A Different View of Hollywood

Photographer Julius Shulman may not be a household name but you’ve probably seen his work or at least its influence in Hollywood films. Shulman spent much of his life photographing architectural wonders in Los Angeles and his photos of private homes, office buildings and public structures helped shape the way that we all see the “City of Angels.”

In the documentary Visual Acoustics (2008) director Eric Bricker celebrates the career of photographer Julius Shulman and it’s an interesting and informative look at the man and his work. Shulman was born in New York and grew up on a Connecticut farm, but when his family moved to Los Angeles in 1923 he began to photograph the city as it was transforming into the modern megalopolis that we know today. In the ’30s Shulman started collaborating with architect Richard Neutra and his photographs were used to promote Neutra’s ideas about modern design. Both men believed that modern architecture should be compatible with our natural landscape and Shulman’s photos exemplified this philosophy. Over time Schulman become a great environmentalist as well as a great photographer and both of his passions are evident in his work. Although his photographs were often staged like a film set using props that he brought from home; Schulman made great use of the landscape and natural light. Structures never seem to overshadow the environment they were placed in and Shulman’s photographs highlight this harmony and balance with nature. The public became familiar with his pictures in popular shelter magazines such as Sunset and Good Housekeeping but he gained international recognition when his work appeared in publications like Architectural Digest and Arts & Architecture.

Top: Young Julius Shulman with architect Richard Neutra

Director Eric Bricker obviously adores his subject and it’s not hard to understand why. At the time that Visual Acoustics was made, Julius Schulman was 93 years old and his sense of humor; healthy ego and bright mind were still working at full capacity. It’s easy to imagine Shulman as a young man when he tells stories about his working relationship with architectural luminaries such as Frank Lloyd Wright. Throughout the film Shulman discusses his work with friends and family members who also offer their own insights about the man and his iconic photographs. But the documentary mainly relies on the opinions of other architects and designers to explain the history and importance of Shulman’s work while actor Dustin Hoffman narrates.

Visual Acoustics will probably appeal to anyone interested in photography, design and architecture but the film also explores Jules Shulman’s lifelong relationship with the city of Los Angeles. It offers potential viewers an intimate look at the Hollywood Hills and highlights many of the Los Angeles homes featured in Shulman’s photos, which can also seen in popular movies such as Body Double (Brian De Palma; 1984), Lethal Weapon 2 (Richard Donner; 1989), The Big Lebowski (Joel & Ethan Coen; 1998), etc.

Bottom: Elder Julius Shulman with his assistant.

The documentary doesn’t offer much insight into Shulman’s personal life and that’s one of its biggest failings. Julius Shulman was obviously somewhat of a private man who is very focused on his work. It’s easy to assume that the director probably had trouble getting him to talk openly about his family and friends, but that problem could have easily been solved by using Dustin Hoffman’s narration to fill in some gaps. And besides Shulman’s actual photographs, Visual Acoustics lacks structure and visual appeal. The documentary just isn’t as dynamic as its subject and I found that somewhat disappointing, but it’s hard to fault its intention. Director Eric Bricker should be complimented for shining a light on one of America’s greatest photographers and introducing a new audience to the beauty and brilliance of modern architecture.

Visual Acoustics has a strong element of nostalgia running through it that makes one long for the Los Angeles of the 1940s-1960s as seen in Julius Shulman’s wonderful photographs. He managed to capture the zeitgeist of modern life at a time when the world appeared to be incredibly glamorous and full of possibility. Throughout the documentary Shulman seems wistful about the past and aches for a future that he knows he will never see. It’s hard not to be moved as we watch him pack up his photo archives before they are sent away to a museum to be analyzed and enjoyed by future generations. Jules Shulman died in 2008 at age 98 but his legacy lives on. Visual Acoustics was recently released on DVD and is available for instant viewing on Netflix.

4 Responses A Different View of Hollywood
Posted By Medusa : July 22, 2010 5:11 pm

Can’t wait to get on Netflix and watch this! I grew up in L.A. of the 1950s and 1960s and of course have a great fondness for the era.

Beautiful photos used here, too! Wonderful post!

Posted By suzidoll : July 23, 2010 1:05 am

This film made my top ten list for 2009; I am glad you spotlighted it as a DVD release. I didn’t mind that the director didn’t delve into Shulman’s personal life, because I think the verite approach to following Shulman around as he speaks his mind reveals enough of his ideas and personality to see how the man and his art connect. My favorite part was cinematographer Dante Spinotti’s efforts to duplicate the famous photo on film.

Posted By Kimberly Lindbergs : July 23, 2010 7:23 pm

Medusa – I think you’ll really enjoy it. Shulman was an amazing photographer and his pictures really encapsulate the eras.

Suszidoll – If I had seen it last year the movie would been one of my favorites from 2009 as well. I think when it ended I just wanted to know more about his personal life and how that may have effected or not effected his work or maybe I just wanted to hear Shulman talk more instead of all the other talking heads? Overall though I think it’s a good film and I’m really glad that it was made. The bits with Dante Spinotti were very interesting!

Posted By chris hyde : July 24, 2010 10:56 am

I thought this doc was OK, but I was sorely disappointed in the same things that you were. Overall the work seemed a bit incomplete to me and didn’t really delve into a lot of depth about the man himself. Otherwise it was fine, but really I think a more incisive director might have made a lot more of its subject.

Leave a Reply

MovieMorlocks.com is the official blog for TCM. No topic is too obscure or niche to be excluded from our film discussions. And we welcome your comments on our blogs and bloggers.
Archives
Popular terms
3-D  Actors  Actors' Endorsements  Animation  Anthology Films  Awards  Books on Film  British Cinema  Character Actors  Chicago Film History  Cinematography  Classic Films  College Life on Film  Comedy  Comic Book Movies  Czech Film  Dance on Film  Digital Cinema  Directors  Disaster Films  Documentary  Drama  Early Talkies  Editing  Educational Films  European Influence on American Cinema  Exploitation  Family Films  Film Composers  film festivals  Film Noir  Film Scholars  Filmmaking Techniques  Food in Film  Foreign Film  French Film  Gangster films  Genre spoofs  Guest Programmers  HD & Blu-Ray  Holiday Movies  Hollywood lifestyles  Horror  Horror Movies  Icons  independent film  Italian Film  Literary Adaptations  Martial Arts  Melodramas  Method Acting  Mexican Cinema  Monster Movies  Movie Books  Movie locations  Movie Stars  Music in Film  Musicals  Outdoor Cinema  Parenting on film  Polish film industry  political thrillers  Pornography  Pre-Code  Producers  Race in American Film  Remakes  Road Movies  Romance  Romantic Comedies  Russian Film Industry  Scandals  Science Fiction  Screenwriters  Semi-documentaries  Short Films  Silent Film  silent films  Social Problem Film  Sports  Sports on Film  Stereotypes  Straight-to-DVD  Studio Politics  Suspense thriller  Swashbucklers  TCM Classic Film Festival  Television  The British in Hollywood  The Hungarians in Hollywood  The Irish in Hollywood  The Russians in Hollywood  Theaters  Underground Cinema  VOD  War film  Westerns  Women in the Film Industry  Women's Weepies