The Magnificent Seven: 50th Anniversary

The 33rd Stars Denver Film Festival still has a week to go. It offers up hundreds of films that were divided this year into 16 different programs, some of which are festival staples (such as Red Carpet Presentations and Documentary Films), others being very unique (case in point being the four-film selection titled Forgotten Transports: To Latvia, To Belarus, To Estonia, To Poland, curated by Lukás Pribyl). TCM viewers can take heart in knowing that SDFF also has a Special Programs section, which is where the repertory titles reside. In honor of its 50th Anniversary, I had the pleasure of revisiting John Sturges’ The Magnificent Seven on a stunning 35mm archive print that is reserved for reel-to-reel projectors.

The Director:

John Sturges (1910 – 1992) was born in Oak Park, Illinois, and later joined the RKO art department in the early thirties. During WWII, and as part of his service, he directed several documentaries (including Thunderbolt, with William Wyler). After the war he went to Hollywood and established a career that began with a short feature debut in 1946 (The Man Who Dared), and then gained traction in the 1950′s with a string of fast paced westerns that delivered the goods, such as Bad Day at Black Rock (1955), Backlash (1956), and Gunfight at the O.K. Corral (1957), to name a few. The sixties would usher in a new era for Sturges, and it was to be a successful one, but it also gave rise to his reputation for favoring artifice over substance as he gave more weight to set pieces rather than the storyline.

The Casting:

The Magnificent Seven were: Yul Brynner (1920 – 1985), Steve McQueen (1930 – 1980), Charles Bronson (1921 – 2003), James Coburn (1928 – 2002), Robert Vaughn (b. 1932), Brad Dexter (1917 – 2002), and Horst Buchholz (1933 – 2003). At the time, Brynner was the obvious leader of the pack for many reasons. He’d already won an Oscar for Best Actor for his performance in The King and I (1956), and his Russian accent and bald head gave him an exotic edge that served him well. McQueen was a young upstart (he’d starred in The Blob and a couple other films), but his ability to steal the show via various physical nuances, along with some very welcome comic relief, definitely helped to put him on the map. These qualities were not lost on Sturges, who three years later gave him a starring role in The Great Escape. Sturges was also clearly impressed with Bronson and Coburn, as they were also brought back for The Great Escape. From my point of view, one of the biggest contributions made by The Magnificent Seven was in its pivotal role of propelling Bronson toward Sergio Leone’s Once Upon a Time in the West (1968). But I’m getting ahead of myself, let’s not forget the three magnificent others.

Robert Vaughn had done various T.V. stints before before a big-screen break in 1959 with The Young Philadelphians (he was nominated for an Oscar). Following that with The Magnificent Seven helped his visibility, but then it was back to T.V. roles, one of the most prominent and long-running of which was The Man from U.N.C.L.E. (starting in 1964). On a fitting note, when Vaughn decided he wanted to get back into the film biz, he did so as a costar to McQueen in Bullitt (1968). Vaughn’s third film with McQueen would be The Towering Inferno (1974), their last collaboration before McQueen’s death six years later.

Brad Dexter’s acting career, mostly for television, spans from 1944 to 1988. He landed roles from The Asphalt Jungle (1950) to Shampoo (1975), but the The Magnificent Seven remains one of his higher profile feature films. He had a brief marriage to singer Peggy Lee and saved another famous singer from drowning: Frank Sinatra – this was in 1964 while both were filming None But the Brave in Kaui, Hawaii. His relationship with Sinatra got as rocky as his marriage to Peggy Lee, and Dexter later would regret trying to produce The Naked Runner and cited many irreconcilable differences with Sinatra before breaking things off.

Horst Buchholz (1933 – 2003) was dubbed the “German James Dean” and was born in Berlin.  He started out working in theater and radio and transitioned to film in 1952 in a career that would span over sixty films. Highlights included winning a Best Actor award at Cannes to working with Billy Wilder on One, Two, Three (1961) – although this at the expense of being in Lawrence of Arabia (1962). He was a polyglot who spoke six languages, a talent that would serve him well when he later appeared in Robert Benigni’s Life is Beautiful (1997) – where he was able to dub his own voice in the foreign release prints.

The Reception:

Based on Akira Kurosawa’s critically acclaimed Seven Samurai (1954), Sturges adaptation proved to be a box-office success. But to put things in perspective: Ben Hur was the box office champ of that year with an initial domestic take of over $17 million. Psycho (released the same year) snagged over $9 million (again, these are opening box office tallies – Psycho currently has a worldwide gross of over $50 million). The Magnificent Seven would rank 39th for the year of 1960 with a domestic b.o. of $2,250,000. But after it was a big hit in Europe it went on to make more money in the U.S. on its re-release.

The more immediate and bigger impact which The Magnificent Seven had was in pushing the western genre out onto the international stage, spurring a movement that helped to internationalize the genre. But despite the fact that Sturges had made a name for himself with economically paced westerns throughout the fifties, The Magnificent Seven helped usher in a new perception of the director as beholden to grand set-pieces rather than taught plots, and this was later cemented in place by The Great Escape (1963) and Ice Station Zebra (1968). Perhaps the 128-minute running time for The Magnificent Seven irked some of the critics, or the fact that both town plazas and riveting scenery are so lovingly photographed that the camera lingers on the architecture and landscapes rather than cut on the flow of dialogue or action. Personally, I don’t mind at all, especially when watching a beautiful and anamorphic, archive print with stunning color splashing out on a big screen. That the film has many other pleasures to offer are easily attested to by the popularity the film enjoyed on a global level. Some grumps complained that The Magnificent Seven spent too much time on the skills displayed by each particular gunman hired to defend a Mexican village from bandits, saying their back-stories was needless shtick. But the fact remains: it’s still great fun. It Italy alone this so-called “shtick” was so fully embraced that it became a huge influence on many spaghetti westerns yet-to-come.

In a way, the first scene that introduces us to The Magnificent Seven encapsulates the whole film. Our heroes risk their lives to stand up to violent bullies to bury a dead Indian in the local Boot Hill. Sure, on the surface they’re doing it for a couple bucks. But it’s paltry money when staking your life against armed xenophobes. No, they’re not doing this for the money, they’re doing it to test themselves.

The Legacy:

First off it’s necessary to mention the music by Elmer Bernstein, which is now so subsumed by popular culture that even somebody who has never seen The Magnificent Seven will recognize it. Then there are the spinoffs: The Return of the Seven (directed by Burt Kennedy in 1966), The Guns of the Magnificent Seven (directed by Paul Wendkos in 1968), and (believe it or not) a comic modernization that uses the original The Magnificent Seven title is on its way. Its premise posits the following: “the cowboys are a struggling local amateur soccer team, the Indians run a nearby Tandoori restaurant and the bandits are a group of menacing thugs led by a maniac known simply as ‘American Bob.’” It’s to be directed by Irvine Welsh (writer of Trainspotting and The Acid House) and gives a role to: Robert Vaughn.

As my mind drifts to the concept of sequels and diminishing returns, I can’t help but add one last note of irony. The latest cover of The Economist has appropriated the iconic image of the seven gunmen from The Magnificent Seven. What’s odd is that in Sturges classic we are presented with seven gunmen who risk their lives to save Mexican farmers and, regardless of your political stripes, that is not one of the causes that comes to mind when looking at these particular power brokers. The cover designer has either never seen the film, is being purposeful with diametric opposition, or simply fell in love with an image of cowboys atop horses and cared not one whit for its origin. Want another nail to pound into the coffin of ironies associated with the travesty below? The last surviving member of The Magnificent Seven, Robert Vaughn, is a long-time member of the Democratic Party and active within various peace groups. I’m pretty sure he’s going to want his horse back.

13 Responses The Magnificent Seven: 50th Anniversary
Posted By Jill Hutchinson : November 7, 2010 2:27 pm

When discussing this great film, I often ask friends to name the actors playing the Seven……and almost without fail they can name six of them. Who do they leave out?…………Brad Dexter.

Posted By dukeroberts : November 7, 2010 11:27 pm

I love this movie and try to expose as many people to it as possible. I never forget Brad Dexter. And, on a political note, I like the cover. Sometimes I feel like I’m the only Republican who visits movie sites. Sigh….. Oh well.

Posted By Jerry Kovar : November 8, 2010 8:52 am

And one of the key elements that makes Magnificent Seven complete is a despicable villain marvelously played by Eli Wallach.

Posted By keelsetter : November 8, 2010 1:36 pm

Jerry, thanks for mentioning Eli Wallach (a glaring omission on my part). Born 1915, he was older than any of the actors playing The Magnificent Seven, and yet (along with Robert Vaughn) is still very active (this year along having parts in WALL STREET: MONEY NEVER SLEEPS and THE GHOST WRITER). I’m especially fond of him in THE LINEUP, and very glad Leone didn’t kill him in THE GOOD, THE BAD AND THE UGLY. According to IMDB, after almost losing his life during a train scene Leone wanted him to do it again and he replied “I’ll never do that again!” Wise choices like that are the reason he’s still around.

Posted By suzidoll : November 8, 2010 2:55 pm

Love the opening image. But, I want to mention BAD DAY AT BLACK ROCK because I just showed it in my film studies class. This semester I have 21 boys and 2 girls, and, so far, this film has been the class’s favorite, beating out CITIZEN KANE and 400 BLOWS. I think John Sturges is vastly underrated.

Posted By john maddox roberts : November 8, 2010 5:27 pm

I’m surprised you left out Roger Corman’s “Battle Beyond the Stars” (1980). It was a cheesy sci-fi adaptation of “Magnificent Seven” with, you guessed it—-Robert Vaughan reprising his role. Amazingly entertaining,in fact.

Posted By keelsetter : November 8, 2010 5:34 pm

D’oh! Of course – the SDFF online write-up for THE MAGNIFICENT SEVEN mentions BATTLE BEYOND THE STARS but I “spaced” it (har). One of the co-writers for the script for that sci-fi reworking of MAG 7 was none other than John Sayles!

Posted By dukeroberts : November 8, 2010 10:26 pm

suzidoll- I agree that Sturges is underrated. Based on Bad Day at Black Rock alone he is better than 3/4 of the directors working today. That movie is fantastic.

Posted By Jerry Kovar : November 9, 2010 8:43 am

By the way, Eli Wallach will be receiving the lifetime achievement award at the next Oscar ceremony.

Posted By Al Lowe : November 9, 2010 6:12 pm

I think I’ll be a grump myself.

Of course, you did a good job, Keelsetter. But…Kelly Lindsberg wrote about this for the Morlocks in March.

So what? Well, there were a lot of other wonderful movies that had their 50th anniversary this year too and did not receive due attention from the Morlocks. Such as: PSYCHO, LOLA MONTES, SPARTACUS, INHERIT THE WIND, THE FACTS OF LIFE, THE SUNDOWNERS, NEVER ON A SUNDAY, THE APARTMENT and EXODUS. Others too. You might remember THE TIME MACHINE. That is the film originally featuring the Morlocks.

Look, THE MAGNIFICENT SEVEN is one of my favorite films also. But I already wrote my comments in a response in March.

Also, what happened to Kelly? This is one of the few times that a Morlock wrote about the same subject as a colleague and did not refer to the previous piece. I also no longer see her name listed among the Morlock contributors.

And now it is time for some nitpicking.

BAD DAY AT BLACK ROCK is not a western. I guess you can stretch things and call it a modern western although it is really a suspense film. It is set after World War II and was the first Hollywood production to address the atrocities committed against the Japanese in this country during that war. I am sure that producer Dore Schary thought of it as a groundbreaking modern drama.
I suspect this is one of those cases when a writer refers to several films and hasn’t seen all of them. I’ve seen it a million times since I was a teen and it shouldn’t be missed. Besides Sturges’ great work, there are unforgettable performances by Tracy, Ryan, Brennan, Marvin, Borginine and Jagger.
But there is no gunplay. No stampedes, train robberies, saloon girls, saloon fights, horses, fighting with Indians – all of the staples of a typical western.
However, there is a brief conversation about the future of the west, how it might be developed and public opinions regarding it.

BAD DAY AT BLACK ROCK seems more like a film noir in color and cinemascope than a western.

Regarding another subject:

The commentary on the MAGNIFICENT SEVEN DVD says that Mexico hated the film, just like they despised the earlier VERA CRUZ and had actually torn seats out of movie theaters where it played.
The reason for the antagonism was that the movie made it seem like Mexicans needed the wonderful Americans to come in and save them. Commentator James Coburn said that he had never thought about it before – but they were right! (This has nothing to do with my other comments but I didn’t bring it up last time.)

In summary, Keelsetter, yes, I understand that you wrote about this film because you saw it at a festival.
I get it.
But you make some of the same points that Kelly did and there are other 1960 films that deserved a tribute. Or non-1960 films for that matter.
There are so many movies…and so little time.

Posted By keelsetter : November 9, 2010 7:04 pm

Hi, Al – No need to apologize for grumpin’; you make excellent points across-the-board. My original intent was to give coverage to all the repertory titles screening at SDFF. These included MASH, LA COLLECTIONNEUSE, WILD RIVER (which I’ve already covered), and, er… TRAINSPOTTING – which, okay, not a “classic” – yet – but it still falls under the aegis of repertory programming. However, so few people showed up to see the first screening of MAG 7 that I decided to let my coverage of it “ride” in a tub-thumping effort to rally the locals to its next screening. This being TCM, I knew others would have covered it in some way, but will admit to having missed Kimberly’s piece when it came out due to being submerged in SXSW events.

Your response reminds me that I need to be careful about letting my posts get too provincial, and to be mindful that the TCM website has a much larger audience – one that is often far more knowledgeable on the topics I’ve picked than I can ever pretend to be. But I love the learning process and am thankful for the input – always.

Which brings me to my last comment: I think what you bring up about the MAG 7′s reception in Mexico is totally fascinating. I have a 16mm print of the film that is in Spanish, and have often wondered if I might ever include it in future programming aimed at the Latino community in my area. I’ve held off for precisely the reasons you mention. Not only does it fall under those “great white hope” films that can be rather insulting, but it gives up a juicy Mexican role to a guy from Brooklyn in brown-face. On the other hand, Eli Wallach puts in a performance that is great fun to watch, and the film itself has a humanist core that is hard to deny.

I could go on. But as you say, there are so many movies out there, and so little time.

Posted By dukeroberts : November 10, 2010 2:27 am

I never really thought about the “Great White Hope” aspect of the film. I tend to find those types of movies irritating (The Blind Side, Dangerous Minds, etc.), but I absolutely love this movie. I suppose I can see why Mexicans might be insulted. Not only was the Mexican villain played by a Brooklyn Jew in brownface, but the one Mexican hero was played by a German!

However, I think it is in the American blood to want to help the less fortunate in other countries who do not have the freedom and opportunities we have here. I think the film speaks well of the genre and of the character of the rugged American, and in Yul Brynner’s case, Russian, cowboy, but it also speaks well of the film that it was based on. It is a great idea to have seven men of varied experiences and skills defend the downtrodden who are not able to help themselves. Regardless of whether they are Japanese villagers or Mexican peasants, it makes for a great story.

Posted By Juana Maria : December 7, 2010 4:12 pm

My Mom has watched a few minutes of this movie, she was able to name only five of the Magnificent Seven. She does not know the names of Brad Dexter and Horst Buchholtz. I have wathed this movie and the follow up films, I am also keenly aware of its importance. There would not likely have been Spaghetti Westerns or “Three Amigos!” I do not think Eli Wallach ever tried to depict a Mexican in bad light only he was playing a role. I too think he should have been mentioned in the article.

Leave a Reply

MovieMorlocks.com is the official blog for TCM. No topic is too obscure or niche to be excluded from our film discussions. And we welcome your comments on our blogs and bloggers.
Archives
Popular terms
3-D  Action Films  Actors  Actors' Endorsements  animal stars  Animation  Anime  Anthology Films  Autobiography  Awards  B-movies  Best of the Year lists  Biography  Biopics  Blu-Ray  Books on Film  British Cinema  Canadian Cinema  Character Actors  Chicago Film History  Cinematography  Classic Films  College Life on Film  Comedy  Comic Book Movies  Czech Film  Dance on Film  Digital Cinema  Directors  Disaster Films  Documentary  Drama  DVD  Early Talkies  Editing  Educational Films  European Influence on American Cinema  Experimental  Exploitation  Fairy Tales on Film  Faith or Christian-based Films  Family Films  Film Composers  film festivals  Film History in Florida  Film Noir  Film Scholars  Film titles  Filmmaking Techniques  Food in Film  Foreign Film  French Film  Gangster films  Genre  Genre spoofs  Guest Programmers  HD & Blu-Ray  Holiday Movies  Hollywood lifestyles  Horror  Horror Movies  Icons  independent film  Italian Film  Japanese Film  Korean Film  Literary Adaptations  Martial Arts  Melodramas  Method Acting  Mexican Cinema  Moguls  Monster Movies  Movie Books  Movie Costumes  Movie locations  Movie lovers  Movie Reviewers  Movie settings  Movie Stars  Music in Film  Musicals  Outdoor Cinema  Paranoid Thrillers  Parenting on film  Polish film industry  political thrillers  Politics in Film  Pornography  Pre-Code  Producers  Race in American Film  Remakes  Road Movies  Romance  Romantic Comedies  Russian Film Industry  Satire  Scandals  Science Fiction  Screenwriters  Semi-documentaries  Serials  Short Films  Silent Film  silent films  Social Problem Film  Sports  Sports on Film  Stereotypes  Straight-to-DVD  Studio Politics  Suspense thriller  Swashbucklers  TCM Classic Film Festival  Television  The British in Hollywood  The Germans in Hollywood  The Hungarians in Hollywood  The Irish in Hollywood  The Russians in Hollywood  Theaters  Trains in movies  Underground Cinema  VOD  War film  Westerns  Women in the Film Industry  Women's Weepies