History is rarely the whole story
Celebrity scandals seem so much a product of the media-circus modernity but they too have a long history in this town. Before the wood putty had hardened in the joins of Tinseltown celebrities were getting themselves in big trouble. Though he’s little remembered today, Roscoe “Fatty” Arbuckle was a prominent figure of the silent era and the subject of one of Hollywood’s first scandals. When Hollywood hopeful Virginia Rappe died after attending an alcohol-fueled Labor Day party thrown by Arbuckle at San Francisco’s St. Francis Hotel, the actor was charged with manslaughter. It had been alleged by Rappe’s friend, Bambina Maud Delmont, that Arbuckle had raped the would-be actress using a piece of ice to penetrate her, and that this blunt object had perforated the girl’s bladder. Police speculated that it was Arbuckle’s excessive weight that had crushed Rappe, causing peritonitis. Newspapers exaggerated Delmont’s claims and printed police speculation as fact. In both tabloids and respectable newspapers (particularly ones owned by William Randolph Hearst), the alleged piece of ice became a Coca Cola or champagne bottle. Public hatred for the moon-faced comedian grew through three trials. The first and second of these ended in deadlocked juries. When a third trial ended in not only an acquittal but an apology from the jury, Arbuckle had little to celebrate. He had been banned from making movies in the United States, he had lost his income, his home, his cars, and he owed his lawyers more than half a million dollars. Though the ban was lifted eight months after it was levied, he was unable to find regular work. Using a pseudonym, Arbuckle directed several pictures and was on the cusp of an acting comeback when he died in his sleep in June 1933 at the age of 46.
Anyone reading about Fatty Arbuckle these days will, as I did 30 years ago, come at the story back-to-front, learning first of the scandal that destroyed his career and afterward about his acting, his accomplishments (among them, discovering Buster Keaton and Bob Hope) and his place in Hollywood history. I suppose movie-lovers younger than I am will have the same relationship to Robert Blake. Born Michael James Vincenzo Gubitosi in Nutley, New Jersey, only five weeks after the death of Fatty Arbuckle, “Mickey Gubitosi” was a late addition to Hal Roach’s “Our Gang,” replacing Eugene “Porky” Lee. Like Michael Jackson, Mickey suffered at the hands of an abusive father and was a troubled youth who often found himself in trouble with the law. After a stint in the army, he returned to Hollywood as Robert Blake and built a career for himself in television and films until his crossover role in IN COLD BLOOD (1967), an adaptation of the true crime chronicle by Truman Capote. Blake was often associated with crime on screens large and small. He played good cops in ELECTRAGLIDE IN BLUE (1973) and BUSTING (1975) and on the hit ABC series BARETTA (1975-1978). After a good decade, Blake’s career continued in fits and starts. For television, he played doomed Teamster leader Jimmy Hoffa in BLOOD FEUD (1983) and multiple murderer John List in JUDGMENT DAY: THE JOHN LIST STORY (1993). He seemed poised for a big screen comeback after contributing a ghoulish cameo to David Lynch’s LOST HIGHWAY (1997) but was in April 2002 arrested for the 2001 murder of his estranged second wife Bonnie Lee Blakely. Three years later, a jury found Blake not guilty of the crime and he was – that word again – acquitted. Nevertheless, LOST HIGHWAY remains Blake’s last film.
6 Responses History is rarely the whole story
I have to concur with Suzidoll–great post. While I enjoy gossip too, I’m always conflicted about what I should know and what I shouldn’t know. I’ve read well written biographies of some stars, but mostly what I’ve read is an exercise in tearing them down. But I find I’m more disappointed in the writer than the celebrity when gossip, that is in no way verifiable, is repeated. And I thoroughly disgusted by the tabloids I see every time I check out at the grocery/drug store. It’s no surprise that Jon & Kate Gosselin are divorcing. I don’t know what they expected from featuring their family on a TV show, but it seems like no good comes from it. I’m not saying that they are important in the grand scheme of things, but did they deserve to have every move they make splashed all over the tabs? I don’t know. Some folks think they do, some don’t. I think the less we know about anyone in the public eye, the better off we’d be. Unless their behavior is antithetical to the messages they espouse, like in the recent adultry case involving the governor of South Carolina. I can’t stand hypocracy and it deserves to be exposed. See–I’m conflicted. Kudos on a brilliantly written piece of movie lore. Even as far back as the days of Fatty Arbuckle the public seemed to be only too eager to eat up all the worst scandal about celebrities. Were we not so eager scandal sheets would not be in business today. A far cry from my old Photoplay magazines with pretty pictures of pretty people! My question is : WHY? Here are a few thoughts on the subject from someone with a degree in journalism who has earned money as a newspaper reporter. Blame it all on our Founding Fathers. They allowed us freedom of the press. I am sure that the political leaders of this country immediately regretted granting us that freedom. Am I sorry for a politician or movie world celebrity whose name is dragged through the mud? What I do resent is a knee jerk dislike of the media that many folks have. Most reporters I know are hard working, all too human people who try their darndest to do a good job. The people who badmouth the media wouldn’t do much better if they had to earn their livings as reporters. A well-known actress made a movie in my town, Pittsburgh, recently, and was quoted in Rolling Stone with a terrible insult about Pittsburgh. She said later it was taken out of context. Out of context? Ridiculous. How can a horrible insult, meant in no other way than as a horrible insult, be out of context? The media makes people responsible for their actions. If you are a politician and promote family values you shouldn’t fool around with other women. Likewise, if you are a movie or TV star couple promoting yourselves as the ideal marriage, you again shouldn’t pursue other people. Should we know the uglier facts about celebrated people in the entertainment world? Well, generally the ugly facts are true. If you don’t want anyone to know about it, you never should have done it. You’re not John Doe any more. You’re a star. There are many, many perks to stardom. But, of course, there is this down side. Michael Jackson did some bizarre things. Fatty Arbuckle did throw a wild party. At best, Robert Blake had a pathetic relationship with that woman. I could go on. Maybe someone will disagree with this. If so, they have freedom of speech and press. They can tell me so, if they want. Excellent post on the scandalous and, as outcome would usually have it, tragic behavior that marred our stars..however,lest it be forgotten, they too were only human. They may have been idolized, but nonetheless, very much like most of us in their insecurities and weaknessess. What is so very, very sad is that so many people seem to derive great pleasure in ranting and raving on whatever “dirt” they can expose toward the character of a fallen star. This is especially true of the deceased, especially if they were handed the misfortune of tragic or sudden, unexpected death. If they are plagued with accusations of unlawful or perversed behavior, we lap it up and lick our lips out loud! If their behavior is considered outlandish, we swallow it whole and beg for more. When will we ever learn to truly appreciate the many marvelous gifts our stars have given us without benefit of maligning their character when they’re gone? How much raw talent does it take to be a mega-star, to live your life without solitude from the masses, to be labeled odd, excessive, or worse yet, accused of murder or indecent or immoral behavior? Personally, I couldn’t handle it…I wonder how many us average Joe’s and Josephine’s could. [...] events and fear of what your eyes might see. As my fellow Morlock RHSmith eloquently outlined here a few weeks ago in his blog on Hollywood’s scandals and audience fixation on them, I would [...] Leave a Reply |
Archives
Featured Sites
Popular terms
3-D
Actors
Actors' Endorsements
Animation
Anthology Films
Awards
Books on Film
British Cinema
Character Actors
Chicago Film History
Cinematography
Classic Films
College Life on Film
Comedy
Comic Book Movies
Czech Film
Dance on Film
Digital Cinema
Directors
Disaster Films
Documentary
Drama
Early Talkies
Editing
Educational Films
European Influence on American Cinema
Exploitation
Family Films
Film Composers
film festivals
Film Noir
Film Scholars
Filmmaking Techniques
Food in Film
Foreign Film
French Film
Gangster films
Genre spoofs
Guest Programmers
HD & Blu-Ray
Holiday Movies
Hollywood lifestyles
Horror
Horror Movies
Icons
independent film
Italian Film
Literary Adaptations
Martial Arts
Melodramas
Method Acting
Mexican Cinema
Monster Movies
Movie Books
Movie locations
Movie Stars
Music in Film
Musicals
Outdoor Cinema
Parenting on film
Polish film industry
political thrillers
Pornography
Pre-Code
Producers
Race in American Film
Remakes
Road Movies
Romance
Romantic Comedies
Russian Film Industry
Scandals
Science Fiction
Screenwriters
Semi-documentaries
Short Films
Silent Film
silent films
Social Problem Film
Sports
Sports on Film
Stereotypes
Straight-to-DVD
Studio Politics
Suspense thriller
Swashbucklers
TCM Classic Film Festival
Television
The British in Hollywood
The Hungarians in Hollywood
The Irish in Hollywood
The Russians in Hollywood
Theaters
Underground Cinema
VOD
War film
Westerns
Women in the Film Industry
Women's Weepies |
This was a beautifully written post on issues of scandal and celebrity. In writing biographies of actors and entertainers, I have researched many a tragic life and it sucked something out of me to be treading in someone’s private business, even if I didn’t repeat it. “Fans” who fall for the media’s line that we have the “right to know,” and seek out scandal in a star’s personal life rather than appreciation for their work, lose a bit of their humanity and compassion for every juicy detail and tidbit of gossip they revel in.