Curiouser and Curiouser Casting Choices
When Blake Edwards was pondering who should play Mr. Yunioshi, Holly Golightly’s Japanese neighbor, in BREAKFAST AT TIFFANY’S (1961), did he call central casting and ask for suggestions? Or did he come up with his own ideas, running through such choices as Benson Fong, Philip Ahn, Toshiro Mifune, Takashi Shimura and others before arriving at the most logical choice…..Mickey Rooney. HUH? Rooney’s manic, exaggerated caricature in the film seems like it was intended for a very different movie and stands out like a flashing neon sign whenever the Mickster is on screen, yelling “Miss Gorightry!” through oversized buck teeth. Besides the movie’s depiction of Mr. Yunioshi as a glaring stereotype, the way Rooney plays it is so extreme that it becomes highly entertaining and memorable for all the wrong reasons. And it’s certainly not the image most people have of this iconic comedy-romance-drama from the sixties…but it’s Mr. Yunioshi who flashes to mind when I think of it. Ok, I admit I’m damaged. Still, it makes you wonder about the casting process of any film and famously wrong-headed choices could be due to any number of reasons: a contract player who had no choice but to do the role despite their resistance, a talent agent-producer deal that was an attempt to broaden their star’s range or popularity, an actor’s desire to challenge himself, or a completely opportunistic choice based on money and exposure. Spend 6 hours a day in makeup to look like an ape or change my image from virginal prom queen to killer whore for $500,000? Sold! In the case of Mickey Rooney in BREAKFAST AT TIFFANY’S it was probably the money and the fact that he hadn’t appeared in a high profile, big budget movie in some time. At that point in his career, he was working in both television and B-movies such as THE PRIVATE LIVES OF ADAM AND EVE (1960) and KING OF THE ROARING 20’s – THE STORY OF ARNOLD ROTHSTEIN (1961) so Blake Edwards’ offer would have been a big step up from those. In his autobiography, Life is Too Short, Rooney wrote, “I was downright ashamed of my role in BREAKFAST AT TIFFANY’S…and I don’t think the director, Blake Edwards, was very proud of it either. I was too cute as, get this, an eccentric Japanese fashion photographer living in a posh New York apartment, and the whole damn movie was just too precious. Audrey Hepburn played a high-priced hooker. You had to read Truman Capote’s story to know that; you wouldn’t have known it from watching the movie.” Here are some more of my favorite eclectic casting decisions that come to mind when I think of actors in roles that are so bizarre or inappropriate you just go, “What the %#@$!” Occasionally this kind of “creative” casting works in spite of itself and helps revive an actor’s career or takes them to new heights in popularity such as Dean Stockwell in David Lynch’s BLUE VELVET and Bette Davis and Joan Crawford in WHAT EVER HAPPENED TO BABY JANE? But it’s more likely to be something like this.
Betsy Palmer was a perky, attractive ingenue in the fifties who enjoyed the limelight briefly in such films as MISTER ROBERTS (1955), opposite Jack Lemmon, and dramatic vehicles like QUEEN BEE (1955) and THE TIN STAR (1957). Never a major star, she drifted into television work but her career seemed over by the time she made a cameo appearance in 1972 in an episode of the TV show, “Love, American Style.” Then nothing….until 1980 when producer/director Sean S. Cunningham said, “Hey, we need a big Hollywood name to play Mrs. Voorhees in FRIDAY THE 13TH.” Okay, so they couldn’t afford a big Hollywood name but they got Betsy Palmer and that’s why anyone born after 1960 probably knows who she is today. Killkillkillkillkillkill………
Paul Newman was probably fed up with being hyped as a male sex object by the early sixties, even though he had already proven that he was an impressive actor with two Oscar nominations under his belt for Cat on a Hot Tin Roof (1958) and The Hustler (1961). So what does he do after Sweet Bird of Youth in 1962? He decides to take a small role in a sprawling, episodic literary adaptation called HEMINGWAY’S ADVENTURES OF A YOUNG MAN (1962) and play a beat-up, broken-down, middle-aged ex-boxer turned bum known as “The Battler.” It was a character he had actually played before in a 1955 TV episode for Playwrights ’56, based on an Ernest Hemingway short story, and it led to his being cast as boxer Rocky Graziano in Somebody Up There Likes Me the next year. But his return to the same role, which was little more than a vignette in the 1962 film, was an odd detour nevertheless. According to Shawn Levy’s recent bio of Newman, “His agents at MCA weren’t too happy with his choice. He was highly marketable at the moment, and they could find lots of well-paid jobs for him if he’d let them. “They said I was a star,” he remembered. “I couldn’t cheapen myself by playing a bit part.” Well, he showed them…and us. It might have been an attempt to sink into a secondary role just for the challenge and love of acting but it certainly alienated his female fans. It was Newman at his most unglamorous and unappealing, his handsome looks buried under very unconvincing makeup. And he was playing opposite Richard Beymer, who was ill-equipped to carry the dramatic burden of the film. Worse of all, Newman barely made an impression in the role except for his grotesque appearance. The film was universally panned and the entry for it in Leonard Maltin’s TV guide dismisses it as “pretentious…..overblown, cornball and embarrassing.” It’s all those things and probably looks much worse and more puzzling now than then. But Newman quickly moved on and Hud was his next picture, making him an even bigger star in a role where he played a cynical son-of-a-bitch and borderline sociopath.
For her last screen appearance, Jennifer Jones joined an all-star cast, most of whom were served up as guest victims or muppets on fire, in the expensive disaster flick THE TOWERING INFERNO (1974); it was so costly in fact, that it required two studios to join forces to produce it (Warner Bros. & 20th Century Fox). William Holden, Robert Vaughn, Robert Wagner and Fred Astaire (who, surprisingly, was nominated for a Best Supporting Actor Oscar for this) are completely wasted in the cookie cutter storyline but the worst indignity was reserved for Jennifer Jones who gets stuck in an exterior glass elevator at the top of the title skyscraper and is then hurled to her death far below. Talk about a final swan song. There is something so gratuitous about the treatment of her character that it becomes a commentary on how veterans stars are exploited by Hollywood – and Irwin Allen – in the name of entertainment. Jimmy Stewart as a circus clown? Do you think he read the script of THE GREATEST SHOW ON EARTH (1952) and said, “I must play Buttons the clown”? Like THE TOWERING INFERNO, Cecil B. DeMille’s circus epic is another all-star affair and Stewart’s role is little more than a cameo with almost no dialogue. Despite the above photo, Buttons is NOT a happy clown and his unfortunate backstory is revealed toward the end of the film; it’s not one of Stewart’s finest moments in acting and nothing more than a pit stop between No Highway in the Sky (1951) and Bend in the River (1952).
Rarely revived today, ON A CLEAR DAY YOU CAN SEE FOREVER (1970) is from Vincente Minnelli’s later period and has its cult followers due to the subject matter (reincarnation), psychedelic-era influences and a lush, overproduced production design. Based on a semi-successful Broadway musical fantasy with a score by Alan Jay Lerner and Burton Lane, the film stars Barbra Streisand as a chain-smoker who hopes a psychiatrist (Yves Montand) can help her break the habit. Instead, Montand discovers, while Streisand is under hypnosis, that she has lived several past lives. The Streisand-Montand pairing doesn’t work but Jack Nicholson, who pops up in the unlikely role of Streisand’s stepbrother, a guitar-playing hippie, provides some laughs. Allegedly, a duet between Streisand and Nicholson ended up on the cutting room floor. Too bad. Still, there is novelty value in seeing Streisand and Nicholson together on the screen and, though it’s a small part, it’s worth a look for Nicholson fanatics.
The much anticipated pairing of John Travolta and Lily Tomlin in MOMENT BY MOMENT (1978) turned out to be one of the biggest boxoffice bombs for Universal in the seventies. Tomlin’s companion, writer/director Jane Wagner, tried to inject some social commentary about Southern California’s privileged white society and cultural rootlessness via an overly familiar tale of a love affair between an older woman and a younger man. But the main problem was a total lack of chemistry between the stars and a vapid script. After Tomlin’s acclaimed performances in The Late Show (1977) and Nashville (1975), MOMENT BY MOMENT was not what the public expected or wanted from her. The New York Times pinpointed the major problem in their review: “That the two stars look enough alike to be brother and sister is no help, and though Miss Wagner’s camera comes in for some tactful close-ups of flesh in the love scenes, they are singularly unerotic. One has the impression that these two lovers would prefer to be doing something else.” Tomlin would later say, “I never should have played it the way I played it. And I also think the initial intention of the movie was quite different -we just couldn’t make it come out – but we were quite innocent about it….we had no idea how the press was going to beat up on us…You couldn’t pick up a magazine for three or four years! Just when I’d think it had finally been put to rest, I’d pick up a magazine with some terrible piece about it and of course I couldn’t do an interview because you have to take that whole trip back.”
You would think that by 1969 the practice of casting Caucasians as Native Americans in movies would have been verboten but here is a blatant example of it and one of the reasons TELL THEM WILLIE BOY IS HERE never worked for me. Directed by Abraham Polonsky, a former victim of the Blacklist, this Western tale of a manhunt for a Paiute Indian wanted for the murder of his girlfriend’s father is a well-intentioned message picture about racial prejudice and social injustice. But Robert Blake and Katharine Ross are all wrong as the Native American lovers on the run. And despite Robert Redford in the starring role, the film wasn’t popular with audiences either.
What’s the point of hiring some of the most famous actors in Hollywood and burying them under tons of makeup? This question always arises when I see movies like Norman McLeod’s 1933 version of ALICE IN WONDERLAND with Cary Grant as the Mock Turtle, Gary Cooper as the White Knight, W.C. Fields as Humpty Dumpty and so on. Or John Huston’s gimmicky mystery thriller, THE LIST OF ADRIAN MESSENGER (1963) in which cameo guest stars Tony Curtis, Frank Sinatra, Burt Lancaster, Robert Mitchum and Kirk Douglas are used as “red herring” suspects – one of them turns up in drag – and part of the fun is in spotting them. In both cases, the big name casting is a stunt and bizarre enough to generate some publicity but you wonder if either film would have been worth doing without their participation.
I could go on with other offbeat casting choices such as Alec Guinness in A MAJORITY OF ONE (1962), Lauren Bacall in Robert Altman’s HEALTH (1980), Peter Lorre in SILK STOCKINGS (1957) and Margot Kidder in THE REINCARNATION OF PETER PROUD (1975) but would like to hear from readers about their favorites.
28 Responses Curiouser and Curiouser Casting Choices
I NEVER, EVER liked Rooney’s Mr. Yunioshi, it was one of those truly WTF film moments that we get now and again. Is it possible that someone important somewhere had written this screenplay with Rooney in mind and it was just something that hadn’t been properly dismissed? John Travolta’s “Battlefield Earth” is 100% bad casting choices; well, the whole enterprise was a bad choice. I must admit I have a fondness for the stunt casting in LIST OF ADRIAN MESSENGER and Jimmy Stewart as Buttons the Clown in GSOE. But, Mickey Rooney in TIFFANY’s is truly a bizarre bit of casting, even in the early 60s. Aside from the offensiveness of it, he’s a cartoon-like character in a film about enchantment. He throws the tone of the movie completely off. It’s so bad, you almost forget about Buddy Ebsen, who also doesn’t seem to fit his role. I’ve been watching a lot of 60s TV shows, and one of the things I enjoy is the strange casting of famous movie stars from days gone by. Aaron Spellings 1963 Burke’s Law seemed to have a fetish about this, with 4-6 guest stars a week, half recent, half classic. We see Zasu Pitts, Mary Astor, Charlie Ruggles, and Joan Blondell, along with Elizabeth Montgomery, Soupy Sales, Don Rickles and Barbara Eden. Quite a treat, and I’m sure most of them were just glad for a paycheck and another turn in the spotlight. Katharine Ross is all wrong for Tell Them Willie Boy is Here, but I don’t think Robert Blake is too bad. At least he had a bit more experience playing Native American parts (he was “Little Beaver” in the Red Ryder movie series). And I don’t mind the stunt casting in Adrian Messenger because I still think it’s an engaging mystery, with a superb performance by star George C. Scott. The first woefully miscast performance that immediately comes to mind is Henry Fonda in The Fugitive. It’s not a terrible film but it would have been much better with someone else in the title role. Don’t get me wrong. I have a fondness for THE LIST OF ADRIAN MESSENGER too but the guest stars are so jarring in that and so covered in makeup that it pulls you of the movie each time you see one. I had not heard before that Curtis and Sinatra only appeared in the curtain call and had body doubles used for that scene. That really makes their participation a shameless advertising hook. But George C. Scott’s performance is my favorite aspect of the movie anyway. I tried to watch THE FUGITIVE once and couldn’t get through it. I remember the visual look of the film was stunning but maybe I should try again. You can pick any number of awful or weird casting choices in more modern flicks. Danny Glover in Predator2 anyone? I guess in that case, the bizarre choice of actor worked as a “fish out of water” effect, giving us some much-needed anxiety for our protagonist (but hey, I even felt scared for poor Arnie in the first one). What do people think about the choice of casting Walter Matthau in “Charlie Varrick”? Like “Breakfast at Tiffany’s”, it’s pretty much a decent movie and moves along at a good pace, but besides the horrible ’70′s music, it’s the choice of casting Matthau in the role that seems most strange. Generally, he fits the role, but there are many times when it just doesn’t feel right (the moment when he beds the secretary begs incredulity). My memory of Charlie Varrick is that it has a low-key kind of charm until Joe Don Baker’s creepy, sadist villain (bearing the strange name of Molly) enters the picture and starts pursuing Matthau and his cohorts. Talk about strange casting, Andy Robinson who played such a sick, twisted f#ck in DIRTY HARRY, is completely sympathetic here as a friend of Varrick’s. Oh yeah, good call on Don Baker’s villain, definitely a mean character. One surprise casting choice that worked beautifully was Bill Murray’s uncredited part as Dustin Hoffman’s roommate in TOOTSIE. Probably not listed due to contract stuff or maybe because he didn’t want to give the impression that it was a “Bill Murray” comedy, he steals the show with his small part, especially when he voices his concern about Hoffman’s reasons for playing a female character on a soap opera (“You are doing this for the play, right? You aren’t doing it just to wear these little outfits?”). Mentioning Danny Glover-remember his cameo in MAVERICK, when he plays a bandit who crosses paths with that charter member of the NAACP, Mel Gibson? The two characters look at each other, think they recognize the other, then shake their heads (while Glover utters his catchphrase from the LETHAL WEAPON movies, “I’m too old for this s***!”). I did enjoy the cast, crew, and director of FREAKS last night on TCM!!! Real character actors for sure! For me, the ultimate mis-cast was John Wayne as Genghis Khan in THE CONQUEROR Robert Redford in 1974′s The Great Gatsby….no, Mia Farrow in 1974′s The Great Gatsby….no, pretty much everyone in 1974′s The Great Gatsby. Are we forgetting the modern elephant in the room? Hayden Christensen as they young Darth Vader? How about Art Linkletter, Robert Evans and Zsa Zsa Gabor? 1. He recently passed on and I don’t want to say anything bad about him because he brought a lot of enjoyment to a lot of peoples’ lives. But, incredibly, Art Linkletter was cast as the romantic lead in an otherwise decent comedy, CHAMPAGNE FOR CAESAR, starring two wonderful actors, Ronald Colman and Vincent Price. 2. Robert Evans, the studio executive, producer and former actor, gets an enormous kick about relating that the major actors in THE SUN ALSO RISES all lobbied producer Darryl F. Zanuck to fire him from the cast because he was doing such an inept job. “The kid stays in the picture,” Zanuck supposedly responded. 3. I can’t figure out why Zsa Zsa Gabor was cast in TOUCH OF EVIL. It is obvious that Marlene Dietrich, Joseph Cotten and Ray Collins came aboard because they were buddies of Welles. Janet Leigh, Dennis Weaver and Mercedes McCambridge probably all responded to the opportunities to play challenging roles. 4. Incidentally, the story idea for THE UNGUARDED MOMENT came from Rosalind Russell, who at one time wanted to do it but realized she was now too old. 5. Jeff, I can’t resist mentioning that when Suzi wrote about LIST OF ADRIAN MESSENGER previously, I wrote in and mentioned that Curtis, Sinatra and Lancaster didn’t film their scenes in makeup and were only around for the finale. 6. Mickey Rooney and Blake Edwards had worked together three times previously. The one happy occasion was OPERATION MADBALL starring Jack Lemmon and Ernie Kovacs and co-starring Rooney. Edwards wrote this comedy which is usually rated fairly high. Yeah, the Redford-Farrow remake of The Great Gatsby is a bust. Al, I forgot about Robert Evans. Great example. And he’s even worse as the scene-chewing villain in THE FIEND WHO WALKED THE WEST. I agree that Mickey Rooney in Breakfast was really off putting, and I love the man. It embarasses me everytime I watch it! I also agree with the modern day elephant of Hayden Christensen. They could have put a tree in place of him and it would have been more animated. I really think that all the characters were miscast in these latest three episodes. I love Touch of Evil, but again, Charlton Heston as a Mexican? It was a strange movie, with odd choices, but I liked it! I thought Marlene did a great job, and really, she really stands out in the movie to me. Well, Mr. Yunioshi had a great theme, anyway: There is a version of Julius Caesar, Charleton Heston is in it as Marc Anthony, Diana Rigg is in it, Robert Vaughn is in it, many others who’s names escape me, but the one actor in it who absolutely stinked was Jason Robards as Brutus! I couldn’t believe my eyes and ears as he labored in a monotonous voice to get out his lines, while everyone else in the pic was acting their hearts out! I now wonder if Mr. Robards was suffering from some health problems at the time of the film’s shoot? I recently tivoed and watched a film, 1946′s The Locket, and in it, Robert Mitchum’s character is an artist, and he jumps out of a window to end it all over a crazy woman. I kept shaking my head about it today, Mitchum, killing himself over a woman? No way! One more I thought of. Watched The Way we Were for the first time this weekend, and I am sorry, even though Redford is a gorgeous guy, he was a bit long in the tooth to play a college student! Robards is also pretty terrible, miscast, and bored-seeming in the 1971 version of Murders in the Rue Morgue. Being an AIP production from the early 70s, the part was most likely written with Vincent Price in mind. Jason Robards was a fine actor, but he really shouldn’t be who you turn to when you can’t get Vincent Price. Also memorably wrong in a similar way is Humphrey Bogart in The Return of Dr. X, playing a part that was probably written for Boris Karloff. Bogart also seems really out of place in The Oklahoma Kid, with James Cagney (who seems just as wrong as Bogie). Didn’t Jennifer Jones get an Oscar nod for best supporting actress for her role in Towering Inferno? I thought I read somewhere how the role boosted her career in the 1970s. Jenni – I think most critics at the time noted how ridiculous it was that Redford and Streisand were playing college kids in THE WAY WE WERE. As for Jones in The Towering Inferno, she wasn’t nominated for any Oscars but she did get a Golden Globe nod (a sad comment when you see how she’s wasted in it). And the movie didn’t help her career in terms of film work – it was her last. Jason – you picked one as crazy as Rooney in Tiffany’s. Bogart in Return of Dr. X with the white streak in his hair and his pet rabbit. Nuts! Like Ivan, I think that Robert Blake is actually pretty good in the painfully politically correct TELL THEM WILLIE BOY IS HERE, but Katharine Ross makes the most ludicrous Indian in any movie. I’m also 100% with Jenni about Jason Robards as Brutus in JULIUS CAESAR, which has always been one of my touchstones for bad performances. He seems to be hungover and reading his lines off cue cards. I can take Robert Mitchum as the macho artist in THE LOCKET, but not as the shy schoolmaster in RYAN’S DAUGHTER. Noel Coward as a heterosexual lecher in BUNNY LAKE IS MISSING is another example of bizarre casting. others: The first I thought of when reading the heading was Charlton Heston in Touch of Evil, but that worked out so well. I love The List of Adrian Messenger and felt that it worked well because of the performance of George C. Scott. I believe that Frank and Curtis played the cameo roles (if you look at Frank’s character you can see Frank’s eyes), but Paul Frees did more than one voice for some of the actors in the makeup. One miscast actor not yet mentioned was Paul Newman as a Mexican in The Outrage, a remake of the far superior Rashomon. John Huston, the director of MESSENGER, confessed to the fraud in his autobiography. He said that actors featured in the end credits did NOT make appearances in the film. He didn’t say which ones. Mitchum is obviously Mitchum. Douglas produced the film and I believe he did some of his characterizations, if not all of them. That leaves Lancaster, Curtis and Sinatra. I too looked at the film closely and I don’t believe it is them during their “cameos” in the film. great post regarding, but! i don’t wish to be so negative but i believe that your site could look a little better if you had a little bit of orange on it :P No, you don’t have to agree… this is merely my simple thoughts and opinions. Thank you to the good post anyway! =) Thanks, Resan Leave a Reply |
Archives
Featured Sites
Popular terms
3-D
Action Films
Actors
Actors' Endorsements
animal stars
Animation
Anime
Anthology Films
Autobiography
Awards
B-movies
Best of the Year lists
Biography
Biopics
Blu-Ray
Books on Film
British Cinema
Canadian Cinema
Character Actors
Chicago Film History
Cinematography
Classic Films
College Life on Film
Comedy
Comic Book Movies
Czech Film
Dance on Film
Digital Cinema
Directors
Disaster Films
Documentary
Drama
DVD
Early Talkies
Editing
Educational Films
European Influence on American Cinema
Experimental
Exploitation
Fairy Tales on Film
Faith or Christian-based Films
Family Films
Film Composers
film festivals
Film History in Florida
Film Noir
Film Scholars
Film titles
Filmmaking Techniques
Food in Film
Foreign Film
French Film
Gangster films
Genre
Genre spoofs
Guest Programmers
HD & Blu-Ray
Holiday Movies
Hollywood lifestyles
Horror
Horror Movies
Icons
independent film
Italian Film
Japanese Film
Korean Film
Literary Adaptations
Martial Arts
Melodramas
Method Acting
Mexican Cinema
Moguls
Monster Movies
Movie Books
Movie Costumes
Movie locations
Movie lovers
Movie Reviewers
Movie settings
Movie Stars
Music in Film
Musicals
Outdoor Cinema
Paranoid Thrillers
Parenting on film
Polish film industry
political thrillers
Politics in Film
Pornography
Pre-Code
Producers
Race in American Film
Remakes
Road Movies
Romance
Romantic Comedies
Russian Film Industry
Satire
Scandals
Science Fiction
Screenwriters
Semi-documentaries
Serials
Short Films
Silent Film
silent films
Social Problem Film
Sports
Sports on Film
Stereotypes
Straight-to-DVD
Studio Politics
Suspense thriller
Swashbucklers
TCM Classic Film Festival
Television
The British in Hollywood
The Germans in Hollywood
The Hungarians in Hollywood
The Irish in Hollywood
The Russians in Hollywood
Theaters
Trains in movies
Underground Cinema
VOD
War film
Westerns
Women in the Film Industry
Women's Weepies |
As much as I love LIST OF ADRIAN MESSENGER, I seem to recall that, at the very least, Curtis’ and Sinatra’s only participation in the movie was during the curtain call, and that body doubles stood in for them in the actual film – including their voices.