For Sharon

vampire5Last Sunday, August 9, 2009, marked the 40th anniversary of a sad event in both American history in general and film history in particular.  “Sad” is my word for what happened, the word that first came to mind as I sat down to write this; you would be well within your rights to prefer to use “horrific” or at least “frightening” in its place, whether you were alive at the time or grew up in the shadow of this occurrence.  It is almost certain that you’ve heard of the murder of Sharon Tate.  On August 9, 1969, the 26 year-old actress and wife of filmmaker roman Polanski was, along with friends Jay Sebring, Abigail Folger and Wojciech Frykowski, and a passer-by named Steven Parent, executed by minions of a wannabe recording artist turned sagebrush messiah named Charles Manson.  These ghastly murders, which left Hollywood reeling for just 24 hours before another unimaginable double homicide committed by the same cast of characters was discovered the following day, have come to be called the Tate-La Bianca Murders.  You’re probably familiar with the best selling account of the murders, the investigation, the arrests, the trials and the conviction of Manson and his “Family.”  HELTER SKELTER was published in 1974.  It’s opening pages promised to scare the hell out of me and it did.  The book was adapted for two TV movies (1976/2004), while the basic story has been retold, repurposed and referenced in narrative films, documentaries, cartoons and even an opera.

SharonI was not yet eight years old when Sharon Tate died.  When I found out about the murders (at some point over the course of the ensuing years) I didn’t know who she was and I’m pretty sure I hadn’t yet seen any of her movies: EYE OF THE DEVIL (1966), THE  FEARLESS VAMPIRE KILLERS (UK: DANCE OF THE VAMPIRES, 1967), VALLEY OF THE DOLLS (1967) or THE WRECKING CREW (1968), to name but a few.  As a preteen, I began to see some of these films on late night TV.  Watching VALLEY OF THE DOLLS, I recognized her name in the credits – it’s just one of those names, it pops – and duly noted that she had played Jennifer North, “the one who dies,” as we kids referred to her.  A short time later, I saw THE FEARLESS VAMPIRE KILLERS and couldn’t take my eyes off of her.  My 10 or 12 year old mind just couldn’t reconcile such beauty, such fairytale-like sweetness, with the ugly particulars of her senselessly cruel slaying a few years earlier.  I became obsessed with the case.  I was 13 when I bought the paperback edition of prosecuting attorney Vincent Bugliosi’s HELTER SKELTER. Up late at night in my room, I pored over every heinous detail while my peers were reading comic books.  My curiosity about the Tate-La Bianca murders had nothing to do with a morbid interest in the forensic aspects of the case.  This fascination in others has launched a thousand (it seems) websites dedicated to the subject, where you can view (if you’re into that kind of thing) full color crime scene and grainy black-and-white postmortem photographs of all the victims and all manner of Manson minutiae.  No, what drew me to the story was a sense that the killings represented a defining transgression in the history of the 20th century.  They changed things.  They ruined everything.  I knew that at the age of 13, even without having read Joan Didion’s assessment that “the Sixties ended abruptly on August 9, 1969, ended at the exact moment when word of the murders on Cielo Drive traveled like brushfire through the community.”

Sharon and RomanLast week some friends were passing around lists on Facebook of “movies that damaged me.”  Most of the popular horror films were cited and key titles from the canon recurred from list to list (among them Polanski’s celebrated 1968 adaptation of ROSEMARY’S BABY) but I couldn’t think of a single fright flick that had done me any real damage.  None could have.  Not post Tate-La Bianca.  When the facts of that case were related to me – probably by my sister Lisa, who was in her youth a walking worst-case-scenario concordance of urban myths, movie plots and true crime chronicles – I changed.  It does something to the mind of a child to learn that these things do happen, that people can enter your home under cover of darkness, can overpower adults, and can hurt people, even children (as the Family had done when they killed both a pregnant Sharon Tate and her unborn son).  After I had fully digested the events of August 9-10, 1969, I hardened.  To this day, I’m borderline obsessive about home security, particularly at night.  I am often the last one up in the wee hours while my own wife and children are sleeping and it’s my nightly ritual to lock doors, check windows, make safe my home.  Am I a light sleeper with eerily acute hearing because of Tate-La Bianca?  Maybe, maybe not.  Not long ago  in the middle of the night, a wall shelf overloaded with DVDs crashed to the floor with an awful racket, prompting me to spring up out of bed in boxer shorts, fists balled, teeth gritted, ready to meet the intruders head-on and stop them cold or die trying.  It is part of my psychological makeup to resist showing surprise or fear and I wonder if it all goes back to August 9, 1969.  I’ll never know how it really breaks down, whether my natural guardedness and reserve is directly connected to Sharon Tate’s death or is just a byproduct of other influences.  Nevertheless, I can’t deny that those events forged a crucial component of my personality.  It’s something I live with.  A legacy.  My creation myth.

Sharon Tate

I don’t mean to imply that the death of a beautiful woman is more of a tragedy than that of someone lacking movie star looks.  Nonetheless, the martyr-like cruelty of her killing, the concommitant murders of her unborn son Paul Richard Polanski (who would have turned 40 this month) and the other victims (whose names remain branded on my brain long after I’ve forgotten those of classmates, neighbors, and distant relatives) – all of this came together for me in my youth as a kind of catechism, making me the man I am now.  This is why I mark August 9th, every year.  I observe the date, I acknowledge its power over me, the way that others do December 7th or September 11th, the way that, every October 19th I relive the death of my sister Cheri and every November 1st the murder of my friend Adrienne Shelly.  These dates are wounds for me and where these deaths broke my skin I can’t be hurt anymore.

08-09-69.  Never Forget.

36 Responses For Sharon
Posted By attilio faroppa : August 14, 2009 3:37 pm

In those years A Clockwork Orange by Kubrick was a very disturbing film as Rosemary’s Baby was, but what happened to beautiful and sweet Sharon Tate and her friends was something totally schocking : noboby had never even figured out that such unmotivated cruelty could take place if not in wartime. Those children of Satan were the reverse of the children of flowers as devils were to angels, but than they had sprung off from the same sources. I think this frightening slaughter put an end to many dreams.

Posted By Martha : August 14, 2009 6:59 pm

I was not quite 7 when it happened, but it also made an impression on me. But the date that remains branded in my brain is December 8th — the day John Lennon was murdered. For me, that was the end to many dreams, as attilio says.

Posted By sittingpugs : August 14, 2009 9:01 pm

I probably have not prowled the interweb for its offerings of articles on Sharon Tate’s death (so do correct me if I’m wrong), but compared to the victims and cases surrounding other serial killers (Ted Bundy, Son of Sam, the Night Stalker, Jeffrey Dahmer etc), there doesn’t seem to be the same tone of sensationalism (?). The Charles Manson side of it, sure–he’s probably been mythologized and demythologized and pitied five times over.

Just in terms of the “facts” of what happened to Polanski’s friends and loved ones, I think “sad” is an appropriate word.

Posted By LadyByTheLake : August 15, 2009 12:44 am

I saw Clockwork Orange back when it was first rated X and had some pretty disturbing scenes in it. Later on they re-rated it R.
I remember The Tate-Bianco murders on August 9, 1969, my little brother turned 4 years old on that day.

Posted By Well Hung Hippie : August 15, 2009 1:00 am

Don’t get me wrong, I’m certainly glad that Charlie Manson is warehoused in a secured area for I hope the rest of his life But I find it amazing that he’s STILL in prison considering he never did any of the actual killing. I have a strong suspicion that if his victims had been ordinary, middle income people and not wealthy Hollywood celebrities, Manson would have been out of prison many years ago.

Posted By gazetna.com : August 15, 2009 4:13 am

I was not quite 7 when it happened, but it also made an impression on me. But the date that remains branded in my brain is December 8th — the day John Lennon was murdered. For me, that was the end to many dreams, as attilio says.

Posted By BigLittleWolf : August 15, 2009 8:59 am

To this day, I do not watch horror movies, precisely because they etch their gruesome scenes on my brain in a way that is quite unlike anything else. As a child, in the 60s and early 70s, I was subjected to one or two which I will never forgot (including the Omen). I subsequently made a choice to “just say no.”

Traveling through Eastern Europe at 16, I saw Auschwitz, some 30 years after its inconceivably horrific usage. Human history and our own lives subject us to enough tragedy and violence without adding indelible cinematic images to the mix.

Posted By Richard Harland Smith : August 15, 2009 11:12 am

I have a strong suspicion that if his victims had been ordinary, middle income people and not wealthy Hollywood celebrities, Manson would have been out of prison many years ago.

Maybe, maybe not. The savagery of these killings (and keep in mind, the La Biancos were well off but certainly not celebrities) had a lot to do with the ruling but society was also deeply afraid of the Pied Piper implications of Manson’s influence on young people. And he played to those fears during his trial. It’s been said and I think it’s probably true that prison was the only home Manson had, so he had no fear of going back in and staying there.

Posted By katelynjane : August 15, 2009 11:50 am

Lately I’ve been hearing more about the Manson and it’s really made me curious about the case and what all the fuss is about. I honestly, until reading your article, had no idea what Manson had done.

I saw an ad for a show the other day with a woman clinging to Manson and saying “he’s a very wise man”.

Thank you for all your information here. I found it really interesting and as disturbing as it may be, I’d like to look into this case more. How can someone be so evil as to mislead people and create such havoc?

Posted By mylifeofcrime : August 15, 2009 12:51 pm

Well Hung Hippie,

Please remember, if not for him, these murders would not have happened. Many times the person who pays for the hit or organizes the murder(s) gets more time than the actual triggerman (i.e. Pamela Smart, Allen Blackthorne, etc.). If it was not due to his actions and/or direction, the murders would not have happened. He set it up. Plus, he was involved in at least one murder directly: Shorty Shea. So, he is where he belongs and I hope he never gets out, nor any of the others involved in this.

Posted By lzcutter : August 15, 2009 1:39 pm

I have a strong suspicion that if his victims had been ordinary, middle income people and not wealthy Hollywood celebrities, Manson would have been out of prison many years ago.>>

I have no doubt that Vince Bugliosi would have prosecuted the case the same way and with the same intent had Sharon Tate and the other victims at her house that evening just been average middle class people.

Rosemary and Leno LaBianca weren’t famous celebrities and Bugliosi wanted justice just as much for them as he did for the Tate victims.

The heinous nature of the crimes was what appalled people back then (I was 12 and remember following the case intently) and justice demanded to be served.

And it was.

Posted By Well Hung Hippie : August 15, 2009 4:29 pm

“I have no doubt that Vince Bugliosi would have prosecuted the case the same way and with the same intent had Sharon Tate and the other victims at her house that evening just been average middle class people…Rosemary and Leno LaBianca weren’t famous celebrities and Bugliosi wanted justice just as much for them as he did for the Tate victims.”

I agree on both points. I’m sure Bugliosi would have done his best as most prosecutors do. But I’m not talking about the procetutuion, I’m talking about what happens after that – sentencing & parole. That’s something that Bugloisi has no control over. I still think Manson might have made parole had the Manson Family victims had been middle class joes. Remember he wasn’t convicted of any of the murders, just the conspiracy. And your absolutely right, the LaBiancas weren’t famous celebs, just very wealthy.

On a related note, I noticed that Lynette “Squeaky” Fromme was released from prison yesterday after serving 34 years for the assassination attempt on Gerald Ford.

Posted By Well Hung Hippie : August 15, 2009 4:31 pm

That should be prosecution, not procetutuion. Sorry for the typo.

Posted By StacyB : August 15, 2009 4:38 pm

I had a nearly identical experience to you when I was 13 as well. Suddenly my entire 8th grade class was reading that book. I learned the horrible details of the crime through the TV movie. Enticed by the eratz Beatles music, I watched and regretted. I developed a sleeping disorder that I wrestle with to this day. I’m very sorry you had such an emotionally wrought experience with this bit of history but I do find comfort in the fact that my reaction wasn’t so neurotic and alien that no one else experienced it. My older boyfriend said he had a similar reaction to the Cuban Missile Crisis. However, he doesn’t freak out when he discovers he’s left the back door unlocked and sleeps an enviable rock solid 8 hours every night. Lucky guy. Anything else to write would be a feeble replication of your own description. Thanks for the eloquence.

Posted By lzcutter : August 15, 2009 4:45 pm

I’m talking about what happens after that – sentencing & parole. That’s something that Bugloisi has no control over. I still think Manson might have made parole had the Manson Family victims had been middle class joes.>>

Here in California, it’s not something we forget. When it comes to parole hearings, it makes the news and people respond by sending emails and letters. Sharon Tate’s mother (and now her sister who stepped in when Doris Tate died) was one of the most vocal voices at parole hearings as is Stephen Kaye who assisted Bugliosi.

It’s not that it was Sharon Tate’s mother talking against parole. It was that it was the mother of one of the victims talking against parole. The Tate family, as well as Stephen Kaye, make sure they are at every parole hearing. I would wager to bet that anyone in their shoes would do the same.

It’s the heinous nature of the crimes that keep them from being paroled, not the fame connected to Sharon Tate and her friends.

Posted By mtb : August 15, 2009 11:07 pm

Interesting information. I didn’t know that and thanks for bringing me up to speed. I will check back more often.

Posted By Gia : August 16, 2009 12:06 am

the fact that Micheal Jackson was murdered by his doctor is something I’m sure of it.I’ll never forget 26 Jun 2009,when Michael gone.

Posted By Tcm’s Classic Movie Blog : August 16, 2009 2:41 am

[...] On August 9, 1969, Tate, her close friends Jay Sebring, Abigail Folger and Wojciech Frykowski, and passer-by Steven Parent, were executed by minions of a wannabe recording artist turned sagebrush messiah named Charles Manson . …Continue [...]

Posted By kaymaan : August 16, 2009 5:52 am

An incident as such even though it happened way before I was born is very hard to forget. The very fact that a very beautiful and talented actress had to die in such a way is hard to digest. This article must have been emotionally difficult on you I guess, well written about an actress who deserves all the attention but definitely not an ending as we all know !!

Posted By medusamorlock : August 16, 2009 10:16 am

RHS, you’ve definitely touched a nerve. I remember wanting to drive by the Cielo Drive house when I finally had wheels, but don’t think I ever did, actually.

The killings certainly symbolized an unhinging of society…something diabolical was revealed that certainly hasn’t gone away.

Excellent article.

Posted By postman : August 16, 2009 12:07 pm

I saw Clockwork Orange back when it was first rated X and had some pretty disturbing scenes in it. Later on they re-rated it R.
I remember The Tate-Bianco murders on August 9, 1969, my little brother turned 4 years old on that day.

Posted By tim : August 16, 2009 1:05 pm

If you thought that was disturbing, just wait till you put it in context with all the other murders that occurred in that same area around the same period. Ready to go down the rabbit hole, Alice?

davesweb.cnchost.com

No,it is not my website, but it sure has opened my eyes…

Posted By ken : August 16, 2009 1:59 pm

I was in fact living in Berkeley when this horror was perpetrated. Many of the local wanna be “newspapers” like the Berkeley Barb and the Tribe, actually embraced “Charlie” and his murderous gang as being “of our own” in the fight against capitalist oppression.

This idiotic, grass-inspired stance disenchanted and divided out many people who had considered themselves “hippies” (socially & politically in the KNOW), so I quit reading the “underground” rags as they became less brotherly-love and more comrades-in-arms oriented. Around the same time Marcus Foster, a member of the Oakland School Board, was murdered by two members of the budding Simbionese Liberation Army as they were against his then recent vote on a local schools’ proposition.

Posted By Richard Harland Smith : August 16, 2009 3:31 pm

That’s a fascinating perspective, Ken, and thanks for sharing it. Could be a movie!

Posted By Molo : August 16, 2009 4:02 pm

Thank you for remembering Sharon Tate. I believe that Manson, and his followers who were convicted in this case, all received the death penalty. When the Supreme Court ruled that penalty unconstitutional, a decision that has since been reversed, the murderers were given a reprieve. That’s more than Tate and the other victims got.

Here in Richmond, a few years ago, a young couple who were well known in the community, were preparing for their annual New Years Day party. They lived on a quiet street in a quiet neighborhood. They were brutally murdered along with their two young children. Their house was chosen at random by two men in the midst of a killing spree because they happened to have their front door open.

My best friend and her family lived in that neighborhood. The fear level was high. Doors were kept locked and people became hyper vigilant. I couldn’t help but be reminded of the Manson killings. The fear fades on the surface but the memory remains, haunting the recesses of our minds. Real monsters do live among us.

Posted By kitsimpson : August 16, 2009 5:44 pm

Lovely piece, and wonderfully insightful. Well done. Thank you.

Posted By Amanda By Night : August 16, 2009 6:24 pm

My boyfriend and I have also been thinking a lot about Sharon and this anniversary of her death. I wish we didn’t have to think about it at all. I wish Sharon and her friends and the La Biancas were here and just a blip on our radar, if any at all.

This article was deeply moving and reminds me of the first time I found out about a celebrities brutal death. It was Bob Crane and I don’t remember how old I was but I sure remember the horrifying feeling I got thinking that this man that I loved so much on television died that way. It was one of the first rites of passage into adulthood I had.

Posted By Robert : August 16, 2009 7:55 pm

I remember when I first learned of Sharon Tate’s death. It was 1979, I was a ninth grader in art class watching Helter Skelter on a film reel. When it was over, my teacher turned on the lights to reveal his tears. Mr. Tate went on to tell us personal stories about his ill-fated cousin. I’ll never forget that.

Posted By Richard Harland Smith : August 17, 2009 1:53 am

Here in Richmond, a few years ago, a young couple who were well known in the community, were preparing for their annual New Years Day party. They lived on a quiet street in a quiet neighborhood. They were brutally murdered along with their two young children.

I’m all too aware of the deaths of Bryan and Kathryn Harvey and their two daughters, Stella and Ruby. I read the horrible facts of the case not long after they happened and I’ve lived with these people in my heart ever since. There re nights when I go to bed and think of them, and then I don’t sleep; I often think of Stella and Ruby while watching my own children play. This story is such the inverse of the Tate-La Bianca situation, though, because here the killers didn’t even have a scrap of mad reasoning urging them on. They wound up taking so little from the Harvey home that the police didn’t initially even consider robbery to have been a motive.

Some wonderful responses here, about which I’m very surprised and exceedingly grateful.

Posted By Dean Cooper Elston : August 17, 2009 4:11 am

I was just 3 months old when the Tate, La Bianca murders happened. I’d heard of Charles Manson when I was growing up but never really new much about what happened. But since just over a week ago (the 40th anniversary) I’ve read up about it and watched a few documentaries on the subject. I looked at the crime scene and autopsy pictures and it’s left me almost broken like these people were my family especially Sharon. How anyone could do this to a pregnant women either beautiful and famous or not is disturbing. I see that Susan Atkins is trying to get released on compassionate grounds due to her dying of brain cancer. Where was her compassion when Sharon Tate begged her for the lives of hers and her unborn baby. There victims were butchered with no remorse and they laughed and sang all throughout their trials. Even if Charles Manson, Tex Watson, Susan Atkins, Patricia Krenwinkel or Leslie Van Houten are ever deemed to be not a threat anymore they should remain incarcerated until they die. These people and people like them should never be released.

Posted By ehcomunicacion : August 17, 2009 9:55 am

Sharon tate was a woman with a incredible beauty. She could be a great star.

Posted By debbe : August 17, 2009 11:48 am

i was fifteen that summer. In july we had taken our first trip to California and had fallen in love with it. So when we heard about what had happened it was hard to follow. I think you are right when you say it was transgressive. The next year students were killed in Ohio at Kent State eleven miles from where I grew up. And I was in New York when John Lennon was murdered. The sense of these things being local was also very interesting because one didnt knowhow it was elsewhere. I think your blog is really great in that it makes one think about culture. what i am trying to say is that sharon tates murder makes one think about dying too young, macabre details of her mnurder and where movies would be if she hadnt died and roman polanski hadnt done what he did and was still able to makemovies in the us…. as well as how n umb we have become to such things now… because of video games and violent movies. lots to think about.

Posted By Al Lowe : August 17, 2009 1:27 pm

In 1969 I was 20 years old – until my birthday at the end of the year.
Still, I didn’t know much about Manson’s horrible crimes. Missed the moon landing too.
You see, I was in Vietnam – from March, 1969 until March, 1970.
Since this is the 40th anniversary of my stint there I have thought about it a little bit from time to time.
I worked as a parts clerk in a motor pool in Long Bihn. We were on convoy back and forth from our workplace every day but never got hit. The company didn’t see action while I was there although they saw combat during the TET offensive before I got there.
The standard tour of duty in Nam was a year. You’d count off your days like you were serving time in jail. (I feel sorry for these kids now who keep getting sent back over to Iraq or Afghanistan until they get hurt or killed.)
We worked long hours every day for two weeks until we each got a day off. I guess the Army thinking was to keep us busy so we didn’t get in trouble.
The guys in the motor pool were okay. But the experience inspired me to get a college degree when I got out of the service.
Eventually I found out the details of Manson’s horrible deed.
And later in life I became acquainted with a killer.
He was my uncle’s friend from work who had served time for killing his wife.
I was living near my uncle at the time, so I saw this guy, his daughter and her infant son on their visits to my uncle.
Then this guy killed his adult daughter.
During the trial they brought up the incest and money squabbles. My uncle and I didn’t know about this. The incident happened nearly 20 years ago and he is still seving time for his daughter’s death.
So I agree with the person who wrote in and said the Manson killers should never be let out of jail.
Those type of people are not like us. They’re inhuman and don’t belong in society.
In Pittsburgh, where I live, a man in a suburb recently fired guns on a women’s fitness class and killed three and injured several others.
I don’t discount your safety precautions. You never know what is going on in anyone’s head.
Maybe that is why we are all so devoted to movies. Movies, unlike Life, usually make sense.

Posted By Jenni : August 17, 2009 3:48 pm

I was 4 when this awful series of murders happened in 1969s. I was old enough to remember my policeman father reading Helter Skelter and then him watching the made-for-tv movie adaptation of the book. I have purposely not looked into the murders gruesome details because they would truly bother me for weeks on end. It’s so awful when one human being or a group of them can do such unthinkable and unspeakable acts to innocent victims.

Interesting post by Ken, who lived in Berkeley at the time. I find it so hard to believe that radicals living there would actually embrace Manson and his ilk!! Moral relativism at its best, I guess.

I read Tess of the D’Ubervilles, by Thomas Hardy, a couple of years ago, then sought out Roman Polanski’s movie version. Beautiful film, faithful to the novel, but at the film’s opening run of credits, were the simple words, “For Sharon”. I cried.

Posted By Richard Harland Smith : August 17, 2009 7:39 pm

Jenni, Roman Polanski’s dedication “for Sharon” was the inspiration for the title of this blog post.

So I agree with the person who wrote in and said the Manson killers should never be let out of jail.
Those type of people are not like us. They’re inhuman and don’t belong in society.

Al, I value your particular perspective … I would only argue that I think Manson’s followers were all too human, all too controlable, all too weak and desiring to be led, to be told there is a plan, to be told what to do and provided with the tools with which to get the job done. I think they represent us at our worst; they are symbols of the ultimate failure of our values and wishes for peace. But they were kids. All over the world, even to this day, kids have been pressed into the service of the most horrific deeds imaginable.

This was in so many ways a class battle, with natural born Have Not Charles Manson (whose biological father, like Sharon Tate’s, was a career soldier) waging his own war against the Haves. He didn’t know who was living in the Cielo House, he just knew they had more than he did. It’s just one tragic kink in the wiring of this tragedy, this outrage, that Manson’s “family” was composed in large part by ex-homecoming queens and star pupils and athletes, kids who had every opportunity to excel and prosper, as Sharon Tate did, but got lost along the way.

I do agree with you, though, that they should never be allowed out of prison. I grieve for the innocence they lost or threw away and I’m glad some of them have become model prisoners. But the society in which they became whole human beings is prison society. That’s where they have lived for most of their lives, that’s where they found themselves and that is where they belong. Forever.

Posted By Perfecto Rodriguez II : September 9, 2009 5:22 pm

Sharon Tate was and still is a very beautiful lady♥ Basicaly the
only movie that I got to watch with her in it was the
“The Fearless Vampire Killers”. I really loved this movie. I am a fashion designer and working on begining our fashion design line. My theme color to my logo is “Scarlet” as well as my favorite color. Sharon Tate really looked very beautiful in the Scarlet~colored dress that she wore which matches Her hair perfectly. I am trying to find a goo color picture on Her wearing this dress.
For a different response to this. Polanski surely was an ignorant “idiot” concerning the dark spirit realm? Didn’t or doesn’t he know that these type of
movies only create “deadly parallels”? The fearless “Vampire Killers”. Well, this was a movies that dealt with blood and death. He should have never done this movie. You’ve heard the old saying, “Your signing your death warrant”. Well, this movie
involving Sharon Tate was a good example of deadly parallels.
Oddly, look at the color of dress that she was wearing?
I don’t care what laws are, Manson should have been “Executed
by electric chair along with all of his deranged followers!!
I will always miss Sharon Tate. As a designer, I understand beauty, and it was tragic what happened. Forget these whatever years of some aneversary. That won’t bring her back.
Thank You very Much for Your movies Ms.Tate♥
A sincere admirer♥ Perfecto

Leave a Reply

MovieMorlocks.com is the official blog for TCM. No topic is too obscure or niche to be excluded from our film discussions. And we welcome your comments on our blogs and bloggers.
Archives
Popular terms
3-D  Actors  Actors' Endorsements  Animation  Anthology Films  Awards  Books on Film  British Cinema  Character Actors  Chicago Film History  Cinematography  Classic Films  College Life on Film  Comedy  Comic Book Movies  Czech Film  Dance on Film  Digital Cinema  Directors  Disaster Films  Documentary  Drama  Early Talkies  Editing  Educational Films  European Influence on American Cinema  Exploitation  Family Films  Film Composers  film festivals  Film Noir  Film Scholars  Filmmaking Techniques  Food in Film  Foreign Film  French Film  Gangster films  Genre spoofs  Guest Programmers  HD & Blu-Ray  Holiday Movies  Hollywood lifestyles  Horror  Horror Movies  Icons  independent film  Italian Film  Literary Adaptations  Martial Arts  Melodramas  Method Acting  Mexican Cinema  Monster Movies  Movie Books  Movie locations  Movie Stars  Music in Film  Musicals  Outdoor Cinema  Parenting on film  Polish film industry  political thrillers  Pornography  Pre-Code  Producers  Race in American Film  Remakes  Road Movies  Romance  Romantic Comedies  Russian Film Industry  Scandals  Science Fiction  Screenwriters  Semi-documentaries  Short Films  Silent Film  silent films  Social Problem Film  Sports  Sports on Film  Stereotypes  Straight-to-DVD  Studio Politics  Suspense thriller  Swashbucklers  TCM Classic Film Festival  Television  The British in Hollywood  The Hungarians in Hollywood  The Irish in Hollywood  The Russians in Hollywood  Theaters  Underground Cinema  VOD  War film  Westerns  Women in the Film Industry  Women's Weepies