Morlock Hijacks Time Machine: 1960′s on.I know it’s Valentine’s Day, but last week I decided to hijack the old Time Machine to get an overview of cinematic history as it pertained to my specific neck of the woods in Colorado. I set it for the 1890s and moved on up to the 1950s. In short: Boulder went from a small mining town of 4,000 with hookers, booze, and a Kinetoscope, to a bustling mountain town that boasted a flagship university with 32,000 folks all living under the shadow of the Cold War with Drive-In theaters to comfort them. Now we look at the turbulent ’60s and beyond. Let’s think of this as a love-letter to my home-town – one with pre-nuptials written into it. 1960s: Shoot for the Moon!
1970s: Blockbusters, VHS, Multi-Plexes, & Mork from Ork.
On more serious fronts, Boulder makes a few other cinematic contributions via: Electra Glide in Blue (1973 – director James William Guercio was a Boulder native), The Divided Trail: A Native American Odyssey (1978 – directed by Jerry Aronson and nominated for an Oscar in the Best Doc Short Subject category), and Breaking Away (1979 – the connection here being that scriptwriter Steve Tesich was influenced in part by a famous Boulder bike race of the time; The Red Zinger). 1980s: Exit the Drive-In, Enter the Reagan Years.
To look at the 80′s as a whole, the operative words would be crass commercialism and style over substance. Think about it: E.T. – the highest grossing film in history for this time and years to come – was a highly visible and huge success story for the marriage between blockbusters and product placements (it made a celebrity of Reese’s Pieces). This was the “Greed is good” decade epitomized by the white-collar criminals of Wall Street (1987). Of course, most of the crimes committed in the eighties by the Reagan administration were eclipsed by the Great Communicators admittedly awesome ability to make a nation feel good about consumption and American Exceptionalism, nevermind the 138 Reagan administration officials that were convicted, indicted, or subject to investigations for a variety of criminal violations. And “high-concept” films? The poster boy for this was Joe Eszterhas. His career was launched with Flashdance (1983) and from there he would eventually become infamous for making millions from “high concepts” you could scribble on a napkin. Although he did give us Showgirls (1995), I’ll grant you that. So to sum up this decade: it starts out with great promise, and Kubrick gives us The Shining (1980) – which has establishing shots in Boulder – but then the tides shift and the name of the game is big money, and making it by any means necessary. Blockbusters get even more inane and crass, the multiplex wins, and the single-screen arthouse scene gets demolished. Ugh. Let’s move on. 1990s: CGI, DVD’s, and Netflix
2000s: Franchises & Indy Breakthrough Pics.
How does this decade end? The key word now is: 3-D. Can I make one last local connection to this upcoming paradigm shift in cinema? All I have to do is turn to a Feb. 1 business insert from our local newspaper titled “Getting the Full Picture.” The byline is this: “RealD’s research and development office, based in Boulder, created the glasses and other technology that makes 3-D movies like Avatar possible.” And at this point, I’m not sure if I’m supposed to end with: “You’re welcome” or “I’m sorry” – only time can tell. 3 Responses Morlock Hijacks Time Machine: 1960′s on.
80′s is the decade of my child hood . most of my favorite films came out then . empire strikes back , raiders of the lost ark, E.T., Blade Runner to name a few I was too harsh on the decade. A day after submitting that piece I remember thinking; “y’know… two of my favorite films of all time were made in the eighties: BRAZIL and EVIL DEAD II.” So it’s not fair to paint the decade with such broadstrokes. Plus, there’s John Carpenter’s THEY LIVE – which offers a fascinating ideological counter-point to the times in which it was made. I was mainly bummed about losing all of our art house cinemas toward the end of that decade. Leave a Reply |
Archives
Featured Sites
Popular terms
3-D
Actors
Actors' Endorsements
Animation
Anthology Films
Awards
Books on Film
British Cinema
Character Actors
Chicago Film History
Cinematography
Classic Films
College Life on Film
Comedy
Comic Book Movies
Czech Film
Dance on Film
Digital Cinema
Directors
Disaster Films
Documentary
Drama
Early Talkies
Editing
Educational Films
European Influence on American Cinema
Exploitation
Family Films
Film Composers
film festivals
Film Noir
Film Scholars
Filmmaking Techniques
Food in Film
Foreign Film
French Film
Gangster films
Genre spoofs
Guest Programmers
HD & Blu-Ray
Holiday Movies
Hollywood lifestyles
Horror
Horror Movies
Icons
independent film
Italian Film
Literary Adaptations
Martial Arts
Melodramas
Method Acting
Mexican Cinema
Monster Movies
Movie Books
Movie locations
Movie Stars
Music in Film
Musicals
Outdoor Cinema
Parenting on film
Polish film industry
political thrillers
Pre-Code
Producers
Race in American Film
Remakes
Road Movies
Romance
Romantic Comedies
Russian Film Industry
Scandals
Science Fiction
Screenwriters
Semi-documentaries
Short Films
Silent Film
silent films
Social Problem Film
Sports
Sports on Film
Stereotypes
Studio Politics
Suspense thriller
Swashbucklers
TCM Classic Film Festival
Television
The British in Hollywood
The Hungarians in Hollywood
The Irish in Hollywood
The Russians in Hollywood
Theaters
Underground Cinema
VOD
War film
Westerns
Women in the Film Industry
Women's Weepies |
How does this decade end? The key word now is: 3-D. Can I make one last local connection to this upcoming paradigm shift in cinema? All I have to do is turn to a Feb. 1 business insert from our local newspaper titled “Getting the Full Picture.” The byline is this: “RealD’s research and development office, based in Boulder, created the glasses and other technology that makes 3-D movies like Avatar possible.” And at this point, I’m not sure if I’m supposed to end with: “You’re welcome” or “I’m sorry” – only time can tell.