THEM’S FIGHTIN’ WORDS!

In my last post I wrapped up my interview with Alex Cox by talking a bit about John Carpenter’s They Live (1988). Alex said: They Live holds up for the first 45 minutes, and then there’s this long wrestling match between Roddy Piper and Keith David, and it never recovers. But those first 45 minutes are amazing. Pretty much the only good science fiction film I’ve seen post 2001: A Space Odyssey.” When I heard that, I thought for sure there would be a long tussle of words in the comment section to rival what John Carpenter claimed was “the longest fight scene in movie history.” To my surprise, only two people chimed in, both in support of the film in general. Where were the cries of bloody murder from the fans of THX 1138, Brazil, Videodrome, RoboCop, A Clockwork Orange, Tetsuo, Inception, Alien, and so on? There are plenty of bones to fight over here, but I’ll stick to They Live for the purpose of this post. As to the long fight scene, I’ve gotten into my own fights with people who dismiss it as ridiculous. Agreeing to some extent with Alex Cox is author and music journalist Greil Marcus who says of They Live that it is “a fabulous movie (except for the endless fight behind the building).” Again, I strongly disagree.

I’m not alone in thinking the fight scene in They Live is essential to the film. Its absurdity is not beside the point, but part of the point – and memorable for a variety of reasons. It even resurfaced in popular culture, as South Park fans already know, in the “Cripple Fight!” (Season 5, episode 2) which was very much an homage to They Live:

We actually animated to that soundtrack, so, for a while, before we put our own sounds in it, it was, like, Jimmy and Timmy fighting, but it was the sounds, the grunts from Roddy Piper, from They Live, with the music and all that… It was actually pretty funny that way, and I think it ended up on the Internet that way or something… The original version… it’s a great fight sequence in They LiveThey Live is a… could have been a… it’s a pretty great movie, uh…” (Trey Parker and Matt Stone, commentary track for South Park “Cripple Fight!” episode.)

Although South Park exploits the camp value, the extended fight scene in They Live endures for very cerebral reasons too:

The violence staged here, this violence of the two of them fighting, is a positive violence, a condition of liberation. The lesson is that our liberation from ideology is not a spontaneous act, an act of discovering our true self. And that’s what I find convincing in this simple scene… just think how it totally turns around the usual new age idea of critique of ideology, which would be: “in everyday life we have ideological glasses, learn to put down, take off, the glasses, and see with your own eyes reality the way it is.” No, unfortunately, it doesn’t work like this. Liberation hurts. You have to be forced to put your glasses on.” (Slavoj Žižek, They Live! Hollywood as an Ideological Machine)

I cribbed both of the quotes above from author Jonathan Lethem’s Deep Focus edition on They Live (released by Soft Skull Press). His own take is one of grudging respect:

If either of them stepped outside their entrenched positions to frame this absurdity (“You’d really rather keep at this than wear these glasses?” “You really want me to wear those glasses so badly you’re going to take this endless beating?”) the air of abjection and embarrassment would be hugely relieved, but the deadly serious joke lessened: here’s another instance of Carpenter’s willingness to lose your respect in order to consolidate your amazement and discomfort. If you hate the fight scene, you blame the director. If you love it, you credit yourself. (Jonathan Lethem, Deep Focus: They Live)

The fight scene, which Carpenter says “was an incredibly brutal and funny fight, along the lines of the slugfest between John Wayne and Victor McLaglen in The Quiet Man” is essential to me for three reasons. The first is that Carpenter’s choice to make a wrestler, Roddy Piper, his leading man was purposefully ideological. Carpenter, himself a wrestling fan who’d met Piper at WrestleMania III earlier in 1987, considers it the working man’s sport and They Live is a film about the war being waged on the working class, the blue collar workers, the under-employed, or the unemployed. For the purpose of this film, they are all in the underclass.

As They Live isn’t just about the underclass but very much for the underclass, the extended fight scene sneaks in some wrestling where you wouldn’t expect it: a science-fiction movie. (Well… an American science-fiction movie. Had it been a Mexican science-fiction movie, or fantasy, or horror film, romance, etc., a big protracted wrestling scene would not be such an anomaly, especially given how huge a folk icon the professional wrestler El Santo is in Mexico. In fact, Carpenter missed a nice opportunity to include Latinos into the underclass he represents in They Live – doubly strange given its Los Angeles setting – an omission that will surely be redressed in any remake.)

The second reason the fight scene is essential to me, also ideological, is much more important: it illustrates how hard it is to make anyone change their perception of the world – even when you have hard proof. (Current topical events to file into this category include climate-change and evolution. Talk about ridiculously extended fight sequences! The latter topic alone has been going on for well over a hundred years.)

The third reason I think the fight sequence is essential is summed up nicely by Phil Hardy in his Science Fiction Overlook Film Encyclopedia. It’s “an effective political point about the underclass being too busy beating each other up to start a revolution.” The revolution here, to be clear, being a revolution against the Reagan revolution of the eighties. But if you look at the disparity in wealth between the haves and have-nots over the last few decades, it really doesn’t matter whether you have a Democrat or Republican in office, the gulf continues to grow. Not only that, but the number of new and unique ways in which we are being bombarded with ads that ask us to “consume” this or that have also skyrocketed.

To see the graph below, and then to read Carpenter’s comments from 20 years ago, is to understand that the central warnings within They Live didn’t disappear with the eighties but rather have become even more relevant today than ever before:

I felt that They Live could be an Invasion of the Body Snatchers for today; rather than Communists-under-the-beds, the monsters would be unrestrained capitalists…

In the US, the middle class is slowly disappearing: there are more poor people and more rich. I think They Live will be looked back on as one of the few voices of outrage at a time when everyone wanted two things: to win, and to make money; all other considerations were secondary…

So it’s about seeing the world in two different ways – normally and through the sun-glasses, which show the truth. We shot every scene twice, which was time consuming; dressing a whole street of billboards with subliminal messages was a pain in the ass. Strangely, though, most people didn’t notice, which was also frightening. Especially the newsstand display, where the magazine covers were plastered with slogans, they passed right by without paying any attention at all. (John Carpenter, Cheap thrills and dark glasses, by Sheila Johnson, London Times, June 22, 1989)

The last point made me laugh. My FB sidebar includes six or seven ads that target me geographically and by personal interests using key-word algorithms. My Gmail account does something similar (albeit more discretely). Product placements are ubiquitous (be they in movies, sporting events, video games, TV, etc.) I don’t even notice them anymore. Yet there they are. Everywhere. And that is one of the reasons why I think They Live is so important: the black-and-white scenes alone are a startling reminder of the world we live in and, like Roddy’s glasses themselves, offer a visual inoculation to the dangers of mindless consumption.

The fact is: the time is ripe for a remake by an astute social critic, one that would drop some of the clumsy buddy-film tropes, mullets, cheesy one-liners, and genre clichés toward the end that hamper the original. And while I’m engaged in such wishful thinking, let me add another suggestion: have the protagonists keep their glasses on most of the time – because those black-and-white scenes kick ass.

Speaking of the glasses that clearly reveal the money-grubbers around us to be soulless alien monsters; I have to share a story that Nile Southern (son of Strangelove scribe Terry Southern) told me was passed along to him by acclaimed title-designer Pablo Ferro:

Pablo Ferro told me a great story told to him by John Carpenter – about the marketing plan meeting with the Universal execs – where they said they were going with ‘Plan B’ (instead of wide distribution and advertising) because “we don’t think this film will appeal to the general movie-going public” John takes a deep breath, pulls out the glasses from his jacket pocket, puts them on and surveys them before saying, “I thought as much,” and leaves the room…


http://www.theofficialjohncarpenter.com/pages/themovies/tl/tl.html

17 Responses THEM’S FIGHTIN’ WORDS!
Posted By Jeff H. : April 10, 2011 4:06 pm

This is probably my favorite Carpenter film, along with BIG TROUBLE IN LITTLE CHINA and DARK STAR. I personally had no trouble with the fight scene-it was ridiculously long but sometimes fights in movies or in real life go on way beyond the reason for the fight in the first place. If you want other good examples in movies:

-the feud in Buster Keaton’s OUR HOSPITALITY
-the fistfight between Gregory Peck and Charlton Heston in THE BIG COUNTRY that ends with Peck asking “Tell me…what did we prove?”
-the rematch in ROCKY II
-the ultimate: ROMEO & JULIET?

THEY LIFE also has one of my top ten lines in all movies: “I have come here to chew bubble gum and kick ass-and I’m all out of bubble gum!”-”Rowdy” Roddy Piper to a group of aliens.

Posted By Junkpile – 4.10.11 « The Human Torch Was Denied A Bank Loan : April 10, 2011 6:01 pm

[...] at TCM’s Movie Moorlocks, keelsetter puts up a spirited defense for Carpenter’s They Live against Alex Cox’s assertion that the Roddy Piper/Keith David alley dust-up essentailly ruins [...]

Posted By AL PEREZ : April 10, 2011 7:06 pm

I feel vindicated. THEY LIVE! is one of my TopTen. What a terrific article this is; thank you. BTW: Do you really think that the MiddleClass is “slowly disappearing”? SLOWLY ?

Posted By Wyatt Wingfoot : April 10, 2011 7:45 pm

There is of course, the fight between Newman and Kennedy in COOL HAND LUKE.

Posted By Oscar : April 10, 2011 9:37 pm

In the poster “They Live” is written like “The Thing,” on the poster for the 1954 movie of the same name that Carpenter did a remake of. . . Wrestling since it is fake, but many die hard fans believe is real, may have been an analogy for the theme of deception and brainwashing. In line with your wonderful graph about increasing income inequality, look at how many in the poorest element of society are espousing political perspectives that masquerade as being for the little man but which are in fact actively working to increase the wealth of the super rich at the expense of everyone else.

Posted By Jeff H. : April 11, 2011 3:05 am

Oscar, your point is one of the best examples of the old saying “voting against your best interests.”

Posted By Chris : April 11, 2011 3:06 pm

The movie resonates even more today than when it was released. The Haves keeping getting more and even better today at getting the Have-Nots to fight one another instead focusing on what they really need to pay attention to.

Posted By keelsetter : April 11, 2011 3:16 pm

Thanks to all for the comments. On the issue of memorable cinematic fight sequences the link below provides 50 (THEY LIVE lands in the top-10):

http://www.progressiveboink.com/archive/fightscenes/25-1.html

As to the divide between the rich and the poor (a predominant theme in THEY LIVE), reading the news today simply reinforces why THEY LIVE is so ripe for a remake:

“Obama reveals his plan to reduce the deficit, in part by scaling back programs for seniors and the poor.” (Laurie Kellman, A.P.)

“The triumph of tea party candidates in 2010 pumped new urgency into a long-brewing Republican Party push for major cuts in domestic and benefit programs, including Medicare and Social Security.” (Charles Babington, A.P.)

“General Electric, the nations’s largest corporation, paid no U.S. corporate taxes in 2010… GE has a team of 975 gilded tax-avoidance professionals in a department working to ensure that the rest of America picks up its tab… The Times report also noted that since 2002, GE has eliminated a fifth of its work force in the U.S.” (The Seattle Times)

Given this kind of news, any remake there might be for THEY LIVE would benefit from a slight title revision. My suggestion is that “they” don’t just “live” – THEY THRIVE.

Posted By joe : April 11, 2011 7:44 pm

There are not many wrestling fans that believe wrestling is real anymore. Wrestling now refers to itself as sports entertainment and not a sport.

Posted By Robert : April 11, 2011 8:27 pm

You’re so right about THEY LIVE being an indictment of the Reagan era. I just wish it wasn’t so relevant today.

I really think this is the best piece I’ve read on this site. Well done.

Posted By Jeff H. : April 12, 2011 12:42 am

The question of a remake has to begin with “who?” Director, cast-who would be good choices? I think Dwayne Johnson might be good in the Roddy Piper role or Jason Statham; not sure who could fill Keith David’s role; maybe the Coens to direct, or Tarentino, or maybe just let Carpenter get the best shot at it…

Posted By keelsetter : April 12, 2011 12:51 am

For potential directors?

I’d love to see David Cronenberg take a crack at it.

Posted By Jeff H. : April 12, 2011 12:59 am

Cronenberg? Excellent choice-wish I had thought of him.

Posted By LRobHubbard : April 13, 2011 6:46 pm

Remake specialist Matthew Reeves is scheduled to do the remake of this – only without the political/social commentary and beefing up the romance. Oh, and it’s not being called a remake; it’s merely another version of the short story that THEY LIVE is based on, “Eight O’Clock In The Morning”.

I guarantee – less epic fistfights and more suckage is promised!

Posted By don_kessinger : April 14, 2011 8:46 am

Great post.

“Given this kind of news, any remake there might be for THEY LIVE would benefit from a slight title revision. My suggestion is that “they” don’t just “live” – THEY THRIVE”

How about ‘THEY VOTED’ ?

Posted By Shawn Glass : April 14, 2011 11:23 am

This was a great article! I think that the remake would be a MONSTER hit if it was put out. Choices for casting would be for Nada-Jason Statham and for Keith David’s part I would cast Terry Crews. As for a director I stick with the one who brought us here; Carpenter. Ya’ll be cool……

Posted By suzidoll : April 14, 2011 1:48 pm

Okay, that tears it. I am including this film on the syllabus for the next film history class I teach.

Leave a Reply

MovieMorlocks.com is the official blog for TCM. No topic is too obscure or niche to be excluded from our film discussions. And we welcome your comments on our blogs and bloggers.
Archives
Popular terms
3-D  Action Films  Actors  Actors' Endorsements  Actresses  animal stars  Animation  Anime  Anthology Films  Autobiography  Avant-Garde  Aviation  Awards  B-movies  Beer in Film  Behind the Scenes  Best of the Year lists  Biography  Biopics  Blu-Ray  Books on Film  Boxing films  British Cinema  Canadian Cinema  Character Actors  Chicago Film History  Cinematography  Classic Films  College Life on Film  Comedy  Comic Book Movies  Crime  Czech Film  Dance on Film  Digital Cinema  Directors  Disaster Films  Documentary  Drama  DVD  Early Talkies  Editing  Educational Films  European Influence on American Cinema  Experimental  Exploitation  Fairy Tales on Film  Faith or Christian-based Films  Family Films  Fan Edits  Film Composers  Film Criticism  film festivals  Film History in Florida  Film Noir  Film Scholars  Film titles  Filmmaking Techniques  Films of the 1980s  Food in Film  Foreign Film  French Film  Gangster films  Genre  Genre spoofs  Guest Programmers  HD & Blu-Ray  Holiday Movies  Hollywood history  Hollywood lifestyles  Horror  Horror Movies  Icons  independent film  Italian Film  Japanese Film  Korean Film  Leadership  Literary Adaptations  Martial Arts  Melodramas  Method Acting  Mexican Cinema  Moguls  Monster Movies  Movie Books  Movie Costumes  Movie locations  Movie lovers  Movie Magazines  Movie Reviewers  Movie settings  Movie Stars  Movies about movies  Music in Film  Musicals  New Releases  Outdoor Cinema  Paranoid Thrillers  Parenting on film  Pirate movies  Polish film industry  political thrillers  Politics in Film  Pornography  Pre-Code  Producers  Race in American Film  Remakes  Revenge  Road Movies  Romance  Romantic Comedies  Russian Film Industry  Satire  Scandals  Science Fiction  Screenwriters  Semi-documentaries  Serials  Short Films  Silent Film  silent films  Social Problem Film  Spaghetti Westerns  Sports  Sports on Film  Stereotypes  Straight-to-DVD  Studio Politics  Stunts and stuntmen  Suspense thriller  Swashbucklers  TCM Classic Film Festival  Tearjerkers  Television  The British in Hollywood  The Germans in Hollywood  The Hungarians in Hollywood  The Irish in Hollywood  The Russians in Hollywood  Theaters  Thriller  Trains in movies  Underground Cinema  VOD  War film  Westerns  Women in the Film Industry  Women's Weepies