Raoul Walsh Remakes HimselfThe top image is from High Sierra (1941), of Humphrey Bogart slugging Alan Curtis in the jaw with his pistol. The bottom image is from the same scene in its remake, Colorado Territory (1949), of Joel McCrea knocking out James Mitchell with a meaty right hand. Both films were directed by Raoul Walsh – the first a gangster movie, the second a Western. Historically speaking, High Sierra is more important for its crystallization of the Humphrey Bogart persona: mulish, bitter, doomed. His good-bad guy Roy Earle was originally slated to be played by both Paul Muni and George Raft, until their queasiness with the script paved Bogart’s way to stardom. And so, it receives a fine DVD transfer and continuous play on TV and at repertory theaters. Colorado Territory has no such claim to history, except as a superior piece of genre filmmaking, so it receives a beat-up, fuzzy transfer in the Warner Archive. So it goes. It’s fascinating to compare the two films in how they approach narrative, set-design, and performance. Let’s get the basic story out of the way (spoilers!) before I chart some of the divergences: a feared heist-artist gets out of jail, and is hired for one more big job by his aging, sickly boss. On the way to his target, he falls in love with a fresh-faced gamine, who eventually rejects him for a younger guy back home. Taking up with the salty dance-hall girl who loved him all along, he tries to escape with his latest haul, but gets chased into the mountains and gunned down from afar.
Colorado Territory is the inverse. McCrea is a competent, but much less nuanced performer, so Walsh invests Bogart’s menace in the set design, compresses the storyline to emphasize his athleticism, and opens up the visual space for more propulsive action. He builds around him – and creates a much more complete work of art. McCrea’s Wes McQueen is truly defined by the landscape here, where in High Sierra Bogart is left adrift in a sea of John Huston’s exposition. The main settings in Colorado Territory are a decrepit Spanish mission town, a moving train, and a more extended sta Wes McQueen is thoroughly subjugated to the nature around him, a speck on the locomotive at his successful heist and a dot in the valley before he’s gunned down. High Sierra pulls a similar comparison, but with less narrative compression. There are detours into a city park as he moonily stares at the sky, and to his old family farm where he talks catfish with a young boy – excess scenes that exist merely to fill in backstory. In Colorado Territory, Walsh finds a way to squeeze in these details in the midst of the action – making for a spring-loaded, densely told tale, crisply shot by Sid Hickox, who Walsh called “the best and fastest cameraman of them all.” (and who also shot White Heat the same year). Walsh valued speed above all, having directed near 140 films in his astonishingly varied career. This post has been mainly about contrasts – but I’ll end with similarities. These films were shot 8 years apart, but Walsh uses some of the same setups to remarkable effect. First there is the introduction of the respective dance-hall girls – who are first shown obscured. Ida Lupino is hidden behind a tree, and then Walsh cuts to a shot of her feet before panning up to her suspicious face. Virginia Mayo is also introduced seated, her head down as she musses her hair, before another dramatic head-raiser, eyes blazing. Then there is the final shoot-outs, which are both remarkable for their extreme long shots from the killer’s POV, emphasizing the distance and ease with which the deed is carried out. Their murder is impersonal, enacted by a stranger, almost as if the land was reclaiming them for itself. The top two are from High Sierra, the bottom two are from Colorado Territory: 9 Responses Raoul Walsh Remakes Himself
you should throw I Died a Thousand Times into the mix too. Makes me wonder how many other directors re-did an earlier movie plot with a different cast and setting. Interesting post. Hope TCM will show Colorado Territory, as I’ve seen High Sierra already. The title of this post is particularly perfect if you’ve read Walsh’s astonishingly entertaining pack-of-lies autobiography Each Man in His Time. Thanks for a great post. We have the same objections to High Sierra, and you make me eager to see Colorado Territory. High Sierra also has a cute doggie, Pard, and a very stereotyped comic African-American. The racial humor is painfully dated. All that and club-footed Velma too! The Bogart and Lupino parts of High Sierra are really good; in fact, I’d forgotten about all the other stuff until I recently saw the film again. I don’t know how “Colorado Territory” could be missed. It is one of Joel McCrea’s best performances. “High Sierra” does have some problems with its story line, but Mr. Walsh corrected much of them in “Colorado”. Both films have doom written all over them from the beginning. In my humble opinion, “Colorado Territory” is the better film. I hope that Warners releases a good DVD somethime soon. Rick – the Warner Archive release of COLORADO TERRITORY is the best it’s going to get, I suspect. If you love the film definitely pick it up, but the print is pretty beat up. It’s definitely watchable though. And I have read EACH MAN IN HIS TIME, passinthru, and you’re right, it’s delightfully ridiculous. He turned his autobiography into his own Raoul Walsh adventure movie. It’s worthless as history but essential in understanding his artistic personality. I haven’t seen the Stuart Heisler remake of HIGH SIERRA, Steve-O, but it sounds…intriguing. Nice post — but I want to mention that High Sierra has another distinction – it’s referenced in John Berryman’s Dream Song #9: … therefore she get on the Sheriff’s mike & howl A mild crack: a far rifle. Bogart’s duds Godspeed to Henry and Mr.Bones. Poetry and the movies — they just go together. [...] Kehr’s erudite readers also took up the challenge, especially Blake Lucas, who wrote an essay-long breakdown of Walsh’s career. Kehr promises an essay in his eagerly awaited collection “When Movies Mattered”, slated for a spring release, and pointed to a forthcoming biography, “The True Adventures of Raoul Walsh”, by Marilyn Ann Moss. I’m adding my rather undigested thoughts here, and will contribute more in the coming weeks the more I see. I watched The Big Trail (1930), The Strawberry Blonde (1941), Battle Cry (1955), and The Tall Men (1955) in quick succession with comment below, and my bits on Me and My Gal (1932) and Colorado Territory (1949) are here and here. [...] Leave a Reply |
Archives
Featured Sites
Popular terms
3-D
Actors
Actors' Endorsements
Animation
Anthology Films
Awards
Books on Film
British Cinema
Character Actors
Chicago Film History
Cinematography
Classic Films
College Life on Film
Comedy
Comic Book Movies
Czech Film
Dance on Film
Digital Cinema
Directors
Disaster Films
Documentary
Drama
Early Talkies
Editing
Educational Films
European Influence on American Cinema
Exploitation
Family Films
Film Composers
film festivals
Film Noir
Film Scholars
Filmmaking Techniques
Food in Film
Foreign Film
French Film
Gangster films
Genre spoofs
Guest Programmers
HD & Blu-Ray
Holiday Movies
Hollywood lifestyles
Horror
Horror Movies
Icons
independent film
Italian Film
Literary Adaptations
Martial Arts
Melodramas
Method Acting
Mexican Cinema
Monster Movies
Movie Books
Movie locations
Movie Stars
Music in Film
Musicals
Outdoor Cinema
Parenting on film
Polish film industry
political thrillers
Pornography
Pre-Code
Producers
Race in American Film
Remakes
Road Movies
Romance
Romantic Comedies
Russian Film Industry
Scandals
Science Fiction
Screenwriters
Semi-documentaries
Short Films
Silent Film
silent films
Social Problem Film
Sports
Sports on Film
Stereotypes
Straight-to-DVD
Studio Politics
Suspense thriller
Swashbucklers
TCM Classic Film Festival
Television
The British in Hollywood
The Hungarians in Hollywood
The Irish in Hollywood
The Russians in Hollywood
Theaters
Underground Cinema
VOD
War film
Westerns
Women in the Film Industry
Women's Weepies |
I have an aversion to the warner archive but if and when i break down Colorado will be one of my first purchases. Shame its release has been handled like a dereliction of duty; I’ve seen High Sierra a dozen or so times and agree somewhat about the awkwardness of the ‘high school crush’ that seems to splay forward from the scenes between Bogart and Joan Leslie. However I’m not in agreement that it renders the movie out of its classic status.
In fact, it illuminates me to the fact that Earle is truly a man out of his elements — where he belongs has passed him by, with younger and quicker guns; where he wants to be is almost a different kind of criminality — yearning for youth and a virgin teen who isn’t all she appears.
If it was Huston who scribbled out this sequence, I say he did it as finely as he could. It does not genuinely meshes with the holdup scenes, but I think that is towards the point. The world is leaving Earle, and the two portions he is clinging to are tearing him apart.
Can’t comment on Colorado due to having not seen it, but am a big fan of McCrae and Mayo. Thanks for the great review!