John Barrymore: Gene Fowler’s Sweet Prince, Part 1

“For each man carries within his own memory a special golden age. Then, when he becomes old enough to seem secure against rebuttal, he tends to make a shining legend of that time. He feels ordained to go up and down like some tireless evangelist seeking to enforce the gospels and the virtues of his own mental treasure upon younger men properly occupied with enjoying their present youth, which in its own ripening will have become a golden age for them one palsied day. Perhaps old men should be denied their clocks and calendars, their mirrors, and their writing tools.”

This poetically insightful passage is from Gene Fowler’s biography of his friend John Barrymore, Good Night, Sweet Prince. A few months ago, I found a copy of this 1944 biography in a used bookstore, and it has become my new favorite celebrity bio. As indicated by the accompanying photo, this copy of Good Night, Sweet Prince has seen better days. The pages are yellowed, the jacket is in pieces, and it looks as though the previous owner’s pet chewed off the corner of the cover. You could say the book has a lot of charm and character—much like the author and the subject.

During their Hollywood years, Barrymore and screenwriter Fowler (The Call of the Wild; Billy the Kid (1941); Beau James) were members of the notorious Bundy Drive Boys, a group of Hollywood actors, artists, and assorted bohemians who drank themselves into the grave under the guise of camaraderie and friendship. The ringleader was the secretive artist and Hollywood hanger-on John Decker, whose house on Bundy Drive gave the gang its name. Members also included W.C. Fields, Errol Flynn, Thomas Mitchell, and art critic-aesthete Sadakichi Hartmann. The gang’s activities included practical jokes, epic drinking bouts, and late-night impromptu stagings of Shakespeare. Fowler wrote in his 1954 memoir of the group, Minutes of the Last Meeting, “These men lived intensely, as do children and poets and jaguars.” However, judging from Good Night, Sweet Prince, Fowler and Barrymore must have been close friends outside the Bundy Drive gang, because the book is filled with anecdotes that paint the carousing actor as a talented man with a troubled soul, a sense of loyalty to family and friends, and a soft spot for animals.

JOHN BARRYMORE AS HAMLET--FOUR YEARS AFTER MEETING WRITER GENE FOWLER

I am sure Fowler glossed over Barrymore’s more disgraceful behavior just as he painted his scandalous deeds as the actions of a temperamental, sensitive artist. But, I really don’t care if Fowler’s chronicle of his friend’s life was accurate, or not. Two things stood out for me as I was reading Good Night, Sweet Prince. I was most intrigued with the attention paid to the Barrymore family tree, and the way family members interacted with historical figures as though it were a common occurrence. But, I also fell under the spell of Fowler’s prose—such as the sample noted above. I am generally not a fan of flowery writing in nonfiction, but this book proved an exception for me. Either Fowler was particularly good at it, or I was just suckered in from the opening paragraph in the “Overture,” where he wrote: “A strange thing happened to me shortly before I decided to undertake this work. . . .if I lacked witnesses to certain of these happenings, I should not care to risk my liberty during a time of bovine opinions and slaughterhouse verdicts.”

Fowler’s writing style definitely takes the sting out of Barrymore’s bursts of temperament and displays of bad-boy behavior. For example, the actor often used the dulcet tones of his famous voice to swear with great verve, which Fowler describes as “. . .the actor [could] revive oaths and threats unused since cutthroats sailed the Spanish Main,” but in the next sentence, he smoothes over such behavior by describing the impact of Barrymore’s voice during a stage performance of Mignon, “The audience sat like lotus-eaters, happy and anaesthetized.”

THE INSIDE COVER OF FOWLER'S BIO SHOWS SKETCHES BY BARRYMORE, WHO WANTED TO BE AN ARTIST AT ONE TIME.

There is an undercurrent of melancholy is some of Fowler’s prose, and I think this is what appeals to me most about his writing style. In discussing the death of the critic Alexander Woollcott (a friend of both Fowler and Barrymore’s), he writes, “. . .my personal opinion is that Death is a great whore. She sleeps with everyone, promiscuously and obscenely, and everyone must sleep with her without willing it.” Or, later, when describing Barrymore’s memory loss around the time of his second divorce from actress Michael Strange (aka Blanche Oelrichs), “. . .it is believed that this was a foreshadowing circumstance of the time when his power to recollect the newer yesterdays would become an unsilvered mirror.” No one writes like that anymore.

LOUISA LANE DREW AS MRS. MALAPROP FROM "THE RIVALS"

My favorite part of the book was the way Fowler delved into the Barrymore family history, narrating it in an anecdotal style in which the famous and infamous drop in and out of the narrative. Also, he chronicles John Barrymore’s remarkable theater career, almost play by play, offering a personal but detailed account of a period most movie fans only vaguely know. There are so many extraordinary anecdotes, incredible encounters with celebrities and historical figures, and astonishing stories that I could not fit them all into one post. This week, I will cover or summarize the Barrymore family history and John’s theatrical career; next week, I will delve into Fowler’s version of the actor’s years as a movie star.

John Barrymore was descended from a long line of theater actors, the Lanes and the Drews, on his mother side, and he was the son of actor Maurice Barrymore. His grandmother, Louisa Lane Drew, the daughter of London actors, had come to America in 1827 where she became a notable actress at age seven. She liked to tell a story about how a Revolutionary War soldier came to see her in a play and was so taken with her that he came backstage to meet her, and she vividly recalled how the Liberty Bell tolled in 1834 for the death of Marquis de Lafayette, the French hero of the American Revolution. It wasn’t till the next year that the bell cracked.

In her seven-decade career, Mrs. Drew costarred with every actor of note, enjoying great success opposite Joseph Jefferson, who was also from a respected theatrical family. She played Ophelia in Junius Brutus Booth’s traveling company of Hamlet. The eccentric Booth was the father of Lincoln’s assassin, actor John Wilkes Booth. After her third marriage—to actor John Drew—Louisa managed stage productions in Philadelphia, where she often appeared in plays as well as managed the Arch Theater. John Wilkes had been a star at one of her playhouses and had even stayed in her home on North Twelfth Street. Eerily, Abraham Lincoln had also visited her playhouse and personally complemented her on her acting. When informed that John Wilkes had assassinated Lincoln, she pulled out a letter from the 16th president in which he thanked her for providing his presidential party with seats at the Arch Street Theater in 1862. She noted to her son, John Drew, “Will our profession ever atone?” Traveling in a professional circle that included both the President and his assassin seemed utterly uncanny to me.

EDWIN BOOTH AS HAMLET.

Edwin Booth, who despite being John Wilkes’s brother managed to become a legend of the theater, also intersected with the Drews and Barrymores. Maurice Barrymore, whose real name was Herbert Blythe, played Laertes in Edwin Booth’s Hamlet in 1875. Booth’s legend was built on his interpretation of Hamlet, which he played many times, most notably on Broadway. He set a Broadway record by playing Hamlet for 100 consecutive nights—a record broke by John Barrymore in 1922-23 when he played the role for 101 consecutive nights. According to Fowler, when John had been in the role about two-and-a-half months, a group of old-school theater people came to see him to ask him to stop his run at 99 appearances. When he asked why, the group noted that he should do it out of respect for the great Edwin Booth. Barrymore scoffed at the aged group and told them that it was time to move on from the past; he purposefully broke Booth’s record by one performance, and then left the production for other opportunities.

Barrymore’s mother Georgianna Drew met her husband, Maurice, through her actor brother John, Jr. The two hit it off immediately and were married in the centennial year, 1876. Louisa showed little respect for the talents of handsome Maurice, because he was only a first-generation actor, but she tolerated him for her daughter’s sake. Georgianna continued to perform onstage after her marriage, and she and her husband occasionally acted together in plays. However, just as often, they toured in different theatrical companies, going their separate ways. Maurice once toured with the great Lillie Langtry across Canada, returning home with a banged-up head after defending Ms. Langtry’s honor from a ruffian hockey player hell-bent on visiting the actress in her room uninvited. Georgianna established herself as a comedienne and became a member of the well-respected Palmer Stock Company. Apparently, it never crossed the minds of any of the Drew actresses to give up the stage for marriage and children. Like Louisa before them, Maurice and Georgianna crossed paths with other notables of the day, giving me the impression that legitimate-theater actors were greatly admired. For example, according to Fowler, Robert Peary, the man credited with discovering the North Pole, once gave Maurice two “Arctic” dogs (probably huskies) out of admiration.

GEORGIANNA BARRYMORE WITH HER TALENTED CHILDREN, ETHEL, LIONEL, AND JOHN (IN HER LAP)

As children, John, Ethel, and Lionel Barrymore met any number of historical figures, including General Nelson A. Miles, who had battled the Apaches out west. He retired to Long Island and was a neighbor to their uncle, John Drew, Jr. According to Fowler, John and Lionel played cowboys and Indians with Miles. And, once, Lionel barged into the home of family friends (also actors) only to discover President Grover Cleveland secretly recuperating from an ailment of the palette.

John and his siblings all claimed that they had no aspirations to become actors, though Lionel and Ethel didn’t waste much time preparing to do anything else. Lionel made his stage debut around 1893 in a play with his grandmother, while Ethel made her New York stage debut at age 14 in The Rivals. John held out the longest, with serious intentions of becoming an artist. He attended art classes at the Slade School in London and then enrolled in the famed Art Students League in New York. He even found a job painting murals at Murray’s Restaurant in New York, where architect Stanford White saw his work and admired it. The two became acquaintances, and White ended up giving him several objets d’art. Coincidentally, a couple of years later, John took up with chorus girl Evelyn Nesbit for a brief time—just before she began a scandalous affair with White. Later, Nesbit’s lover, millionaire Harry K. Thaw, murdered White. Reading about the Barrymores is akin to chasing across history with a who’s who of the noted and the notorious.

John Barrymore finally succumbed to the family legacy, more to pay the bills than anything else. At first, he toyed with acting, gaining little attention until 1909 when he appeared in The Fortune Hunter, which catapulted him to Broadway stardom. During his run in The Fortune Hunter, Barrymore developed a crush on vaudeville singer Nora Baye, but sister Ethel discouraged him from pursuing her because “she’s the romantic ideal of W.C. Fields.” When Barrymore wanted to know more about Fields, Ethel took him to the Ziegfeld Follies, where W.C. was the featured comedian. This marked Barrymore’s first encounter with the great Fields, who later became a close friend and drinking companion in Hollywood. Supposedly, after seeing the comedian juggle and deliver lines in his trademark style, Barrymore remarked, “I’m not in love with Miss Baye now. Hell! I’m in love with W.C. Fields.”

JOHN BARRYMORE AS PETER IBBETSON

Fowler’s biography does an excellent job of detailing New York’s theater scene during the 1910s, which was populated by eccentric people with strange names like A. Toxin Worm, a press agent. Fowler offers an insider’s view of the respected theatrical troupes of the day, the important playwrights and critics, the ins and outs of staging a production, and the night life that was part of this world. Fowler met Barrymore in 1918 after the actor had earned acclaim as a tragedian in such productions as Justice by playwright John Galsworthy and Peter Ibbetson, which was mounted at the dogged insistence of actress Constance Collier. When it looked like the production might fall through for lack of money, Florenz Ziegfeld stepped in to donate electrical equipment from his Follies, while famed actress Maude Adams volunteered to supervise the lighting for no fee.

In Peter Ibbetson, John costarred with his brother Lionel, who played the wicked Colonel Ibbetson. Lionel had left the theater in the mid-1910s to appear in motion pictures, including those of D.W. Griffith. Sadly, the oldest Barrymore sibling had become withdrawn after his two infant daughters died. He preferred to be at home and escape into a private world where he created etchings and paintings. Performing in movies churned out at the Metro Studios on 61st Street in New York meant his work day ended in the afternoon, so he could go home to paint and etch. After much prodding by John and playwright Edward Sheldon, Lionel agreed to appear in Peter Ibbetson and by all accounts, he nailed the part. In 1904, Lionel was quoted regarding what constitutes the “Great Actor.” He noted, “The Great Actor always must act. He must make a ceremony of waking up in the morning. He must sit in his room and act so that his whole body vibrates to the thrill of it. . . He must live in roles and love them. . .Let the most profound, the most classic line fall from his lips, he must be unconscious of the fact that he is not the author of it.” In his grief over his baby daughters, Lionel had forgotten this credo; his role in Peter Ibbetson with his brother John helped him find it again.

THE ALCHEMIST'S CORNER TODAY

During this time period, Barrymore lived on the top floor of a building on Washington Square in Greenwich Village. He called his apartment the “Alchemist’s Corner.” He charmed the matronly landlord into allowing him to make significant changes to his apartment, including adding an intentionally crooked staircase that wound its way to the roof, where he added a rooftop cottage and garden with exotic plants. He painted the baseboard and moldings black and covered the bathroom walls with mirrors. He added stained glass, a white marble fireplace, and lots of Victorian furniture. Barrymore may have been most happy in this very private space, which he rarely shared with anyone. Years later, when he returned to New York from Hollywood, he walked passed his old digs and recalled his younger bohemian days with fondness and melancholy, not realizing that the weight from the dirt from his garden, plus years of leaking water, had collapsed the roof.

BARRYMORE'S HAMLET: YOUNG, REBELLIOUS, AND HOT

The high point of John Barrymore’s stage career was his interpretation of two Shakespeare roles for theatrical producer-director Arthur Hopkins, Richard III in 1920 and Hamlet in 1922-23. The production of the former was critically acclaimed, but it was the latter that made him a legend in the theater. His interpretation of Hamlet updated the character from the 19th-century tradition of idealizing him into a genteel, introspective figure. Barrymore infused Hamlet with youthful rebellion, darkness, danger, and sexuality. After his record-breaking 101 Broadway performances, he revived the play on tour the following year and then took it to London. When he returned to New York in 1925, he quit the theater.

At this point in the biography, which is halfway through the 468-page book, Fowler mentions Barrymore’s film career for the first time. He begins this phase of JB’s life by intoning: “We hitherto have avoided extensive references to Jack’s cinematic experiments, out of respect for Shakespeare and Ella Wheeler Wilcox. The picture upon which we shall now drape a hasty festoon was undertaken at the close of [the play] Clair de Lune, after the birth of Jack’s daughter.” Next week, I will cover John Barrymore’s adventures in Hollywood as told by his good friend Gene Fowler.

22 Responses John Barrymore: Gene Fowler’s Sweet Prince, Part 1
Posted By dukeroberts : February 28, 2011 2:24 pm

I kind of like the old style of writing in flowery prose. Of course, no one speaks or writes like that anymore, but that’s kind of a shame.

John Barrymore was a very interesting character and I am glad you decided to split your post into two separate posts. Reading about these older actors and of that era is fascinating to me. I also think it important as we should not forget them. Thanks for the great write-up as usual, suzidoll.

Posted By suzidoll : February 28, 2011 5:34 pm

Dukeroberts: I sometimes think that no one is going to read something about screen actors from 60+ years ago, let alone a part of their career that pre-dates that. But, I feel I have to write about them and try to put their careers/talents in a context that will reveal the value of preserving their contributions. I appreciate it when readers respond to these particular posts so sincerely. Thank you so much.

Posted By Wendy T. Merckel : February 28, 2011 5:58 pm

I found a copy of Good Night, Sweet Prince years ago and fell in love with the book and Fowler’s Barrymore. You are right that Fowler’s writing style leans toward the romantic and flowery, but I am very glad he documented his friendship with the eccentric actor. There are sections of this book that I will always remember.

Fowler’s stories add up to an enormously entertaining and poignant portrait of Barrymore at a time in his life we would never know about without Fowler’s contribution. The time period covered is one that virtually no one has written about, and the artistic personalities talked about here are not discussed much nowadays. This book made me want to run away and join the theatre, living the Bohemian lifestyle that Barrymore enjoyed for a short time.

Thank you for writing about this lost gem of a biography. Perhaps new readers, and movie and theatre fans will find out about this fascinating book.

Posted By lisaem : February 28, 2011 6:59 pm

Wonderful post and I can’t wait for the 2nd installment. I’ve done lots of research on John Wilkes Booth and Lincoln, and from that became enamored of Edwin Booth. I’ve probably run across some of this info but had forgotten, and I loved to read about JWB’s friendship with Louisa. So many actors were shocked and scandalized by JWB’s “mad act” (as it’s famously been dubbed) especially because they had known him as a good friend and charming colleague. Still one of the most insane incidents in American history, with such amazing participants. Edwin was already bedeviled, even before JWB’s crime, especially by drink and an often sad personal life. So interesting to read about Barrymore’s “Hamlet” — did he use the famous skull that Edwin had at the Player’s Club? These were incredible men, tortured in so many ways, but endlessly intriguing!

And for a ghostly treat, listen to the 1893 recording Edwin made of some lines from “Othello” on wax. He died that same year. Here’s a link:
http://madshakespeare.com/2010/03/youtube-pick-edwin-booth-performs-othello/

I’d say that John Barrymore was more a John Wilkes Booth-type — matinee idol, stage lover, master of derring do, but obviously possessed some of the character flaws of Edwin.

Love this post, Suzi! Encore! Encore!

Posted By lisaem : February 28, 2011 7:00 pm

I keep forgetting that I’m logged in as another account, but that comment was from Medusa!

Posted By dukeroberts : February 28, 2011 8:09 pm

Suzi- It is my pleasure.

Medusa- The recording is very neat to listen to. It’s too bad you can’t really understand him over all of the hissing and crackling. I would love to be able to hear that legendary voice clearly.

Posted By debbe : February 28, 2011 11:15 pm

would like to find this book and read it. lovely post.

Posted By Lisa W. : February 28, 2011 11:58 pm

I love how well this post illustrates how romantic the theatre is and how we love our actors! “Goodnight, Sweet Prince” sounds like a gem of a book— thanks, Suzi!

PS I LOVE the name A. Toxin Worm!!

Posted By Vincent : March 1, 2011 12:59 am

Fascinating stuff about Barrymore and his stage life. I will be interested to see what Fowler has to say about his film career, particularly about “Twentieth Century.” Gene was a good friend of Carole Lombard, who chose him as one of her 10 most interesting men outside of Hollywood for Look magazine in the fall of 1938: http://community.livejournal.com/carole_and_co/94261.html

Posted By Jeff H. : March 1, 2011 3:31 am

I have been a Gene Fowler fan for almost 40 years and have a nice collection of his books (including a couple of signed editions) and even was an aquaintence of his son Will for a few years before his death. I have never found his writing style “flowery,” even though some today might call it that. You must remember that he came of age in the era of the great newspaper writer/reporters and the media barons who might have controlled many papers but also hired some of the best writers of their time.

If you can, pick up a copy of H. Allen Smith’s incredible biography of “The Last of the Bison,” as one of Fowler’s friends dubbed him, along with Will’s “The Second Handshake” and “The Young Man From Denver” for an fascinating look at this great talent who is in need of rediscovery, along with what I think would be an astounding biopic for either HBO or theatrical showings. Thank you for this posting.

Posted By Mike : March 1, 2011 8:23 am

I have read this book before as I am always reading a bio on a golden age or silent film star. Or so it seems.

What I wanted to say was that I just saw Christopher Plummer as Barrymore at the Elgin Theatre in Toronto this past Friday. A wonderful performance from Plummer.

I think I found the show more rewarding than some because I knew more of Barrymore’s story than the average ticketholder, therefore I seemed to be doing more smiling or laughing.

For example, Fowler’s name came up in the play and I wondered how many people here knew the name.

See the show if Plummer turns up in your town.

Filmfanmike

Posted By Heidi : March 2, 2011 1:24 pm

Great topic! I am going to look out for a copy of this, as I have not read it before. I find that I am more interested in movies that were made more than 40 years ago. They simply do not make them like that anymore. I don’t know if my profession (archaeologist) leads me to like the older things, but perhaps. My husband and I work well together, I love the old movies and am constantly trying to broaden his experiences by viewing them for the first time, and he trys to do the same with more current movies for me. I think it is a sad statement that most people today wouldn’t be interested in something from 60 years ago, but I agree that it is probably true. But, you know that we are all interested, so keep it coming!

Posted By dukeroberts : March 2, 2011 8:40 pm

Heidi- I’m afraid you are quite correct. Most of the people I know in my age group (under 40), won’t watch something if it’s black and white. ‘Tis a sad state of affairs.

Posted By Heidi : March 3, 2011 1:17 pm

dukeroberts, I know that is true for the under 40, but imagine my surprise at the number of people just over that age group that have no interest. Surprise and sadness, they don’t know what they are missing. I just got my husband to watch “Sunrise” the other day. He was so surprised to enjoy a silent movie! And I got him to watch the Great Dictator too, and he was surprised because he thought it was a silent movie (which is why he never watched it)! I don’t know where I went wrong with him, but I am working to rectify it! *g* “Wings” is on the dvr, and will be the next eye opening experience for him.

Posted By Jeff H. : March 3, 2011 4:00 pm

Heidi-kudos to you for getting your husband to watch “Sunrise”-excellent and challenging choice to introduce him. You might want to show him Fairbanks “Mark of Zorro” or any Keaton or Lloyd feature as well-have introduced many a person to the wonders of the silent screen with those and have not had a problem with any of those. I would hold off on “Passion of Joan d’Arc” and “Intolerance” for a while, though….I envy him seeing “Wings” for the first time-great film.

Posted By dukeroberts : March 3, 2011 8:01 pm

All is not totally lost for the younger generations. I have introduced my 18 year old nephew to some older films. We have watched Strangers On a Train, Shadow of a Doubt, It’s a Wonderful Life (of course) and On the Waterfront. In addition to that, I showed him The Great Dictator as well. What it is about that movie? I also know a young lady in her twenties who prefers silent films to any other and Suzi’s own cousin is not averse to watching old movies, although she doesn’t like westerns (sigh).

Posted By dukeroberts : March 3, 2011 8:04 pm

Jeff- yes, Mark of Zorro, any Lloyd and any Keaton films are good jumping on points of introducing people to silents. My sisters, who do not quite share my affinity for older movies, sat and watched Safety Last with me. I didn’t ask if they liked it. It did not concern me if they did, bu they watched it.

Posted By Jeff H. : March 4, 2011 4:44 am

Doris-that young lady in her 20s should be wrapped in cotton and watched over carefully: she is a rare breed!

Duke-when I taught a silent film class years ago I also showed SAFETY LAST. I used some generic music up to the climbing scene but could not think of anything useable for that part, so I just showed it without music at all. The gasps and the screams were all the soundtrack that film needed, to the point that one person told me “never do that again!” I think comedy works best along with action because after a while no one notices that no one can be heard-the action on the screen takes care of everything, as it should.

Posted By Jenni : March 6, 2011 12:27 am

Suzi, my grandma had Reader’s Digest condensed books in hardcover, about 15 of these books, and I would pour over them just to view the pictures when I was in grade school. I vividly remembered Fowler’s Good Night, Sweet Prince as one of the condensed book’s selections. I never read it, but do remember the pictures, especially the one of Mrs. Barrymore and her 3 children. Your article has whetted my reading apetite to locate Fowler’s book! Glad you are writing a part 2.

Posted By TCM's Classic Movie Blog : March 7, 2011 1:09 pm

[...] a movie career, is certainly more difficult to read than the first half, which I discussed in last week’s post. The great actor experiences only about five or six good years in Hollywood before his health [...]

Posted By March Links : The Shadow Cabaret : March 31, 2011 9:59 am

[...] classic John Barrymore biography Good Night, Sweet Prince. Fans of the Great Profile can link to Part One here and Part Two [...]

Posted By History Of Animation : January 3, 2012 10:19 am

I’m not certain where you’re getting your info, however great topic. I needs to spend a while finding out much more or figuring out more. Thanks for magnificent info I used to be searching for this info for my mission.

Leave a Reply

MovieMorlocks.com is the official blog for TCM. No topic is too obscure or niche to be excluded from our film discussions. And we welcome your comments on our blogs and bloggers.
Archives
Popular terms
3-D  Action Films  Actors  Actors' Endorsements  animal stars  Animation  Anime  Anthology Films  Autobiography  Awards  B-movies  Best of the Year lists  Biography  Biopics  Blu-Ray  Books on Film  British Cinema  Canadian Cinema  Character Actors  Chicago Film History  Cinematography  Classic Films  College Life on Film  Comedy  Comic Book Movies  Czech Film  Dance on Film  Digital Cinema  Directors  Disaster Films  Documentary  Drama  DVD  Early Talkies  Editing  Educational Films  European Influence on American Cinema  Experimental  Exploitation  Fairy Tales on Film  Faith or Christian-based Films  Family Films  Film Composers  film festivals  Film History in Florida  Film Noir  Film Scholars  Film titles  Filmmaking Techniques  Food in Film  Foreign Film  French Film  Gangster films  Genre  Genre spoofs  Guest Programmers  HD & Blu-Ray  Holiday Movies  Hollywood lifestyles  Horror  Horror Movies  Icons  independent film  Italian Film  Japanese Film  Korean Film  Literary Adaptations  Martial Arts  Melodramas  Method Acting  Mexican Cinema  Moguls  Monster Movies  Movie Books  Movie Costumes  Movie locations  Movie lovers  Movie Reviewers  Movie settings  Movie Stars  Music in Film  Musicals  Outdoor Cinema  Paranoid Thrillers  Parenting on film  Polish film industry  political thrillers  Politics in Film  Pornography  Pre-Code  Producers  Race in American Film  Remakes  Road Movies  Romance  Romantic Comedies  Russian Film Industry  Satire  Scandals  Science Fiction  Screenwriters  Semi-documentaries  Serials  Short Films  Silent Film  silent films  Social Problem Film  Sports  Sports on Film  Stereotypes  Straight-to-DVD  Studio Politics  Suspense thriller  Swashbucklers  TCM Classic Film Festival  Television  The British in Hollywood  The Germans in Hollywood  The Hungarians in Hollywood  The Irish in Hollywood  The Russians in Hollywood  Theaters  Trains in movies  Underground Cinema  VOD  War film  Westerns  Women in the Film Industry  Women's Weepies