Whither The Great Dames, Anyway?Looking through my picture collection I came upon this delightful photograph of actress Josephine Hull accepting her Best Supporting Actress Academy Award for Harvey, which she won in 1951. Though she died just a few weeks more than a full fifty years ago, you take a look at that face and that bearing and realize that nobody looks like that anymore. Nobody. Not even Josephine was certainly born into another time, making her entrance at the beginning of 1877. To put that into perspective, Abraham Lincoln had been dead not even a dozen years when she came into the world. It was truly another era, one that has receded into dim history now, but Josephine was a spirited and talented woman, one who felt the irresistible lure of theater while still a girl. She graduated from Radcliffe College in 1899 and then embarked on a long and distinguished theatrical career beginning in 1906 (interrupted by a short marriage) which eventually led her to a small handful of memorable movie roles. She’s probably most remembered by movie fans for her role in Harvey as James Stewart’s skeptical sister Veta, who’s not at all charmed by her brother’s imaginary rabbit friend. Josephine originated the role on Broadway in 1944, following her smash hit three-and-a-half year run in Arsenic and Old Lace as one of the murderous but charming old ladies. She was lucky enough to make it into the movie of Arsenic, but hadn’t been so fortunate with her earlier role in the 1936 farce You Can’t Take It With You, which she had to turn down because she was still appearing in it onstage. Directed by Frank Capra, the movie version of Arsenic was filmed in December of 1941, but After her triumph in Harvey, Josephine did a lot of NYC-based live television and also returned to the Broadway theater, including originating the role of the feisty shareholder in 1953’s The Solid Gold Cadillac, a part that was played by a much younger Judy Holliday when the movie was produced two years later. Josephine retired from all work in 1955 and died of a cerebral hemorrhage on March 12, 1957. When you look at that face, that marvelous face just made for the theatrical stage, you should be thankful that some of the wonderful plays from the first half of the last century made it to the screen relatively intact with some members of the original casts present. One of the Movie Morlocks will have to do a long post about the Broadway and movie roles that changed hands over the years, but let’s appreciate what we’ve got, including the unique Josephine Hull, who looks like your great grandmother, probably, but who had the heart and talent equal to any of the sassiest actresses around today. 4 Responses Whither The Great Dames, Anyway?
I know exactly what you mean! I'm sure we both will admit to more informality these days, but there's a whole class of women who simply aren't out there on the screen, except, perhaps as comic characters. And even then, often played by men! (I'm thinking Eddie Murphy and Tyler Perry, maybe. Played well, though!). Maybe they don't even exist anymore in real life…could that be so? These days we only applaud the grandmothers who look thirty-five, and sometimes are, scarily enough. If there ever was a time that we needed a Margaret Dumont, this is it!I'm with you, Karen! No nobody looks like that anymore, you are so right. And I am very tired of male actors building their careers by pretending to be women which no modern studio would ever allow on the screen! While nobody can compare to the great ladies mentioned, (and let us not forget Beulah Bondi, Jessie Royce Landis and Spring Byington), I would like to nominate a few formidable contemporary contenders. Although you ofen have to go to television to see them, Nina Foch; Angela Lansbury (post Jessica Fletcher); Doris Roberts; the great Elizabeth Wilson; and of course, Lauren Bacall- all carry on the tradition of the “grand old dame” as well as it is humanly possible to do in this day and age. So, maybe there’s hope. Don't forget the Brits – Katie Johnson, Gladys Cooper, and Wendy Hiller (although her birth year is 1912). Leave a Reply |
Archives
Featured Sites
Popular terms
3-D
Actors
Actors' Endorsements
Animation
Anthology Films
Awards
Books on Film
British Cinema
Character Actors
Chicago Film History
Cinematography
Classic Films
College Life on Film
Comedy
Comic Book Movies
Czech Film
Dance on Film
Digital Cinema
Directors
Disaster Films
Documentary
Drama
Early Talkies
Editing
Educational Films
European Influence on American Cinema
Exploitation
Family Films
Film Composers
film festivals
Film Noir
Film Scholars
Filmmaking Techniques
Food in Film
Foreign Film
French Film
Gangster films
Genre spoofs
Guest Programmers
HD & Blu-Ray
Holiday Movies
Hollywood lifestyles
Horror
Horror Movies
Icons
independent film
Italian Film
Martial Arts
Melodramas
Method Acting
Mexican Cinema
Monster Movies
Movie Books
Movie locations
Movie Stars
Music in Film
Musicals
Outdoor Cinema
Parenting on film
Polish film industry
political thrillers
Pre-Code
Producers
Race in American Film
Remakes
Road Movies
Russian Film Industry
Scandals
Science Fiction
Screenwriters
Semi-documentaries
Silent Film
silent films
Social Problem Film
Sports
Sports on Film
Stereotypes
Studio Politics
Suspense thriller
Swashbucklers
Television
The British in Hollywood
The Hungarians in Hollywood
The Russians in Hollywood
Theaters
Underground Cinema
VOD
War film
Westerns
Women in the Film Industry
Women's Weepies |
Thanks so much for making the point I've often remarked upon–what ever happened to little old ladies and grande dames? It's not just the Josephine Hulls we no longer see–either on the screen or on the street–it's the Margaret Dumonts, the Lucile Watsons, the Sara Allgoods? Where are the large, imposing women who wore low cut backless evening gowns with such authority? No one has the guts to look like a grandmother anymore, or the confidence to show it off. It's so crazy that there are more realistic-looking people in old Hollywood movies than we see on the street today.