Didja ever notice – “prescience” – in film?I was finally getting around to watching some of the Academy Award nominated movies that I’d taped during TCM’s 31 Days of Oscar (in February of this year) the other day when I happened upon None Shall Escape (1944), which had earned Alfred Neumann and Joseph Than a Best Original Story nomination. It’s a World War II drama that accurately predicted the Nuremberg trials and (of course) also predated Stanley Kramer’s star-studded blockbuster – Judgment at Nuremberg (1961) – about the actual events. I’m always fascinated to discover movies whose stories are prescient, some eerily so, and one of my favorites is airing on the channel later this month. Though it was thought to be too cynical to attract much of an audience in its day, Billy Wilder’s Ace in the Hole (1951) does an excellent job of capturing the kind of media circus that is now commonplace at the site of tragic events. While a curiously morbid public has always been drawn to train wrecks (of any kind), moviegoers at the time of this drama’s release were too naive to believe that a reporter could be so unscrupulous as to manipulate the rescue of a dying man for his paper’s circulation, ratings, and perhaps an even bigger reward. Kirk Douglas plays the sensationalist newspaperman who exploits the mine trapped Leo Minosa (Richard Benedict) in hopes of winning a Pulitzer Prize! His web of ambition ensnares others including Minosa’s own disgruntled wife (Jan Sterling), a cub photographer (Robert Arthur), and the local sheriff (Ray Teal) up for reelection. If you’ve yet to see it, don’t miss it this June 12th at 4:15 PM ET; Wilder, Lesser Samuels, and Walter Newman earned a Best Writing Oscar nomination for their Story and Screenplay that was based on an actual event. In the romantic comedy It Should Happen to You (1954), director George Cukor & writer Garson Kanin predict today’s “cult of celebrity” in which everyone is striving to find and claim their “15 minutes of fame”; it also touches on the costs associated with achieving it. The movie works primarily because of the unique talents of its star Judy Holliday and the “quirky, innocent, naive, seemingly dizzy yet fairly smart and proud” character qualities that she brought to her too few film roles. That same year, director Elia Kazan and writer Budd Schulberg won Oscars for On the Waterfront (1954). Three years later, they collaborated on their only other project titled A Face in the Crowd (1957), a stunningly prescient look at the power of television and celebrities in the political process. Andy Griffith gives a performance that has to be seen to be believed as the Arkansas Traveler, an Arthur Godfrey-like character who wields undue influence over fans of his homespun shtick, radio and TV programs. While the Manchurian Candidate (1962), released approximately 13 months before President John F. Kennedy’s assassination, bears some resemblance to those subsequent historical events, “life imitated art” much more succinctly after the release of Marooned (1969). John Sturges’s sci-fi drama portrays the United States at a time when space travel had become blase and a group of three astronauts (played by Richard Crenna, James Franciscus, and Gene Hackman) get stranded in space such that the space agency must figure out how to get them home before their oxygen runs out. The film was released in Los Angeles on December 11th, 1969 and it received the Special Effects Academy Award on April 9, 1970 … Apollo 13 launched April 11, 1970 (and you know the rest of the story)! Since I’ve already written about writer Paddy Chayefsky’s prescience for Sidney Lumet’s drama Network (1976), which further defined the forthcoming celebrity culture and ratings-based news programming as well as predicting faux experts and “reality” TV (and earned Chayefsky his third Academy Award), now it’s your turn: What other classic “ahead of their time” movies can YOU think of which predicted the future? 4 Responses Didja ever notice – “prescience” – in film?
Well, I don't know about you but I think Orwell's book 1984 and the first film version of it in 1954 really predicted the way the corporate world would control its employees – spying on them, spreading mass media lies, using fear to turn people against each other. It's all happening now in a more subtle, nobody's talking about it way. I don't think Orwell realized how much people would rather go shopping or indulge their materialistic fantasies than value their own personal freedom. Or that nobodies like Paris Hilton would be created periodically to distract the masses from real problems and issues affecting their lives. And in most ways the 1976 version of KING KONG was a creepy symbolic foreshadowing of the attack on the World Trade Center. The Parallax View. This glimpse of our shadow government, our corporate overlords, seemed outlandish in the mid-70s. Hmmmn . . the Conversation w/ Gene Hackman. It is so disturbing with it left unresolved in the end and Gene sitting in his destroyed apartment . . . shadow conspiracy (shiver,shiver). It doesn't necessary predate Watergate but does foreshadow the age of continuous surveillance. Leave a Reply |
Archives
Featured Sites
Popular terms
3-D
Actors
Actors' Endorsements
Animation
Anthology Films
Awards
Books on Film
British Cinema
Character Actors
Chicago Film History
Cinematography
Classic Films
College Life on Film
Comedy
Comic Book Movies
Czech Film
Dance on Film
Digital Cinema
Directors
Disaster Films
Documentary
Drama
Early Talkies
Editing
Educational Films
European Influence on American Cinema
Exploitation
Family Films
Film Composers
film festivals
Film Noir
Film Scholars
Filmmaking Techniques
Food in Film
Foreign Film
French Film
Gangster films
Genre spoofs
Guest Programmers
HD & Blu-Ray
Holiday Movies
Hollywood lifestyles
Horror
Horror Movies
Icons
independent film
Italian Film
Literary Adaptations
Martial Arts
Melodramas
Method Acting
Mexican Cinema
Monster Movies
Movie Books
Movie locations
Movie Stars
Music in Film
Musicals
Outdoor Cinema
Parenting on film
Polish film industry
political thrillers
Pornography
Pre-Code
Producers
Race in American Film
Remakes
Road Movies
Romance
Romantic Comedies
Russian Film Industry
Scandals
Science Fiction
Screenwriters
Semi-documentaries
Short Films
Silent Film
silent films
Social Problem Film
Sports
Sports on Film
Stereotypes
Straight-to-DVD
Studio Politics
Suspense thriller
Swashbucklers
TCM Classic Film Festival
Television
The British in Hollywood
The Hungarians in Hollywood
The Irish in Hollywood
The Russians in Hollywood
Theaters
Underground Cinema
VOD
War film
Westerns
Women in the Film Industry
Women's Weepies |
Not a movie, but this guy in a physics lab in Switzerland envisioned this system in which you could actually embed links to other content.Imagine a future where your post about movies "linked", as the kids say, to some sort of database full of more detailed information about those movies. Back to your point, <a href="http://www.tcmdb.com/title/title.jsp?stid=68197">"The Battle of Algiers"</a> certainly seems prescient now. Red Dawn, cheesy as it is, shows what happens when a superpower attempts to fight a home grown insurgency. Heck for that matter, so does Gibson's "the Patriot". (Only one link used to see if links will be stripped.)