The Prince of Darkness: Bruce Surtees

Pale Rider

I remember one thing I wanted to do is get a shot in darkness illuminated by a single candle. The old way to get a picture of someone walking with a candle was to set up a complicated series of controlled lights, dimmers clicking on, synchronized to the step of the person with the candle. [...] I didn’t want that kind of thing again. So I picked young Bruce Surtees, and said, “You’ve got to do it without dimmers.” If I’d said that to an old-timer, he would have said goodbye. But Bruce would try to find a way to do anything I asked him. For that candle scene, he put a little bulb in the base of the candleholder and we shot. It took guts. We realized we might get nothing, and we knew we would have to intensify it, send it through a special lab. When we saw the film, most of the screen was black except for a circle of light showing the girl’s face. We didn’t care that it was black, that it wouldn’t show up on a television screen when the studio sold the picture to some network in a couple of years. Screw them. We liked it. It was exciting.’ -Don Siegel on The Beguiled [From 'Don Siegel: Director' by Stuart M. Kaminsky, 1974.]

This “young” cinematographer Bruce Surtees turned 72 yesterday, and it’s time to celebrate his remarkable career. He’s been on my mind lately, as for much of the last year I’ve been familiarizing myself with the early directorial efforts of Clint Eastwood.  Surtees was his go-to cinematographer from Play Misty For Me (1971) to Pale Rider (1985, see top image from DVD Beaver), where the Malpaso (Eastwood’s production company) house style was established: location shooting draped in deep chiaroscuro blacks paired with hard, desaturated light (plus lots of back-lighting, and no fill lights). It was during this period he was dubbed “The Prince of Darkness.” [Suzi points out that Gordon Willis had the same nickname, but both are worthy!] He did great work with other directors, with Arthur Penn on Night Moves, Bob Fosse on Lenny (which earned him an Oscar nomination) and Sam Fuller on White Dog, but his Clint work is what he’ll forever be associated with.

If Bruce was the Prince of Darkness, then his dad Robert would be one of the Kings of Golden Age Color. He had a dizzying career, acting as an assistant to Gregg Toland before lensing Vicente Minnelli’s operatic satire The Bad and the Beautiful as well the popping colors of Oklahoma! and George Cukor’s Les Girls . He made his name on these latter stunners, later winning an Oscar for Ben-Hur in 1959. He shifted gears in his late period, opting for more intimate dramas and subdued palettes like The Graduate (1967), the 70s dramas of Robert Mulligan (from Summer of ’42 (1971) through Same Time, Next Year (1978)), and the supple B&W of The Last Picture Show (1971).

For his gig on Mark Robson’s Lost Command (1966), Robert hired Bruce as one of his camera operators. Foot firmly in the door, Bruce was then hired on in the same position for Don Siegel, where he worked on Coogan’s Bluff (1968, he’s operating the camera during the motorcycle chase near the Cloisters) and Two Mules for Sister Sara (1970). Eastwood told Michael Henry that on the latter shoot, there were some communication problems with the legendary Mexican DP Gabriel Figueroa, and that Surtees was an invaluable interlocutor. Eastwood and Siegel agreed they would elevate him to DP as soon as they could.

It didn’t take long, and with Siegel’s The Beguiled in 1971, Surtees was hired as director of photography. The opening quote The Beguiled 2refers to Surtees’ inventive work on this Civil War American gothic , which Morlock Jeff discussed last year. Leeched of color, aside from fetid greens and browns, the palette is close to the sepia tone of Matthew Brady’s photographs, and is loaded with examples of low-key lighting, including the one Siegel emphasizes. It is a tale of barely repressed sexual hysteria, as a Southern female boarding school nurses Clint’s Yank back to health. It looks like Surtees used the candle trick that Siegel discusses multiple times, as various girls sneak into Clint’s room with that one pinprick of light. They are soon enveloped by the deep blacks in Surtees’ photography, subsumed in their awakening sexual desires. The entire feature is available for viewing on Hulu, and the first candle shot appears at the 21 minute mark, if you’d like to sample Surtees’ wares.

Even early on, Surtees was adept at matching lighting to the emotional tenor of the scene, as his protege (and future Eastwood DP) Jack Green (Unforgiven) can attest. Green was recently profiled in American Cinematographer magazine:

He recalls cinematographer Bruce Surtees (Pale Rider, Tightrope) “standing on a set and giving instructions to the gaffer using his hand as if it were a paintbrush. You would swear there was paint coming out of his fingers! Bruce was a lighting minimalist. If he walked onto a set and saw four lights burning, he’d tell the gaffer to turn one off. I realized the fewer lights you had, the fewer complications there were. It was fascinating to see how Bruce expressed himself to his gaffer and electricians. To this day, I try to duplicate that as best I can.” Green listened to how Surtees and Eastwood would describe lighting in emotional terms. “In Pale Rider, Clint was talking about the scene where the bad guys are standing in the mayor’s house at a fireplace, planning what they’re going to do. He described them as ‘the devil’s advocates,’ and he wanted them surrounded by this boiling firelight. I learned from him and Bruce how to think about lighting in an emotional way.”

He painted with light, as John Alton so poetically phrased it. After crystallizing the hard blue light of Dirty Harry, Surtees would elaborate his gothically dark approach further on Eastwood’s directorial debut, Play Misty For Me. That film, pitched at a similar level of sexual hysteria, etches the phenomenally unhinged performance by Jessica Walter out of backlit shadows and unnaturally hard California light. In ’73, with High Plains Drifter, Surtees shot the landscape with unusually wide apertures, so that, as Ric Gentry puts it in the collected Clint Eastwood Interviews, “everything in the town appears visually scorched by the light, almost flaming.” Appropriate for a town that Eastwood’s ghost rennames HELL.

Josey

josey2The Malpaso image doesn’t fully cohere until Outlaw Josey Wales, in 1976. There, with a few more infernal notes, would be the palette Eastwood and his collaborators painted with the rest of their career. Eastwood told Ric Gentry some of the tricks from that film’s particular vision:

It is with Josey Wales, however, that Eastwood and Surtees teamed up to do some of their most imaginative work. “Bruce came up with a suggestion that i thought was very innovative,” Eastwood recalls. “At that time they were going to stop manufacturing a certain film stock, a much slower stock than is used presently. We were scheduled to begin shooting in the fall of the year, which is a great time to shoot a Western because the sun stays low in the sky, josey3though you do run the risk of an early winter setting in. But Bruce said, ‘Why don’t we use this slow stock? We’ll have to use a little more light for certain scenes, but for outdoors it gets richer blacks. The only trouble is they’re running out of it.’ ”

Now, I love rich blacks in a film. I can’t stand it when the blacks go grey and come out milky. In fact, I worked with one cinematographer who wanted to force everything, but I didn’t have the patience for the way the blacks would curdle and go milky. But Bruce doesn’t do that. He has a hard light effect and I wanted to backlight the whole movie. He knew what I liked, the blacks and the contrast, and he wanted to use this stock.

Eastwood goes on to say that they shot sunsets for sunrises, to “get that very heavy cross light”, and which adds heightened sensePale Rider 2 of decay in this story of a man haunted and hunted by violence. By the time Pale Rider came around in 1985, Surtees had played around with the dark gleaming surfaces of the surprisingly existential thriller mechanics of Firefox (1982, the sullen physicality of this movie could be called Bressonian), the dusty penumbras of Honkytonk Man (1982), and the moody nightscapes of the severely underrated Dirty Harry vehicle, Sudden Impact (1983, would you believe me if I said it was his Vertigo?). This is without even mentioning his work with other directors, including the epochal fogged Chicago in Risky Business (1983). But with Pale Rider Surtees reached the limit of his style with Eastwood. A self-conscious homage to the Westerns of Boetticher and Leone, it’s perhaps Eatwood’s most stylized work (see the lineup of duster jackets). It has the feel of a summing up, and for Surtees, it was to be his final collaboration with the director. His assistant, Jack Green, would take over up through Space Cowboys in 2000, after which Tom Stern took the helm. There’s an amazing continuity to Eastwood’s production team over the years.

So here’s to you, Prince of Darkness. Happy Birthday.

0 Response The Prince of Darkness: Bruce Surtees
Posted By suzidoll : July 28, 2009 5:16 pm

Love those cinematographers. Gordon Willis has also been called the Prince of Darkness for his work with Coppola on The Godfather.

Posted By suzidoll : July 28, 2009 5:16 pm

Love those cinematographers. Gordon Willis has also been called the Prince of Darkness for his work with Coppola on The Godfather.

Posted By Michael J. Anderson : July 29, 2009 9:56 am

A very fine piece Rob, and particularly timely for me as I will be screening “The Outlaw Josey Wales” for my class this coming Monday.

As per your claim that “Sudden Impact” is the director’s “Vertigo,” I like it a lot. As we recently discussed, there is a particular richness to his films of this period, and so I can see how it would follow that his “Vertigo” would be a product of his real phase of self-revisionism. (Perhaps before my Eastwood lecture I may re-screen “Sudden Impact” to test the claim.) Either way, this is the richness and most exciting thing about auteurist criticism: the unending possibility for discovery and especially re-discovery, where new viewings can entirely redraw the contours of a director’s career. So why not “Sudden Impact”?

Posted By Michael J. Anderson : July 29, 2009 9:56 am

A very fine piece Rob, and particularly timely for me as I will be screening “The Outlaw Josey Wales” for my class this coming Monday.

As per your claim that “Sudden Impact” is the director’s “Vertigo,” I like it a lot. As we recently discussed, there is a particular richness to his films of this period, and so I can see how it would follow that his “Vertigo” would be a product of his real phase of self-revisionism. (Perhaps before my Eastwood lecture I may re-screen “Sudden Impact” to test the claim.) Either way, this is the richness and most exciting thing about auteurist criticism: the unending possibility for discovery and especially re-discovery, where new viewings can entirely redraw the contours of a director’s career. So why not “Sudden Impact”?

Posted By Michael J. Anderson : July 29, 2009 9:58 am

I meant to say “first” real phase… I don’t want to minimize his subsequent self-revisionism by implying that it was less so.

Posted By Michael J. Anderson : July 29, 2009 9:58 am

I meant to say “first” real phase… I don’t want to minimize his subsequent self-revisionism by implying that it was less so.

Posted By R. Emmet Sweeney : July 30, 2009 11:21 am

Yes, Mike. What I find fascinating about this early work is that this “revisionism” is already completely present, when the received wisdom is that this began with UNFORGIVEN. SUDDEN IMPACT and FIREFOX were probably the largest revelations for me.

The former, which takes place near the San Francisco of Vertigo, shows Dirty Harry’s identity blending into the killer he is tracking (his wife at the time, Sandra Locke). This serial killer/pursuer cliche is pushed to uncomfortable lengths, until Harry’s goals are indistinguishable from the killer’s.

Firefox is a spy film that is incredibly dark and slow, with a minimum of dialogue. Eastwood is a man just doing a job while the idealists he is helping are murdered all around him. It’s like a cross between the Jean-Pierre Melville and Bresson, if I may indulge in some hyperbole. Eastwood acts like one of Bresson’s impassive “models” as he sleepwalks through a Melville landscape of wounded anti-heroes. It’s astonishingly morbid for a Hollywood thriller.

Posted By R. Emmet Sweeney : July 30, 2009 11:21 am

Yes, Mike. What I find fascinating about this early work is that this “revisionism” is already completely present, when the received wisdom is that this began with UNFORGIVEN. SUDDEN IMPACT and FIREFOX were probably the largest revelations for me.

The former, which takes place near the San Francisco of Vertigo, shows Dirty Harry’s identity blending into the killer he is tracking (his wife at the time, Sandra Locke). This serial killer/pursuer cliche is pushed to uncomfortable lengths, until Harry’s goals are indistinguishable from the killer’s.

Firefox is a spy film that is incredibly dark and slow, with a minimum of dialogue. Eastwood is a man just doing a job while the idealists he is helping are murdered all around him. It’s like a cross between the Jean-Pierre Melville and Bresson, if I may indulge in some hyperbole. Eastwood acts like one of Bresson’s impassive “models” as he sleepwalks through a Melville landscape of wounded anti-heroes. It’s astonishingly morbid for a Hollywood thriller.

Posted By TCM’s Classic Movie Blog : August 4, 2009 2:04 pm

[...] catch up with TV series I had fallen behind on (like the ubiquitous 30 Rock), but in researching my piece on Bruce Surtees last week, I discovered that Don Siegel’s The Beguiled was streaming for free on the site. [...]

Posted By TCM’s Classic Movie Blog : August 4, 2009 2:04 pm

[...] catch up with TV series I had fallen behind on (like the ubiquitous 30 Rock), but in researching my piece on Bruce Surtees last week, I discovered that Don Siegel’s The Beguiled was streaming for free on the site. [...]

Posted By tuesday weld : September 26, 2009 1:45 pm

speaking of wives, did you ever meet his second one, carol surtees? pretty scary!!

Posted By tuesday weld : September 26, 2009 1:45 pm

speaking of wives, did you ever meet his second one, carol surtees? pretty scary!!

Posted By little lulu : July 6, 2010 1:55 pm

you areSO-O-O right about the wife. i think they called bruce the prince of darkness because carol, his wife was the queen, very scary indeed!! what ever happened to them ? is he still making films. not still married to her, i bet.

Posted By little lulu : July 6, 2010 1:55 pm

you areSO-O-O right about the wife. i think they called bruce the prince of darkness because carol, his wife was the queen, very scary indeed!! what ever happened to them ? is he still making films. not still married to her, i bet.

Posted By noir fan : January 25, 2011 12:31 am

the back story on surtees’ cinamatic style is that his diabetes was causing his eyesight to fail but he was so good at what he did that he was able to compensate to a large extent.he is certainly a genius, hope he gets the recognition he deserves. i knew he and his then wife carol when i lived in carmel valley years ago. i know what people mean his wife,she had clearly married bruce for his money and was running through it at an alarming rate. she’d had a lot of plastic surgery done; it had that overdone hardened look that michael jackson got near the end of his life.

Posted By noir fan : January 25, 2011 12:31 am

the back story on surtees’ cinamatic style is that his diabetes was causing his eyesight to fail but he was so good at what he did that he was able to compensate to a large extent.he is certainly a genius, hope he gets the recognition he deserves. i knew he and his then wife carol when i lived in carmel valley years ago. i know what people mean his wife,she had clearly married bruce for his money and was running through it at an alarming rate. she’d had a lot of plastic surgery done; it had that overdone hardened look that michael jackson got near the end of his life.

Posted By Moira Finnie : March 2, 2012 10:25 am

Reading this morning of the death of Bruce Surtees at 74, I immediately thought of this excellent appreciation. I hope that this cinematographer’s body of work receives more deserved attention. Thank you for writing so eloquently about his career and films.

Posted By Moira Finnie : March 2, 2012 10:25 am

Reading this morning of the death of Bruce Surtees at 74, I immediately thought of this excellent appreciation. I hope that this cinematographer’s body of work receives more deserved attention. Thank you for writing so eloquently about his career and films.

Leave a Reply

Current ye@r *

We regret to inform you that FilmStruck is now closed.  Our last day of service was November 29, 2018.

Please visit tcm.com/help for more information.

We would like to thank our many fans and loyal customers who supported us.  FilmStruck was truly a labor of love, and in a world with an abundance of entertainment options – THANK YOU for choosing us.