My back issuesI don’t know that I’ve ever watched an entire episode of HOARDERS, the A&E reality TV series about people who obsessively collect things and wind up entrapped by their possessions, but I’ve seen enough and I get the point. As such, I’ve been spending a little time lately wading through my collection of film magazines with a mind toward, you might say, thinning the herd. I have a tendency to hold onto things but it’s not for reasons of security or the need to control my environment or any of the myriad whacko reasons people wind up with 137 kitty kat clocks, 52 eight track head cleaner cassettes and a gross of D’ag bags. As a freelance writer, I never know what I’m going to be writing about from month to month, so I’ve been characteristically slow to part with old issues of Film Comment or Sight & Sound or Cineaste because, hey, it could happen that I’m asked to write about Joris Ivens or Maurice Pialat or Marco Bellocchio and if it does then I’ll really need that 13, 15 or even 3o-year issue of that august film journal. But chances are I won’t. So let’s take out the trash, shall we… or at least ask some hard questions about what stays and what goes.
9 Responses My back issues
I’ve collected FILMS IN REVIEW since I was a young teen (my source was often Larry Edmunds on Hollywood Blvd.)…they’re wonderful for so many reasons, but one of the things I find especially interesting from today’s vantage point is how hard people worked, i.e., in the letters section, to find bits of info that we now have instantly at our fingertips via resources like IMDb. Makes me think of my own teen years when I would comb through the movie credits of various books looking for the credits of various actors, which I would note on file cards. The other thing I notice, both in FIR and in older film reference books, is how often the authors had to rely on their memories for descriptions of film plots or impressions of movies, because so often the movies weren’t accessible. Sometimes the plotlines described, for example, are wildly inaccurate. It’s also interesting to see how critical tastes have changed, i.e., I remember a FIR profile of Robert Taylor (perhaps by Everson?) said something along the lines that JOHNNY EAGER was a mistake and all wrong for Taylor, and today it’s one of his more admired films, particularly of those he made before WWII. Thanks for sharing your trip down memory lane and jarring loose my own reminisces. Best wishes, I also remember FILMS IN REVIEW, especially the columns on film collecting and the ultimate filmmusic column by Page Cook, who was one of the more passionate writers on the subject, and when he got a bug up his backside about something he would find a way to sneak a reference to it into whatever he was critqueing, even if no rational person on earth would be able to do the same. I remember how incensed he was about John Williams’ score for THE EMPIRE STRIKES BACK-the way he tore into it by the time you finished reading you wondered if Williams had murdered Cook’s parents. For a number of years whenever he really disliked something ESB was the baseline for how bad the score was, even if the score he waa writing about in no way even had the same kind of sound as Williams score. Cook was the Nancy Grace of filmmusic writers and as looney as he was-a lot of the time-not many wrote on the subject with the passion he had for it. Royal S. Brown was great in Fanfare, but Cook made it a religion. I still have some issues of Film Comment that I treasure (the WB cartoon issue signed by Mel Blanc and Friz Freleng is one) along with American Film, Take One, the first issue of Animation, some early copies of Cinefex and even The Perfect Vision, which used to be the mecca for laserdisc collectors. Have considered scanning these into my computer and selling the hard copies, but the feel of them is really hard to part with. Ooh, great piece, RHS. Films in Review is like popcorn. Once you start nibbling on one issue, you can never stop, so I completely understand your reluctance to part with them. Before you decide to toss some of these periodicals for good, do you think scanning them into a computer might be do-able–or is that just stalling the inevitable again? “Ooh, great piece, RHS. Films in Review is like popcorn. “Once you start nibbling on one issue, you can never stop, so I completely understand your reluctance to part with them. Before you decide to toss some of these periodicals for good, do you think scanning them into a computer might be do-able–or is that just stalling the inevitable again?” Not a bad idea. I think not long ago, someone put up the entire run of Baseball Digest online (classic cinema and baseball are passions of mine — go Nationals!), and I think Films in Review deserves similar treatment. I am also wondering if Films in Review could just be put online? I have much the same problem Richard having been an avid buyer of film mags since before the flood…when I was still correspondent for Films and Filming in the UK I gathered boxes of back issues with covers so iconic I kept most of them for that reason alone. Then came L’Ecarn Fantastque in Paris where I was the Hollywood coresspondent for two years so there goes another two boxes of a magazine in French…..as far as Films IN Review I have been writing for them for over a decade now and yes Jenni it is online as we speak at filmsinreview,com….check out my new column Camp David next week for my Vincent Price 100th birthday tribute……now back to stacking magazines…. Thank you for the info about Filmsinreview.com, David. I logged onto it after the Superbowl was over, and will definitely check out your column on Mr. Price. Great post! I also share the baseball passion, and my Baseball Digest collection is rather out of control. For such little things, they take up a lot of space. Fortunately, thus far, I have not had to choose to cull them down, but that is in my future. I hope I can do a meaningful job of it. If they are online, then it will be a bit easier. I have watched one full episode of “Hoarders” and found it to be a bit too close to home! *G* Leave a Reply |
Archives
Featured Sites
Popular terms
3-D
Action Films
Actors
Actors' Endorsements
animal stars
Animation
Anime
Anthology Films
Autobiography
Awards
B-movies
Best of the Year lists
Biography
Biopics
Blu-Ray
Books on Film
British Cinema
Canadian Cinema
Character Actors
Chicago Film History
Cinematography
Classic Films
College Life on Film
Comedy
Comic Book Movies
Czech Film
Dance on Film
Digital Cinema
Directors
Disaster Films
Documentary
Drama
DVD
Early Talkies
Editing
Educational Films
European Influence on American Cinema
Experimental
Exploitation
Fairy Tales on Film
Faith or Christian-based Films
Family Films
Film Composers
film festivals
Film History in Florida
Film Noir
Film Scholars
Film titles
Filmmaking Techniques
Food in Film
Foreign Film
French Film
Gangster films
Genre
Genre spoofs
Guest Programmers
HD & Blu-Ray
Holiday Movies
Hollywood lifestyles
Horror
Horror Movies
Icons
independent film
Italian Film
Japanese Film
Korean Film
Literary Adaptations
Martial Arts
Melodramas
Method Acting
Mexican Cinema
Moguls
Monster Movies
Movie Books
Movie Costumes
Movie locations
Movie lovers
Movie Reviewers
Movie settings
Movie Stars
Music in Film
Musicals
Outdoor Cinema
Paranoid Thrillers
Parenting on film
Polish film industry
political thrillers
Politics in Film
Pornography
Pre-Code
Producers
Race in American Film
Remakes
Road Movies
Romance
Romantic Comedies
Russian Film Industry
Satire
Scandals
Science Fiction
Screenwriters
Semi-documentaries
Serials
Short Films
Silent Film
silent films
Social Problem Film
Sports
Sports on Film
Stereotypes
Straight-to-DVD
Studio Politics
Suspense thriller
Swashbucklers
TCM Classic Film Festival
Television
The British in Hollywood
The Germans in Hollywood
The Hungarians in Hollywood
The Irish in Hollywood
The Russians in Hollywood
Theaters
Trains in movies
Underground Cinema
VOD
War film
Westerns
Women in the Film Industry
Women's Weepies |
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Screen Icons 40s50s, Classic Film Reader. Classic Film Reader said: TCM Movie Morlocks My back issues http://bit.ly/fLLEvf [...]