The Not-Good GermanSome plot spoilers are contained in this review.
Of all the films that arrived in late '06, Steven Soderbergh's "The Good German" was the one I was most looking forward to. Lo and behold, It has become the one by which I was most disappointed. And if you think that phrasing is awkward, the structure to "The Good German" is much worse. The experiemental mash-up of "Casablanca" intrigue and "Third Man" postwar malaise sounds good on paper, and indeed, it could've worked, but the script by Paul Attanasio–a writer who usually pens very good material–is remarkably and surprisingly flat. It thuds from the very beginning. Even the opening titles are uninspired. White type over black that you can barely read. Soderbergh was probably suggesting an Italian neo-realist feel to the titles, but the layout–with the supporting actors listed in stairstep fashion and the retro Warner Bros., suggested a polished studio picture. The flat, muddled feel starts from the very beginning when we meet George Clooney and Tobey Maguire. Clooney is a correspondent, whose presence in Berlin is to cover the Potsdam Conference, the global huddle that will draw the gameplan for the next big thing, The Cold War. It's a good premise in which to base your postwar espionage thriller. Instead, Clooney and Maguire try for some tough guy talk, but there's just something not clicking about it. I kept wanting to hear the patter of a 1940s movie, afterall. What we get instead is Tobey Maguire imitating Mickey Rooney saying the F-word whenever possible. Granted, Maguire's character is described as "a boy," but still, Berlin was supposedly his town. He knew all the ins and outs. Instead, Maguire looks like he fell off the army-issued turnip truck just moments before Clooney arrived. Maguire is so annoyingly phony, I was hoping he'd be killed off. When he is bumped off, this signals the film's three act structure, based on the three principal leads' independent points of view. And you know it's a new pov when the dreaded mark of a bad screenplay, the thing called "Totally Unnecessary Voice Over", kicks in. Things look up a bit with Clooney's scenes with Cate Blanchett, playing a mysterious German prostitute. Both are very good and convincing as 40s-era stars. Blanchett has the experience, having played Kate the Great in "The Aviator" while Clooney just looks like he could've been an MGM star. They even have fairly good chemistry together, but the script eventually kills it. The pace to this film is frustrating. Aside from the script, I must fault Soderbergh on a few things. His daytime outdoor wide shots of the ruined Berlin are much too washed out. Granted, he may have done this to eliminate the need for a lot of CGI shots of wartorn Berlin, but it feels like he went too far. Moreover, he fails to create a sense of space, the understanding of where Cate's house is in relation to the rest of the city, for example. The few action scenes are lethargic and the music by Thomas Newman feels spread on, like cold peanut butter on cheap, white bread. Aside from Cate and Clooney looking good, there are a few other highlights to the picture. One of the shadowy Russian characters looks a lot like Conrad Veidt, an amusing nod to the villain in "Casablanca." And there are some nice compositions in black and white. Soderbergh knows how to make pretty shots, especially in one sequence set in an abandoned movie theater. But pretty shots do not a good movie make. The highlight is Robin Weigart (Deadwood). She brings much needed energy and especially humor to the film as Cate's roomie and fellow streetwalker. If only the movie had some of her good-time on hard-times gal delivery. "The Good German" is an interesting experiment from Steven Soderbergh, but it is an overblown, disappointing, lifeless wash out. It's not good. 6 Responses The Not-Good German
Spoilers contained:Oh so glad I forced myself to read the book before I rushed out to see the movie. It was a good read and although of course it read like Casablanca meets The Third Man. In those movies, in that era you could only allude to the nasty profiteering and sex-for-survival; this book simultaneously held it up to the light and rolled around in the mud. The Americans aren't always the white hatters, atrocities are evenly distributed, and Opie-faced GIs pedal flesh and cigarettes on the side. The government decides who is expendable in a war crimes tribunals or who can escape prosecution by pandering their technological secrets whatever think tank snags them first. Notably repulsive are the companies with sticky fingers on both shores and in both sides of the political pudding, thereby ensuring their prosperity and survival no matter who wins. I found myself wishing they would have their heads and assets shorn, remember when they called it "collaboration". They are much less sympathetic than women who traded their bodies for food and a roof over their head. But still as in life, nobody is painted totally black or white, not even the Nazi sympathizers; nobody walks away unscathed. Justice is truly blind because in all the chaos, not everybody gets their just desserts.Still looking forward to seeing the movie. Bravo the idea of using only those technologies available to film-makers of that era and in glorious black and white. A MAJOR disappointment. A quality cast and good to excellent technical work, but the movie just sort of blows. Excellent, salient points to your review. I haven't seen the movie yet,and I might not bother now. But your comments ring true for thetrailers I've seen. Washed out.I just don't want to experience that era washed over andblahblahblahed out. [url=http://sex-adult.freehostia.com/hanging-boob.html]hanging boob[/url] hanging boob Leave a Reply |
Archives
Featured Sites
Popular terms
3-D
Action Films
Actors
Actors' Endorsements
Actresses
animal stars
Animation
Anime
Anthology Films
Autobiography
Avant-Garde
Aviation
Awards
B-movies
Beer in Film
Behind the Scenes
Best of the Year lists
Biography
Biopics
Blu-Ray
Books on Film
Boxing films
British Cinema
Canadian Cinema
Character Actors
Chicago Film History
Cinematography
Classic Films
College Life on Film
Comedy
Comic Book Movies
Crime
Czech Film
Dance on Film
Digital Cinema
Directors
Disaster Films
Documentary
Drama
DVD
Early Talkies
Editing
Educational Films
European Influence on American Cinema
Experimental
Exploitation
Fairy Tales on Film
Faith or Christian-based Films
Family Films
Fan Edits
Film Composers
Film Criticism
film festivals
Film History in Florida
Film Noir
Film Scholars
Film titles
Filmmaking Techniques
Films of the 1980s
Food in Film
Foreign Film
French Film
Gangster films
Genre
Genre spoofs
Guest Programmers
HD & Blu-Ray
Holiday Movies
Hollywood history
Hollywood lifestyles
Horror
Horror Movies
Icons
independent film
Italian Film
Japanese Film
Korean Film
Leadership
Literary Adaptations
Martial Arts
Melodramas
Method Acting
Mexican Cinema
Moguls
Monster Movies
Movie Books
Movie Costumes
Movie locations
Movie lovers
Movie Magazines
Movie Reviewers
Movie settings
Movie Stars
Movies about movies
Music in Film
Musicals
New Releases
Outdoor Cinema
Paranoid Thrillers
Parenting on film
Pirate movies
Polish film industry
political thrillers
Politics in Film
Pornography
Pre-Code
Producers
Race in American Film
Remakes
Revenge
Road Movies
Romance
Romantic Comedies
Russian Film Industry
Satire
Scandals
Science Fiction
Screenwriters
Semi-documentaries
Serials
Short Films
Silent Film
silent films
Social Problem Film
Spaghetti Westerns
Sports
Sports on Film
Stereotypes
Straight-to-DVD
Studio Politics
Stunts and stuntmen
Suspense thriller
Swashbucklers
TCM Classic Film Festival
Tearjerkers
Television
The British in Hollywood
The Germans in Hollywood
The Hungarians in Hollywood
The Irish in Hollywood
The Russians in Hollywood
Theaters
Thriller
Trains in movies
Underground Cinema
VOD
War film
Westerns
Women in the Film Industry
Women's Weepies |
That's really surprising…the cast is great and all of the reviews that I've read have been great! I'm looking forward to watching this…on DVD of course.