First the Sedatives, Then the Bad News![]() lobby card from The Man Who Knew Too Much (1956) Up until James Stewart first worked for Alfred Hitchcock in Rope (1948) and Anthony Mann in Winchester ‘73 (1950), his screen persona was relatively benign, reflecting an impeccable moral character and all-American, boy-next-door quality. There may have been an occasional suggestion that there was something troubling beneath the surface as in Frank Capra’s It’s a Wonderful Life but it wasn’t until Hitchcock’s Rear Window (1954) and Mann’s The Naked Spur that we saw the dark side of James Stewart emerge. It was one that was obsessive, paranoid, calculating and controlling. And the scene in Hitchcock’s 1956 remake of THE MAN WHO KNEW TOO MUCH, where Stewart compells his wife (Doris Day) to take sedatives before he gives her some bad news is ultra creepy in the way it plays out. There is a perverse sense of power and self-absorption evident in his entire orchestration of the sequence. ![]() Reggie Nalder as the assassin in The Man Who Knew Too Much (1956) Although it has some remarkable choreographed scenes of suspense – the marketplace stabbing, the assassin preparing to strike during the Albert Hall concert – THE MAN WHO KNEW TOO MUCH has never been one of my favorite Hitchcocks and the repeated use of the Oscar-winning song “Que Sera Sera” quickly becomes annoying and actually works against the suspenseful mood. But I had forgotten how impressive Doris Day could be in dramatic scenes until I happened to catch THE MAN WHO KNEW TOO MUCH on TCM’s Summer Under the Stars salute to Day on Sunday, August 10th. The scene where the couple return to their hotel room after witnessing the murder of Louis Bernard (Daniel Gelin) and being questioned by the police is just as disturbing as that scene in George Sluizer’s original version of The Vanishing in which Rex (Gene Bervoets) agrees to take a sedative from Raymond (Bernard-Pierre Donnadieu) in order to learn what happened to his missing fiancee Saskia (Johanna ter Steege). ![]() Before the family vacation goes off the rails in The Man Who Knew Too Much (1956) There’s no easy way to deliver horrible news to anyone but the manner in which Stewart prepares to tell Day that their son has been kidnapped borders on the sadistic. First, he snaps at her when she prepares to make a phone call to check on their son, prompting her to ask, “Are we about to have our monthly fight?” And then he begins browbeating her into submission, pushing sedatives on her because she needs to relax and he’s a doctor, after all. Stewart: You know what happens when you get excited and nervous so here. Day: Six months ago you said I took too many pills. Stewart: Six months ago you weren’t a witness to a murder. Now you’ve been excited. You’ve been talking a blue streak. You’ve been walking around in circles. Day: I haven’t. Stewart: Jo, I make my living knowing when and how to adminster medicine. Now, why fight me on this? ![]() The Man Who Knew Too Much (1956) promotional material Not only is Stewart practically maniacal in his manipulation but he’s also extremely patronizing to Day as if she’s an ignorant child. And then he offers the bait. Stewart: Alright, I’ll make a deal with you….there’s something about this Louis Bernard and the police station and this whole spy business I haven’t told you yet. Day: What? Stewart: Here’s the price of curiosity. He hands her the pills. She takes them, saying “Alright Dr. McKenna. I’m now relaxed and listening.” And he begins to pace the room, watching the drugs start to take effect, as he recounts the events that led up to their current situation. It’s when she begins to recline, woozy from the sedatives, that he drops the news that their son has been kidnapped. Through sheer will power Day struggles to her feet, hysterical yet defiant, as Stewart tries to restrain her. “Damn you, you gave me sedatives,” she screams at him as her panic reaches full blown porportions, bursting forth in waves of uncontrollable sobbing and recriminations. It’s a powerful primeval moment in the movie, one that strikes deep in the heart of any parent or viewer who can empathize. Maybe Stewart’s behavior was understandable after witnessing Day’s overwrought reaction to the bad news but there is still something sinister about his handling of the entire situation that isn’t dispelled by his remorse at the end of the sequence when he begs her to forgive him as she drifts into unconsciousness. If only THE MAN WHO KNEW TOO MUCH could have consistently achieved the intensity of this scene….But it does offer positive proof that Stewart and Day were much more intriguing and dynamic when they broke away from their established screen personas and took chances in potentially risky roles such as this. ![]() The Man Who Knew Too Much (1956) 7 Responses First the Sedatives, Then the Bad News
I watched this movie recently and was moved to tears when Doris is struggling through the medicinal haze, distraught over the news about their son’s abduction. I am a mom of 7, my youngest the same age as the boy in the film, and it hit me so hard trying to imagine her pain and fear at this news. I have always wondered why the Academy Awards people haven’t given Ms. Day an honorary oscar for her tremendous amount of work. She can sing, dance, and act so well! A true triple threat! Medusa, Jimmy didn’t say “monthly fight”. Doris did, so changes the context a bit. I suppose the queasy scene that you describe between Doris Day and James Stewart reflected an almost unconscious chauvinism of the fifties, though all of Doris’ instinctive discomfort about their situation in Marrakesh comes true, and Stewart later is dependent on her ferreting out the truth and preventing a crime–while he runs around London accosting taxidermists and looking for boogie men in Albert Hall. Actually, I can’t watch very much of the Doris Day Breakdown Trilogy. I was exposed to The Man Who Knew Too Much, Julie and Midnight Lace at a tender age. Consequently, when Doris starts to veer toward blubbering, screaming or shallow breathing followed rapidly by hysterics, I have to leave the room. Seemingly the least burdened by anything like an actress’s technique, it all appears a wee bit too real and too close to the bone for this viewer. After perusing the new bio, Doris Day: The Untold Story of the Girl Next Door by David A. Kaufman, it sounds as though her third husband Marty “The Would-Be Mogul” Melcher liked seeing his wife in these movies where the woman seemed to be having a nervous breakdown on celluloid. Trouble was, Day sort of lost it on each flick off screen too. I’ve noticed that Ms. Day could give a restrained dramatic imitation of an adult who was responsible for her own actions in the fifties when working with a professional of the highest caliber–James Cagney in Love Me or Leave Me. Maybe Jimmy slipped Marty a few sedatives that time, encouraging him to quit “guiding” his talented wife so much for a spell. Interesting blog. Thanks for writing it. Ah, I misread it, but now I think it’s about PMS more than ever! Thanks for correcting me, Megan! Maybe he just got tired of slapping her whenever she became hysterical. He is a doctor, after all, and might have injured his hand. Well, it’s like the man said… girls are drama! Hmmn . . .a hysterical Doris is nothing I would want to face either. Love her to pieces but a viewing of Please Don’t Eat the Daisies is akin to raking nails acrossed a chalk board for me . . . Can you see the flip side of this . . today if Doris and Jimmy didn’t head straight to the police after young Hank’s disappearance and fled the country. . . they would be accused of being evasive, tried (sp) by the media, and who would believe this crazy yarn about preventing an assasination . . . a movie in itself but sadly too derivitive to be bought by the public today. Leave a Reply |
Archives
Featured Sites
Popular terms
3-D
Action Films
Actors
Actors' Endorsements
animal stars
Animation
Anime
Anthology Films
Autobiography
Awards
B-movies
Best of the Year lists
Biography
Biopics
Blu-Ray
Books on Film
Boxing films
British Cinema
Canadian Cinema
Character Actors
Chicago Film History
Cinematography
Classic Films
College Life on Film
Comedy
Comic Book Movies
Czech Film
Dance on Film
Digital Cinema
Directors
Disaster Films
Documentary
Drama
DVD
Early Talkies
Editing
Educational Films
European Influence on American Cinema
Experimental
Exploitation
Fairy Tales on Film
Faith or Christian-based Films
Family Films
Film Composers
film festivals
Film History in Florida
Film Noir
Film Scholars
Film titles
Filmmaking Techniques
Food in Film
Foreign Film
French Film
Gangster films
Genre
Genre spoofs
Guest Programmers
HD & Blu-Ray
Holiday Movies
Hollywood lifestyles
Horror
Horror Movies
Icons
independent film
Italian Film
Japanese Film
Korean Film
Leadership
Literary Adaptations
Martial Arts
Melodramas
Method Acting
Mexican Cinema
Moguls
Monster Movies
Movie Books
Movie Costumes
Movie locations
Movie lovers
Movie Reviewers
Movie settings
Movie Stars
Music in Film
Musicals
New Releases
Outdoor Cinema
Paranoid Thrillers
Parenting on film
Polish film industry
political thrillers
Politics in Film
Pornography
Pre-Code
Producers
Race in American Film
Remakes
Road Movies
Romance
Romantic Comedies
Russian Film Industry
Satire
Scandals
Science Fiction
Screenwriters
Semi-documentaries
Serials
Short Films
Silent Film
silent films
Social Problem Film
Sports
Sports on Film
Stereotypes
Straight-to-DVD
Studio Politics
Suspense thriller
Swashbucklers
TCM Classic Film Festival
Television
The British in Hollywood
The Germans in Hollywood
The Hungarians in Hollywood
The Irish in Hollywood
The Russians in Hollywood
Theaters
Trains in movies
Underground Cinema
VOD
War film
Westerns
Women in the Film Industry
Women's Weepies |
Is Stewart referring to PMS when he talks about their “monthly fight”? Interesting…