Suckers on the Screen and Suckers in the Audience

After purposely avoiding it for years due to its terrible reputation, my curiosity finally got the best of me when TCM aired TENTACLES (1977), following the stupefying ZAAT (1972) on Friday May 7th, and I finally watched it from start to finish. One of several ill-conceived and pathetic attempts to cash in on the boxoffice success of JAWS, the Italian produced TENTACLES is a perversely entertaining nature run amok thriller that stands out from the other killer shark clones like MAKO: THE JAWS OF DEATH (1976) and TINTORERA! (1977) by substituting a more elusive title menace – a giant octopus.  What sets TENTACLES’ particular brand of ineptness apart from other run of the mill JAWS ripoffs and makes it hard to stop watching is its almost abstract approach to narrative combined with a you’ve-gotta-be-kidding-me high profile cast that includes John Huston, Shelley Winters, Henry Fonda, Cesare Danova, Claude Akins and Bo Hopkins, who is self-taught in his own peculiar interpretation of Method Acting.       

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r0cEXCv7Woc]

While almost everyone on the planet who has seen TENTACLES and commented it on it has trashed it as boring, stupid and for masochistic completists only, I found it to be an oddly appealing train wreck of a movie, mostly due to the participation of John Huston as the world’s oldest investigative reporter, Shelley Winters as his divorced, single mom sister!! and Henry Fonda as the grumpy head of a super corporation called Trojan, Inc. that is constructing a massive underwater tunnel that is apparently stirring up the denizens of the deep – in particular, a rarely glimpsed carnivorous octopus. Whenever Huston, Winters and Fonda are on the screen, I am immediately pulled out of the movie and find myself considering them, not as the characters they are playing, but the Hollywood legends they once were.

Why did they agree to appear in something that was so far beneath their talents like TENTACLES? The easy answer is money but there must have been other reasons. A driving need to work, regardless of the quality? The chance to work with director Ovidio G. Assonitis or receive top billing in an American International Pictures release? The opportunity to work with actors they admired and liked? Maybe that was true of Huston and Winters who would go on to appear together again in another Italian mishmash, THE VISITOR (1979), a post-Exorcist thriller that also starred Glenn Ford, Lance Henriksen, Mel Ferrer, Sam Peckinpah and Franco Nero as Jesus! But Henry Fonda literally “phones” in his performance here, crabbing to someone at the other end of the receiver in two of his three scenes which didn’t involve any on-screen interaction with Huston or Winters and were probably shot in one day. It’s the sort of colorless cameo that could have been played by anybody and a curious choice for Fonda who at this point in his career hadn’t really appeared yet in a low-budget exploitation film on the order of TENTACLES. The big budget boxoffice disaster about killer bees, THE SWARM, would follow a year later along with such less prestigious projects as CITY ON FIRE (1979), WANDA NEVADA (1979) and METEOR (1979). Yet, Fonda obviously had a great agent at the time of TENTACLES because he receives the distinctive screen credit of “Special Appearance by Henry Fonda as Mr. Whitehead.” Not to be outdone, Claude Akins’ agent also secured him a special screen credit: “With Claude Akins as Robards” (the resort town’s ineffective sheriff).

But back to Huston and Winters as a barely functional brother-sister team; their scenes together are fascinatingly bad. Although the opening credits reveal that no less than four writers worked on the screenplay – Steven W. Carabatsos, Tito Carpi, Jerome Max, Sonia Molteni – it seems apparent that most of the dialogue was improvised, especially by Ms. Winters who at one point mentions that her second husband was Italian (in real life her second husband was Vittorio Gassman) and makes a running joke out of her weight. So does Huston and even her son, a terrible child actor who blurts out dialogue like a cheerful robot such as “Mommie, you’re plump. There’s more to love.” Shelley also appears to be slightly drunk in all of her scenes, particularly her first appearance when she awkwardly interrupts Huston’s typing to offer him a drink:

Winters: Whatdidja do, work all night? Didn’t mama tell you that was bad for your eyes?

Huston: And she told you to stay away from candy.

Winters (pointing to her body) What do you mean candy, little brother? This isn’t candy, it’s passion!

Huston: And whom did you seduce last night?

Winters: Frank Cannetti. You know, the bartender where Christine works? Oh, he’s so young and beautiful and so Italian.

Huston: Aren’t you ever gonna slow down?

Winters: Never. Hey, how about a Bloody Mary?

Huston: No, it’s either too late or too early – or something.

And so it goes with Huston either wandering around in his nightgown or looking rumpled in his reporter attire and Shelley accenting her blowsy character with unflattering color striped outfits and an oversized Mexican sombrero in one scene. Huston is actually rather endearing here as the sole voice of reason in a manhunt for a killer octopus and not at all how most people really think of him both on screen and off, which is probably closer to the cunning and malevolent Noah Cross of Roman Polanski’s CHINATOWN (1974). Winters, on the other hand, is already a parody of herself at this point in her career, specializing in grotesque caricatures, something that began in earnest in 1968 with her Mrs. Daphne Flatow creation in WILD IN THE STREETS. Things would steadily go downhill from there with occasional high points (NEXT STOP, GREENWICH VILLAGE, 1976) and pop culture landmarks (THE POSEIDON ADVENTURE, 1972) before Winters became completely indiscriminate in her choice of material – POOR PRETTY EDDIE (1976), FANNY HILL (1983), WITCHFIRE (1986), PURPLE PEOPLE EATER (1988), THE SILENCE OF THE HAMS (1994). TENTACLES starts to look pretty good compared to some of those.

Huston has made some odd acting choices over the years too despite the fact that his reputation as a great director is secure in the history of American cinema. Like Orson Welles, did he take on acting roles solely for the money or to feed his gambling addiction? How else to explain his appearance in movies like DE SADE (1969), BATTLE FOR THE PLANET OF THE APES (1973) in heavy ape make-up, Rene Cardona Jr.’s THE BERMUDA TRIANGLE (1978) and TENTACLES. Yet, of all the Hollywood veterans who participated in the latter film, the one who grabs the biggest on-screen credit is the distributor with the opening annotation “Samuel Z. Arkoff Presents.” In typical exploitation fashion, the American International Pictures mogul also provided exhibitors with a pressbook that touted real facts about the order Octopoda.

Somewhere past the midpoint of TENTACLES, the Huston-Winters subplot is simply dropped after a sailboat regatta ends in disaster with Shelley’s son one of the few survivors. (JAWS 2 would actually steal this plot device the following year) The movie then morphs into something closer in tone to THE DAY OF THE DOLPHIN with tough city kid turned marine life specialist Bo Hopkins setting his two beloved killer whales loose on the octopus that murdered his wife (played by sexy Italian actress Delia Boccardo).

Hopkins’ character already seems slightly cuckoo when he’s first introduced and he only gets kookier as the movie races toward a peculiar anti-climax with Bo sailing off into the sunset for Africa with his hunky assistant trainer. His big scene is NOT the one when he first learns of his wife’s horrible death and Huston comments “I’ve read that the suckers on a tentacle are like claws on a tiger,” oblivious to the tactlessness of his remark. Instead, Bo’s big moment is his soliloquy to the killer whales which comes off like a major mental breakdown and not the heroic pep talk it’s meant to be: “I’ve lost a loved one. I need your help more now than ever. I remember the time I was training ya, people used to call ya killers. They used to call me that on the streets. Doesn’t mean nuthin’. You have more love in your heart, more affection than any human being I ever met. [That doesn’t say much about his wife] But now I can’t ask anybody else so I’m asking you to help me kill this octopus. I hope you understand that. I know I’m in your environment. I don’t want it this way. But if I release ya and you go away, I want you to know that I understand. Alright, enough said. I gotta go now. If you feel anything, you talk to me. Make some noises. I know people think we’re crazy. Maybe we are…maybe we are.”

What follows in probably the most unexciting demise of a predator in any JAWS-like ripoff. Shot in extreme close-up where we can only see bits and pieces of the action, the two killer whales rip the octopus apart. If anything, you’ll feel sorry for the octopus which looks like it is really being harmed and probably was since this was an Italian production that didn’t have to conform to the guidelines of the ASPCA. But when all is said and done, the octopus is a very secondary character in TENTACLES unlike Bruce the Shark in JAWS. Not only does it not make an appearance until the middle of the movie and even then it looks no more threatening than a speciman in the local aquarium but the first few attacks happen off camera as well. A baby is snatched out of its carriage, a peg-legged sailor is scooped up for lunch…but we never see these events. We have to use our imaginations. Maybe that’s a stroke of genius on director Olidio G. Assonitis’s part because when you get a look at the special effects octopus created for the film’s major attack sequence – the one where it wrecks a ship with a self-created tidal wave and scoops up the lovely Delia Boccardo in a tentacle – it’s delightfully tacky in the same manner of those miniature set bashing creatures from Toho Studios like MOTHRA and GHIDRAH, THE THREE-HEADED MONSTER. At least there is no attempt to ape John Williams’ primal music score and Stevio Cipriani’s sleazy synthesizer music cues with electric harpsichord highlights is anything but expected. To be honest, it recalls BEHIND THE GREEN DOOR (1972) and other porno films of that era with their predominant synthesizer scores.

Yes, TENTACLES doesn’t fit comfortably into the post-JAWS imitation genre or any exploitation category for that matter since it lacks any sex scenes or hardcore violence (It’s tame enough to qualify as acceptable entertainment for unsophisticated six-year-olds and above). But its complete failure as a thriller or even a trashy ripoff make it an appealing guilty pleasure for all of the reasons I’ve stated above and the main reason why I’d rather watch this than some recent formulaic Hollywood release at your local mall cinema. I’m not alone here and this appears to be a rising trend among moviegoers, possibly in reaction to uninspired remakes and tired formulas. How else to explain the growing cult behind such recent so-bad-they’re-good success stories as THE ROOM or BIRDEMIC: SHOCK AND TERROR?

26 Responses Suckers on the Screen and Suckers in the Audience
Posted By Mike Watt : May 15, 2010 1:09 pm

Never dismiss a bad movie outright. Some of the best movies are the worst ones. (How’s that for cinephile psychobabble?)

Posted By Mike Watt : May 15, 2010 1:09 pm

Never dismiss a bad movie outright. Some of the best movies are the worst ones. (How’s that for cinephile psychobabble?)

Posted By wilbur twinhorse : May 15, 2010 5:27 pm

Not bad Mike! It’s all PsyOpstical Delusions from this end of the lens…no Rhodes Scholars in sight. Damn, sorry I didn’t put that one on the crappy fios dvr! I thought about it and then, meh. Drink more think less.

Posted By wilbur twinhorse : May 15, 2010 5:27 pm

Not bad Mike! It’s all PsyOpstical Delusions from this end of the lens…no Rhodes Scholars in sight. Damn, sorry I didn’t put that one on the crappy fios dvr! I thought about it and then, meh. Drink more think less.

Posted By rhsmith : May 15, 2010 5:43 pm

Am I the only one here who owns the Tentacles soundtrack?

Posted By rhsmith : May 15, 2010 5:43 pm

Am I the only one here who owns the Tentacles soundtrack?

Posted By wilbur twinhorse : May 15, 2010 9:37 pm

Dude, you must be! Evidently it’s an unholy alliance of sound and sight! I recommend unfiltered sake and check out Venus and the Crescent Moon with the Earth Shine on it, as we speak. ciao

Posted By wilbur twinhorse : May 15, 2010 9:37 pm

Dude, you must be! Evidently it’s an unholy alliance of sound and sight! I recommend unfiltered sake and check out Venus and the Crescent Moon with the Earth Shine on it, as we speak. ciao

Posted By Jenni : May 15, 2010 9:42 pm

I too, tivoed this a couple of weeks ago off of TCM, and we watched it last Saturday evening. What a hoot it was! When Shelley Winter’s son in the movie first called her,”Mom”, I about fell off the sofa because I thought she was the child’s grandmother! John Huston has to be the oldest investigative reporter imaginable, and Henry Fonda, the money must have been more than he could say no to. As Bo Hopkins was reciting his long, babbling speech to his 2 killer whales, intoning about how they had more love in their hearts than any creature he’d ever known, I thought, but what about your recently dead wife?! Ouch! When the killer whales killed the octopus, I also wondered if a real octopus had died in the making of this movie. It was obvious to our family that the movie was hoping to cash in on the popularity that Jaws launched, and I only wished that Mystery Science Theatre could have gotten a hold of it to give it true justice!

Posted By Jenni : May 15, 2010 9:42 pm

I too, tivoed this a couple of weeks ago off of TCM, and we watched it last Saturday evening. What a hoot it was! When Shelley Winter’s son in the movie first called her,”Mom”, I about fell off the sofa because I thought she was the child’s grandmother! John Huston has to be the oldest investigative reporter imaginable, and Henry Fonda, the money must have been more than he could say no to. As Bo Hopkins was reciting his long, babbling speech to his 2 killer whales, intoning about how they had more love in their hearts than any creature he’d ever known, I thought, but what about your recently dead wife?! Ouch! When the killer whales killed the octopus, I also wondered if a real octopus had died in the making of this movie. It was obvious to our family that the movie was hoping to cash in on the popularity that Jaws launched, and I only wished that Mystery Science Theatre could have gotten a hold of it to give it true justice!

Posted By morlockjeff : May 15, 2010 10:48 pm

Yes, Jenni, it’s totally bonkers and hilarious in all the wrong places. MST3 would have been the ideal showcase for it. I actually like the Italian title TENTACOLI better..makes it sound like an exotic pasta dish.

Posted By morlockjeff : May 15, 2010 10:48 pm

Yes, Jenni, it’s totally bonkers and hilarious in all the wrong places. MST3 would have been the ideal showcase for it. I actually like the Italian title TENTACOLI better..makes it sound like an exotic pasta dish.

Posted By Filmfanmike : May 16, 2010 7:51 am

Saw this years ago as a kid, and of course it seemed good at the time. Now it’s just boring although I have always enjoyed Bo Hopkins but admittedly he is better suited to being a sidekick in a Burt Reynolds style 70′s flick.

What I would really like to see is Great White since we are really talking about Jaws rip-offs here. James Franciscus and Vic Morrow. Anyone out there seen it or no if there’s a reliable copy. I do believe it got pulled years ago through a lawsuit. I have the original film poster but would like to see the film.

Cheers’

Posted By Filmfanmike : May 16, 2010 7:51 am

Saw this years ago as a kid, and of course it seemed good at the time. Now it’s just boring although I have always enjoyed Bo Hopkins but admittedly he is better suited to being a sidekick in a Burt Reynolds style 70′s flick.

What I would really like to see is Great White since we are really talking about Jaws rip-offs here. James Franciscus and Vic Morrow. Anyone out there seen it or no if there’s a reliable copy. I do believe it got pulled years ago through a lawsuit. I have the original film poster but would like to see the film.

Cheers’

Posted By Medusa : May 17, 2010 12:18 am

Tentacoli…mmmmmm…now I’m hungry again! What a delicious mess of a movie!

Posted By Medusa : May 17, 2010 12:18 am

Tentacoli…mmmmmm…now I’m hungry again! What a delicious mess of a movie!

Posted By alltheway : May 18, 2010 1:10 am

Thoroughly loved this movie. Thanks TCM. And the soundtrack was easily one of my greatest pleasures, so I envy rhsmith big-time. The film was good to dance to and had plenty of strange action and drama.

Posted By alltheway : May 18, 2010 1:10 am

Thoroughly loved this movie. Thanks TCM. And the soundtrack was easily one of my greatest pleasures, so I envy rhsmith big-time. The film was good to dance to and had plenty of strange action and drama.

Posted By ktarheel : May 19, 2010 9:53 am

It seems like many of the old classic film stars did these cheesy monster/disaster films in the ’70s. I know Myrna Loy said in her bio that it was basically for the money. I had never heard of this one and might need to check it out; especially if it contained MST3K commentary!

Posted By ktarheel : May 19, 2010 9:53 am

It seems like many of the old classic film stars did these cheesy monster/disaster films in the ’70s. I know Myrna Loy said in her bio that it was basically for the money. I had never heard of this one and might need to check it out; especially if it contained MST3K commentary!

Posted By Kimberly Lindbergs : May 20, 2010 6:48 pm

I enjoyed your piece, Jeff. Especially since I’ve been watching a lost of monster movies myself lately. I’ve seen Tentacles before and I enjoy it for what it is but I hadn’t seen ZAAT until recently. I watched ZAAT the same night you watched Tentacles and I’ve got to say that ZAAT is so awful that it makes Tentacles look like a masterpiece.

Posted By Kimberly Lindbergs : May 20, 2010 6:48 pm

I enjoyed your piece, Jeff. Especially since I’ve been watching a lost of monster movies myself lately. I’ve seen Tentacles before and I enjoy it for what it is but I hadn’t seen ZAAT until recently. I watched ZAAT the same night you watched Tentacles and I’ve got to say that ZAAT is so awful that it makes Tentacles look like a masterpiece.

Posted By morlockjeff : May 21, 2010 12:18 am

Thanks Kimberly. Regarding ZAAT, I saw it on the big screen in a beautiful 35mm print with the Florida-based filmmaker present in the audience in Atlanta. The audience loved it. Of course, they laughed at it in all the right places – which was most of the movie – but the director seemed fine with that. This was his only commercial feature and I think he was happy just to be celebrated and remembered with a screening of his film, much like Tommy Wiseau (THE ROOM) and James Nguyen (BIRDEMIC: Shock and Terror), except they are much more calculated in their promotion of ‘le bad cinema.’ Nothing in either of their films is as funny or as bizarre as ZAAT’s inflexible, un-Darwin like mutation.

Posted By morlockjeff : May 21, 2010 12:18 am

Thanks Kimberly. Regarding ZAAT, I saw it on the big screen in a beautiful 35mm print with the Florida-based filmmaker present in the audience in Atlanta. The audience loved it. Of course, they laughed at it in all the right places – which was most of the movie – but the director seemed fine with that. This was his only commercial feature and I think he was happy just to be celebrated and remembered with a screening of his film, much like Tommy Wiseau (THE ROOM) and James Nguyen (BIRDEMIC: Shock and Terror), except they are much more calculated in their promotion of ‘le bad cinema.’ Nothing in either of their films is as funny or as bizarre as ZAAT’s inflexible, un-Darwin like mutation.

Posted By Kimberly Lindbergs : May 21, 2010 1:28 am

Thanks for sharing that great story, Jeff! I wish I had seen ZAAT in similar circumstances. I probably would have enjoyed it a lot more if I watched it with low expectations and a sense of humor. For one reason or another I tend to be more forgiving of films made before 1970 that are unintentionally funny.

Posted By Kimberly Lindbergs : May 21, 2010 1:28 am

Thanks for sharing that great story, Jeff! I wish I had seen ZAAT in similar circumstances. I probably would have enjoyed it a lot more if I watched it with low expectations and a sense of humor. For one reason or another I tend to be more forgiving of films made before 1970 that are unintentionally funny.

Leave a Reply

Current ye@r *

We regret to inform you that FilmStruck is now closed.  Our last day of service was November 29, 2018.

Please visit tcm.com/help for more information.

We would like to thank our many fans and loyal customers who supported us.  FilmStruck was truly a labor of love, and in a world with an abundance of entertainment options – THANK YOU for choosing us.