Treat yourself to… Mummy Movies!

Once again I find myself in the lonely position of defending a personal pleasure which causes me no guilt at all, for all the contumely and horse laughs it may inspire in the rest of the world.  I speak, you should have deduced by now, of the Mummy.   Arguably the least loved member of the Universal Classic Monsters stable, the Mummy is dear to me and I’ve been thinking about him a lot this Halloween.

But first a little ancient history.  Universal’s cycle of Mummy movies began, you should not be surprised to learn, with Karl Freund’s THE MUMMY (1932).  Universal had been sufficiently impressed by the 1922 opening of the tomb of boy prince Tutankhamen and an alleged consequential curse that struck down a number of those who had dared to defile the sacred site, to throw some lucre into a scenario that would capitalize on America’s fascination with/fear of mysterious Egypt.  Carl Laemmle, Jr. pressed into service Richard Schayer, head of the studio’s scenario department, and novelist Nina Wilcox Putnam, who cobbled together these elements into a story treatment: Cagliostro, the tale of an ancient Egyptian magician who has prolonged his life by science into the 20th Century, where he avenges himself on the woman who broke his heart by murdering females who have the misfortune of resembling her.  When the property was handed off to John L. Balderston (who had helped in the transition of Dracula from the stage to the screen), the title changed from The King of the Dead to Im-Ho-Tep while the scenario was repurposed from a revenge motif to love story.  One of the best of Universal’s initial monster films, THE MUMMY is crisp and fleet-of-foot, efficient yet highly atmospheric; some critics have used the word “hypnotic” and I am in full agreement.  Boris Karloff is, true to his nickname in those days, genuinely uncanny as the deathless Im-Ho-Tep, thanks in part to the pains of Universal make-up maestro Jack Pierce.  Superior to Tod Browning’s DRACULA (1931), the film may even be better than James Whale’s FRANKENSTEIN (1931), although I expect a fight over that notion.  THE MUMMY is an undeniable work of art, gorgeous and unearthly, and I could talk about it all day.  But not today.

Universal took its sweet time in maximizing the franchisable qualities of THE MUMMY, letting seven years elapse before giving the world THE MUMMY’S HAND (1940).  Although the studio’s Mummy vehicles would utilize footage from the Freund film, they were not direct sequels.  Karloff’s Im-Ho-Tep is gone, dust in the wind, and standing in his place is Kharis, a former prince of the royal house of King Amenophis, who was buried alive three thousand years ago for trying to restore life to the dead Princess Ananka.  Played in THE MUMMY’S HAND by former cowboy actor Tom Tyler (who brings, though he is asked to do precious little, a startling physicality to the role) and then by Lon Chaney, Jr. for the remaining three follow-ups, Kharis became the go-to Mummy for American popular culture.  As the generation who grew up with Kharis in the 40s matured, comic mummies began to turn up in nightclub acts, in burlesque shows, in novelty songs, in print cartoons and animated shorts.  In 1955, Abbott and Costello met the Mummy (whose name was the vaguely familiar Klaris).  In 1959, future serious poet Rod McKuen recorded a comic album, Songs our Mummy Taught Us, with humorist Bob McFadden.  That same year, the United Kingdom’s Hammer Studios remade Universal’s THE MUMMY to their own specifications and its success beget its own franchise.  Through the 60s and 70s, mummies were part and parcel of a number of popular entertainments, making murderous or comical guest appearances on JONNY QUEST and THE MUNSTERS and selling briskly through the back pages of Famous Monsters of Filmland in the form of jigsaw puzzles, model kits, comic books, posters, Halloween masks, buttons and bendable figures.

So specialized – or perhaps even peculiar – am I in my thinking at this moment that I even want to pass over THE MUMMY’S HAND in my defense of Kharis.  I like the movie a lot, mind you; it works a charm as intended by Universal, as a peppy B-movie, a popcorn muncher cranked out at modest cost ($80,000, compared to BRIDE OF FRANKENSTEIN’s nearly $300,000 budget) with contract actors (Dick Foran, Wallace Ford, George Zucco) and available resources (the integral temple set is left over from James Whale’s GREEN HELL).  My reasons for excluding it from this discussion have partly to do with tone – it’s less of a horror movie than a pre-Indiana Jones-style adventure with an Egyptian backbeat and a Mummy pop-up for added chills.  It’s closer in spirit to the 1999 Stephen Sommers remake and its sequels, taking the mystical/fantastical elements of Karl Freund’s THE MUMMY for granted and layering on comic relief, fisticuffs and shoot-outs to jazz up the material.  Again, I like THE MUMMY’S HAND, I’ve bought it on both VHS and DVD (I’ve also owned a few of the sequels on Super 8mm film!), but it’s the Chaney Kharis movies of which I’ve been thinking this Halloween season.  They have a strange power over me – perhaps only me – and comprise one of the most unique movie franchises in cinema history.  Reliant on formula the way Kharis the Mummy was dependent on tea brewed from the strength and immortality-bestowing tana leaves, these films are otherwise incredibly cynical, downbeat, and even anarchic in their disregard for audience expectations.

In THE MUMMY’S TOMB (1942), the action shifts from Egypt to the United States – specifically Massachusetts, where the protagonists of THE MUMMY’S HAND have retired.  Peggy Moran’s character from the earlier film is explained to have died of natural causes, while widower Dick Forgan regales his adult son (John Hubbard) and prospective daughter-in-law (Elyse Knox) with the tale of his infamous face-off with the Mummy many years before.  Meanwhile back in Egypt, the High Priest of Karnak (George Zucco, wearing old age make-up and sporting a withered arm) who had resurrected Kharis in the previous film, sends the slightly singed but nevertheless highly functional Mummy off with an acolyte (Turhan Bey) to exact a terrible revenge.  And terrible it is!  With Bey’s oily, Machiavellian Mehmet Bey ensconced as a cemetery caretaker in the leafy New England hamlet of Mapleton… the perfect base of operations for sending his monster on on nightly missions.

Spoilers are at this point unavoidable, so let me get right to the nub of it – damn your eyes if you’d rather not know.  Well short of the conclusion of its brisk 60 minute running time, THE MUMMY’S TOMB kills off every surviving character from THE MUMMY’S HAND – all of whom are, by this point, darling elderly folk – and throws in a character’s spinster sister to boot!  If you thought BENEATH THE PLANET OF THE APES (1970) or FRIDAY THE 13TH, PART 2 (1981) had the stones for killing off major characters in their first sequels , THE MUMMY’S TOMB did all that thirty to forty years earlier.  Now don’t get me wrong – I’m not crushing on the tack of killing off major characters in a sort of postmodern, Psychotronic haze… I hate that these characters get killed (BABE HANSON MURDERED crows Mapleton’s local fishwrap… despite the fact that the character was named Babe Jensen in THE MUMMY’S HAND) but I love that the Mummy sequels, with Lon Chaney, Jr. as Kharis, don’t care how I feel.

It’s worth point out at this juncture that it was in production of THE MUMMY’S TOMB that Universal decided that Lon Chaney, Jr. should be billed as Lon Chaney, forcing the association with his late father, “the Man of a Thousand Faces” in a bid to make him the studio’s “Master of Menace.”  Chaney fils had already changed his Christian name from Creighton to Lon (short for Leonidas) in honor of his dad, who died in 1930.  Chaney, Jr. already had little love for the Mummy movies and this studio mandate was yet another irritation.  Chaney’s baby was the character he helped to create in Universal’s THE WOLF MAN (1941) and fleshed out in the sequels FRANKENSTEIN MEETS THE WOLFMAN (1942), HOUSE OF FRANKENSTEIN (1944), HOUSE OF DRACULA (1945), bowing out in the role with the satiric ABBOTT AND COSTELLO MEET FRANKENSTEIN (1948).  Chaney had his own series of INNER SANCTUM thrillers at Universal and got to play the Count in SON OF DRACULA (1943).  The actor had ambitions and dreams for himself even within the pinched confines of the horror genre but playing the mute Frankenstein monster in GHOST OF FRANKENSTEIN (1942) and the shambling Kharis in THE MUMMY’S TOMB, THE MUMMY’S GHOST (1944) and THE MUMMY’S CURSE (1944) was just a means to an end – a pay check, with a side order of headache.  And yet… and yet… I love these movies.

There’s an anything goes vibe to the Universal Mummy cycle, telegraphed in THE MUMMY’S TOMB with the whole slaughter of all the good guys from THE MUMMY’S HAND.  In THE MUMMY’S GHOST, Kharis is back, with a new handler… duly-sworn High Priest of Arkam John Carradine.  (For some reason, between the last installment and this, the name of the temple spewing out High Priests like Gal Fridays was changed from Karnak to Arkam.)  Whereas Turhan Bey had played his villainous Mehmet Bey as an oily son-of-a-bitch, smug and dissembling, Carradine etches Yousef Bey as a popeyed true believer… albeit with an ultimately fatal eye for beauty.  And true to the series’ depraved disregard for established characters, one of Bey’s first orders of business is to kill off a character (Frank Reicher) established in THE MUMM Y’S TOMB as the local expert on all things Egyptian.  See what I’m saying – you just can’t get used to anybody in these movies!  With all those who have wronged Kharis dead and buried, the screenwriters here rejigger the Mummy’s raison d’etre, shifting the emphasis from vengeance to love everlasting.    Identifying local college girl Amina Mansouri (Ramsay Ames, who replaced Aquanetta after the first day of shooting) as the reincarnation of his beloved Princess Ananka, Kharis and Yousef make various attempts to tap that, resulting in various deaths and assorted mayhem.  There’s some atmospheric stalking and slaying on the Southern California locations and sets made to stand in for Massachusetts and the whole shebang ends on a surprisingly downbeat note that I don’t want to spoil, except to say I suspect it was inspired by a shocking reveal in Frank Capra’s LOST HORIZON (1937).

The series ends on an even wackier note in THE MUMMY’S CURSE, as Kharis and Ananka turn up in… Louisiana!  Ananka is played this time out by Virginia Christine, who would enjoy a measure of immortality herself as the neighborly “Mrs. Olsen” in a 21-year run of TV spots for Folgers Coffee.  Lacking the seductive, smokey allure of Ramsay Ames, the Iowa-born Christine brings to the role a beguiling oddness, a foreign-ness that suits her character, displaced as Ananka is by geography and three millennia.  The actresses’ first scene, in which Ananka is unearthed by construction vehicles in the bayou and rises painfully to claw herself out of the mud, is eerily matter-of-fact, a strangely poetic image of self-birthing.  She shuffles stiff-legged, like a Romero zombie, to the edge of a swampy tarn, steps into the water and is renewed, emerging from the drink with a pert Bettie Page hair-do.  Ananka isn’t given all that much to do in the script, unfortunately, with all the heavy lifting falling on the shoulders of villain Peter Coe (as yet another High Priest of Arkam) and his wormy helpmeet Martin Kosleck.  This time out, it’s Kosleck who falls for the heroine, murdering his master and in so doing bringing upon himself the wrath of Kharis, whose anger may not be able to shatter the world but it is hell to pay on stone and concrete.

If you’re so inclined, you could nitpick the Universal Mummy sequels into so much pillow ticking.  They’re cheap (THE MUMMY’S TOMB avails itself of stock footage from James Whale’s FRANKENSTEIN and look at that dummy mummy head above!) and repetitive and maybe not so well thought-out.  Burned to a crisp at the end of THE MUMMY’S HAND, Kharis returns in THE MUMMY’S TOMB with one working arm and yet he is able to climb up a trellis to the second floor of a plantation house to commit murder and carry the dead weight of an unconscious Ananka up the ladder of an elevated mine shack in THE MUMMY’S GHOST.  You’ll just have to work out for yourself how he got from Massachusetts to Louisiana for THE MUMMY’S CURSE – I’m guessing continental shift or plate tectonics but don’t quote me.  Yet despite all the warts on this pig, I dig it, the whole crumbly run.  Kharis is a deliberate, silent predator – strictly business – which is a refreshing change of pace in this day and age of fiends who try much too hard and talk way too much (I’m looking at you, Jigsaw).  Film to film, the series offers the horror hound a Gothic smorgasbord: graveyards and shadows, full moons and monsters on the loose, brave men in swell suits, imperiled farmers with shotguns, beautiful girls who scream big and scream loud, undying love, forbidden passions, ancient grudges  and maledictions aplenty… Universal’s Mummy movies really do have it all.  Treat yourself this Halloween to some old school spookery and call on Kharis… once he gets you in his moldy grasp he never lets you down.

14 Responses Treat yourself to… Mummy Movies!
Posted By THE FUTURIST! : October 22, 2010 10:21 am

Ah! What a happy happenstance … THE FUTURIST! has been watching (while wearing a fez and brewing a hot cup of tanna leaves) the Universal Mummy movies this month of Shocktober. He is currently about to watch THE MUMMY’S GHOST. Wonderful post, Morlocks, wonderful.

Posted By suzidoll : October 22, 2010 11:54 am

THE MUMMY is my favorite of the Universal monster movies, because the mise-en-scene, especially the lighting, is so awe-inspiring. And, Karloff is terrific. While I appreciate FRANKENSTEIN, and I admire its direction, Karloff is hidden behind the giant Frankenstein head, so we are left with Colin Clive as the “face” man.

My favorite Universal horror film in general is THE BLACK CAT.

Nice overview of Mummy-mania. I will put the link on Facebook, because I am doing a 31 Days of Horror countdown and am recommending THE MUMMY today.

Posted By Maryann : October 22, 2010 8:40 pm

Thank you for this wonderful retrospective. I’m glad someone else appreciates the Mummy films as much as I do.

Posted By john august smith : October 24, 2010 10:30 am

I always liked the comedians retort ” If you could not outrun the Mummy you deserved to be caught”

Posted By Jenni : October 24, 2010 8:26 pm

Mrs. Olson as a mummy! Gotta love that! I always loved those Folgers coffee commercials as a kid for some reason. Probably why I buy that brand today.

Posted By DBenson : October 25, 2010 5:08 am

While the later Mummy films are fun, they’re frustrating in the same way the Frankenstein sequels are frustrating. In both cases, they take an intriguing character defined by Karloff and reduce it to an iconic makeup with nothing inside. You’ll note the later entries in both series are really about everything EXCEPT their title characters.

I’m not expecting Shakespeare. But Dracula was pure, conscious evil; the Wolfman a tragic hero under a curse; the various Invisible Men (usually) dangerous villains with the wit to realize their power . . . even the Creature often registered as a victim as well as a thinking, motivated terror. There was something, however rudimentary, for actors to chew on and audiences to think on. Those monsters were stars!

Lon Chaney and Glenn Strange managed to impart menace to Mummy and Monster, but the scripts explicitly denied them the ability to do more than cringe from flames and want to carry girls around.

Posted By Richard Harland Smith : October 25, 2010 12:44 pm

I certainly can’t argue with you, especially vis a vis the Frankenstein monster, who in his final films is used as little more than a prop, saved for the final frames. But once you get past the disappointment you enter a whole new mindset where these constructions have an effect on you that sits apart from the original context… and such is the case for me with Kharis. Watching his shambling walk, I can’t help but think he’s a link in the chain between depictions of Haitian zombies in movies of the 30s and 40s and the flesh-eating variety patented by George Romero and company in 1968. I think works of art (high art or lowbrow) can exist on different planes simultaneously, meaning I can watch The Mummy’s Ghost and tear it apart with one part of my brain while the other enjoys the thrill of seeing a centuries old monster shuffle across the frame, looking for his one true love.

Posted By Kimberly Lindbergs : October 25, 2010 2:34 pm

I love the exotic nature of the Mummy movies. I was born with the travel bug but I’ve only been able to make a few trips out of the country and the Mummy movies brought me to Egypt and through the streets of Cairo (even if was just a Hollywood set) so I’ve always found them really fascinating. I think the ’32 version of THE MUMMY with Karloff is one of the best Universal horror films. I can enjoy the later films as well but I tend prefer the Hammer Mummy movies from the ’60s and ’70s more than their American counterparts. But overall I just dig the Mummy as a monster (bad pun intended!).

Posted By Marianne : October 25, 2010 11:49 pm

I just have to add—The Mummy is my favorite also–expecially the Karloff version…Although Kharis comes close…

Posted By Cinema Dave : October 27, 2010 1:39 pm

Actually, I see Kharis as the Grandfather of the Terminator.

Posted By Jason : October 27, 2010 3:45 pm

I’ve always wondered if ‘Arkam’ in The Mummy’s Ghost was a reference to H.P. Lovecraft, and if it was the first one in cinema history.

Posted By Richard Harland Smith : October 27, 2010 4:58 pm

That’s a good call, Dave. I’m with you there.

Posted By October Links : The Shadow Cabaret : October 30, 2010 9:33 pm

[...] TCM “Morlocks” celebrate the season with an ambitious series of posts on memorable horror films, including – but not limited to – the Hammer shockers The Brides of Dracula and Curse of the Werewolf, MGM’s faux-Dracula romp Mark of the Vampire and a guilt-free shamble through the Universal Mummy series. [...]

Posted By TCM's Classic Movie Blog : November 12, 2010 11:57 am

[...] MAN MADE MONSTER is the original “More Power!” horror movie – countless medicos in countless horror movies made in its wake would stare at those same dials, watching those same needles inch precipitously into the red, as smoke erupted from the same transformers and the Thing on the Slab twitched to life and then live to regret the decision.  Think Atwill again in THE GHOST OF FRANKENSTEIN (1942), Patrick Knowles in FRANKENSTEIN MEETS THE WOLFMAN (1943) or Karloff as the vengeful Gustav Niemann in HOUSE OF FRANKENSTEIN.  Chaney later played some interesting variations on Dynamo Dan, notably Butcher Benton in Jack Pollexfen’s INDESTRUCTIBLE MAN (1956) and the moronic Groton in Al Adamson’s DRACULA VS. FRANKENSTEIN (1971), which reunited him (FWIW) with his HOUSE OF FRANKENSTEIN costar J. Carrol Naish.  When Dan shuffles across the countryside in the film’s denouement, carrying a lifeless Anne Nagel in his (rubber-insulated) arms, the moment looks ahead to Chaney’s portrayal of Kharis in the last three sequels to Universal’s THE MUMMY (1933), about which I wrote last month.   [...]

Leave a Reply

MovieMorlocks.com is the official blog for TCM. No topic is too obscure or niche to be excluded from our film discussions. And we welcome your comments on our blogs and bloggers.
Archives
Popular terms
3-D  Action Films  Actors  Actors' Endorsements  animal stars  Animation  Anime  Anthology Films  Autobiography  Awards  B-movies  Best of the Year lists  Biography  Biopics  Blu-Ray  Books on Film  Boxing films  British Cinema  Canadian Cinema  Character Actors  Chicago Film History  Cinematography  Classic Films  College Life on Film  Comedy  Comic Book Movies  Czech Film  Dance on Film  Digital Cinema  Directors  Disaster Films  Documentary  Drama  DVD  Early Talkies  Editing  Educational Films  European Influence on American Cinema  Experimental  Exploitation  Fairy Tales on Film  Faith or Christian-based Films  Family Films  Film Composers  film festivals  Film History in Florida  Film Noir  Film Scholars  Film titles  Filmmaking Techniques  Food in Film  Foreign Film  French Film  Gangster films  Genre  Genre spoofs  Guest Programmers  HD & Blu-Ray  Holiday Movies  Hollywood lifestyles  Horror  Horror Movies  Icons  independent film  Italian Film  Japanese Film  Korean Film  Leadership  Literary Adaptations  Martial Arts  Melodramas  Method Acting  Mexican Cinema  Moguls  Monster Movies  Movie Books  Movie Costumes  Movie locations  Movie lovers  Movie Reviewers  Movie settings  Movie Stars  Music in Film  Musicals  New Releases  Outdoor Cinema  Paranoid Thrillers  Parenting on film  Polish film industry  political thrillers  Politics in Film  Pornography  Pre-Code  Producers  Race in American Film  Remakes  Road Movies  Romance  Romantic Comedies  Russian Film Industry  Satire  Scandals  Science Fiction  Screenwriters  Semi-documentaries  Serials  Short Films  Silent Film  silent films  Social Problem Film  Sports  Sports on Film  Stereotypes  Straight-to-DVD  Studio Politics  Suspense thriller  Swashbucklers  TCM Classic Film Festival  Television  The British in Hollywood  The Germans in Hollywood  The Hungarians in Hollywood  The Irish in Hollywood  The Russians in Hollywood  Theaters  Trains in movies  Underground Cinema  VOD  War film  Westerns  Women in the Film Industry  Women's Weepies