Didja ever notice – “prescience” – in film?

I was finally getting around to watching some of the Academy Award nominated movies that I’d taped during TCM’s 31 Days of Oscar (in February of this year) the other day when I happened upon None Shall Escape (1944), which had earned Alfred Neumann and Joseph Than a Best Original Story nomination. It’s a World War II drama that accurately predicted the Nuremberg trials and (of course) also predated Stanley Kramer’s star-studded blockbuster – Judgment at Nuremberg (1961) – about the actual events. I’m always fascinated to discover movies whose stories are prescient, some eerily so, and one of my favorites is airing on the channel later this month.

Though it was thought to be too cynical to attract much of an audience in its day, Billy Wilder’s Ace in the Hole (1951) does an excellent job of capturing the kind of media circus that is now commonplace at the site of tragic events. While a curiously morbid public has always been drawn to train wrecks (of any kind), moviegoers at the time of this drama’s release were too naive to believe that a reporter could be so unscrupulous as to manipulate the rescue of a dying man for his paper’s circulation, ratings, and perhaps an even bigger reward. Kirk Douglas plays the sensationalist newspaperman who exploits the mine trapped Leo Minosa (Richard Benedict) in hopes of winning a Pulitzer Prize! His web of ambition ensnares others including Minosa’s own disgruntled wife (Jan Sterling), a cub photographer (Robert Arthur), and the local sheriff (Ray Teal) up for reelection. If you’ve yet to see it, don’t miss it this June 12th at 4:15 PM ET; Wilder, Lesser Samuels, and Walter Newman earned a Best Writing Oscar nomination for their Story and Screenplay that was based on an actual event.

In the romantic comedy It Should Happen to You (1954), director George Cukor & writer Garson Kanin predict today’s “cult of celebrity” in which everyone is striving to find and claim their “15 minutes of fame”; it also touches on the costs associated with achieving it. The movie works primarily because of the unique talents of its star Judy Holliday and the “quirky, innocent, naive, seemingly dizzy yet fairly smart and proud” character qualities that she brought to her too few film roles. That same year, director Elia Kazan and writer Budd Schulberg won Oscars for On the Waterfront (1954). Three years later, they collaborated on their only other project titled A Face in the Crowd (1957), a stunningly prescient look at the power of television and celebrities in the political process. Andy Griffith gives a performance that has to be seen to be believed as the Arkansas Traveler, an Arthur Godfrey-like character who wields undue influence over fans of his homespun shtick, radio and TV programs.

While the Manchurian Candidate (1962), released approximately 13 months before President John F. Kennedy’s assassination, bears some resemblance to those subsequent historical events, “life imitated art” much more succinctly after the release of Marooned (1969). John Sturges’s sci-fi drama portrays the United States at a time when space travel had become blase and a group of three astronauts (played by Richard Crenna, James Franciscus, and Gene Hackman) get stranded in space such that the space agency must figure out how to get them home before their oxygen runs out. The film was released in Los Angeles on December 11th, 1969 and it received the Special Effects Academy Award on April 9, 1970 … Apollo 13 launched April 11, 1970 (and you know the rest of the story)!

Since I’ve already written about writer Paddy Chayefsky’s prescience for Sidney Lumet’s drama Network (1976), which further defined the forthcoming celebrity culture and ratings-based news programming as well as predicting faux experts and “reality” TV (and earned Chayefsky his third Academy Award), now it’s your turn:

What other classic “ahead of their time” movies can YOU think of which predicted the future?

4 Responses Didja ever notice – “prescience” – in film?
Posted By MikeJ : June 3, 2007 7:12 pm

Not a movie, but this guy in a physics lab in Switzerland envisioned this system in which you could actually embed links to other content.Imagine a future where  your post about movies "linked", as the kids say, to some sort of database full of more detailed information about those movies.  Back to your point, <a href="http://www.tcmdb.com/title/title.jsp?stid=68197">"The Battle of Algiers"</a> certainly seems prescient now.  Red Dawn, cheesy as it is, shows what happens when a superpower attempts to fight a home grown  insurgency.  Heck for that matter, so does Gibson's "the Patriot". (Only one link used to see if links will be stripped.) 

Posted By Nancy R. : June 6, 2007 10:44 pm

Well, I don't know about you but I think Orwell's book 1984 and the first film version of it in 1954 really predicted the way the corporate world would control its employees – spying on them, spreading mass media lies, using fear to turn people against each other. It's all happening now in a more subtle, nobody's talking about it way. I don't think Orwell realized how much people would rather go shopping or indulge their materialistic fantasies than value their own personal freedom. Or that nobodies like Paris Hilton would be created periodically to distract the masses from real problems and issues affecting their lives. And in most ways the 1976 version of KING KONG was a creepy symbolic foreshadowing of the attack on the World Trade Center.

Posted By ariel : June 7, 2007 7:46 pm

The Parallax View. This glimpse of our shadow government, our corporate overlords, seemed outlandish in the mid-70s.

Posted By cso : November 29, 2007 12:09 pm

Hmmmn . . the Conversation w/ Gene Hackman.  It is so disturbing with it left unresolved in the end and Gene sitting in his destroyed apartment . . . shadow conspiracy (shiver,shiver).  It doesn't necessary predate Watergate but does foreshadow the age of continuous surveillance.

Leave a Reply

MovieMorlocks.com is the official blog for TCM. No topic is too obscure or niche to be excluded from our film discussions. And we welcome your comments on our blogs and bloggers.
Archives
Popular terms
3-D  Actors  Actors' Endorsements  Animation  Anthology Films  Awards  Books on Film  British Cinema  Character Actors  Chicago Film History  Cinematography  Classic Films  College Life on Film  Comedy  Comic Book Movies  Czech Film  Dance on Film  Digital Cinema  Directors  Disaster Films  Documentary  Drama  Early Talkies  Editing  Educational Films  European Influence on American Cinema  Exploitation  Family Films  Film Composers  film festivals  Film Noir  Film Scholars  Filmmaking Techniques  Food in Film  Foreign Film  French Film  Gangster films  Genre spoofs  Guest Programmers  HD & Blu-Ray  Holiday Movies  Hollywood lifestyles  Horror  Horror Movies  Icons  independent film  Italian Film  Literary Adaptations  Martial Arts  Melodramas  Method Acting  Mexican Cinema  Monster Movies  Movie Books  Movie locations  Movie Stars  Music in Film  Musicals  Outdoor Cinema  Parenting on film  Polish film industry  political thrillers  Pornography  Pre-Code  Producers  Race in American Film  Remakes  Road Movies  Romance  Romantic Comedies  Russian Film Industry  Scandals  Science Fiction  Screenwriters  Semi-documentaries  Short Films  Silent Film  silent films  Social Problem Film  Sports  Sports on Film  Stereotypes  Straight-to-DVD  Studio Politics  Suspense thriller  Swashbucklers  TCM Classic Film Festival  Television  The British in Hollywood  The Hungarians in Hollywood  The Irish in Hollywood  The Russians in Hollywood  Theaters  Underground Cinema  VOD  War film  Westerns  Women in the Film Industry  Women's Weepies