Crime Is a Business Like Any Other

I’m not sure if there’s a traceable connection between the bleakness of 1933 for most Americans in the Great Depression and the cynicism that poured from movie screens in that year, but I’m willing to bet that audiences who warmed to such deep dish pre-code fare as Baby Face, Bombshell, I’m No Angel and Employee’s Entrance probably didn’t bat an eye when presented with the rawness of Blood Money, a movie that I came across last week for the first time. Blood Money (1933) was a distinctly unwholesome, yet compelling movie that was never on my radar, so it was a bit of a surprise to stumble across this 65 minute trip through an entertainingly sordid world peopled with characters for whom the word “raffish” might be too refined.  Made at Twentieth Century Productions a little over a year before their merger with Fox Studios in 1935, the film went ahead in the first year of Darryl Zanuck‘s stewardship of the studio. It was one of the movies that seems to reflect the young mogul’s brashly iconoclastic Warner Brothers‘ roots. Featuring themes centered around an exploitive relationship between the corrupt rich and the underworld, the symbiotic ties between criminals and police, loyalty among thieves that was often more reliable than conventional morality, shifting gender roles, and the stranger fruits of human desire, it is far less known than other crime films of that same period, such as Little Caesar and Public Enemy.

Part of the reason for this may be the fact that it stars George Bancroft, an actor best remembered by most of us for his second tier character roles in later films, particularly his fine work as the warm-hearted marshal “Curly Wilcox” in John Ford’s Stagecoach (1939).  Perhaps Bancroft ought to be better remembered as well for his earlier starring work under Josef Von Sternberg in three films about life on the shady side of society, the silents Underworld (1927), The Docks of New York (1928) and an early, significant talkie, Thunderbolt (1929), (the latter role even earned the actor an early Oscar nomination as Best Actor in a Leading Role).

In some of his better films, George Bancroft played a man who lived by a self-determined rough code, often sacrificing himself while keeping his inner nobility well hidden.  His early fame may also have faded so much because of the relative obscurity of these important yet transitional movies at the end of the silent era. Another factor may have been the removal of many pre-code films from circulation after the Production Code became the industry’s self-imposed censor and protector of public morals. The dimming of Bancroft‘s unlikely stardom may also have been tarnished by his reported tendency to “go Hollywood” and believe his own publicity as a tough guy. A burly man, he might easily have played a more genial sibling of Wallace BeeryComing late to acting, Bancroft, who was a graduate of the Annapolis Naval Academy, went into acting by way of one of the last of the 19th century Minstrel Shows. Appearing in movies as a rough type beginning in 1921, he was already in his forties, but was lucky enough to play good roles despite his lack of that usual movie actor’s essential of that time, physical beauty and youth. As his ego grew, however, he reportedly became more difficult to work with, refusing direction at times, and allegedly claiming in one scene in which his character was to die that “One bullet can’t kill Bancroft!”

In Blood Money, Bancroft plays Bill Bailey, a bailbondsman who takes money from the guilty, the innocent, the rich and the poor, with little distinction or deference on display for any of his clients. The character played by George Bancroft* has no apparently well hidden nobility to mask, though his matter of fact attitude toward his business assisting criminals to get out of jail is regarded by him as “perfectly respectable” since “crime is a business like any other.”

He even accepts as collateral the deedsof a widow’s house whose son has been arrested; expressing admiration for the sixteen year old lad, who has a rather “complicated” relationship with a woman in her ’30s. Bancroft plays a former cop, and, frankly, a cheerful scumbag without much to recommend him–except that he doesn’t take any guff from anyone, (except his longtime, considerably cagey mistress). He seems to be a man without delusions, especially since his years on the force left him knowing too much about the inner workings of the city. Commenting on the praise being heaped on a “reform” mayor, Bailey says:
“As long as you have cities, you’re bound to have vice in them. And you can’t control human nature…the only difference between a liberal and a conservative man is that the liberal man recognizes the existence of vice and tries to control it, while the conservative just turns his back  and pretends it doesn’t exist.”

We soon learn that Bailey, after a tough day filching every red cent from everyone who comes through his door, relaxes in a dive where he encounters a woman dressed as a man at the bar, (seen at the right, we later learn that “she just does that for fun”). He also hears the legendary vaudevillian and rare film presence, Blossom Seeley,  (who may remind you a bit of Gladys George & Mae West), singing a vaguely familiar tune called “The Bad in Every Man”. (The familiar melody was later used by Rodgers and Hart for one of their biggest hits, “Blue Moon”).

The speakeasy is run by Bancroft‘s very formidable mistress, a “nightclub hostess” and tough gal Judith Anderson (in her film debut), who presides over what looks like a combination speakeasy and bordello. Anderson‘s presence, for those who tend to think of her as Mrs. Danvers in Rebecca almost a decade later is that of a glamorously assertive, sensual woman who realizes Bailey’s many weaknesses may be part of his appeal for her. Having helped Bancroft when he was thrown off the police, she shares a fondness for her boyfriend’s tendency to play both sides of the street, and appears to wield an unusual amount of power for a female character in what is superficially a gangster film.  While Judith Anderson would play another powerful criminal in Lady Scarface (1941), this is actually a better role than that simpler later film. Exercising more influence over other denizens of the underworld as the story develops, Anderson brings some of the authority that she must have had playing in her classical stage roles to this part. As the powerful character “Ruby Darling” she is softened by her love for the big lug, (even acknowledging his two timing tendencies with a somewhat sinister laugh), and her loyalty to  her younger brother, (Chick Chandler) an erratic, tow headed thief, (who is dating the cross-dressing dame at the bar).  Anderson creates a vivid portrait of a highly intelligent natural leader whose executive skills in her shadowy world hide a passionate attachment to her man and her sibling. Her conflicted love eventually turns against Bancroft, bringing the story to a rousing, (if unlikely) conclusion. Beneath her facade there is an ominous undercurrent in her character. Ruby Darling turns out to be the brains of the criminal lowlifes in this movie, though her mercurial nature leads her astray as well. Though each of the characters seems fairly stable on the surface, almost everyone in this movie is a slave to their own rage, leading them to seek revenge  and an eventual walk on the wild side.

The seemingly no-nonsense air about Bailey makes the shine that a shoplifting society beauty (played by Frances Dee ) takes to him more puzzling. Arrested for lifting a few items at a swanky department store, (despite the fact that she has a charge account there), Dee‘s kleptomaniac character exhibits a plethora of strange complexes. Addicted to excitement, aroused by rough men, and an inveterate liar; she manipulates a flattered, slightly puzzled, but not easily fooled Bancroft into helping her to cover up her arrest from her wealthy father. In a very strange scene, he is invited to a Hawaiian party at her posh home, where, showing a rather uninhibited side, Dee joins the hula dancers on display, teasing Bancroft to a fare-thee-well. Taken aback by the dissolute debutante’s aggressive pursuit of him; Dee tells Bancroft that she needs a tough guy to tame her, “so she can follow him around like a dog on a leash.”  Soon the two are carrying on a not so secret affair, even though Bancroft is made increasingly nervous by his new girlfriend’s avid need for excitement. While attending the dog track together and rubbing elbows with the hoi polloi, they encounter Chick Chandler, a hot-headed bank robber who happens to know Bancroft well. With a new glint of excitement in her large, glittering eyes, Dee drops the laid back Bancroft for Chandler‘s brand of brutish fun, complete with a harsh kiss that Dee reports with satisfaction “hurt her lip.”

If, like me, you may be used to seeing Frances Dee as an actress who personifies vibrantly fresh wholesomeness and purity on screen, the epitome of which was  her role as Meg in Little Women, (also filmed in 1933), this role is 180 degrees away from her usual screen persona. Though she once said that she took a role in  Val Lewton‘s I Walked With a Zombie (1943) in order to buy her mother a car with the salary,  her haunting appearance in So Ends Our Night (1941), her ambivalent role  in The Private Affairs of Bel Ami (1947) and her lovely serenity opposite her husband Joel McCrea in Four Faces West (1948) indicated someone who selected her roles with considerable thought, this forgotten film should have showed Hollywood that she had real range as an actress.  The writer and one of the  preeminent film critics of the 1930s and 1940s in America, James Agee, once wrote that Dee was “one of the very few women in movies who really had a face …. and always used this translucent face with delicate and exciting talent.” Using her beautiful face, doe-like eyes, and graceful form, Ms. Dee show a talent that longed to grow, but, in this film, the actress clearly relished the challenging part.

Perhaps, unlike your dim correspondent, Dee‘s final scene, when her eyes light up once  when she encounters a disheveled, unknown female job seeker in the lobby of an office building who has just escaped from a wolfish man after answering a want ad, you will catch on to the meaning behind Dee‘s rapid vault toward the elevator more quickly than I did. According to her biographer, Andrew Wentnik, “When a friend…admonished her for playing a prostitute in Blood Money (1933), she denied it saying, ‘I played a masochistic nymphomaniacal kleptomaniac, not a prostitute.’”

There is one other reason that occurs to me that may have contributed to Blood Money being less well known until recently. The director and screenwriter of this movie,  Rowland Brown, (seen below on the left), was one of those quirkily talented individuals who seems to have been lost in the shuffle of Hollywood history during the studio era. From what little I’ve been able to gather about him, he was born in Ohio and began his professional life as a commercial illustrator, specializing in bringing the fashion and sports pages of newspapers to vivid graphic life.  and migrated to Fox Studios in the late ’20s, where he worked his way up from a common laborer to a position as a gagman, a screenwriter and a director.


Never heard of him? Well, you may have enjoyed some of his stories on screen. As a writer he contributed to the screenplays for Doorway to Hell (1930), What Price Hollywood (1932),  Angels With Dirty Faces (1938), Johnny Apollo (1940), and Kansas City Confidential (1952), almost all of which, to some degree, have some sympathy for the criminal class, acknowledge the existence of institutional corruption making it harder for the little guy, and a feel for the life of the streets, (which one critic described derisively as “pavement poetry”). He was nominated for an Oscar for his screenwriting for Doorway to Hell and Angels With Dirty Faces. Yet, as a director, he seems to have been his own worst enemy. After making a splash with Quick Millions (1931) featuring a very young, dynamic Spencer Tracy as a truck driver who organizes a criminal organization, he might have expected a promising career with steady work in the studio system. While some supposed ties to vaguely socialist causes may have affected his studio employment along the way, it was an alleged fist fight with an unnamed studio executive around the time of Blood Money‘s production that cut short his Fox career. Moving to England to jumpstart his career, Brown found a job directing Leslie Howard in The Scarlet Pimpernel (1934), but after a month, another violent run-in with someone on the production side of the film led to his immediate dismissal. Occasional uncredited work as a director on such films as The Devil Is a Sissy (1936) and writing, notably the George Raft movie, Nocturne (1946) and his last credit, for the excellent Phil Karlson-directed Kansas City Confidential are part of his threadbare cinematic legacy. As a director, Blood Money displays some possible skill on Brown and his crew’s part for the rapidly paced scenes in Bailey’s Bail Bond office, establishing the seedy air of Anderson’s “nightclub” and a very tense concluding scene edited between a potentially deadly (if ludicrous) billiard game and a pell mell taxi ride across LA’s actual streets, (I love to see real street scenes filmed surreptiously–and no doubt cheaply–in sometimes still recognizable places in old movies).  Though the movie probably didn’t have a very large budget, and, based on the print I saw, it seems to have been photographed in the dark in several scenes as well. Btw, we do have one other possible reason to be thankful to the largely unheralded Rowland Brown. In 1942, he wrote and produced a melodrama called Johnny 2×4 at the Longacre Theater in New York City. The story was set in an imaginary speakeasy of his youth called the “2 x 4 Club” in Greenwich Village, between 1926 and 1933. A tall, sloe-eyed kid came to his office after all the speaking parts had been cast, shyly asking if she could be considered for a part and submitting her resume and photo. Apparently taking pity on her–or was he prescient?–he called her a few days later, giving her a non-speaking walk-on part that enabled the new graduate from acting school to get her Equity card, and appear in a short-lived but colorful show with such pros as Barry Sullivan and Harry Bellaver–on Broadway. The name of the young actress whose first professional acting job was awarded by Rowland Brown? At the time it was Betty, later Lauren Bacall.

_________________________________
*
Whenever I’ve seen George Bancroft in these various roles in the late ’20s and early ’30s, I’ve been reminded that he might have been the ideal choice to bring to life Dashiell Hammett‘s “Continental Op” character on screen. The Op, a lowly detective for a Pinkerton-like agency was described by the classic crime novelist as “thick-bodied, mulishly stubborn, and indifferent to pain”–all qualities that Bancroft could easily have displayed. Btw, I’ve wondered if the title of the film Blood Money might have been derived from two of the author’s stories, first published in The Black Mask pulp magazine in 1927; “$106,000 Blood Money” and “The Big Knockover”, which were eventually published as one novel with the title Blood Money in 1943.

Sources:

Bacall, Lauren, By Myself and Then Some, HarperCollins, 2005.
Clarens, Carlos, Hirsch, Foster, Crime Movies, Da Capo Press, 1997.
LaSalle, Mick, Dangerous Men: Pre-code Hollywood and the Birth of the Modern Man,
Macmillan, 2002.

12 Responses Crime Is a Business Like Any Other
Posted By Vincent : October 10, 2008 1:02 am

Just as a point of clarification: if this film was made in 1933, I’m pretty certain Darryl F. Zanuck made it at his new 20th Century studio, before it merged with Fox. The company logo in the lower left-hand corner of the poster looks somewhat different than the 20th Century-Fox logo we know from a few years later.

Posted By moirafinnie : October 10, 2008 7:23 am

A good point, Vincent, and I thank you for your clarification.

According to the information that I referred to in the course of this article, Blood Money was “a Twentieth Century production; released by United Artists just before merging with Fox Studios.” In many parts of the U.S. the film was eventually released in 1935 under the 20th Century Fox banner in an expurgated, (and no doubt incoherent form) following production code outlines to the letter. As our readers may know, Fox Studios merged with Twentieth Century (formed by Zanuck and his backers in 1933), in 1935. Today, the film is now wholly owned and occasionally broadcast by Fox on their classic cable movie channel. Though this movie and others are in need of restoration, I regard it as a hopeful sign that some of the pre-1935 library, such as this movie and others, including Zoo in Budapest(1933),The Devil’s in Love,The Power and the Glory (1933) and Up the River (1930) are beginning to see the light of day once again. In some cases a few of these movies are shown in archives, at revival theaters, and are now available on home recordings as well, allowing modern audiences to view them for the first time in over half a century. Blood Money has never been released commercially on video or dvd, though copies may be obtained through some sources.

I hope that you’ll post about your reactions to Blood Money if you’ve had a chance to see this film. Thanks again.

Posted By Suzi Doll : October 10, 2008 4:37 pm

I wish I had seen this film and will look for it in the future. From now on, “the only difference between a liberal and a conservative man is that the liberal man recognizes the existence of vice and tries to control it, while the conservative just turns his back and pretends it doesn’t exist” is my new favorite movie line to quote.

Thanks Moirafinnie for digging up this up.

Posted By Stacia : October 10, 2008 10:25 pm

Distinctly unwholesome? There is no higher recommendation! I will be on the look-out for this one, I am very intrigued.

Posted By BillB : October 13, 2008 11:56 am

Being a Lon Chaney Sr and George Raft fan I cant wait for this one! What a tresat…but I’m a bit concerned about when you metioned “expurgated and incoherent form” i want to make sure i get the real deal. Any clues – and where did you et copy you watched? Soon to be a George Bancroft fan I think. Was that Ann Bancrofts father?

Posted By Will : October 13, 2008 12:11 pm

I caught this one a few weeks ago on Fox Movie classics and really enjoyed it. It was fascinating to see Bancroft in a lead role after watching him play supporting characters in other crime films, and that last scene with Frances Dee where she eagerly rushes off to be mauled is something else. Slowly but surely, I’ve been working my way through all the movies in Danny Peary’s CULT MOVIE books, and this was one I never thought I’d catch. The print wasn’t great, but maybe it’ll show up again — or even on DVD.

Posted By Movie Man » The Morlocks are back : October 13, 2008 12:20 pm

[...] highly recommend this post on the very obscure movie BLOOD MONEY and its complicated star, George Bancroft. Having caught the movie on Fox Movie Classics a couple of [...]

Posted By moirafinnie : October 13, 2008 2:29 pm

Hi Stacia,
Well, if a little “unwholesomeness” is what you long for, this film is definitely designed to appeal to that craving. Btw, Blood Money, along with Ann Vickers and Scarface, (both of which are shown on TCM occasionally), were subject to censorship around the country when released. Blood Money was one of several movies reportedly deemed “unfit” by more than one board in the Midwest in particular. Since the studio was trying to survive in the depth of the Depression, there may have been a tendency to see some of the resultant publicity as manna from heaven for the often meager box office of those years–despite the fact that the same industry unified behind the self-imposed censorship enforced under the stricter enforcement of the PCA beginning in July, 1934.

Hi BillB,
I received a dvd-r of Blood Money from a friend. Those expurgated forms of the movie that were allegedly distributed after 1934 may exist somewhere, but I understand that the version that is occasionally broadcast on FMC cable is the original pre-code, but is badly in need of restoration. You may be able to locate a copy of the film from online collectors, but unfortunately, there is currently no commercial dvd available from Fox. It would be great if 20th Century Fox could start to distribute some of those earlier films in their library on dvd in the future, since they have done a splendid job of packaging their later, better known films for that market in recent years.

The splendid actress Anna Maria Italiano was born in the Bronx in 1931 to Michael and Mildred Italiano. The actress only became “Ann Bancroft” two decades later when her career began. George Bancroft was married twice and had only one child by his second wife, Octavia Broske. As far as I know the memorable actress of recent decades and the earlier, tough guy actor are not related.

Posted By Al Lowe : October 16, 2008 12:44 pm

The name Blossom Seeley sounded vaguely familiar. Then it hit me.

Betty Hutton played Blossom in the biopic Somebody Loves Me in 1952. Her leading man was Ralph Meeker, better known these days for Kiss Me Deadly and Naked Spur.
I’ve never seen Somebody Loves Me (or Blood Money either).
This was Hutton’s last Paramount film. She married the choreographer on the Seeley film and insisted he direct her next movie. When Paramount declined, she walked out.
Her rapid decline reminds me of the “Lonesome Rhodes Express, Going Down” scene in Face in the Crowd. She had made two of the biggest hits of the early 50s, Annie Gets Your Gun and Greatest Show on Earth. Then suddenly she was no longer in demand.
The film depicted Seeley as a vaudeville headliner, Broadway star and World War I volunteer.

Posted By judyge : November 1, 2008 1:07 pm

This sounds like a fascinating movie – I hope it shows up on TCM in the UK some time. Will keep my eyes open for it. Thanks for another great posting.

Posted By Bob Rooney : November 15, 2008 10:25 am

This is an unexpectedly marvelous movie that I saw recently on the Fox movie channel. The story is about as sordid as Hollywood could get and makes the self-imposed industry Production Code understandable. It was a good change of pace part for Frances Dee and I was surprised to see such a young, confident Judith Anderson (I would not have thought that this was her first movie). Good movie. Thanks for another good piece.

Posted By TCM's Classic Movie Blog : February 25, 2010 2:28 pm

[...] Dreiser’s An American Tragedy (1931), etched a lively portrayal of a fervid thrill seeker in Blood Money (1933), as well as her best known turn as gentle Meg in Little Women (1933). When an ambivalent [...]

Leave a Reply

MovieMorlocks.com is the official blog for TCM. No topic is too obscure or niche to be excluded from our film discussions. And we welcome your comments on our blogs and bloggers.
Archives
Popular terms
3-D  Action Films  Actors  Actors' Endorsements  animal stars  Animation  Anime  Anthology Films  Autobiography  Awards  B-movies  Best of the Year lists  Biography  Biopics  Blu-Ray  Books on Film  British Cinema  Canadian Cinema  Character Actors  Chicago Film History  Cinematography  Classic Films  College Life on Film  Comedy  Comic Book Movies  Czech Film  Dance on Film  Digital Cinema  Directors  Disaster Films  Documentary  Drama  DVD  Early Talkies  Editing  Educational Films  European Influence on American Cinema  Experimental  Exploitation  Fairy Tales on Film  Faith or Christian-based Films  Family Films  Film Composers  film festivals  Film History in Florida  Film Noir  Film Scholars  Film titles  Filmmaking Techniques  Food in Film  Foreign Film  French Film  Gangster films  Genre  Genre spoofs  Guest Programmers  HD & Blu-Ray  Holiday Movies  Hollywood lifestyles  Horror  Horror Movies  Icons  independent film  Italian Film  Japanese Film  Korean Film  Literary Adaptations  Martial Arts  Melodramas  Method Acting  Mexican Cinema  Moguls  Monster Movies  Movie Books  Movie Costumes  Movie locations  Movie lovers  Movie Reviewers  Movie settings  Movie Stars  Music in Film  Musicals  Outdoor Cinema  Paranoid Thrillers  Parenting on film  Polish film industry  political thrillers  Politics in Film  Pornography  Pre-Code  Producers  Race in American Film  Remakes  Road Movies  Romance  Romantic Comedies  Russian Film Industry  Satire  Scandals  Science Fiction  Screenwriters  Semi-documentaries  Serials  Short Films  Silent Film  silent films  Social Problem Film  Sports  Sports on Film  Stereotypes  Straight-to-DVD  Studio Politics  Suspense thriller  Swashbucklers  TCM Classic Film Festival  Television  The British in Hollywood  The Germans in Hollywood  The Hungarians in Hollywood  The Irish in Hollywood  The Russians in Hollywood  Theaters  Trains in movies  Underground Cinema  VOD  War film  Westerns  Women in the Film Industry  Women's Weepies