Elvis on Tour: Split Screen Fit for a King
Elvis on Tour chronicled the singer’s short but grueling 15-city tour in the spring of 1972. The tour started in Buffalo, New York, and came to a sold-out conclusion in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Filmmakers Pierre Adidge and Robert Abel succeeded in capturing the hectic pace of Elvis’s touring schedule through their choice of filmmaking techniques, which are much more noticeable and effective on the big screen. The first documentary to capture Elvis on stage, Elvis: That’s the Way It Is, had caught Elvis’s 1970 summer appearance at the International Hotel, including rehearsals in Hollywood. Director Denis Sanders shot a straightforward concert documentary, showing Elvis on stage primarily from the perspective of the audience. While Sanders’s well-crafted film featured some stellar cinematography by Lucien Ballard, it lacks the energy of Elvis on Tour. In the early 1970s, Presley was still excited about his return to live performances, and his concerts exuded energy and electricity, not only from Elvis but also from the 30 or more musicians and singers that backed him. In the intro that preceded Elvis on Tour, long-time Presley associates felt that Adidge and Abel captured the King on stage more effectively than Sanders had in Elvis: That’s the Way It Is. Adidge, whose specialty was sound recording, and Abel, a documentarian, chose to shoot their film verite style, which dominated nonfiction filmmaking in the 1960s and early 1970s. Often described as “a fly on the wall” style, cinema verite filmmakers preferred minimal interaction with their subject during shooting. With as few obtrusive techniques as possible from the filmmakers—meaning no voice-over narration, no intertitles, no formal interviews, no staged scenes—the subject is presented naturally and without artifice. The original verite filmmakers from the 1960s preferred direct sound, hand-held camera, and minimal editing to achieve an ideal goal of capturing the “truth” of their subject with minimal manipulation by the filmmakers. However, younger generations of directors who picked up the style became less rigid in their approaches. Adidge and Abel shot Elvis on Tour using seven 16mm cameras, with cameramen positioned backstage, on stage, in the wings, and in the audience. Much of the footage was hand-held, and the cameramen were adept at anticipating how and where their subject was going to move onstage. In addition to moving his hips, winding his arms, and executing karate moves, Elvis prowled the stage constantly while singing. Even when chatting with the audience between songs, he was always moving—a bundle of nervous energy wound tight as a drum. The hand-held camerawork complemented Elvis’s perpetual motion. The technique that most caught my attention was the use of split screen, which was much more noticeable and effective when seen on a huge screen in a theater. A trendy technique of the era, split screen had been used in Woodstock as well as several feature films, including The Boston Strangler. Throughout the new introduction to this special screening, Elvis’s former associates stress that Adidge and Abel intended to uncover and explore the “real Elvis.” The split screen technique allowed the filmmakers to creatively convey and reveal various aspects to Elvis and his music in different ways. Sometimes, the selection of images in the split-screen panels was based on the song. Each song on the tour was shot at least five times, and during some numbers, the panels feature Elvis singing the same song in separate concerts in different cities. The split screen not only amplifies the energy radiating from Elvis as he performs but also suggests that he sang the song with the same passion and conviction in each concert, at least at this point in his career. At times, the editing between the three panels is accelerated, jacking up the level of excitement and energy while maintaining a rhythm that fits the music. At other times, the split screen depicted the interaction between Elvis and the many musicians and singers that backed him on stage. The big dramatic sound that defined Presley in the 1970s—when he was billed as the World’s Greatest Entertainer—included the musical contributions of a soulful African American girl group called the Sweet Inspirations, a gospel quartet known as the Stamps, and a rock group dubbed the TCB Band whose members were hand-picked by Elvis. Lead guitarist James Burton, known as the Master of the Telecaster and a Rock ‘n’ Roll Hall of Fame inductee in 2001, shaped the TCB Band’s Southern-flavored sound. Through split screen, Elvis is shown giving cues and minimal direction to the band, the Sweet Inspirations, or the Stamps. Sometimes, Elvis and a musician or singer will merely glance at each other as a private message or joke subtly passes between them. The split screen technique illustrates the close connection between Elvis and the members of his musical entourage. Other split screen sequences in Elvis on Tour offer insights of a different nature. Over the years, I have read about—and written about—the impact of gospel music on Elvis, but one split screen sequence revealed the significance of gospel in a way that words just can’t express. Elvis liked to stop the show and ask J.D. Sumner and the Stamps, a gospel group who was part of his on-stage back-up ensemble, to sing the hymn “Sweet, Sweet Spirit.” When not touring with Elvis, the Stamps sang four-part harmony a capella in the old shape-note style of the early 20th century. For “Sweet, Sweet Spirit,” Presley turned the show completely over to the Stamps, who sang this hymn in that style. In split screen, the Stamps are shown performing the song in one panel, while Elvis stands quietly listening to them in another panel. And, he is truly listening. With his head bowed, he silently mouths some of the lyrics and smiles slightly, getting lost in his own private reverie. The split screen technique reveals gospel to be more than an influence on his music. Elvis was born and raised in the poor South, and gospel music is part of the culture. Listening to the Stamps sing the music of his childhood calmed or soothed him, reducing his nervous energy, at least temporarily. As they say in the South, it “called him back home,” meaning it reminded him of his childhood, his religion, his culture, his identity—it reminded him of Home with a capital H. For the observant viewer, it’s a glimpse of—but not into—the private, personal Elvis. ![]() IN THE EARLY 1970s, ELVIS WAS EXCITED TO BE BACK ON THE ROAD, AND HIS PERFORMANCES WERE FULL OF ENERGY. Gospel music pops up again in another sequence, which is one of my favorites. In an informal pre-show rehearsal, Elvis, members of the TCB Band, the Sweet Inspirations, and the Stamps hang loose. A bit nervous, Elvis begins to sing the gospel song “I, John” to break the tension and pull the gang together. Everyone knows the lyrics to the hymn as, one by one, each begins to sing in harmony. Not only is gospel music key to Elvis’s sound, but it is also the thread that binds together the seemingly diverse musical elements of his act—the rock band, the African-American backup singers, and the old-time gospel quartet. In addition to the creative editing within the split screen sequences, Elvis on Tour includes several montages that sum up Presley’s career in earlier incarnations. In 1972, when this film was released, footage of Elvis from The Ed Sullivan Show had not been seen since 1956-1957 when it first aired. The filmmakers wanted to remind audiences of Elvis’s cultural impact 15 years earlier, so clips from the Sullivan show are edited together in briskly paced sequences. Elvis’s film career is briefly referenced in a montage of kisses from his 31 narrative movies. The effect is a light-hearted recapping of a part of his career that Elvis detested. Elvis on Tour offers no critical condemnation of his movie career, though the new introduction suggests that the filmmakers may have wanted to go in that direction. Apparently, in a series of interviews with Elvis without the participation of his manager, Colonel Tom Parker, Presley revealed his loathing for his movies, declaring, “Hollywood never understood me.” In the introduction, former Presley associates—who, like their friend and employer, disliked Elvis’s movies—make a big deal out of these candid interviews. However, in the documentary itself, very little from these interviews is used, and nothing critical about the movies is directly stated. I suspect that in keeping with Parker’s strategy of maintaining a positive spin on all things Elvis, he nixed any negative commentary on the movies. In charge of the montage sequences was a young filmmaker named Martin Scorsese. Those interviewed in the introduction refer to Scorsese as a bundle of energy who never seemed to sleep. Apparently, he worked on the montage sequences of Elvis on Tour during the day and cut Mean Streets at night. The editing of this film in the split screen and montage sequences is instrumental to its success and undoubtedly contributed to its Golden Globe win as best documentary. I wonder if contributing to the editing of Elvis on Tour and Woodstock gave Scorsese the itch for rockumentaries, which he later scratched with The Last Waltz, Shine a Light, and his upcoming documentary on George Harrison, Living in the Material World. Last year, I wrote Elvis for Dummies, which gave me an opportunity to interpret and analyze the King’s career and star image, putting them in a socio-historical context. I included a few paragraphs on Elvis on Tour, but I wish I had been able to watch the film on the big screen before writing the book. After seeing the documentary the way it was intended to be seen, I noticed more, provoking me to think harder about the images, songs, and techniques. 14 Responses Elvis on Tour: Split Screen Fit for a King
SUZIE, ever see the morbid shot of ELVIS in his coffin? & of all people it was a relative that snapped it! TCM did a marvelous job-(NOTE: THOUGH MAY OF 1998′s *SINATRA HOMAGE WAS IT’S “MT. SUMMIT” & DIG THIS, EVEN THE POST OFFICE WAS PACKED WITH ALL THINGS *”CHAIRMAN!”) Though in January of this year Priscilla & a bodyguard joined Osbo in celebrating his 76th anniversary of his birth-(January 8th, 1935) Have you ever been to “GRACELAND?” Speaking of Elvis, most know he was in a ton of forementioned “MOVIE-MAGAZINE’S” Something TCM & on here should really touch upon. On that note, who has TCM’s version of “SCENE-IT?” I’m with Patrick.. would love to see this. As ever Suzi, en enlightening examination… so much to know and you are the awesome guide…. hope this movie makes it out west. I missed it when it played here in Jacksonville and have been waiting for years for it to come out on DVD. It’s finally coming out, but I sure wish I could have seen it on the big screen. Thanks for the great write-up. I have many Elvis books. What are some of your others? Love all things Elvis. Graceland, back in the early part of the 80′s when I went there, was Spectacular! I have to say, as far as the movies, I didn’t watch them for their movie quality, I watched them as a music video for Elvis! Just to see and hear him play his music. I would love to have seen this, though. Sounds interesting! DukeRoberts: Thanks for asking about my Elvis books. I have actually written several. I began writing about Elvis in 1989, so I have been writing about him for 20 years. My first was a coffee-table book called ELVIS: A TRIBUTE TO HIS LIFE. I also wrote THE FILMS OF ELVIS PRESLEY, ELVIS: FOREVER IN THE GROOVE, and ELVIS: AMERICAN IDOL. I also developed a coffee table book called ELVIS ALBUM, which is a collection of actual newspaper and magazine articles, photos, and photos of collectibles arranged as though a fan had kept a scrapbook on Elvis. On the opposite side of the fence, I wrote an academic study of Elvis called UNDERSTANDING ELVIS. The best one is definitely ELVIS FOR DUMMIES. The Dummies format was perfect for explaining Elvis and his impact on American pop culture. Jeff: Thanks for your comments. I have been to Graceland many times, including last year. And, the photo of Elvis in his coffin was supposedly taken by a family member, who sold it to National Enquirer. It was taken by a home camera from far away, but NE blew it up and “enhanced” it. I will definitely check out some of your books. I finally went to Graceland in 2007, after 20 years of wanting to go. I have never been so excited in my whole life. That may sound pathetic, but I was there with Elvis. How could I not have been excited? love this, esp. the discussion of all the many ways split-screen can reinforce or deliver meaning. and the Scorsese tidbit! everything you write about Elvis is always beyond erudite and charged w/ actual passion for the subject — it’s why people should write books. NEED URGENT HELP NOT ONLY FROM (SUZIE) BUT ANY OTHERS TOO, PLEASE! TCM HAS BEEN ADVERTIZING IT “SUS” “TRADING CARDS”-(saying a limited availablity) NEED A TIP OR LINK, PLEESE TO ANYONE THANK YOU SUZIE, which do you like better, l950′or ’70′s Preseley? THOUGH THE SPLIT SCREEN MAY HAVE INFLUENENCED Scorsese, not certain though/ EXCUSE “MISPRINTS” NEED AN EDIT BUTTON SPORTS FANS!!! Leave a Reply |
Archives
Featured Sites
Popular terms
3-D
Action Films
Actors
Actors' Endorsements
animal stars
Animation
Anime
Anthology Films
Autobiography
Awards
B-movies
Best of the Year lists
Biography
Biopics
Blu-Ray
Books on Film
Boxing films
British Cinema
Canadian Cinema
Character Actors
Chicago Film History
Cinematography
Classic Films
College Life on Film
Comedy
Comic Book Movies
Czech Film
Dance on Film
Digital Cinema
Directors
Disaster Films
Documentary
Drama
DVD
Early Talkies
Editing
Educational Films
European Influence on American Cinema
Experimental
Exploitation
Fairy Tales on Film
Faith or Christian-based Films
Family Films
Film Composers
film festivals
Film History in Florida
Film Noir
Film Scholars
Film titles
Filmmaking Techniques
Food in Film
Foreign Film
French Film
Gangster films
Genre
Genre spoofs
Guest Programmers
HD & Blu-Ray
Holiday Movies
Hollywood lifestyles
Horror
Horror Movies
Icons
independent film
Italian Film
Japanese Film
Korean Film
Leadership
Literary Adaptations
Martial Arts
Melodramas
Method Acting
Mexican Cinema
Moguls
Monster Movies
Movie Books
Movie Costumes
Movie locations
Movie lovers
Movie Reviewers
Movie settings
Movie Stars
Music in Film
Musicals
New Releases
Outdoor Cinema
Paranoid Thrillers
Parenting on film
Polish film industry
political thrillers
Politics in Film
Pornography
Pre-Code
Producers
Race in American Film
Remakes
Road Movies
Romance
Romantic Comedies
Russian Film Industry
Satire
Scandals
Science Fiction
Screenwriters
Semi-documentaries
Serials
Short Films
Silent Film
silent films
Social Problem Film
Sports
Sports on Film
Stereotypes
Straight-to-DVD
Studio Politics
Suspense thriller
Swashbucklers
TCM Classic Film Festival
Television
The British in Hollywood
The Germans in Hollywood
The Hungarians in Hollywood
The Irish in Hollywood
The Russians in Hollywood
Theaters
Trains in movies
Underground Cinema
VOD
War film
Westerns
Women in the Film Industry
Women's Weepies |
Though I’m in the *Sinatra club, Elvis was 1 cool-cat!!!
Though a far superior docu on him was 1970′s “That’s The Way It Is”
Featuring in what most call his prime, at age 35.
Supetb songs too>”Suspicious Minds” “Polk Salad Annie” “In the Ghetto”
Please reprint,etc “Evis for Dummies” though
Don’t know how they keep track, given “Westwood,cem” is FREE.
Marilyn’s grave said to be 2nd most visited on the planet, after ELVIS
& TCM really should do a special on it’s books. Especially with the new “Inside Movie Magazine’s” By Anthony Slide
“100 Collectible Classics” By Frank Miller is it’s finest to date
Plus, agree or not, a tribute to Hollywoods “Walk-of-Fame”
Celebrating it’s 40th year this yr *J. Woodward was first entertainer to be given one, in l960.
Though it was in June of l96l that the intitial (1,558) were installed. Many posthumously>*Gable, *Coop, *Bogie, Valentino, Harlow, Lombard, W.C., Fairbanks & many others.
A fun-fact is, many tourists’ actually belive a certain celeb is laid to rest under their “Star!”
Pretty neat trick, considering Gene Autry has (5)
SOMETHING TO PONDER, PLEEESE!