GHETTO BLUES – BEAUTY AND DESPAIR IN WATTS

still

After 30 years, Charles Burnett’s KILLER OF SHEEP – a 1977 independent film shot on 16mm and made for a rock bottom budget of $10,000 from film grants – is finally getting a theatrical release in selected markets (mostly repertory and art cinemas like the Landmark chain in major cities). A stark yet often lyrical portrait of life on the edge in an economically depressed neighborhood in south L.A., the film avoids a traditional narrative and draws you in through a series of vignettes in the lives of a working class family presided over by Stan, who works in a slaughterhouse for sheep, hence the film’s title. On the surface, Watts looks like a wasteland but Burnett finds poetry in odd places and creates moments of quiet beauty from the squalor – kids leaping across rooftops, Stan’s daughter singing to her doll while her mother primps in the bathroom mirror, a group of teenagers trying to physically move an abandoned railroad car, Stan and his wife slow dancing to Dinah Washington’s “This Bitter Earth.” Even the dehumanizing day to day glimpses of Stan’s work in the slaughterhouse is tempered by Burnett’s ironic use of music and occasionally disorienting camera angles. still

Many of the scenes in the movie are filmed at floor level as if indicative of the beaten-down, defeated nature of some of the Watts residents. In one scene Stan tries to repair the kitchen floor while being distracted by tensions between visiting neighbors and a son who enjoys bullying his sister. In another scene, we observe a crap game from the point of view of a woman’s leg. And in one of the sadder moments, we watch floor level negotiations for a used car engine end in a thoughtless accident that sums up the futility of Stan’s life.

coupleThe film may be uncompromising in its portrait of how grinding poverty crushes the soul and spirit yet there’s a vitality and creative energy on display here that is exhilarating. Burnett approaches his terrain like an ethnographer and we get an insider view of a culture most moviegoers have never seen before – slices of real life, moments of truth. And the kids in the film will break your heart such as Stan’s daughter, a mute and forlorn figure, wandering around in a dog mask or the impish kid dodging dirt clogs from behind a piece of plywood. Yet there’s never an attempt to sentimentalize or condescend to these ragtag kids, running around in packs unsupervised. When you see the film, you’ll understand why it has been compared to the Italian neorealism classics of Vittorio de Sica – “The Bicycle Thieves” – and Roberto Rossellini – “Open City“. Like those films, Burnett also used mostly non-professional actors and friends from his Watts neighborhood and it only adds to the film’s authenticity.

stillThe main problem facing KILLER OF SHEEP is how to encourage people to take a chance on it since most moviegoers want simple escapism. They don’t expect art, poetry, and raw emotion from a movie but that’s what you’ll take away from this one-of-a-kind masterpiece. So if you’re a true cinephile you’d better rush to see it while you can because its commercial prospects in this day and time are slim. It only lasted a week in its Atlanta engagement and I suspect that’s an indication of how it will play around the country.

For more information, visit the KILLER OF SHEEP web site

http://www.killerofsheep.com/

2 Responses GHETTO BLUES – BEAUTY AND DESPAIR IN WATTS
Posted By Joel : May 12, 2007 4:28 pm

You have to admit that KILLER OF SHEEP is not a very audience friendly title. But I'm not sure what title I'd replace it with. I do think this is a remarkable film but how to describe it to friends is a problem. What do you say when someone asks what's it about? "Oh, it's about this really depressed guy who works in a slaughterhouse and is too numb to make love to his wife or care about anything and…" "OK, you can stop there…I go to the movies to NOT think about stuff like that."But my question is always, why is it that most people think movies are supposed to be mindless diversions and not food for thought? Why can't using your brain or witnessing a cinematic work of art be entertaining too in it's own way?

Posted By Chris : May 14, 2007 11:47 am

I would say that it is a differnet audience that intentionally watches, say PIXOTE, than watches mindless fare that is "bubblegum for the eyes", as Frank Lloyd Wright once described television.Perhaps more disconcerting is what was the most frequently requested movie when I worked Sundays at a used book/video store, and by a ratio of 4 or 5 to 1, was the movie SCARFACE. People of all ethnic backgrounds and age groups would breathlessly describe the wanton violence they liked best ( of course there was the guy who described the violence of the Hong Kong chop suey flicks with wonton breath). The next favorite was the GODFATHER movies. And I would dare say for the same reasons. There was ALWAYS a waiting list for these movies.I was also abject to discover that Kubrick films have become a sort of high adrenaline drug to the 16-20 year old set. Without much experience in real world activity, they live precaiously through the excess of movies like FULL METAL JACKET and CLOCKWORK ORANGE. And the strangness is, they aren't upset watching these films as one SHOULD be, as watching PIXOTE or THE KILLER OF SHEEP also is, but exhilirated by the over-the-top excess. This is actually a scary proposition. And one I don't see changing anytime soon. Violence has become the new poetry. Like pop music, if it's over two minutes and not sacchrine, is doesn't hold the attention span of modern audiences. Sad ,really.

Leave a Reply

MovieMorlocks.com is the official blog for TCM. No topic is too obscure or niche to be excluded from our film discussions. And we welcome your comments on our blogs and bloggers.
Archives
Popular terms
3-D  Actors  Actors' Endorsements  Animation  Anthology Films  Awards  Books on Film  British Cinema  Character Actors  Chicago Film History  Cinematography  Classic Films  College Life on Film  Comedy  Comic Book Movies  Czech Film  Dance on Film  Digital Cinema  Directors  Disaster Films  Documentary  Drama  Early Talkies  Editing  Educational Films  European Influence on American Cinema  Exploitation  Family Films  Film Composers  film festivals  Film Noir  Film Scholars  Filmmaking Techniques  Food in Film  Foreign Film  French Film  Gangster films  Genre spoofs  Guest Programmers  HD & Blu-Ray  Holiday Movies  Hollywood lifestyles  Horror  Horror Movies  Icons  independent film  Italian Film  Literary Adaptations  Martial Arts  Melodramas  Method Acting  Mexican Cinema  Monster Movies  Movie Books  Movie locations  Movie Stars  Music in Film  Musicals  Outdoor Cinema  Parenting on film  Polish film industry  political thrillers  Pornography  Pre-Code  Producers  Race in American Film  Remakes  Road Movies  Romance  Romantic Comedies  Russian Film Industry  Scandals  Science Fiction  Screenwriters  Semi-documentaries  Short Films  Silent Film  silent films  Social Problem Film  Sports  Sports on Film  Stereotypes  Straight-to-DVD  Studio Politics  Suspense thriller  Swashbucklers  TCM Classic Film Festival  Television  The British in Hollywood  The Hungarians in Hollywood  The Irish in Hollywood  The Russians in Hollywood  Theaters  Underground Cinema  VOD  War film  Westerns  Women in the Film Industry  Women's Weepies