When are you done watching?I’m an inveterate collector of images. Some of these I take with a camera that I keep on my person at all times – driving, in the supermarket, strolling the aisles at Target – some that I cut or tear from magazines and newspapers and keep in a spiral-bound “morgue” of a notebook, but most are pictures I find on the Internet and save to an ever-bulging desktop file folder. More often than not, I don’t have any purpose for appropriating a particular image… I just want it. I’ve had this frame grab from the original NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD (1968) for some weeks now. Don’t know where I saw it but I knew I had to have it. If you know the movie, you’ll recognize the scene: Barbara (Judith O’Dea) has fled the rural cemetery where her brother Johnny (Russell Streiner) has been attacked by a shambling ruin of a man (Bill Hinzman), who knocks Johnny senseless (perhaps killing him) and then pursues her. Barbara jumps into her car… but Johnny has the keys, so she throws the thing into gear with the hope of coasting out of this derelict’s range. The man pursues the rolling vehicle with a singularity of purpose that is almost maniacal, his mouth slack, his focus on Barbara as if his own personal safety is less important than his desire to lay hands on her. When people saw this movie 40 years ago (exactly) they probably didn’t know where NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD was going. There was no zombie subgenre then and tales of vampirism tended to be Gothic, if not outright Romantic. The bland familiarity of this film’s Pennsylvania location must have blown the minds of moviegoers looking for a storybook getaway. The daytime setting of the opening frames surely would have put the audience at ease – sun’s still up, nothing bad can happen until it gets dark. Having the first attack take place in daylight was just the first of many masterstrokes from the pen of George Romero, a point that may be lost on those coming to the movie fresh in 2008 or just forgotten by those who, like me, can count their viewings of it in double and triple digits. The reason this one image speaks to me is that it makes me, in an instant, relive the whole movie in my head. More than that, it makes me want to go rewatch NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD and try to see the whole movie with the new eyes that I bring to this one fleeting instant taken out of context. I’m at a loss to tell you precisely why I find this one image so evocative It’s a combination of things, I guess… the natural proscenium of the car window, the distant woods beyond, the ghoul’s white hand pressed so flatly against the glass he is trying to break through and that look on his face, such a weird marriage of fearsomeness and desperation. The whole of NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD is expressed in this one simple composition: the horror, the terror, and the ineffable sadness of this puzzle we call life. So, back to NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD for me for the, I’ve lost count, 20th, 25th, 30th time? All my life I’ve had people look at me like I have two heads because I’ll watch the same movie multiple times (these are usually people who follow professional sports) but sometimes it takes repeat viewings to really see something and to sort out kneejerk reactions from true emotional response. Haven’t you ever found your opinion of a movie change the second or third time around… love turns to like, like turns to mild distaste or dismissal grows into admiration and admiration into love? Human beings are chemical reactions, our process is ongoing, and movies, like all kinds of stimulus, change that chemistry. So based on the alchemy of a single frame, I’m sent back to a movie I’ve spent days watching (if each viewing were to be strung back-to-back) and one I liked the first time. It may seem like madness to you and maybe it is. Anyway, my renewed interest is nothing if not well timed, as a brand new transfer of NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD has just been released on DVD in honor of its 40th anniversary. I wonder if I’ll ever be done watching this damned thing. 8 Responses When are you done watching?
What added to my enjoyment of seeing NOTLD for the first time, was seeing it on 42nd Street with some patrons who were more frightening than the zombies. Me and McSwine and Charlie were accustomed to getting ripped off with a double feature on The Deuce that promised far more than it delivered (think, Frankenstein vs. The Space Monster/Curse of the Voodoo). After sitting through a rather tame Dr. Who and the Daleks, we experienced NOTLD. No hoopla, no idea of what was to come. And you are dead on (fittingly), the opening nailed it. The Anco Theater was alive like we had never seen it, hollering at the screen. Giving instructions to the brother and sister on screen, to get their arses and other body parts the heck out of there. And of course, it only got better. Both the film and the audience. Take that, sports fans. There is a famous review of NOTLD written by a father who took his young son to the film, thinking it was going to be a familiar horror film that followed all of the conventions. But, the starkness of the imagery in NOTLD, plus it’s genre-busting characteristics, frightened the little tyke to hysteria. The writer was outraged that such a film was shown in theaters with no warning as to its content, and he was upset that his little father-son experience was ruined! I remember reading the article reprinted in the READERS’ DIGEST and getting scared just from that experience. But, it made me want to see the movie, and years later I did. This screen grab does bring back all of the reasons why the film scared me — and still does. And I enjoyed your well-written reflection on the nature of imagery. That was no father, that was Roger Ebert! Ebert’s piece had first been published in the Chicago Sun Times and reprinted in Reader’s Digest. And Ebert has been bashed in some fan circles for coming off like he didn’t appreciate the movie – he did (and he was one of the biggest boosters of its belated sequel, Dawn of the Dead a decade later) – but he was on the money about it being shown to the wrong audience. Mind you, this was back in the days when stuff like True Grit could get a G (General Audience) rating even though people get shot, stabbed, bashed over the head with rocks, bitten by rattlesnakes and have their fingers chopped off. Agreed, that one shot evokes the whole film: Strange, kinetic, black and white. I saw this when it came out (40 years ago? Ouch!). Loved horror films, I had grown up on Shock Theater and Hammer Films. This one changed everything. The rules and rituals of monster movies were out the window. Seeing this was like getting hit by a truck. Hey, I resemble that remark, Jonathan! Nuts? Me? Thanks! :-) In terms of that still, RHS, the poor guy looks so desperate and you know he didn’t ask to be zombified…he’s trying so hard to be a good monster. Pretty tragic and of course terrifying and sad, so sad. This is still a milestone of a movie. I’m just glad there are better copies of it that are available after years of 3rd and 4th generation dupes. Leave a Reply |
Archives
Featured Sites
Popular terms
3-D
Actors
Actors' Endorsements
Animation
Anthology Films
Awards
Books on Film
British Cinema
Character Actors
Chicago Film History
Cinematography
Classic Films
College Life on Film
Comedy
Comic Book Movies
Czech Film
Dance on Film
Digital Cinema
Directors
Disaster Films
Documentary
Drama
Early Talkies
Editing
Educational Films
European Influence on American Cinema
Exploitation
Family Films
Film Composers
film festivals
Film Noir
Film Scholars
Filmmaking Techniques
Food in Film
Foreign Film
French Film
Gangster films
Genre spoofs
Guest Programmers
HD & Blu-Ray
Holiday Movies
Hollywood lifestyles
Horror
Horror Movies
Icons
independent film
Italian Film
Literary Adaptations
Martial Arts
Melodramas
Method Acting
Mexican Cinema
Monster Movies
Movie Books
Movie locations
Movie Stars
Music in Film
Musicals
Outdoor Cinema
Parenting on film
Polish film industry
political thrillers
Pornography
Pre-Code
Producers
Race in American Film
Remakes
Road Movies
Romance
Romantic Comedies
Russian Film Industry
Scandals
Science Fiction
Screenwriters
Semi-documentaries
Short Films
Silent Film
silent films
Social Problem Film
Sports
Sports on Film
Stereotypes
Straight-to-DVD
Studio Politics
Suspense thriller
Swashbucklers
TCM Classic Film Festival
Television
The British in Hollywood
The Hungarians in Hollywood
The Irish in Hollywood
The Russians in Hollywood
Theaters
Underground Cinema
VOD
War film
Westerns
Women in the Film Industry
Women's Weepies |
I’ve listened to the same piece of music for over a week now. I have countless new movies I’ve gotten on DVD from Netflix that have gone back unseen, because I had a personal favorite on hand I preferred to watch instead. And pictures – as my banners might betray, I’m obsessed with screengrabs, stills and posters. I have prized internet possessions (whoever thought there would be such a thing?), posters only found on the internet in small sizes because the larger sizes are for sale and watermarked. Mwhaahhahaahaha!!! I eat watermarks for breakfast (with toast of course). Anyway, I love sharing them too. Sometimes I think I could do my whole blog with just scans and internet grabs. So you’re not mad. MedusaMorlock? Sure, she’s nuts. But you’re okay.