Bastille Day Cinema: Reign of Terror (1949)
What better way to celebrate Bastille Day than to honor the greatest French Revolution film noir of all time on its 60th anniversary? None, I say! The baroque madness of Reign of Terror is shared by three great Hollywood artisans: director Anthony Mann, cinematographer John Alton, and production designer William Cameron Menzies. Mann and Alton cranked out T-Men for the Eagle-Lion studio in 1948, which became a minor hit, earning $1.6 million on an investment of $424,000. Eager to cash in, the studio had the duo squeeze out the magnificent Raw Deal later that same year.
Looking to class up their operation, Eagle-Lion entered a distribution deal with independent producer Walter Wanger to churn out some serious minded historical spectacles. Having worked on the John Ford-Gregg Toland collaboration The Long Voyage Home and Hitchcock’s Foreign Correspondent, among others, he was supposed to bring respect to this neighbor to Poverty Row. He was given seven figure budgets for two films: Tulsa (1949, a Susan Heyward Western), and The Bastille. It soon became clear that Eagle-Lion had overextended itself, and The Bastille was downgraded from an ‘A’ picture to
Confronted with a sudden lack of funds, Mann’s team had to improvise, and they did it brilliantly. There are a few visual motifs that Mann sets up with Alton, including a simple one involving mirrors, denoting duplicity and vanity, and generally marking the characters for doom. In the first image, Robespierre’s ally is snuffed out after admiring his visage. In the second and third, Madelon is shunted into the background as a trembling ghost – as she has yet to fully gain D’aubigny’s trust. The last shows Robespierre’s face in full plumage before it gets blasted off.
William Cameron Menzies had to whip up a crowd of thousands with a cast of hundreds. Leger Grindon’s book, Shadows of the Past, from which I’m drawing the production history, notes that in filming the National Convention:
His inventive use of rear-projection in conjunction with his other tricks truly pulls off a sense of dizzying magnitude. In its uncanny vastness, Menzies’ tricks adds to the feeling of vertigo that the characters are trapped in, and which might possibly would have been lost in the higher budgeted version. Alton’s cinematography is all claustrophobic menace, with an unusual amount of distorting extreme close-ups that
According to Grindon, Reign of Terror opened in 1949 during the week of Bastille Day in Los Angeles. It performed modestly, pulling in under $40,000 before closing after 11 days. Before releasing the film in NYC, Eagle-Lion completely changed the marketing for the film, emphasizing the action elements while barely mentioning the French Revolution backdrop. The title was changed to The Black Book when it was released that autumn in New York (it’s been released under both titles on home video, although Reign of Terror has become the standard, as evidenced by the recent VCI release, which is supposed to display the best image quality currently available). Despite another middling box office showing, it eventually turned a profit after two years of bookings. TCM is screening the film on September 7th at 1PM, so there’s no excuse. Rent the DVD or settle in with TCM, but by all means watch this sterling example of creativity seeking ingenious ways around a lack of cash.
6 Responses Bastille Day Cinema: Reign of Terror (1949)
Good example of how a lack of cash brings out the creativity even more in people. I will be watching this one, my French ancestors would want me to! One casting puzzlement to me is Robert Cummings. I saw him in Saboteur, thought he was fine there, and in King’s Row,but I still mainly think of him as a romance or comic actor, more than a dramatic one. I’ll have to do my own research on him, I guess. Every good noir has a good thug and there’s no exception here. The great Charles McGraw (T-Men) as the chief executioner is noir heaven. I was so relieved to see the recent DVD of “Reign of Terror” was created from a better print than I’d ever seen of this dimly lit film before. I loved the way that you detail the various creative shortcuts Mann and Alton took in trying to make their stringent budget look much better than expected, and how this truly enhanced the psychological impact of the movie. I’m also cheered to see you mention the contributions of the sometimes controversial Philip Yordan to this and other films as well–I wonder if he might have taken the term “pulpy” as a compliment!? I’m with Jenni regarding the seemingly odd casting of Robert Cummings here. I thought that Richard Basehart made an excellent and believable Robespierre, but each time Cummings came into view in this movie, he seemed a bit unreal to me. His role as a spy in “Reign of Terror” came at the end of a decade of some of that actor’s best work with some good scripts and directors, (including the “interesting failures” such as “Flesh and Fantasy”, “The Chase” and “The Lost Moment”, as well as the really good films Jenni mentioned). However, he just didn’t carry much weight as an actor for me, nor did he seem the least bit French in this movie. Did you think his casting helped the film? Thanks for writing about this movie in such detail and for mentioning Leger Grindon’s book on historical films, “Shadows of the Past”, which I’ve just purchased thanks to your intriguing quotes from it. Moira (and Jenni), I agree that Cummings does not make much of an impact in the film. Apparently Walter Wanger wanted Victor Mature before the budget was cut. But the film’s value for me lies in its astonishing visuals, so Cummings’ affectless portrayal doesn’t detract from the film’s impact too much (at least for me). The standout performance is Arnold Moss as Fouche, whose tongue-in-cheek menace is delightful throughout. Well, I guess it’s up to me to put in a kind word about Robert Cummings. Leave a Reply |
Archives
Featured Sites
Popular terms
3-D
Action Films
Actors
Actors' Endorsements
animal stars
Animation
Anime
Anthology Films
Autobiography
Awards
B-movies
Best of the Year lists
Biography
Biopics
Blu-Ray
Books on Film
British Cinema
Canadian Cinema
Character Actors
Chicago Film History
Cinematography
Classic Films
College Life on Film
Comedy
Comic Book Movies
Czech Film
Dance on Film
Digital Cinema
Directors
Disaster Films
Documentary
Drama
DVD
Early Talkies
Editing
Educational Films
European Influence on American Cinema
Experimental
Exploitation
Fairy Tales on Film
Faith or Christian-based Films
Family Films
Film Composers
film festivals
Film History in Florida
Film Noir
Film Scholars
Film titles
Filmmaking Techniques
Food in Film
Foreign Film
French Film
Gangster films
Genre
Genre spoofs
Guest Programmers
HD & Blu-Ray
Holiday Movies
Hollywood lifestyles
Horror
Horror Movies
Icons
independent film
Italian Film
Japanese Film
Korean Film
Literary Adaptations
Martial Arts
Melodramas
Method Acting
Mexican Cinema
Moguls
Monster Movies
Movie Books
Movie Costumes
Movie locations
Movie lovers
Movie Reviewers
Movie settings
Movie Stars
Music in Film
Musicals
Outdoor Cinema
Paranoid Thrillers
Parenting on film
Polish film industry
political thrillers
Politics in Film
Pornography
Pre-Code
Producers
Race in American Film
Remakes
Road Movies
Romance
Romantic Comedies
Russian Film Industry
Satire
Scandals
Science Fiction
Screenwriters
Semi-documentaries
Serials
Short Films
Silent Film
silent films
Social Problem Film
Sports
Sports on Film
Stereotypes
Straight-to-DVD
Studio Politics
Suspense thriller
Swashbucklers
TCM Classic Film Festival
Television
The British in Hollywood
The Germans in Hollywood
The Hungarians in Hollywood
The Irish in Hollywood
The Russians in Hollywood
Theaters
Trains in movies
Underground Cinema
VOD
War film
Westerns
Women in the Film Industry
Women's Weepies |
Thank you for the fascinating background.
I’ve never seen a really decent print of this movie. Is TCM about to make my dream come true?