Film Endings That Perplex, Surprise or Just Leave You Hanging, Part TwoHere are five more movie endings that refuse to give audiences the expected closure or satisfaction of the typical Hollywood feature. By some coincidence and not design, three are from 1968 – something was definitely “in the air” then or maybe it was the water.
1. Rosemary’s Baby (1968) Evil triumphs in the end and the heroine and anyone else deemed good are powerless to stop it. Before 1968 most horror films worked on a cathartic level where audiences could exorcise their fears by watching a sympathetic protagonist struggle against the powers of darkness and finally overcome them. But the comfort level disappeared with the release of films such as ROSEMARY’S BABY and NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD (also 1968, see below). Whether this disturbing and pessimistic new approach was merely a reflection of the era in which it was made – Viet Nam, the civil rights movement, campus unrest, the emerging drug culture – is hard to say but the brilliance of Roman Polanski’s film is its presentation of evil in a realistic setting. And the devil worshippers don’t look or act like crazed cult members but are instead a mixture of grandparents, middle-aged spinsters, career professionals or someone equally innocuous in appearance. The climax, in particular, really threw audiences for a loop, with Polanski refusing to show the demonic child. Even more disturbing was Rosemary’s final gesture. After the initial horror and outrage over what was done to her, she surrenders to the inevitable and follows her maternal instincts to comfort the baby as it begins to cry. The final shot of her cradling the son of Satan as Krzysztof Komeda’s haunting lullaby plays over the end credits was NOT the resolution most moviegoers wanted to see, regardless of how the novel ended. At least Polanski didn’t show us any close-ups of Rosemary nursing the baby. The dark ending of the movie was just a foreshadowing of worst things to come in the culture and Polanski’s own life – his wife Sharon Tate and three friends were slaughtered in their Los Angeles home by members of Charles Manson’s cult commune only a year later in August of 1969.
2. Night of the Living Dead (1968) Stupidity triumphs in the end of George Romero’s groundbreaking masterpiece. The flesh-eating dead are truly nightmarish images from the id run wild but the most disturbing aspect of the movie was the fact that the besieged survivors were completely incapable of working together as a group and, in most cases, the situation exposed their worst human traits – selfishness, panic, carelessness, and aggressive behavior toward each other. We don’t usually expect all of the good characters to die in a horror movie but after Ben (Duane Jones), the sole survivor of an all-night zombie assault, is mistaken for one of the living dead and shot in the head, the joke is on us. The beauty of NOTLD is that it can be read on so many levels but regardless of whether you accept the ending as black comedy or a grim commentary on the human condition, the movie’s influence on future horror films and directors is unquestionable. You also have to wonder what is worse – a world inhabited by the living dead or vigilante rednecks who shoot first and ask questions later.
3. Play Dirty (1968) This terrific Andre De Toth World War II adventure – which was recently released on DVD – may seem like a “Dirty Dozen” ripoff on the surface but it’s actually much more subversive, with touches of wicked black humor and tautly directed action sequences that avoid the sadistic excesses of Robert Aldrich’s 1967 blockbuster. It’s topped off by a twist ending which is as effective as a surprise slap in the face. De Toth’s cynical, unromantized approach to what could have been a standard genre film is unexpectedly refreshing. There are no heroes here…or survivors. After all, war is hell….or didn’t you know that by now?
4. McCabe and Mrs. Miller (1971) Robert Altman’s revisionist Western is still his finest film in my opinion and one that plays by its own rules. The film’s final moments, in which McCabe (Warren Beatty) is stalked in the snow by three hired gunslingers while the town’s residents rush to put out a fire, is one of the great ironic endings in American cinema. McCabe, who is more of a con-artist and bumbler than a gunfighter, somehow manages to kill his foes but is mortally wounded in the process. As he lies dying in the snow while the townspeople succeed in putting out the fire in the church they rarely attended, Altman cuts to the final scene of Mrs. Miller (Julie Christie), McCabe’s lover and business partner, lost in an opium haze in the Chinese workers’ quarters where she, assuming the worst, has retreated to avoid the showdown between McCabe and his hired killers. It’s a melancholy, defeatist conclusion to a rough and messy portrait of frontier life and the misfits who really won the west.
5. Sword of Doom (1966) Unlike most other samurai films of the period, this costume drama from director Kihachi Okamoto features a protagonist who is little more than a sociopathic killer, slaying people without provocation or good reason. As played by Tatsuya Nakadai, Ryunosuke is at war with the world, a rabid dog who is driven by an inner rage. The film doesn’t so much end as spontaneously combust. Surrounded by countless swordsmen, Ryunosuke slices and dices his way through them in a frenzy though he is clearly outnumbered. During a peak moment of ferocity, the movie ends on a freeze-frame, immortalizing Ryunosuke’s true nature. For a portrait of unrelenting evil, it is a stunning and idiosyncratic entry in the samurai genre. 6 Responses Film Endings That Perplex, Surprise or Just Leave You Hanging, Part Two
Sword of Doom. Did that actually have an ending? I thought there was something wrong with the DVD when it stopped at the freeze frame. I mean I wanted to see that mean SOB get what he deserved! And I was denied the pleasure. Talk about frustration. But you're right. The ending is hard to forget. There is no closure even though we know the guy is doomed hence the title. “Life’s a bitch.” “What did he say?” “He said you’re a bitch.” (Loosely but idiomatically translated.) I would think the The Incredible Shrinking Man ( written by Richard Matheson ), as well as the movie adaption, are both perplexing in what exactly happens to the title character. Does he shrink beyond the universe as we know it? We really don't know. We can only speculate.And 2001 : A Space Odyssey ends in a vague and confusing fashion. A visual exercise ( or trance ) at the end that really never brings anything into clarity ( which is contrary to Arthur C. Clarke's writing style ). Kubrick's ending leaves a lot to be desired. Are you listening, Dave?A far cry from typical science fiction movies, these films end with a question mark ( beyond, "are the aliens coming?"). And excellent in each their own right, they are somewhat unsettling as well. What the heck is going on at the end of Mickey One? A little personal history. I watched Mickey One as part of a high school film study class. Film study teacher played the entire film, rewound the last couple of minutes of the final reel (yes, this was the days of 16mm film and film projector). Played the end of Mickey One a second time. Rewound the film and played the end of Mickey One a third time…at a slow film speed. You know what? I still did not understand the final few moments of Mickey One. Here is what I remember. Warren Beatty is standing on a stage. Beatty is lit by a very bright spotlight. Beatty looks directly into the bright light. Beatty mumbles into his microphone something like, "…is that what it is all about?" Back to spotlight. Spotlight does not respond to Beatty's question. Audience watches as very bright light slowly turns into a sun ray looking thing and…the end(?).What is Beatty looking at? What is Beatty talking about? Why the sun ray thing? I have more questions, but I think three questions are quite enough…thank you. So, any answers?Rusty I'm with you Rusty. I didn't get Mickey One either and felt like I was a dope. But now I'm not sure Arthur Penn or Warren Beatty knew what it was about either. They were trying to discover what it was about by making the film. That's the difference between filmmaking in the 60s and now. Sometimes you have to bring something to a movie like that to get something out of it and all I brought was an empty shell that wanted to be filled up with entertainment…some laughs…some thrills. Guess I should have done my research. Leave a Reply |
Archives
Featured Sites
Popular terms
3-D
Actors
Actors' Endorsements
Animation
Anthology Films
Awards
Books on Film
British Cinema
Character Actors
Chicago Film History
Cinematography
Classic Films
College Life on Film
Comedy
Comic Book Movies
Czech Film
Dance on Film
Digital Cinema
Directors
Disaster Films
Documentary
Drama
Early Talkies
Editing
Educational Films
European Influence on American Cinema
Exploitation
Family Films
Film Composers
film festivals
Film Noir
Film Scholars
Filmmaking Techniques
Food in Film
Foreign Film
French Film
Gangster films
Genre spoofs
Guest Programmers
HD & Blu-Ray
Holiday Movies
Hollywood lifestyles
Horror
Horror Movies
Icons
independent film
Italian Film
Literary Adaptations
Martial Arts
Melodramas
Method Acting
Mexican Cinema
Monster Movies
Movie Books
Movie locations
Movie Stars
Music in Film
Musicals
Outdoor Cinema
Parenting on film
Polish film industry
political thrillers
Pre-Code
Producers
Race in American Film
Remakes
Road Movies
Romance
Romantic Comedies
Russian Film Industry
Scandals
Science Fiction
Screenwriters
Semi-documentaries
Short Films
Silent Film
silent films
Social Problem Film
Sports
Sports on Film
Stereotypes
Studio Politics
Suspense thriller
Swashbucklers
TCM Classic Film Festival
Television
The British in Hollywood
The Hungarians in Hollywood
The Irish in Hollywood
The Russians in Hollywood
Theaters
Underground Cinema
VOD
War film
Westerns
Women in the Film Industry
Women's Weepies |
If you hadn't read the novel and were seeing GONE WITH THE WIND for the first time, you'd have to admit the ending was not at all typical for what it is considered one of the greatest Hollywood movies ever made. I mean, Scarlett, the heroine, isn't allowed the romantic fade-out ending. She's abandoned by the man she finally realizes she loves. Not only that but some of the main characters die along the way – Scarlett's daughter, her father, Melanie. Scarlett is even forced to kill a trespasser. Ashley ends up lost and disillusioned and Rhett storms off in anger and bitterness. Not the typical Hollywood ending.