“Was the murderer a man… or man’s best friend?”
I’ve been curious about THEY ONLY KILL THEIR MASTERS for years mainly due to its catchy title and subject matter. I also love a good mystery and the movie’s original poster art grabbed my attention. The film’s plot centers around the murder of a beautiful and mysterious woman in a small California coastal town. It’s assumed that she was killed by her dog, a Doberman Pinscher, that was found hovering over her dead body. Naturally there aren’t a lot of suspects in a town with such a small population but the local sheriff (James Garner) takes his time looking for clues and interviewing potential witnesses. Throughout the course of the film a few red herrings are tossed around without much forethought until the whole thing comes to an unimaginative end.
The cast is full of capable actors including the handsome and charming James Garner as Sheriff Abel Marsh and a much younger Katherine Ross as his love interest. Age differences aside, these two just don’t have a lot of chemistry and their love scenes seem incredibly awkward at times. Hal Holbrook is somewhat interesting as the town’s veterinarian but he never really seems committed to his role and the award-winning actress June Allyson plays his wife. Allyson’s sexually ambiguous character is intriguing but unfortunately she’s given very little screen time. Peter Lawford has one of the movie’s meatiest roles as the murdered woman’s jilted husband but I kept getting distracted by his big hair and loungewear. The ‘70s setting did work in the film’s favor because my favorite moments of THEY ONLY KILL THEIR MASTERS were the interior shots of the murdered woman’s isolated beach house. If you happen to be fond of early ‘70s design you might appreciate her groovy pad as much as I did.
The film was directed by James Goldstone who made a name for himself while working on many celebrated television shows like The Outer Limits (1963-64), The Fugitive (1964), Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea (1964-65), Rawhide (1965), Perry Mason (1965), Honey West (1965) and Star Trek (1966). THEY ONLY KILL THEIR MASTERS was one of Goldstone’s first feature films but his stilted directing style was better suited for television. The film is hampered by lackluster cinematography, poorly staged fight scenes and lifeless dialogue exchanges. If I didn’t know any better I would have assumed that I was watching a made-for-TV movie. The script was written by Lane Slate and it had potential but there’s a slight homophobic and misogynistic quality about the writing that impedes the production. And when you compare it to European thrillers that were made around the same time or American films with a similar setting like Clint Eastwood’s Play Misty For Me (1971), THEY ONLY KILL THEIR MASTERS comes across as a poorly constructed amateur effort. THEY ONLY KILL THEIR MASTERS has occasionally been mentioned in the same breath as other films featuring killer Doberman dogs like The Boys from Brazil (1978), but it’s nowhere near as entertaining as that Oscar nominated movie. I did appreciate they way that the film dealt with the idea of a murderous dog and placed the blame for any negative behaviors squarely at the feet of the animal’s owner and trainer. I’m particularly fond of Doberman Pinschers because my grandfather owned one that I dearly loved. Her name was Smiley and she was a beautiful animal but she had been trained to attack. My grandfather trusted the dog enough to let it baby-sit me and she was totally devoted to protecting her family, but one day Smiley got loose and attacked a passing stranger. Thankfully no one was seriously hurt but my grandfather was forced to let the dog go. I don’t know if her training had been too rough or if she was abused in any way before my grandfather adopted her but I do know that she was a wonderful dog. Unfortunately you can’t always predict an animal’s behavior and stress as well as other factors can lead to dangerous situations. But there are effective ways to deal with aggressive pets if you’re willing to make the effort and THEY ONLY KILL THEIR MASTERS alludes to that possibility. I wish I could tell you that THEY ONLY KILL THEIR MASTERS was ripe for rediscovery but I think it’s actually ripe for a remake. According to Jay Scott’s book Midnight Matinees: Movies and Their Makers 1975-1985, director John Huston once said “There is a willful lemming-like persistence in remaking past successes time after time. They can’t make them as good as they are in our memories, but they go on doing them and each time it’s a disaster. Why don’t we remake some of our bad pictures – I’d love another shot at ‘Roots of Heaven’ – and make them good?” I couldn’t agree with Huston more and THEY ONLY KILL THEIR MASTERS would really benefit from a reimagining of the material with a better director at the helm. There’s a seed of a good idea somewhere in the movie and lots of room for creative camerawork, some lush location photography and interesting acting roles if the script is flushed out. Are you listening Hollywood? How about forgoing the planned remakes of Alfred Hitchcock’s The Birds (1963), John Arnold’s Creature from the Black Lagoon (1954), David Cronenberg’s The Brood (1979) and John Carpenter’s Escape From New York (1981). I personally think the creative forces behind these projects would have better success and critical respect if they decided to remake THEY ONLY KILL THEIR MASTERS instead. 15 Responses “Was the murderer a man… or man’s best friend?”
This one and 1974′s “The Midnight Man”, which I prefer to TOKTM because the script was better, shared a similar look and feel, especially the murderous man-eating lesbian aspect, which really dates it in today’s reality – this was a theme in a lot of popular fiction around then, like Ron Goulart’s “After Things Fell Apart”. I say watch it once, get it over with, like a neat, quick hanging. I actually liked the movie. Ha ha. I’m not kidding. I spent the night of my 35th birthday watching it on my mom’s couch in 2009. It played on TCM. It was a fun, kind of brainless mystery. You’re right about it seeming like a TV movie, but TV movies in the 70′s were better than TV movies today. Brian’s Song and Duel are two great examples. Part of the fun of the movie was James Garner’s breezy approach to solving the murder. His character was so very much like Jim Rockford, one of my all time favorite TV characters (right up there with Captain James T. Kirk, Don Draper, Dexter Morgan, Pete Malloy, Batman, Dan Tana, Superman, the Lone Ranger, Lucy Ricardo, Barney Fife and Tonto). Another bit of fun of the movie was spotting all of the MGM old timers that were cast, seemingly in tribute before closing down the lot. Though it is kind of cheesy, it is fun. However, I do not recommend spending $20.00 on it if you’ve never seen it. It was a 1970′s Doberman movie, though! You shoulda known that was gonna be painful. Medusa – Thanks for making me laugh today! Vanwall – Now you’ve gone and made me curious about THE MIDNIGHT MAN but I’ll try and avoid it. Still… directed by AND starring Burt Lancaster?!?! THE MIDNIGHT MAN is tempting! Duke – Thankfully I only paid $14.95 for it so maybe I got off easy. Garner is great but I’d much rather watch reruns of The Rockford Files than sit through THEY ONLY KILL THEIR MASTERS again. My expectations probably didn’t help matters since I really wanted it to be a better movie. MarsNova – But I really like THE BOYS FROM BRAZIL! And I had been led to believe that THEY ONLY KILL THEIR MASTERS might be as good. Of course I also realize that THE BOYS FROM BRAZIL probably doesn’t appeal to everyone, but what can I say. I love Gregory Peck, james Mason and Laurence Olivier so I’ll blame them for my fascination with the movie even though a lot of people think they were slumming when they agreed to appear in it. Generally speaking though my film tastes tend to be a little eclectic and THE BOYS FROM BRAZIL is an unusual movie. I love The Boys from Brazil too. I really love the scene where dead Guttenberg blinks. I am like you in that I also prefer to rent a film before purchasing it to make sure it’s something I want to see again or show in my classes. I will go so far as to say that I prefer “browsing” through titles in a store, reading the wrap copy and comparing and contrasting my “lucky finds” before purchasing. It’s called shopping, and there is fun in it. Like browsing in a book store, or shopping for a new blouse, it can be a leisure-time activity. Getting something online is just “buying” or “downloading.” Not fun, just spending money. I resent that the browsing option I prefer in renting or purchasing movies is being replaced by online transactions. I fear we will all become like those chubby characters in WALL-E who are fat, unhealthy, and glued to computer screens. I remember being very excited when this came on TV when I was a kid (you’re right–it’s that incredibly tantalizing title), but losing interest halfway through. I should add the title They Only Kill Their Masters is *so* good, that I considered buying it from Warner Archive when I saw it listed, despite clearly remembering my disappointment. Duke – Let’s hear it for THE BOYS FROM BRAZIL! I think it’s a great film made even better by Jerry Goldsmith’s score and Henri Decaë’s cinematography. rhsmith – Noted! Suzi- What’s really bugging me lately is the fact that Netflix & the like drove all the good local DVD rental shops out of business. Now Netflix is talking about ending DVD rentals and only offering streaming films, plus they’ve also recently stopped purchasing new titles released by small DVD companies. In other words they’ll only be offering mainstream or widely popular and critically approved films soon. To make matters worse, companies like Warner, etc. are now only offering older films for sale and the general public can’t rent them. It’s creating a huge gulf between wealthy film fans who can afford to buy new DVDs every week and those of us who can’t and prefer to rent. This is also going to have a huge effect on libraries and colleges. I’m really surprised that the topic isn’t getting more coverage. The future looks extremely grim for film fans unless they’ve got plenty of extra spending money on hand. ratzkywatzky – The title is great but really misleading. And thanks for mentioning TRAPPED. You’ve got me eager to see it! Netflix is my best friend, but I didn’t know they were making those changes. I used to work at Blockbuster and remember how angry I would get when we got rid of great classic or lesser seen titles. Why must they do that? I hate the idea of it. Maybe Turner Classic Movies could team up with Warner Brothers to offer some streaming titles on their web site on occasion. They could show a few titles a month or whatever, titles that have been released from the Archives, to drum up sales and interest in the whole Archives collection. They already have a built in niche audience: folks like us. I just got a sale email from Warner Archives Collection. $5.00 off select Archives titles. You might have spent only $9.95 on They Only Kill Their Masters. Bummer. Oh, by all means see “The Midnight Man”, I like it. It’s sort of like “Lawman” goes to college – Lancaster relentless, because it’s the right thing to do. Oh goodness, I saw this movie about 6 years ago and feel the same way you did. My high school self thought “Oh a June Allyson movie!” and you see her peaking around a corners and running away. I think she probably has 5 minutes total in the movie. Other irritating things about this movie: I too thought this seemed like a made for TV movie. I remember I read that Ann Rutherford was not at all pleased with her experience during this movie. She was excited about returning to the MGM backlot but found it completely changed. She was expected to do her own makeup and wear her own clothing, which she wasn’t used to at all. Sure, she had a really small part, but during her time, even walk-ons were given costumes and made up. Leave a Reply |
Archives
Featured Sites
Popular terms
3-D
Action Films
Actors
Actors' Endorsements
animal stars
Animation
Anime
Anthology Films
Autobiography
Awards
B-movies
Best of the Year lists
Biography
Biopics
Blu-Ray
Books on Film
Boxing films
British Cinema
Canadian Cinema
Character Actors
Chicago Film History
Cinematography
Classic Films
College Life on Film
Comedy
Comic Book Movies
Czech Film
Dance on Film
Digital Cinema
Directors
Disaster Films
Documentary
Drama
DVD
Early Talkies
Editing
Educational Films
European Influence on American Cinema
Experimental
Exploitation
Fairy Tales on Film
Faith or Christian-based Films
Family Films
Film Composers
film festivals
Film History in Florida
Film Noir
Film Scholars
Film titles
Filmmaking Techniques
Food in Film
Foreign Film
French Film
Gangster films
Genre
Genre spoofs
Guest Programmers
HD & Blu-Ray
Holiday Movies
Hollywood lifestyles
Horror
Horror Movies
Icons
independent film
Italian Film
Japanese Film
Korean Film
Leadership
Literary Adaptations
Martial Arts
Melodramas
Method Acting
Mexican Cinema
Moguls
Monster Movies
Movie Books
Movie Costumes
Movie locations
Movie lovers
Movie Reviewers
Movie settings
Movie Stars
Music in Film
Musicals
New Releases
Outdoor Cinema
Paranoid Thrillers
Parenting on film
Polish film industry
political thrillers
Politics in Film
Pornography
Pre-Code
Producers
Race in American Film
Remakes
Road Movies
Romance
Romantic Comedies
Russian Film Industry
Satire
Scandals
Science Fiction
Screenwriters
Semi-documentaries
Serials
Short Films
Silent Film
silent films
Social Problem Film
Sports
Sports on Film
Stereotypes
Straight-to-DVD
Studio Politics
Suspense thriller
Swashbucklers
TCM Classic Film Festival
Television
The British in Hollywood
The Germans in Hollywood
The Hungarians in Hollywood
The Irish in Hollywood
The Russians in Hollywood
Theaters
Trains in movies
Underground Cinema
VOD
War film
Westerns
Women in the Film Industry
Women's Weepies |
Even James Garner’s magic touch can’t always fix something that’s sub-par! This one is definitely TV-Movie level.
These Dobermans should be so lucky to have the provenance of “The Boys from Brazil” — I’m afraid these pooches are more akin to their canine compadres in “The Doberman Gang”! :-)