My back issues

I don’t know that I’ve ever watched an entire episode of HOARDERS, the A&E reality TV series about people who obsessively collect things and wind up entrapped by their possessions, but I’ve seen enough and I get the point.  As such, I’ve been spending a little time lately wading through my collection of film magazines with a mind toward, you might say, thinning the herd.  I have a tendency to hold onto things but it’s not for reasons of security or the need to control my environment or any of the myriad whacko reasons people wind up with 137 kitty kat clocks, 52 eight track head cleaner cassettes and a gross of D’ag bags.  As a freelance writer, I never know what I’m going to be writing about from month to month, so I’ve been characteristically slow to part with old issues of Film Comment or Sight & Sound or Cineaste because, hey, it could happen that I’m asked to write about Joris Ivens or Maurice Pialat or Marco Bellocchio and if it does then I’ll really need that 13, 15 or even 3o-year issue of that august film journal.  But chances are I won’t.  So let’s take out the trash, shall we… or at least ask some hard questions about what stays and what goes.

I’ve decided to do this on a case by case basis.  First up, the March/April 2002 issue of Film Comment.  I bought this New York-based magazine pretty regularly in the B.C. (Before Children), when I was between marriages and had nothing better to do with my money.  Flipping through this almost 10-year-old issue I find a lot of head-scratchers.  In the “Opening Shots” column (news items from around the world of film), Nicole Kidman is announced as one of the stars of then upcoming HARRY POTTER AND THE CHAMBER OF SECRETS and also of something called COURT AND SPARK.  These things didn’t happen, of course, nor did Jamie Foxx replace Bill Murray as Bosley in CHARLIE’S ANGELS: HALO, which was released instead as CHARLIE’S ANGELS: FULL THROTTLE (2003) with Bernic Mac in the role.   I’m also not sad to report that, 9 years later, Christopher McQuarrie’s script for the American remake of Johnnie To’s THE MISSION (1999) has born fruit or that the Tobey Maguire-Jennifer Lopez remake of Sam Fuller’s THE NAKED KISS (1964) never progressed beyond the Really Bad Idea stage.  I don’t mean to make it sound like I’m picking on Film Comment for being chockablock with inside tips that turned out to be so many popcorn farts – that’s the nature of the beast, I guess, and one of the most fascinating things about Hollywood is the stuff that never got made, or perhaps just got made under entirely different circumstances than anyone attached early on could have imagined.  I can see now what drew me to this issue back in 2002: an article on photographer Gregory Crewdson, a piece by Jason Gross on the GHOST WORLD (2001) soundtrack, Richard Combs’ selection of Michael Haneke’s THE PIANO TEACHER (2001) as “Movie of the Moment” and a page dedicated to Francois Ozon’s 8 WOMEN (2002).  Other stuff – the cover story on Francis Ford Coppola, “Oscar Predix” and fiction — who’s precious idea was that? — didn’t interest me then and doesn’t now.  Decision:  toss.

Some years ago, a friend way up Vancouver way sent me a bunch of Canadian film magazines from the 1970s.  Mind you, these magazines were old when I got them — the issue at the right is from 1973 — and they have aged another decade in my care.  As a kid growing up in North East Connecticut, I loved seeing the odd Canadian movie that would trickle down to the New York stations we could receive at night if we rotated our roof ariel all the way to the west.  It was a treat to get these magazines and read about the Canadian film industry of the era in which I discovered it and they gave me some unique insights into how movies were made (and why they weren’t) in the Great White North.  In addition to boasting a haunting shot of Genevieve Bujold looking all ghostly on the cover, issue #7 of Canadian Cinema, there’s an interview with the actress, a ton of ads for then-state of the art camera equipment (“the Bolex EBM Electric: The Standard in 16mm!”) and, best of all for a geeks like me, an item in the “Canadian Film News” under the subheading of “More Canadian Features?” that notes that “another upcoming project called FEAST OF THE CANNIBAL GHOULS, a $50,00, full length super-16mm features (is) to be shot on location in Sudbury, Ontario… The horror story will use local talent, except for U.S. actor John Carradine in the lead.”  The movie this turned out to be was CORPSE EATERS (1974), the first Canadian zombie movie ever (and something to see if you haven’t had the pleasure), which went into the can without the services of John Carradine.  Given that CORPSE EATERS doesn’t seem to have been made — which is to say, budgeted, location-scouted, cast, blocked, shot, printed, processed and duplicated — so much as resulted from a chemical spill, it’s cool (in a purely Psychotronic way) to seed this little news item but it’s not really a justification for keeping the mag, I’m sorry to say.  Decision:  re-read the Bujold interview and toss.

I picked up this issue of the British film magazine Neon when I was in London in the fall of 1997, specifically (if I remember correctly) to read on the train when I made the trip by rail to Bath.  It’s an over-sized magazine and this cover had actual holes where the bloody bullet holes appear — which I thought was cool. (Still do!)  Devoted to violence in cinema, the subject of this particular issue was right up my alley.  “World of Pain: 100 Years of Gore” by Andrew Male is a well-argued defense of ultra-violence as a credible component of movie storytelling (“We should never believe that the movies have an obligation to teach us how to become better people…”) and makes interesting reading alongside “Shoot to Kill” by Gareth Grundy, an article about the specter of snuff films and the very real and tragic story of a Hollywood hopeful who imploded on his way to a studio deal, taking out his estranged wife and 13 year-old daughter before turning his gun on himself in the San Jacinto mountains.  (The movie did get made, by the way, by and starring Johnny Depp, with Marlon Brando — no, really.)  There’s also a tribute to the then-recently deceased Robert Mitchum by Jim Jarmush, an appreciative piece on Ken Russell’s THE DEVILS (1970) by Richard Falcon and a short interview with Mike Hodges regarding GET CARTER (1971) but at a distance of 14 years I don’t know if there’s much to hold my ongoing interest.  Decision:  toss.

I remember where I got this: at a subterranean book shop on 12th Street in the Village, right across the street from the rep house Cinema Village.  Twelfth Street Books was one of my regular stops downtown back when I lived in Manhattan, and I usually made a beeline right from The Strand to there (that is, if I hadn’t already spent all my folding money at the Strand).  Never crowded, the joint had a juicy pulp fiction section in a corner that you had to squeeze to fit into (as I remember) but it was the film section that I loved the best.  I bought a lot of stuff there, from the taciturn clerk with indie pic good looks and a serious nicotine habit.  They often had a big old carboard box full of old film magazines and that’s where I picked up more than a few issues of the mighty Films in Review.  It’s a good issue — the letters section alone has correspondence from Dewitt Bodeen and William K. Everson (“Changing a hot bulb in the middle of a screening can be painful as well as time-consuming and annoying…”) — with pieces on Dorothy Gish and Franz Waxman and a funny reminiscence by Samuel A. Peeples about getting on Boris Karloff’s bad side but the real find for me here was Jack Edmund Nolan’s profile of Eddie Constantine, just one of my favorite actors ever! Constantine was an American who found fame abroad, principally in France but in international productions all over the Continent.  He made the occasional English language film (Guy Green’s SOS PACIFIC and John Mackenzie’s THE LONG GOOD FRIDAY, although he has considerable cult film clout for starring in Jean-Luc Godard’s ALPHAVILLE, too) but never made any real impact in America.  That’s what makes “The Eddie Constantine Vogue” (which would make a terrific band name) such a find, rounded out as it is with a then-comprehensive filmography and representing about the only thing I have read on Eddie Constantine in English.  I relied heavily on this when I wrote the supplemental materials for Anchor Bay’s LONG GOOD FRIDAY DVD a few years ago.  Decision: keep, possibly forever.

One of my favorite haunts in Times Square — a place I confess not to having spent a lot of time, apart from theatre-related business — was the big Virgin Megastore, which I’m sure replaced four peep shows and a tattoo parlor or maybe just a big old shuttered retail space, I don’t remember.  Pricing at Virgin was never better than SRP, which made me a Mondo Kim’s and Tower Records customer, but Virgin did have a great magazine rack and that’s where I picked up this 1999 issue of BadAzz MoFo.  My friend Chris Poggiali is a contributor to this issue but I don’t know if I knew that when I picked it up — I may have spent my hard-earned $4.95 on the strength of the cover alone and the peripheral promise of “Akira Kurosawa!  Midgets!  T-shirt Giveaway!”  BadAzz MoFo was a very funny ‘zine that followed Blaxploitation and some related subgenres (spaghetti westerns, chop sockey) and it was rich in both wit and the kind of slavish attention to detail that can come from only the most dedicated aficionado.  There’s a lot to love here — from Chris’ overview of the Donald Westlake “Richard Stark” novels (which inspired such films as POINT BLANK, THE SPLIT, THE OUTFIT and SLAYGROUND) to the big spaghetti western feature to sidebars on black westerns, real life black cowboys and “Injunsploitation.”  Plus, the mag had an unbeatable rating system — afros:  4 afros meant excellence, 1 afro meant fair and no afros/Jeri curls meant sucks.  Not surprisingly, irreverence is the coin of the BadAzz MoFo realm — check this review for John Frankenheimer’s RONIN (1998):  :Ever watch a James Bond flick, and wonder what the shit would be like if Robert DeNiro was starring in it?  Me neither.”  13 years later and I’m still laffin’.  Let’s remember that, BadAzz MoFo issue no. 4, as we go our separate ways.  We had a good run.  Decision:  toss, with regrets.

I bought Famous Monsters of Filmland pretty religiously between 1971 and 1977 or ’78 but I entered adulthood with just one issue left over from my childhood.  I really can’t account for that.  I must have given my Mom the go-ahead to trash my collection while I was in college (no, I wasn’t drunk) which meant that when my love of monsters and monster accessories kicked back in during the early 90s I had to re-purchase many back issues.  Luckily, FM has never been a rare item and I met some great guys at horror conventions who’d kept these then-twenty and thirty year-old issues in tip top condition.  I don’t really know why this particular issue from July 1970 is kicking around outside of the heavy duty cardboard box in which I store my FM back issues — I must have referred to it at some point in the past two years — but there it is, at my elbow.  What a cover!  No such scene appears in WITCHCRAFT (1964) but Vic Prezio’s illustration is a winner nonetheless — I love the look on the sacrificial victim’s face.  There’s a feature article on witchcraft in the movies, chockablock with illustrations, and a strange novelization-like condensation of Edgar Ulmer’s THE BLACK CAT (1934) … plus, those classic Warren Publishing back pages, full of wonderful items to buy with your allowance, like a Mole People mask or 8mm cut-downs of THE BLOB (1958), THE 4D MAN (1959) and IT CAME FROM OUTER SPACE (1953).  I ordered a lot of stuff from Captain Company back in the day but I spent even more time just looking at all of this bounty and wondering what my life would be like with it in my house.  In a way, my consideration of the essential, lasting worth of this issue is a bit of a cheat because I would never and will never part with my Famous Monsters collection.  Decision: keep.  These back issues will go with me to the very lip of my grave… and perhaps beyond!

9 Responses My back issues
Posted By Tweets that mention TCM’s Classic Movie Blog — Topsy.com : February 4, 2011 2:26 am

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Screen Icons 40s50s, Classic Film Reader. Classic Film Reader said: TCM Movie Morlocks My back issues http://bit.ly/fLLEvf [...]

Posted By Laura : February 4, 2011 3:41 am

I’ve collected FILMS IN REVIEW since I was a young teen (my source was often Larry Edmunds on Hollywood Blvd.)…they’re wonderful for so many reasons, but one of the things I find especially interesting from today’s vantage point is how hard people worked, i.e., in the letters section, to find bits of info that we now have instantly at our fingertips via resources like IMDb. Makes me think of my own teen years when I would comb through the movie credits of various books looking for the credits of various actors, which I would note on file cards.

The other thing I notice, both in FIR and in older film reference books, is how often the authors had to rely on their memories for descriptions of film plots or impressions of movies, because so often the movies weren’t accessible. Sometimes the plotlines described, for example, are wildly inaccurate. It’s also interesting to see how critical tastes have changed, i.e., I remember a FIR profile of Robert Taylor (perhaps by Everson?) said something along the lines that JOHNNY EAGER was a mistake and all wrong for Taylor, and today it’s one of his more admired films, particularly of those he made before WWII.

Thanks for sharing your trip down memory lane and jarring loose my own reminisces.

Best wishes,
Laura

Posted By Jeff H. : February 4, 2011 5:42 am

I also remember FILMS IN REVIEW, especially the columns on film collecting and the ultimate filmmusic column by Page Cook, who was one of the more passionate writers on the subject, and when he got a bug up his backside about something he would find a way to sneak a reference to it into whatever he was critqueing, even if no rational person on earth would be able to do the same. I remember how incensed he was about John Williams’ score for THE EMPIRE STRIKES BACK-the way he tore into it by the time you finished reading you wondered if Williams had murdered Cook’s parents. For a number of years whenever he really disliked something ESB was the baseline for how bad the score was, even if the score he waa writing about in no way even had the same kind of sound as Williams score. Cook was the Nancy Grace of filmmusic writers and as looney as he was-a lot of the time-not many wrote on the subject with the passion he had for it. Royal S. Brown was great in Fanfare, but Cook made it a religion.

I still have some issues of Film Comment that I treasure (the WB cartoon issue signed by Mel Blanc and Friz Freleng is one) along with American Film, Take One, the first issue of Animation, some early copies of Cinefex and even The Perfect Vision, which used to be the mecca for laserdisc collectors. Have considered scanning these into my computer and selling the hard copies, but the feel of them is really hard to part with.

Posted By moirafinnie : February 4, 2011 1:29 pm

Ooh, great piece, RHS. Films in Review is like popcorn.

Once you start nibbling on one issue, you can never stop, so I completely understand your reluctance to part with them. Before you decide to toss some of these periodicals for good, do you think scanning them into a computer might be do-able–or is that just stalling the inevitable again?

Posted By Vincent : February 4, 2011 5:44 pm

“Ooh, great piece, RHS. Films in Review is like popcorn.

“Once you start nibbling on one issue, you can never stop, so I completely understand your reluctance to part with them. Before you decide to toss some of these periodicals for good, do you think scanning them into a computer might be do-able–or is that just stalling the inevitable again?”
___________________________

Not a bad idea. I think not long ago, someone put up the entire run of Baseball Digest online (classic cinema and baseball are passions of mine — go Nationals!), and I think Films in Review deserves similar treatment.

Posted By Jenni : February 5, 2011 10:13 pm

I am also wondering if Films in Review could just be put online?

Posted By David Del Valle : February 6, 2011 2:42 pm

I have much the same problem Richard having been an avid buyer of film mags since before the flood…when I was still correspondent for Films and Filming in the UK I gathered boxes of back issues with covers so iconic I kept most of them for that reason alone. Then came L’Ecarn Fantastque in Paris where I was the Hollywood coresspondent for two years so there goes another two boxes of a magazine in French…..as far as Films IN Review I have been writing for them for over a decade now and yes Jenni it is online as we speak at filmsinreview,com….check out my new column Camp David next week for my Vincent Price 100th birthday tribute……now back to stacking magazines….

Posted By Jenni : February 7, 2011 10:53 am

Thank you for the info about Filmsinreview.com, David. I logged onto it after the Superbowl was over, and will definitely check out your column on Mr. Price.

Posted By Heidi : February 7, 2011 1:36 pm

Great post! I also share the baseball passion, and my Baseball Digest collection is rather out of control. For such little things, they take up a lot of space. Fortunately, thus far, I have not had to choose to cull them down, but that is in my future. I hope I can do a meaningful job of it. If they are online, then it will be a bit easier. I have watched one full episode of “Hoarders” and found it to be a bit too close to home! *G*

Leave a Reply

MovieMorlocks.com is the official blog for TCM. No topic is too obscure or niche to be excluded from our film discussions. And we welcome your comments on our blogs and bloggers.
Archives
Popular terms
3-D  Action Films  Actors  Actors' Endorsements  animal stars  Animation  Anime  Anthology Films  Autobiography  Awards  B-movies  Best of the Year lists  Biography  Biopics  Blu-Ray  Books on Film  British Cinema  Canadian Cinema  Character Actors  Chicago Film History  Cinematography  Classic Films  College Life on Film  Comedy  Comic Book Movies  Czech Film  Dance on Film  Digital Cinema  Directors  Disaster Films  Documentary  Drama  DVD  Early Talkies  Editing  Educational Films  European Influence on American Cinema  Experimental  Exploitation  Fairy Tales on Film  Faith or Christian-based Films  Family Films  Film Composers  film festivals  Film History in Florida  Film Noir  Film Scholars  Film titles  Filmmaking Techniques  Food in Film  Foreign Film  French Film  Gangster films  Genre  Genre spoofs  Guest Programmers  HD & Blu-Ray  Holiday Movies  Hollywood lifestyles  Horror  Horror Movies  Icons  independent film  Italian Film  Japanese Film  Korean Film  Literary Adaptations  Martial Arts  Melodramas  Method Acting  Mexican Cinema  Moguls  Monster Movies  Movie Books  Movie Costumes  Movie locations  Movie lovers  Movie Reviewers  Movie settings  Movie Stars  Music in Film  Musicals  Outdoor Cinema  Paranoid Thrillers  Parenting on film  Polish film industry  political thrillers  Politics in Film  Pornography  Pre-Code  Producers  Race in American Film  Remakes  Road Movies  Romance  Romantic Comedies  Russian Film Industry  Satire  Scandals  Science Fiction  Screenwriters  Semi-documentaries  Serials  Short Films  Silent Film  silent films  Social Problem Film  Sports  Sports on Film  Stereotypes  Straight-to-DVD  Studio Politics  Suspense thriller  Swashbucklers  TCM Classic Film Festival  Television  The British in Hollywood  The Germans in Hollywood  The Hungarians in Hollywood  The Irish in Hollywood  The Russians in Hollywood  Theaters  Trains in movies  Underground Cinema  VOD  War film  Westerns  Women in the Film Industry  Women's Weepies