere for people to see what was originally made for viewing and in the environment it was meant to be viewed in…with a group of others sharing laughs, screams and the whole gambit of emotions, together. Thanks to all of you out there like Mike, who are trying to gives us a chance at this rich and important social experience. Hello from NW Indiana! Concerning the question about the significance of the name Shock Theater, it’s worth noting that in the later 1950s there was a TV show in Chicago called Shock Theatre, hosted by a character who called himself “Marvin.” Marvin dressed in black and wore black glasses with thick lenses, which magnified his eyes. I can remember watching this show with my sister when I was a kid, particularly when the movie was the original Bela Lugosi Dracula. I recall being deliciously scared by the movie and fascinated by Marvin’s antics between segments of the film. how did i miss this post? as an ardent watcher of wolfman mac’s chiller drive in theater and off beat cinema out of buffalo, i have been watching movies i have never seen. wish chicago was closer….. [...] Shock Theater: “We Guarantee to Bury You Without Charge if You Die of Fright” (moviemorlocks.com) [...] Leave a Reply |
Archives
Featured Sites
Popular terms
3-D
Action Films
Actors
Actors' Endorsements
animal stars
Animation
Anime
Anthology Films
Autobiography
Awards
B-movies
Best of the Year lists
Biography
Biopics
Blu-Ray
Books on Film
British Cinema
Canadian Cinema
Character Actors
Chicago Film History
Cinematography
Classic Films
College Life on Film
Comedy
Comic Book Movies
Czech Film
Dance on Film
Digital Cinema
Directors
Disaster Films
Documentary
Drama
DVD
Early Talkies
Editing
Educational Films
European Influence on American Cinema
Experimental
Exploitation
Fairy Tales on Film
Faith or Christian-based Films
Family Films
Film Composers
film festivals
Film History in Florida
Film Noir
Film Scholars
Film titles
Filmmaking Techniques
Food in Film
Foreign Film
French Film
Gangster films
Genre
Genre spoofs
Guest Programmers
HD & Blu-Ray
Holiday Movies
Hollywood lifestyles
Horror
Horror Movies
Icons
independent film
Italian Film
Japanese Film
Korean Film
Literary Adaptations
Martial Arts
Melodramas
Method Acting
Mexican Cinema
Moguls
Monster Movies
Movie Books
Movie Costumes
Movie locations
Movie lovers
Movie Reviewers
Movie settings
Movie Stars
Music in Film
Musicals
Outdoor Cinema
Paranoid Thrillers
Parenting on film
Polish film industry
political thrillers
Politics in Film
Pornography
Pre-Code
Producers
Race in American Film
Remakes
Road Movies
Romance
Romantic Comedies
Russian Film Industry
Satire
Scandals
Science Fiction
Screenwriters
Semi-documentaries
Serials
Short Films
Silent Film
silent films
Social Problem Film
Sports
Sports on Film
Stereotypes
Straight-to-DVD
Studio Politics
Suspense thriller
Swashbucklers
TCM Classic Film Festival
Television
The British in Hollywood
The Germans in Hollywood
The Hungarians in Hollywood
The Irish in Hollywood
The Russians in Hollywood
Theaters
Trains in movies
Underground Cinema
VOD
War film
Westerns
Women in the Film Industry
Women's Weepies |
“Eventually I realized I had seen a good chunk of the films nominated for the Best Picture Oscar, so I decided to see them all (I finished that task in 2009).”
He’s seen the Patriot (1928)? Can… can I see it?