Giving in to a bleak mood — and coming out of it — with the help of “Kings Row”
Based on novelist Dr. Henry Bellamann’s 1940 novel, the titular town of Kings Row — Thus — and if you haven’t seen the movie and don’t want any spoilers, skip this part — in the movie the relationship of the idealistic Parris (Robert Cummings) and his childhood sweetheart Cassie (Betty Fields), who is basically held captive by her father and Yikes! Pretty clear why 1940s-era American moviegoers maybe weren’t quite up for that, eh? There were also some hints of homosexuality which weren’t transferred to the screenplay, but we pretty well So here comes the part that everybody remembers. Drake is injured in a railroad accident, and they I haven’t talked about main character Parris Mitchell (Robert Cummings) much, not because he isn’t interesting; he’s actually the catalyst or at least the nexus between all the other characters. His friendship with Drake, his relationship with the stricken Cassie and her father, and earlier, the loving The movie continues as Parris returns to Kings Row as a doctor and confronts the blackness ther In another change from the book, in the movie the finale is Drake getting a stiff dose of reality from Dr. Parris, after he completely believes Louise’s story about Doctor Gordon’s unnecessary Sure, I know Kings Row isn’t about America in 2008, but I’m taking what I can from it. I’m putting my hopes behind the smart folks, behind the ones who face the truth and try to make a better world, and reject superstition and have compassion for others. I’m turning my back on zealots, and liars, and going for the hope. Well, what do you know? I’m not in quite as bad a mood as I was a while ago. I’m working for change. (For those of you who haven’t seen the movie lately, shhh…it’s actually online.) 10 Responses Giving in to a bleak mood — and coming out of it — with the help of “Kings Row”
This was an insightful analysis of what may be one of the most subversive American major studio movies of the post pre-code era. Ironic, isn’t it, that it was helmed by one of the most politically reactionary of directors, Sam Wood, (who also made Hemingway’s For Whom the Bell Tolls, with a decided sympathy for the Spanish Republic)? Clearly, he was a storyteller first. I guess that goes to show that politics in Hollywood is one thing, making commercially viable movies with great stories is another. In terms of the exposure of the underside of the American dream, it seems to me that the power of this movie may be its recognition of pain, waste and evil in every corner of the world. The fact that the characters see this clearly by the end of the film, and release themselves from the burden that it might impose to move on with their lives is all the more remarkable, since this movie was made at the height of WWII. I would love to see all of the PCA correspondence with Warner Brothers over the content of this screenplay, as the article that you cited really touched off my curiosity! This may also be one of the few movies in which the presence of Robert Cummings doesn’t send me lunging for the remote control.As you point out, he is actually convincingly intellectual without seeming to be what used to be called a “pantywaist” about it, (“pantywaist” probably equals “ineffectual, possibly effeminate nerd” in more recent terminology). Since many American movies of the period, (not to mention now), have a strong streak of anti-intellectualism in them, this is really refreshing. One small quibble, which probably reflects my bias toward Claude Rains in anything: “cold, incisive” seems to be his persona on the surface, but, as revealed in several scenes, particularly in the final meeting of Cummings & Rains, he’s also a man who sees rather clearly that his analytical skills and self-imposed sense of dignity have isolated him from life. He is clearly desperately lonely and trying to do the right thing for once in his paternalistic relationship with Cummings‘ character. I thought that this largely tacit acknowledgment of the trap that he has made for himself gave his character a truly tragic element. I try to see this movie every couple of years, particularly to hear the glorious score, the cinematography and that marvelous, studio-bound yet all encompassing art direction of William Cameron Menzies, not to mention the cast’s work, (in particular Ann Sheridan, who was never more winning). I can see that you’ve now given me even more to derive from it. Thanks, Medusa–this is a fine, provocative piece with much to think about in your observations. I can understand why you are feeling discouraged by whats going on in this country. I’m reminded of the ending of the movie Grapes of Wrath, when Ma Joad turns to Pa Joad and says, “We’ve sure taken a beating.” “King’s Row” is a kind of joke in the film community, so when I first saw it a few years ago I was surprised at how good it was. Sheridan really was a fine actress and I recommend “King’s Row” to anyone who thinks she was just a pretty face. Cummings is always pleasant and he gets a bad rap for it, although in KR and other films his pleasantness is necessary and welcome amidst all the melodrama and chaos and murder. My only disappointment with KR is in Rains’ character, because even toned down you get a real sense of evil underlying his actions, yet it’s so vague that one has trouble getting a handle on it. Rains’ trademark pathos and humanity just muddies the waters in that particular plotline. What an excellent write-up! I’m glad to see KR get some much-needed positive, intelligent discussion. There is something definitely special about “Kings Row”, possibly the whole is better than the sum of its parts. Though some of the acting is maybe a little on the breathless side, there is real humanity in the performances. Sheridan is really quite good, isn’t she? I think knowing what happened in the book informs watching the film — even if they are talking about insanity in the movie, you can believe that Rains was playing it as if it were the incest from the book. And of course Rains is so good that even being so misguided, he’s a sympathetic (well, sort of) character. But Charles Coburn…brrrr! He’s terrifying in the role. I also forgot to mention Charles Davenport as Col. Skeffington, one decent constant in the town. Great performance. Thanks for the comments! Yes, lovable old Charles Coburn is a cold, sadistic SOB in this film which only proves just what a great range he had and how effortless he made it appear. But as horrible as he is, we still adore him because he cut Ronald Reagan down to size. Medusa, congratulations on a fine piece about one of my favorite films “King’s Row”. I like tales about small towns and it’s inhabitants where evil usually lurks. Good stuff. Oops, Mongo…yes, I meant Harry Davenport. And Ann Sheridan is radiant, isn’t she? Thanks for the comments! This country may be going to heck but there are always the movies and TV to make you forget about it. Medusa, I’m so glad you chose to write about “King’s Row.” I saw it on television for the first time when I was 11 or 12 and had to talk myself into watching it again as an adult. Charles Coburn really did a number on me! Very scary performance! Of course, I did watch the movie again and thought all the actors gave fine performances – especially, Ann Sheridan. I hope you’re feeling less in a funk. Sometimes I have to declare a moratorium and avoid the news for a few days in order to stay sane. Movies are great “comfort food.” Great article! Leave a Reply |
Archives
Featured Sites
Popular terms
3-D
Actors
Actors' Endorsements
Animation
Anthology Films
Awards
Books on Film
British Cinema
Character Actors
Chicago Film History
Cinematography
Classic Films
College Life on Film
Comedy
Comic Book Movies
Czech Film
Dance on Film
Digital Cinema
Directors
Disaster Films
Documentary
Drama
Early Talkies
Editing
Educational Films
European Influence on American Cinema
Exploitation
Family Films
Film Composers
film festivals
Film Noir
Film Scholars
Filmmaking Techniques
Food in Film
Foreign Film
French Film
Gangster films
Genre spoofs
Guest Programmers
HD & Blu-Ray
Holiday Movies
Hollywood lifestyles
Horror
Horror Movies
Icons
independent film
Italian Film
Literary Adaptations
Martial Arts
Melodramas
Method Acting
Mexican Cinema
Monster Movies
Movie Books
Movie locations
Movie Stars
Music in Film
Musicals
Outdoor Cinema
Parenting on film
Polish film industry
political thrillers
Pornography
Pre-Code
Producers
Race in American Film
Remakes
Road Movies
Romance
Romantic Comedies
Russian Film Industry
Scandals
Science Fiction
Screenwriters
Semi-documentaries
Short Films
Silent Film
silent films
Social Problem Film
Sports
Sports on Film
Stereotypes
Straight-to-DVD
Studio Politics
Suspense thriller
Swashbucklers
TCM Classic Film Festival
Television
The British in Hollywood
The Hungarians in Hollywood
The Irish in Hollywood
The Russians in Hollywood
Theaters
Underground Cinema
VOD
War film
Westerns
Women in the Film Industry
Women's Weepies |
great movie fantastic score Regans fianest perforance