When are you done watching?

I’m an inveterate collector of images.  Some of these I take with a camera that I keep on my person at all times – driving, in the supermarket, strolling the aisles at Target – some that I cut or tear from magazines and newspapers and keep in a spiral-bound “morgue” of a notebook, but most are pictures I find on the Internet and save to an ever-bulging desktop file folder.  More often than not, I don’t have any purpose for appropriating a particular image… I just want it.  I’ve had this frame grab from the original NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD (1968) for some weeks now.  Don’t know where I saw it but I knew I had to have it.  If you know the movie, you’ll recognize the scene:  Barbara (Judith O’Dea) has fled the rural cemetery where her brother Johnny (Russell Streiner) has been attacked by a shambling ruin of a man (Bill Hinzman), who knocks Johnny senseless (perhaps killing him) and then pursues her.  Barbara jumps into her car… but Johnny has the keys, so she throws the thing into gear with the hope of coasting out of this derelict’s range.  The man pursues the rolling vehicle with a singularity of purpose that is almost maniacal, his mouth slack, his focus on Barbara as if his own personal safety is less important than his desire to lay hands on her. 

When people saw this movie 40 years ago (exactly) they probably didn’t know where NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD was going.  There was no zombie subgenre then and tales of vampirism tended to be Gothic, if not outright Romantic.  The bland familiarity of this film’s Pennsylvania location must have blown the minds of moviegoers looking for a storybook getaway.  The daytime setting of the opening frames surely would have put the audience at ease – sun’s still up, nothing bad can happen until it gets dark.  Having the first attack take place in daylight was just the first of many masterstrokes from the pen of George Romero, a point that may be lost on those coming to the movie fresh in 2008 or just forgotten by those who, like me, can count their viewings of it in double and triple digits. 

The reason this one image speaks to me is that it makes me, in an instant, relive the whole movie in my head.  More than that, it makes me want to go rewatch NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD and try to see the whole movie with the new eyes that I bring to this one fleeting instant taken out of context.  I’m at a loss to tell you precisely why I find this one image so evocative  It’s a combination of things, I guess… the natural proscenium of the car window, the distant woods beyond, the ghoul’s white hand pressed so flatly against the glass he is trying to break through and that look on his face, such a weird marriage of fearsomeness and desperation.  The whole of NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD is expressed in this one simple composition: the horror, the terror, and the ineffable sadness of this puzzle we call life.

So, back to NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD for me for the, I’ve lost count, 20th, 25th, 30th time?  All my life I’ve had people look at me like I have two heads because I’ll watch the same movie multiple times (these are usually people who follow professional sports) but sometimes it takes repeat viewings to really see something and to sort out kneejerk reactions from true emotional response.  Haven’t you ever found your opinion of a movie change the second or third time around… love turns to like, like turns to mild distaste or dismissal grows into admiration and admiration into love?  Human beings are chemical reactions, our process is ongoing, and movies, like all kinds of stimulus, change that chemistry.  So based on the alchemy of a single frame, I’m sent back to a movie I’ve spent days watching (if each viewing were to be strung back-to-back) and one I liked the first time.  It may seem like madness to you and maybe it is.  Anyway, my renewed interest is nothing if not well timed, as a brand new transfer of NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD has just been released on DVD in honor of its 40th anniversary.  I wonder if I’ll ever be done watching this damned thing.

8 Responses When are you done watching?
Posted By Jonathan Lapper : August 19, 2008 7:26 pm

I’ve listened to the same piece of music for over a week now. I have countless new movies I’ve gotten on DVD from Netflix that have gone back unseen, because I had a personal favorite on hand I preferred to watch instead. And pictures – as my banners might betray, I’m obsessed with screengrabs, stills and posters. I have prized internet possessions (whoever thought there would be such a thing?), posters only found on the internet in small sizes because the larger sizes are for sale and watermarked. Mwhaahhahaahaha!!! I eat watermarks for breakfast (with toast of course). Anyway, I love sharing them too. Sometimes I think I could do my whole blog with just scans and internet grabs. So you’re not mad. MedusaMorlock? Sure, she’s nuts. But you’re okay.

Posted By 42nd Street Memories : August 20, 2008 8:32 am

What added to my enjoyment of seeing NOTLD for the first time, was seeing it on 42nd Street with some patrons who were more frightening than the zombies. Me and McSwine and Charlie were accustomed to getting ripped off with a double feature on The Deuce that promised far more than it delivered (think, Frankenstein vs. The Space Monster/Curse of the Voodoo). After sitting through a rather tame Dr. Who and the Daleks, we experienced NOTLD. No hoopla, no idea of what was to come. And you are dead on (fittingly), the opening nailed it. The Anco Theater was alive like we had never seen it, hollering at the screen. Giving instructions to the brother and sister on screen, to get their arses and other body parts the heck out of there. And of course, it only got better. Both the film and the audience. Take that, sports fans.

Posted By RHS : August 20, 2008 10:39 am

I love a good McSwine story!

Posted By Suzi Doll : August 20, 2008 12:30 pm

There is a famous review of NOTLD written by a father who took his young son to the film, thinking it was going to be a familiar horror film that followed all of the conventions. But, the starkness of the imagery in NOTLD, plus it’s genre-busting characteristics, frightened the little tyke to hysteria. The writer was outraged that such a film was shown in theaters with no warning as to its content, and he was upset that his little father-son experience was ruined! I remember reading the article reprinted in the READERS’ DIGEST and getting scared just from that experience. But, it made me want to see the movie, and years later I did. This screen grab does bring back all of the reasons why the film scared me — and still does. And I enjoyed your well-written reflection on the nature of imagery.

Posted By RHS : August 20, 2008 1:23 pm

That was no father, that was Roger Ebert! Ebert’s piece had first been published in the Chicago Sun Times and reprinted in Reader’s Digest. And Ebert has been bashed in some fan circles for coming off like he didn’t appreciate the movie – he did (and he was one of the biggest boosters of its belated sequel, Dawn of the Dead a decade later) – but he was on the money about it being shown to the wrong audience. Mind you, this was back in the days when stuff like True Grit could get a G (General Audience) rating even though people get shot, stabbed, bashed over the head with rocks, bitten by rattlesnakes and have their fingers chopped off.

Posted By Pierre Fournier : August 21, 2008 3:13 am

Agreed, that one shot evokes the whole film: Strange, kinetic, black and white.

I saw this when it came out (40 years ago? Ouch!). Loved horror films, I had grown up on Shock Theater and Hammer Films. This one changed everything. The rules and rituals of monster movies were out the window. Seeing this was like getting hit by a truck.

Posted By Medusa : August 21, 2008 10:08 pm

Hey, I resemble that remark, Jonathan! Nuts? Me? Thanks! :-)

In terms of that still, RHS, the poor guy looks so desperate and you know he didn’t ask to be zombified…he’s trying so hard to be a good monster. Pretty tragic and of course terrifying and sad, so sad.

Posted By David : August 22, 2008 10:57 am

This is still a milestone of a movie. I’m just glad there are better copies of it that are available after years of 3rd and 4th generation dupes.

Leave a Reply

MovieMorlocks.com is the official blog for TCM. No topic is too obscure or niche to be excluded from our film discussions. And we welcome your comments on our blogs and bloggers.
Archives
Popular terms
3-D  Actors  Actors' Endorsements  Animation  Anthology Films  Awards  Books on Film  British Cinema  Character Actors  Chicago Film History  Cinematography  Classic Films  College Life on Film  Comedy  Comic Book Movies  Czech Film  Dance on Film  Digital Cinema  Directors  Disaster Films  Documentary  Drama  Early Talkies  Editing  Educational Films  European Influence on American Cinema  Exploitation  Family Films  Film Composers  film festivals  Film Noir  Film Scholars  Filmmaking Techniques  Food in Film  Foreign Film  French Film  Gangster films  Genre spoofs  Guest Programmers  HD & Blu-Ray  Holiday Movies  Hollywood lifestyles  Horror  Horror Movies  Icons  independent film  Italian Film  Literary Adaptations  Martial Arts  Melodramas  Method Acting  Mexican Cinema  Monster Movies  Movie Books  Movie locations  Movie Stars  Music in Film  Musicals  Outdoor Cinema  Parenting on film  Polish film industry  political thrillers  Pornography  Pre-Code  Producers  Race in American Film  Remakes  Road Movies  Romance  Romantic Comedies  Russian Film Industry  Scandals  Science Fiction  Screenwriters  Semi-documentaries  Short Films  Silent Film  silent films  Social Problem Film  Sports  Sports on Film  Stereotypes  Straight-to-DVD  Studio Politics  Suspense thriller  Swashbucklers  TCM Classic Film Festival  Television  The British in Hollywood  The Hungarians in Hollywood  The Irish in Hollywood  The Russians in Hollywood  Theaters  Underground Cinema  VOD  War film  Westerns  Women in the Film Industry  Women's Weepies