The Fat Spy: There Are No Words to Describe How Bad This Movie Is

fat1Last week, our blogathon on topics related to the Academy Awards referenced many award-winning films: Some of these movies were classics that deserved their Oscars; others were forgettable films that the Academy honored for reasons that had more to do with popularity, trends, or political correctness. Yet, even those films were well crafted, competently acted, and engaging, whether they spoke to everyone’s tastes, or not. The focus on award-winners made me think in the opposite direction — about films that are so bad they don’t even qualify for the Razzies.

 ”Razzies” is short for the Golden Raspberry Awards, which are an exercise in cynicism designed to poke a hole in the Academy Awards’ pomp by “honoring” the supposed worst films of the year. The Golden Raspberries were created in 1980 by John Wilson, a publicist (big surprise). “Raspberry” comes from an old vaudeville term, “blowing a raspberry,” which is a noise that audience members made when an act was particularly bad. Sometimes bad movies on the caliber of Razzie winners can actually be fun to watch, especially on cable when you don’t have anything invested in the experience. Bad movies can remind us that you don’t always have to watch a good movie to have a good movie experience. However, just like the Oscars don’t always honor the best, the Razzies don’t always (dis)honor the worst. In my job, I have seen screeners for movies that are so bad they are self-distributed by the filmmakers, because even distributors of low-budget horror junk won’t touch them. I have invented my own award for these films; it’s the “There Are No Words To Describe How Bad This Movie Is” Award, or the Suzi Award.  

This bargain-basement level of filmmaking is not a recent phenomenon, and horror isn’t the only genre plagued with it. One of the best examples of a really bad film (if that makes sense) is a little gem I picked up on the DVD bargain table for $1.00 called The Fat Spy, which definitely deserves a Suzi Award because it is truly too bad for words.  

fatspy4

MANSFIELD LONG BEFORE THE FAT SPY

 The Fat Spy is a spoof of several movie fads popular in the mid-1960s, particularly beach movies and spy adventures. The nonsensical storyline involves a group of teenagers who look for an old Spanish galleon on an island off the coast of Florida, but the island is inhabited by a horticulturalist searching for Ponce de Leon’s Fountain of Youth for a cosmetics company. The cast is a strange mix of movie stars, TV celebrities, and unknowns. The plant scientist, Irving, is played by 1960s stand-up comic Jack E. Leonard, who has a dual role. He also costars as Irving’s ruthless twin brother, Herman, who — like Irving — works for cosmetics tycoon Mr. Wellington, played by Golden Age leading man Brian Donlevy. Herman is in love with rival cosmetics mogul, Camille Salamander, and the two scheme to find the Fountain for themselves. The role of Camille, who is also called Rapunzel Fingernail for reasons never explained, is not performed so much as “inhabited” by brassy comedienne Phyllis Diller. As an additional complication, Irving is in love with Wellington’s daughter, Junior, played by sex symbol Jayne Mansfield. One of the teenagers is played by rock ‘n’ roll singer Johnny Tillotson, but the others are played by unknowns with names like Tony Turner and Tommy Trick. 

Normally, at this point, I would offer a warning of “spoiler alert,” but if anyone were to watch this film, it would not matter if they knew plot details in advance, because the film makes no sense anyway. At the end of the film, all of the parties end up at a park where the Fountain of Youth is located. But, the Fountain is not the legendary water source searched for by explorer Ponce De Leon. As a matter of fact, it is not water at all but twin black roses that, when eaten, turn the characters back into childhood versions of themselves.  No kidding.

fatspy2

 The Fountain of Youth quest is an attempt to spoof James Bond and other spy adventures. The addition of pop songs, references to current fads in pop culture, and the absurdist plot are reminiscent of the intentional campiness of the popular spy spoof What’s New, Pussycat?, but The Fat Spy is so poorly conceived, directed, and acted that it misses the mark by a wide margin. The teen subplot is heavily padded with forgettable pop songs, such as “You Put Me Down in the Nicest Way” and a dance tune in which everyone does “The Turtle.” Indeed, The Fat Spy, which has a 78-minute running time, averages a song every four minutes. The central teenage couple is named Frankie and Nanette, which is supposed to be a joke on the Frankie Avalon and Annette Funicello Beach Party movies, but it is a one-note joke stretched over 78 minutes. And, it is a really long 78 minutes — the three-hour Benjamin Button flies by in comparison. 

fatspy6

DONLEVY AND MANSFIELD MUDDLE THROUGH A SCENE

Joseph Cates directed the film in the same superficial manner of the television variety specials that were his bread and butter. Cates’s directorial skills were so poor that he could not handle so basic a technique as matching eyelines from shot to shot during a conversation. In their medium and close-up shots, the characters rarely seem to look at the person speaking to them, but instead look into empty space or in the complete opposite direction. In an early conversation between Mansfield and Donlevy, for example, we assume from the way the scene is edited that the two are standing across the desk from each other in Donlevy’s office. Then, as the conversation progresses, they also appear to be addressing someone at the far side of the room. Near the end of the scene, Cates cuts to master shot, which reveals they are actually standing next to each other and there is no one else in the room at all.           

Most of the actors embarrass themselves in this film. Diller and Leonard perform in the broad manner of TV comedy sketches, while Mansfield falls back on a parody of her characters from earlier comedies. The appearance of Mansfield in the film is just plain sad, because it reveals the decline of her career. Though a gifted comedienne, she had a narrow range because of her star image as a sex goddess and her unique physical appearance. Bad management and an addiction to publicity combined to push her career into a series of too-similar roles in increasingly poor films. In The Fat Spy, Mansfield, who was pregnant at the time, looked tired and bloated. She made another film in the same year called Las Vegas Hillbillies; I wonder if it is worse that The Fat Spy, though I can’t see how. 

fatspy7

DONLEVY IN HIS LATER CAREER

The only actor who fares worse is Brian Donlevy, who had been appearing in Hollywood movies since the silent era. Donlevy, whose life was like a story from an adventure book, had supposedly ridden with General Pershing’s army chasing Pancho Villa across Mexico. He then joined the famous Lafayette Escadrille during World War I. In Hollywood, he became a successful actor, playing both villains and leading men, earning an Oscar nomination as the sadistic sergeant in Beau Geste. During the Golden Age, he appeared in such classics as Jesse James, Miracle of Morgan’s Creek, and The Kiss of Death. He deserved a better end to his career than to appear in such drivel as The Fat Spy. It’s hard to pick a low point in the film since the whole movie is 78 minutes of low points, but I did feel sorry for Donlevy in the scene in which his character is sailing his yacht to the island. As he stands on the deck peering out to sea, a series of voices can be heard in the background imitating stars who played famous Hollywood gangsters — Bogart, Cagney, and Robinson. I can only guess that the purpose is to show that Donlevy’s character is as tough and ruthless as a gangster. However, the scene really only serves to remind the audience that these big stars retired or ended their careers with fame and respect, while Donlevy’s glory had long since faded, though it is no reflection on his talent.  

I am sure that everyone has watched an equivalent to The Fat Spy — a film so bad that there are no words to describe it. If you think your film is deserving of a Suzi Award, leave a comment with the title, so that I can either watch it . . . or avoid it!

11 Responses The Fat Spy: There Are No Words to Describe How Bad This Movie Is
Posted By Vincent : February 16, 2009 5:08 pm

Jeez, that description makes “Don’t Worry, We’ll Think Of A Title” (also released in 1966) seem like “Citizen Kane.”

Incidentally, I agree with your thoughts on Jayne Mansfield; she had some genuine comedic talent, but 1) made some bad career moves and 2) was working in an era in which actresses were objectified like no time before or since. Just read newspapers and magazines from 50 years ago, and see all the listings of actresses’ measurements or references to their “superstructure.” Ship Jayne back in time some 20 years earlier, and while she wouldn’t have given the top comediennes of the ’30s a run for their money, she’d have had a solid career as a character actress, along the lines of the similarly buxom, if less outrageous, Marie Wilson.

Posted By Medusa : February 16, 2009 5:10 pm

Wow — isn’t it amazing that some company would even bother to put that movie out on DVD, no matter how cheap?

It’s interesting to me, in that I wrote a blog a while back about Jordan Christopher, who’s in the movie. Didn’t do much for his career!

It does sound godawful, for sure! You are a brave gal for sitting through it!

Posted By debbe : February 16, 2009 8:33 pm

suzidoll, loved the blog. had never heard of this movie, and I wonder how did this film get greenlighted? Who owed who what? Do you know what studio made this stinker?
It really gets me when I think of all the good scripts ( ok mine) that are having trouble reaching an audience, and here there is this clunker that got made with some recognizeable talent. Wow Why did they give up so much to make so little?

I think however, you should do more Suzi Awards. Have you ever seen Carnival of Souls?

Posted By Lisa Wright : February 17, 2009 9:21 pm

Debbe, I agree. Whenever I see an awful one… and I haven’t had the misfortune of seeing this one… I wonder, Did NO one read the script?! Probably the worst I’ve seen belong to the shlock horror genre, where bad is really good! I’ll have to think of one to nominate, for your awards ceremony, Suzi!

Posted By Lisa Wright : February 17, 2009 9:22 pm

P.S.
Keep writing the good ones, Debbe! And let us know when/where we can see one!

Posted By Dan Oliver : February 18, 2009 4:44 pm

Debbe,

Are you implying the Carnival of Souls is a potential Suzi Award winner? If so, you will find many who disagree strongly. While it’s hindered somewhat, particularly in its opening dialogue scenes, by its low budget, Carnival of Souls is a genuinely creepy and influential independent film. A classic of its kind. Give it some love, please.

Posted By policomic : February 22, 2009 12:48 pm

I’d like to nominate the Hammer production, “The Lost Continent”– a truly bizarre film about a doomed ship full of losers that encounters first, a sea monster, and then a strange land full of viking-like primitives, ruled by a child. It must be seen–preferably at about 3:00 a.m.–to be believed.

Posted By Stacia : February 23, 2009 2:35 am

Dan, I am hoping Debbe means the 1998 remake of “Carnival of Souls”, the one with Larry Miller. I love it in the way I love bad B movies, but it is, indeed, a stinker.

Posted By Helen : February 23, 2009 11:48 am

I don’t know if anyone else has seen this film, but White Comanche with William Shatner (playing Native Americans twins!!) and Joseph Cotten is cheesetastic. Filmed in Spain during the spaghetti western phase of the late 1960′s/early 1970′s, I guess this was Shatner’s attempt to be Clint Eastwood. There’s a scene where he’s fighting with some guy (Spanish no doubt) and he knocks him over a cliff–you can see the stunt guy actually pushing himself off against a rock. And Shatner just didn’t have the “gravitas” to pull it off. It’s really bad.

Posted By debbe : February 23, 2009 12:36 pm

Lisa! If only someone would want to make my movies! And as far as Carnival of Souls- two points. It just played here on the ASU channel where they play the worst sci-fi movies of all time…. and on my third viewing, it doesn’t seem to hold up. I can see why it is a cult indie classic – ( Quartermas….) and maybe I could see not nominating it for a Suzi award.. because I just saw this movie called Dead Man Walking from the sixties and from Italy that was really pretty g-d awful and makes Carnival of Souls, original and 1998 look like Citizen Kane. I met the star of the original Carnival of Souls- we were kind of regulars at parties, and I had never seen the movie when I met her. This was in the nineties. She was my own personal Norma Desmond. Very good casting I must say.

Posted By Paul : February 24, 2009 5:18 pm

Suzi – I have never seen THE FAT SPY (but sounds like it is right up my alley), but I can tell you that LAS VEGAS HILLBILLYS (yes, this is the correct spelling of the film title… an omen of sorts of what’s to follow) is a true Z-Grade musical misfit. Some decent country music numbers are jumbled with some brief vintage Vegas travelogue stock footage. Oh, and there is even an attempt to tell a story. A couple of hicks inherit a casino and so they high-tail it to Sin City to make it big. They come to find out the place is a complete dump. Sadly, JAYNE MANSFIELD plays the gambling manager (in a near catatonic state), while MAMIE VAN DOREN (who is a bit out of her prime) is supposed to be the singing talent… and neither are on-screen all that much. And neither seem all that excited to be there. Somehow, after the “incredible” success of this schlock, they decided to do a sequel of sorts entitled HILLBILLYS IN A HAUNTED HOUSE, which at least has more of a comedic/horror angle to the storyline, which helps to ease the pain.

Leave a Reply

MovieMorlocks.com is the official blog for TCM. No topic is too obscure or niche to be excluded from our film discussions. And we welcome your comments on our blogs and bloggers.
Archives
Popular terms
3-D  Actors  Actors' Endorsements  Animation  Anthology Films  Awards  Books on Film  British Cinema  Character Actors  Chicago Film History  Cinematography  Classic Films  College Life on Film  Comedy  Comic Book Movies  Czech Film  Dance on Film  Digital Cinema  Directors  Disaster Films  Documentary  Drama  Early Talkies  Editing  Educational Films  European Influence on American Cinema  Exploitation  Family Films  Film Composers  film festivals  Film Noir  Film Scholars  Filmmaking Techniques  Food in Film  Foreign Film  French Film  Gangster films  Genre spoofs  Guest Programmers  HD & Blu-Ray  Holiday Movies  Hollywood lifestyles  Horror  Horror Movies  Icons  independent film  Italian Film  Literary Adaptations  Martial Arts  Melodramas  Method Acting  Mexican Cinema  Monster Movies  Movie Books  Movie locations  Movie Stars  Music in Film  Musicals  Outdoor Cinema  Parenting on film  Polish film industry  political thrillers  Pornography  Pre-Code  Producers  Race in American Film  Remakes  Road Movies  Romance  Romantic Comedies  Russian Film Industry  Scandals  Science Fiction  Screenwriters  Semi-documentaries  Short Films  Silent Film  silent films  Social Problem Film  Sports  Sports on Film  Stereotypes  Straight-to-DVD  Studio Politics  Suspense thriller  Swashbucklers  TCM Classic Film Festival  Television  The British in Hollywood  The Hungarians in Hollywood  The Irish in Hollywood  The Russians in Hollywood  Theaters  Underground Cinema  VOD  War film  Westerns  Women in the Film Industry  Women's Weepies