Crime Is a Business Like Any Other
In some of his better films, George Bancroft played a man who lived by a self-determined rough code, often sacrificing himself while keeping his inner nobility well hidden. His early fame may also have faded so much because of the relative obscurity of these important yet transitional movies at the end of the silent era. Another factor may have been the removal of many pre-code films from circulation after the Production Code became the industry’s self-imposed censor and protector of public morals. The dimming of Bancroft‘s unlikely stardom may also have been tarnished by his reported tendency to “go Hollywood” and believe his own publicity as a tough guy. A burly man, he might easily have played a more genial sibling of Wallace Beery. In Blood Money, Bancroft plays Bill Bailey, a bailbondsman who takes money from the guilty, the innocent, the rich and the poor, with little distinction or deference on display for any of his clients. The character played by George Bancroft* has no apparently well hidden nobility to mask, though his matter of fact attitude toward his business assisting criminals to get out of jail is regarded by him as “perfectly respectable” since “crime is a business like any other.” He even accepts as collateral the deedsof a widow’s house whose son has been arrested; expressing admiration for the sixteen year old lad, who has a rather “complicated” relationship with a woman in her ’30s. Bancroft plays a former cop, and, frankly, a cheerful scumbag without much to recommend him–except that he doesn’t take any guff from anyone, (except his longtime, considerably cagey mistress). He seems to be a man without delusions, especially since his years on the force left him knowing too much about the inner workings of the city. Commenting on the praise being heaped on a “reform” mayor, Bailey says: The speakeasy is run by Bancroft‘s very formidable mistress, a “nightclub hostess” and tough gal Judith Anderson (in her film debut), who presides over what looks like a combination speakeasy and bordello. Anderson‘s presence, for those who tend to think of her as Mrs. Danvers in Rebecca almost a decade later is that of a glamorously assertive, sensual woman who realizes Bailey’s many weaknesses may be part of his appeal for her. Having helped Bancroft when he was thrown off the police, she shares a fondness for her boyfriend’s tendency to play both sides of the street, and appears to wield an unusual amount of power for a female character in what is superficially a gangster film. While Judith Anderson would play another powerful criminal in Lady Scarface (1941), this is actually a better role than that simpler later film. Exercising more influence over other denizens of the underworld as the story develops, Anderson brings some of the authority that she must have had playing in her classical stage roles to this part. As the powerful character “Ruby Darling” she is softened by her love for the big lug, (even acknowledging his two timing tendencies with a somewhat sinister laugh), and her loyalty to her younger brother, (Chick Chandler) an erratic, tow headed thief, (who is dating the cross-dressing dame at the bar). Anderson creates a vivid portrait of a highly intelligent natural leader whose executive skills in her shadowy world hide a passionate attachment to her man and her sibling. Her conflicted love eventually turns against Bancroft, bringing the story to a rousing, (if unlikely) conclusion. Beneath her facade there is an ominous undercurrent in her character. The seemingly no-nonsense air about Bailey makes the shine that a shoplifting society beauty (played by Frances Dee ) takes to him more puzzling. Arrested for lifting a few items at a swanky department store, (despite the fact that she has a charge account there), Dee‘s kleptomaniac character exhibits a plethora of strange complexes. Addicted to excitement, aroused by rough men, and an inveterate liar; she manipulates a flattered, slightly puzzled, but not easily fooled Bancroft into helping her to cover up her arrest from her wealthy father. In a very strange scene, he is invited to a Hawaiian party at her posh home, where, showing a rather uninhibited side, Dee joins the hula dancers on display, teasing Bancroft to a fare-thee-well. Taken aback by the dissolute debutante’s aggressive pursuit of him; Dee tells Bancroft that she needs a tough guy to tame her, “so she can follow him around like a dog on a leash.” Soon the two are carrying on a not so secret affair, even though Bancroft is made increasingly nervous by his new girlfriend’s avid need for excitement. While attending the dog track together and rubbing elbows with the hoi polloi, they encounter Chick Chandler, a hot-headed bank robber who happens to know Bancroft well. With a new glint of excitement in her large, glittering eyes, Dee drops the laid back Bancroft for Chandler‘s brand of brutish fun, complete with a harsh kiss that Dee reports with satisfaction “hurt her lip.” There is one other reason that occurs to me that may have contributed to Blood Money being less well known until recently. The director and screenwriter of this movie, Rowland Brown, (seen below on the left), was one of those quirkily talented individuals who seems to have been lost in the shuffle of Hollywood history during the studio era. From what little I’ve been able to gather about him, he was born in Ohio and began his professional life as a commercial illustrator, specializing in bringing the fashion and sports pages of newspapers to vivid graphic life. and migrated to Fox Studios in the late ’20s, where he worked his way up from a common laborer to a position as a gagman, a screenwriter and a director.
_________________________________ Sources: Bacall, Lauren, By Myself and Then Some, HarperCollins, 2005. 12 Responses Crime Is a Business Like Any Other
A good point, Vincent, and I thank you for your clarification. According to the information that I referred to in the course of this article, Blood Money was “a Twentieth Century production; released by United Artists just before merging with Fox Studios.” In many parts of the U.S. the film was eventually released in 1935 under the 20th Century Fox banner in an expurgated, (and no doubt incoherent form) following production code outlines to the letter. As our readers may know, Fox Studios merged with Twentieth Century (formed by Zanuck and his backers in 1933), in 1935. Today, the film is now wholly owned and occasionally broadcast by Fox on their classic cable movie channel. Though this movie and others are in need of restoration, I regard it as a hopeful sign that some of the pre-1935 library, such as this movie and others, including Zoo in Budapest(1933),The Devil’s in Love,The Power and the Glory (1933) and Up the River (1930) are beginning to see the light of day once again. In some cases a few of these movies are shown in archives, at revival theaters, and are now available on home recordings as well, allowing modern audiences to view them for the first time in over half a century. Blood Money has never been released commercially on video or dvd, though copies may be obtained through some sources. I hope that you’ll post about your reactions to Blood Money if you’ve had a chance to see this film. Thanks again. I wish I had seen this film and will look for it in the future. From now on, “the only difference between a liberal and a conservative man is that the liberal man recognizes the existence of vice and tries to control it, while the conservative just turns his back and pretends it doesn’t exist” is my new favorite movie line to quote. Thanks Moirafinnie for digging up this up. Distinctly unwholesome? There is no higher recommendation! I will be on the look-out for this one, I am very intrigued. Being a Lon Chaney Sr and George Raft fan I cant wait for this one! What a tresat…but I’m a bit concerned about when you metioned “expurgated and incoherent form” i want to make sure i get the real deal. Any clues – and where did you et copy you watched? Soon to be a George Bancroft fan I think. Was that Ann Bancrofts father? I caught this one a few weeks ago on Fox Movie classics and really enjoyed it. It was fascinating to see Bancroft in a lead role after watching him play supporting characters in other crime films, and that last scene with Frances Dee where she eagerly rushes off to be mauled is something else. Slowly but surely, I’ve been working my way through all the movies in Danny Peary’s CULT MOVIE books, and this was one I never thought I’d catch. The print wasn’t great, but maybe it’ll show up again — or even on DVD. [...] highly recommend this post on the very obscure movie BLOOD MONEY and its complicated star, George Bancroft. Having caught the movie on Fox Movie Classics a couple of [...] Hi Stacia, Hi BillB, The splendid actress Anna Maria Italiano was born in the Bronx in 1931 to Michael and Mildred Italiano. The actress only became “Ann Bancroft” two decades later when her career began. George Bancroft was married twice and had only one child by his second wife, Octavia Broske. As far as I know the memorable actress of recent decades and the earlier, tough guy actor are not related. The name Blossom Seeley sounded vaguely familiar. Then it hit me. Betty Hutton played Blossom in the biopic Somebody Loves Me in 1952. Her leading man was Ralph Meeker, better known these days for Kiss Me Deadly and Naked Spur. This sounds like a fascinating movie – I hope it shows up on TCM in the UK some time. Will keep my eyes open for it. Thanks for another great posting. This is an unexpectedly marvelous movie that I saw recently on the Fox movie channel. The story is about as sordid as Hollywood could get and makes the self-imposed industry Production Code understandable. It was a good change of pace part for Frances Dee and I was surprised to see such a young, confident Judith Anderson (I would not have thought that this was her first movie). Good movie. Thanks for another good piece. [...] Dreiser’s An American Tragedy (1931), etched a lively portrayal of a fervid thrill seeker in Blood Money (1933), as well as her best known turn as gentle Meg in Little Women (1933). When an ambivalent [...] Leave a Reply |
Archives
Featured Sites
Popular terms
3-D
Action Films
Actors
Actors' Endorsements
animal stars
Animation
Anime
Anthology Films
Autobiography
Awards
B-movies
Best of the Year lists
Biography
Biopics
Blu-Ray
Books on Film
British Cinema
Canadian Cinema
Character Actors
Chicago Film History
Cinematography
Classic Films
College Life on Film
Comedy
Comic Book Movies
Czech Film
Dance on Film
Digital Cinema
Directors
Disaster Films
Documentary
Drama
DVD
Early Talkies
Editing
Educational Films
European Influence on American Cinema
Experimental
Exploitation
Fairy Tales on Film
Faith or Christian-based Films
Family Films
Film Composers
film festivals
Film History in Florida
Film Noir
Film Scholars
Film titles
Filmmaking Techniques
Food in Film
Foreign Film
French Film
Gangster films
Genre
Genre spoofs
Guest Programmers
HD & Blu-Ray
Holiday Movies
Hollywood lifestyles
Horror
Horror Movies
Icons
independent film
Italian Film
Japanese Film
Korean Film
Literary Adaptations
Martial Arts
Melodramas
Method Acting
Mexican Cinema
Moguls
Monster Movies
Movie Books
Movie Costumes
Movie locations
Movie lovers
Movie Reviewers
Movie settings
Movie Stars
Music in Film
Musicals
Outdoor Cinema
Paranoid Thrillers
Parenting on film
Polish film industry
political thrillers
Politics in Film
Pornography
Pre-Code
Producers
Race in American Film
Remakes
Road Movies
Romance
Romantic Comedies
Russian Film Industry
Satire
Scandals
Science Fiction
Screenwriters
Semi-documentaries
Serials
Short Films
Silent Film
silent films
Social Problem Film
Sports
Sports on Film
Stereotypes
Straight-to-DVD
Studio Politics
Suspense thriller
Swashbucklers
TCM Classic Film Festival
Television
The British in Hollywood
The Germans in Hollywood
The Hungarians in Hollywood
The Irish in Hollywood
The Russians in Hollywood
Theaters
Trains in movies
Underground Cinema
VOD
War film
Westerns
Women in the Film Industry
Women's Weepies |
Just as a point of clarification: if this film was made in 1933, I’m pretty certain Darryl F. Zanuck made it at his new 20th Century studio, before it merged with Fox. The company logo in the lower left-hand corner of the poster looks somewhat different than the 20th Century-Fox logo we know from a few years later.