GHETTO BLUES - BEAUTY AND DESPAIR IN WATTS
After 30 years, Charles Burnett’s KILLER OF SHEEP - a 1977 independent film shot on 16mm and made for a rock bottom budget of $10,000 from film grants - is finally getting a theatrical release in selected markets (mostly repertory and art cinemas like the Landmark chain in major cities). A stark yet often lyrical portrait of life on the edge in an economically depressed neighborhood in south L.A., the film avoids a traditional narrative and draws you in through a series of vignettes in the lives of a working class family presided over by Stan, who works in a slaughterhouse for sheep, hence the film’s title. On the surface, Watts looks like a wasteland but Burnett finds poetry in odd places and creates moments of quiet beauty from the squalor - kids leaping across rooftops, Stan’s daughter singing to her doll while her mother primps in the bathroom mirror, a group of teenagers trying to physically move an abandoned railroad car, Stan and his wife slow dancing to Dinah Washington’s “This Bitter Earth.” Even the dehumanizing day to day glimpses of Stan’s work in the slaughterhouse is tempered by Burnett’s ironic use of music and occasionally disorienting camera angles. Many of the scenes in the movie are filmed at floor level as if indicative of the beaten-down, defeated nature of some of the Watts residents. In one scene Stan tries to repair the kitchen floor while being distracted by tensions between visiting neighbors and a son who enjoys bullying his sister. In another scene, we observe a crap game from the point of view of a woman’s leg. And in one of the sadder moments, we watch floor level negotiations for a used car engine end in a thoughtless accident that sums up the futility of Stan’s life.
For more information, visit the KILLER OF SHEEP web site 2 Responses GHETTO BLUES - BEAUTY AND DESPAIR IN WATTS
I would say that it is a differnet audience that intentionally watches, say PIXOTE, than watches mindless fare that is "bubblegum for the eyes", as Frank Lloyd Wright once described television.Perhaps more disconcerting is what was the most frequently requested movie when I worked Sundays at a used book/video store, and by a ratio of 4 or 5 to 1, was the movie SCARFACE. People of all ethnic backgrounds and age groups would breathlessly describe the wanton violence they liked best ( of course there was the guy who described the violence of the Hong Kong chop suey flicks with wonton breath). The next favorite was the GODFATHER movies. And I would dare say for the same reasons. There was ALWAYS a waiting list for these movies.I was also abject to discover that Kubrick films have become a sort of high adrenaline drug to the 16-20 year old set. Without much experience in real world activity, they live precaiously through the excess of movies like FULL METAL JACKET and CLOCKWORK ORANGE. And the strangness is, they aren't upset watching these films as one SHOULD be, as watching PIXOTE or THE KILLER OF SHEEP also is, but exhilirated by the over-the-top excess. This is actually a scary proposition. And one I don't see changing anytime soon. Violence has become the new poetry. Like pop music, if it's over two minutes and not sacchrine, is doesn't hold the attention span of modern audiences. Sad ,really. Leave a Reply |
Archives
Featured Sites
Popular terms
3-D
Actors
Animation
Anthology Films
British Cinema
Character Actors
Classic Films
Comedy
Comic Book Movies
Czech Film
Dance on Film
Directors
Disaster Films
Documentary
Drama
Exploitation
Family Films
Film Noir
Foreign Film
French Film
Gangster films
Genre spoofs
HD & Blu-Ray
Holiday Movies
Hollywood lifestyles
Horror
Horror Movies
Icons
Italian Film
Monster Movies
Movie locations
Movie Stars
Music in Film
Musicals
Outdoor Cinema
Polish film industry
political thrillers
Pre-Code
Producers
Race in American Film
Road Movies
Scandals
Science Fiction
Screenwriters
Semi-documentaries
Silent Film
silent films
Stereotypes
Suspense thriller
War film
Westerns
Women in the Film Industry |
You have to admit that KILLER OF SHEEP is not a very audience friendly title. But I'm not sure what title I'd replace it with. I do think this is a remarkable film but how to describe it to friends is a problem. What do you say when someone asks what's it about? "Oh, it's about this really depressed guy who works in a slaughterhouse and is too numb to make love to his wife or care about anything and…" "OK, you can stop there…I go to the movies to NOT think about stuff like that."But my question is always, why is it that most people think movies are supposed to be mindless diversions and not food for thought? Why can't using your brain or witnessing a cinematic work of art be entertaining too in it's own way?